Re: RFS: courier-pythonfilter
On Monday 03 November 2008 15:15, Stephan Peijnik wrote:
These .py files are not to be executed directly in any way, other
than from within the pythonfilter apps itself.
If those files are not to be executed directly in any way removing
the shebang might a.) be a good idea and b.) fix your lintian
warnings. Hope that helps.
Stephan, thank you for that suggestion. Since there are quite
a few .py files, I decided to write a small bash script[0] to help me
quickly generate dpatches for all of them.
As such I've now done a new upload which utilizes dpatch for the
purpose of removing the shebangs where it is appropriate to do so.
I've also included a watch file, btw.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/courier-pythonfilter/
I'm really crossing my fingers that a sponsor will find time
to do an upload to the official Debian archives of this package
as there is nothing similar currently in the Debian archives.
pythonfilter is incredible useful for anybody running the Courier MTA
as it provides a whole bunch of filters, ready to use. This includes
a greylisting filter, a spamassassin filter, a clamav filter, an
attachments filter, a noduplicates filter (if courier receives
a message with multiple aliases that expand to the same address,
the message may be delivered to that address multiple times.
This module checks for, and removes the duplicates), and many
others.
At the same time, pythonfilter offers a framework for easy development
of new filters.
B/R,
Frederik Dannemare
[0]
#!/bin/bash
#set -x
APP=courier-pythonfilter-1.4
PATCHDIR=${APP}/debian/patches
PATCHDESC=is not
executable in upstream sources and should only be
called from within the pythonfilter apps themselves.
Hence, #!/usr/bin/python is removed for better
Debian Policy compliance.
[ -d ${PATCHDIR} ] || mkdir ${PATCHDIR}
:${PATCHDIR}/00list
COUNTER=1
for dir in ${APP}/courier ${APP}/filters; do
for file in $(find ${dir} -name *.py); do
if [ $(head -n1 ${file} | egrep '^#!/usr/bin/python') ]; then
cp ${file} ${file}.upstream
tail --lines=+2 ${file}.upstream ${file}
diff -u ${file}.upstream ${file} ${file}.diff
if [ ${COUNTER} -le 9 ]; then
NUMBER=0${COUNTER}
else
NUMBER=${COUNTER}
fi
dpatch patch-template -p ${NUMBER}_shebang_removal \
${file} ${PATCHDESC} \
${file}.diff ${PATCHDIR}/${NUMBER}_shebang_removal.dpatch
echo $(basename ${PATCHDIR}/${NUMBER}_shebang_removal.dpatch)
${PATCHDIR}/00list
(( COUNTER++ ))
mv ${file}.upstream ${file}
rm ${file}.diff
else
echo ${file} is without a shebang. No need to create patch for it.
fi
done
done
pgpmVW7wX78fv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
RFS: courier-pythonfilter
Hi I am looking for a sponsor for my package courier-pythonfilter (ITP: 504080) Package name: courier-pythonfilter (version 1.4-1) Upstream Author : Gordon Messmer gordon AT dragonsdawn DOT net URL: http://phantom.dragonsdawn.net/~gordon/courier-pythonfilter/ License: GPLv3 Section: mail Description: filter collection for the Courier MTA pythonfilter is a collection of useful filters for the Courier MTA, and a framework for developing new filters in Python. . pythonfilter can be used to filter spam and viruses, as well as implement other local mail policies. I've done Debian package maintenance in the past (although I've been inactive for the past year or so) so the quality of the package should be good. The package is lintian clean[0] and it builds without problems in a clean pbuilder environment. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/courier-pythonfilter - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/courier-pythonfilter/courier-pythonfilter_1.4-1.dsc Best regards, Frederik Dannemare [0] It's easy to claim so with an overrides file, I suppose ;) but I felt I had to do it (please let me know if you think otherwise). E.g.: courier-pythonfilter: script-not-executable ./usr/share/python-support/courier-pythonfilter/courier/quarantine.py courier-pythonfilter: script-not-executable ./usr/share/python-support/courier-pythonfilter/pythonfilter/greylist.py These .py files are not to be executed directly in any way, other than from within the pythonfilter apps itself. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motion, 2.6, and v4l loopback device [WAS Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 August 2004 13:52, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so I'm really, really I'll look at it and upload within an hour or so (unless there are problems). I saw a copy of Frederik's same e-mail in debian-mentors earlier today and already checked it over and uploaded. My only concern was that it's not quite up-to-date with the latest upstream (3.1.14 vs 3.1.16), but since it's a bugfix, I went ahead and sponsored. When I adopted the package, I chose to update from 3.0.6 to 3.1.14, and not 3.1.15/3.1.16, because I personally feel 3.1.14 is the most stable of them. .15 had a lot of problems, and although .16 fixed much of this, I still feel 3.1.14 is the better choice for the sarge release. Many thanks for the upload, Wesley. I really appreciate it. And thank you, Adam, for once again offering to help me with an upload. BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module, which is not only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6 kernels. I have been using motion and 2.6 without the v4l loopback device. I don't know much about it, but I think it was initially developed for debugging motion in real-time or something like that. Best regards, - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBK9PKLSX61ZxOtagRAo/GAJsHj/OD67IJPEL8N9OOQ8VMUhwcnACeMs8b JYIhtI1iPEcqPFNOERiw0kg= =k4KF -END PGP SIGNATURE-
motion, 2.6, and v4l loopback device [WAS Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 August 2004 13:52, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so I'm really, really I'll look at it and upload within an hour or so (unless there are problems). I saw a copy of Frederik's same e-mail in debian-mentors earlier today and already checked it over and uploaded. My only concern was that it's not quite up-to-date with the latest upstream (3.1.14 vs 3.1.16), but since it's a bugfix, I went ahead and sponsored. When I adopted the package, I chose to update from 3.0.6 to 3.1.14, and not 3.1.15/3.1.16, because I personally feel 3.1.14 is the most stable of them. .15 had a lot of problems, and although .16 fixed much of this, I still feel 3.1.14 is the better choice for the sarge release. Many thanks for the upload, Wesley. I really appreciate it. And thank you, Adam, for once again offering to help me with an upload. BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module, which is not only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6 kernels. I have been using motion and 2.6 without the v4l loopback device. I don't know much about it, but I think it was initially developed for debugging motion in real-time or something like that. Best regards, - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBK9PKLSX61ZxOtagRAo/GAJsHj/OD67IJPEL8N9OOQ8VMUhwcnACeMs8b JYIhtI1iPEcqPFNOERiw0kg= =k4KF -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so I'm really, really I'll look at it and upload within an hour or so (unless there are problems). I saw a copy of Frederik's same e-mail in debian-mentors earlier today and already checked it over and uploaded. My only concern was that it's not quite up-to-date with the latest upstream (3.1.14 vs 3.1.16), but since it's a bugfix, I went ahead and sponsored. When I adopted the package, I chose to update from 3.0.6 to 3.1.14, and not 3.1.15/3.1.16, because I personally feel 3.1.14 is the most stable of them. .15 had a lot of problems, and although .16 fixed much of this, I still feel 3.1.14 is the better choice for the sarge release. Many thanks for the upload, Wesley. I really appreciate it. And thank you, Adam, for once again offering to help me with an upload. - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHbzALSX61ZxOtagRAuhTAJ90nDBfW8uwAqyVUQ+0M5eCf1aDewCfRB3e WiImPLIuSdC+j7nUaSABtgM= =Lm9r -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so I'm really, really I'll look at it and upload within an hour or so (unless there are problems). I saw a copy of Frederik's same e-mail in debian-mentors earlier today and already checked it over and uploaded. My only concern was that it's not quite up-to-date with the latest upstream (3.1.14 vs 3.1.16), but since it's a bugfix, I went ahead and sponsored. When I adopted the package, I chose to update from 3.0.6 to 3.1.14, and not 3.1.15/3.1.16, because I personally feel 3.1.14 is the most stable of them. .15 had a lot of problems, and although .16 fixed much of this, I still feel 3.1.14 is the better choice for the sarge release. Many thanks for the upload, Wesley. I really appreciate it. And thank you, Adam, for once again offering to help me with an upload. - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHbzALSX61ZxOtagRAuhTAJ90nDBfW8uwAqyVUQ+0M5eCf1aDewCfRB3e WiImPLIuSdC+j7nUaSABtgM= =Lm9r -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS: motion - please upload new revision with debconf fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was hoping that my sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so I'm really, really hoping for a kind DD to notice this mail and sponsor the upload. Here's the new changelog entry: * Only prompt user with debconf info, if an earlier version of motion has already been installed (Closes: #263717). * Include French po-debconf translation by Olivier Trichet [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Closes: #264549). * Update debian/watch file. Especially the debconf thing is worth an upload, I think. It's annoying to get prompted for something that isn't relevant. Package available at: http://sentinel.dk/debian/motion/ Package is lintian clean and builds in a pbuilder chroot environment. In general it is in very good shape, I think, so it should not take long to review it. PACKAGE INFO: === Package name: motion Version: 3.1.14 Upstream source: http://motion.sourceforge.net/ Upstream author: Kenneth Lavrsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] License: GPLv2 Description: V4L capture program supporting motion detection Motion is a program that monitors the video signal from one or more cameras and is able to detect if a significant part of the picture has changed. Or in other words, it can detect motion. . Motion is a command line based tool. It has no graphical user interface. Everything is setup either via the command line or via configuration files. . The output from motion can be: - jpg files - ppm format files - mpeg video sequences . Also, motion has its own minimalistic web server. Thus, you can access the webcam output from motion via a browser. === Best regards, - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHP2NLSX61ZxOtagRAvYmAJ9HGFjNH6zBTiCB93b8sNskppMWBQCfeIf3 gYIBn0hw2Ua8JsEfElFYCjY= =jeyW -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS: motion - please upload new revision with debconf fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was hoping that my sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so I'm really, really hoping for a kind DD to notice this mail and sponsor the upload. Here's the new changelog entry: * Only prompt user with debconf info, if an earlier version of motion has already been installed (Closes: #263717). * Include French po-debconf translation by Olivier Trichet [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Closes: #264549). * Update debian/watch file. Especially the debconf thing is worth an upload, I think. It's annoying to get prompted for something that isn't relevant. Package available at: http://sentinel.dk/debian/motion/ Package is lintian clean and builds in a pbuilder chroot environment. In general it is in very good shape, I think, so it should not take long to review it. PACKAGE INFO: === Package name: motion Version: 3.1.14 Upstream source: http://motion.sourceforge.net/ Upstream author: Kenneth Lavrsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] License: GPLv2 Description: V4L capture program supporting motion detection Motion is a program that monitors the video signal from one or more cameras and is able to detect if a significant part of the picture has changed. Or in other words, it can detect motion. . Motion is a command line based tool. It has no graphical user interface. Everything is setup either via the command line or via configuration files. . The output from motion can be: - jpg files - ppm format files - mpeg video sequences . Also, motion has its own minimalistic web server. Thus, you can access the webcam output from motion via a browser. === Best regards, - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHP2NLSX61ZxOtagRAvYmAJ9HGFjNH6zBTiCB93b8sNskppMWBQCfeIf3 gYIBn0hw2Ua8JsEfElFYCjY= =jeyW -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RFS: spong - system and network monitoring system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 12 August 2004 23:44, Nico Golde wrote: Hello Clément, * Clément Stenac [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-12 23:21]: I have the intention to adopt the spong package and have filled an ITA. (bug #235526 ) spong is a system and network monitoring tool. [...] i wanted to adopt it too in the past, but i thought the upstream homepage isnt available anymore. do you have tried it? http://spong.sourceforge.net/ is accessible, but it certainly does not look as if spong is still maintained. - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBG+2bLSX61ZxOtagRArSEAKCNhDecjQp8QNQmg90fPDVzsinWUwCeOTW3 ZitmpIeM9q/DgpvJ2NTyqAM= =3l1t -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RFS: spong - system and network monitoring system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 12 August 2004 23:44, Nico Golde wrote: Hello Clément, * Clément Stenac [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-12 23:21]: I have the intention to adopt the spong package and have filled an ITA. (bug #235526 ) spong is a system and network monitoring tool. [...] i wanted to adopt it too in the past, but i thought the upstream homepage isnt available anymore. do you have tried it? http://spong.sourceforge.net/ is accessible, but it certainly does not look as if spong is still maintained. - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBG+2bLSX61ZxOtagRArSEAKCNhDecjQp8QNQmg90fPDVzsinWUwCeOTW3 ZitmpIeM9q/DgpvJ2NTyqAM= =3l1t -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS/(ITA): motion - V4L capture program supporting motion detection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm currently in the process of adopting[1] motion, and for this purpose I need someone interested in sponsoring uploads of this package[2]. It is available via mentors.debian.net as well. I have done a fair amount of work[3] on the package to improve the quality of it, since it was in rather bad shape when I adopted it. I welcome any criticism/suggestions. Package name: motion Version: 3.1.14 Upstream source: http://motion.sourceforge.net/ Upstream author: Kenneth Lavrsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] License: GPLv2 Description: V4L capture program supporting motion detection Motion is a program that monitors the video signal from one or more cameras and is able to detect if a significant part of the picture has changed. Or in other words, it can detect motion. . Motion is a command line based tool. It has no graphical user interface. Everything is setup either via the command line or via configuration files. . The output from motion can be: - jpg files - ppm format files - mpeg video sequences . Also, motion has its own minimalistic web server. Thus, you can access the webcam output from motion via a browser. [1]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=254336 [2]http://www.cs.auc.dk/~frda/debian/motion/ [3]ChangeLog: * New upstream release. * New maintainer. Package was orphaned (Closes: #254336). * Remove mentioning of included ffmpeg in README.Debian. * Remove out-of-date debian/TODO file. * Update debian/control file to reflect new maintainership. * Update package description in debian/control. * Remove tar from Build-Depends, since it is already build-essential. * Add CREDITS to debian/docs. * Add extra documentation files (listed in debian/motion.docs). * Add example config files (listed in debian/motion.examples). * Add manpage for motion-control binary. * Update debian/rules (working from a much more recent template). * Use /etc/motion (instead of /etc) af sysconfdir. * Add use of gettext-based debconf templates. * Add debconf to Depends in debian/control. * Add po-debconf to Build-Depends in debian/control. * Add /etc/motion/motion.conf to debian/motion.conffiles. * Edit Makefile.in to make files install into their correct locations. * Edit configure/configure.in to avoid use of rpath. Best regards, - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9/puLSX61ZxOtagRAtoDAJ0eQ+BwVCnTF3ETWKHaC+7W4En8/gCff4tv wm45P2OojpNqIqubyNlak6M= =enob -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS/(ITA): motion - V4L capture program supporting motion detection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm currently in the process of adopting[1] motion, and for this purpose I need someone interested in sponsoring uploads of this package[2]. It is available via mentors.debian.net as well. I have done a fair amount of work[3] on the package to improve the quality of it, since it was in rather bad shape when I adopted it. I welcome any criticism/suggestions. Package name: motion Version: 3.1.14 Upstream source: http://motion.sourceforge.net/ Upstream author: Kenneth Lavrsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] License: GPLv2 Description: V4L capture program supporting motion detection Motion is a program that monitors the video signal from one or more cameras and is able to detect if a significant part of the picture has changed. Or in other words, it can detect motion. . Motion is a command line based tool. It has no graphical user interface. Everything is setup either via the command line or via configuration files. . The output from motion can be: - jpg files - ppm format files - mpeg video sequences . Also, motion has its own minimalistic web server. Thus, you can access the webcam output from motion via a browser. [1]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=254336 [2]http://www.cs.auc.dk/~frda/debian/motion/ [3]ChangeLog: * New upstream release. * New maintainer. Package was orphaned (Closes: #254336). * Remove mentioning of included ffmpeg in README.Debian. * Remove out-of-date debian/TODO file. * Update debian/control file to reflect new maintainership. * Update package description in debian/control. * Remove tar from Build-Depends, since it is already build-essential. * Add CREDITS to debian/docs. * Add extra documentation files (listed in debian/motion.docs). * Add example config files (listed in debian/motion.examples). * Add manpage for motion-control binary. * Update debian/rules (working from a much more recent template). * Use /etc/motion (instead of /etc) af sysconfdir. * Add use of gettext-based debconf templates. * Add debconf to Depends in debian/control. * Add po-debconf to Build-Depends in debian/control. * Add /etc/motion/motion.conf to debian/motion.conffiles. * Edit Makefile.in to make files install into their correct locations. * Edit configure/configure.in to avoid use of rpath. Best regards, - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9/puLSX61ZxOtagRAtoDAJ0eQ+BwVCnTF3ETWKHaC+7W4En8/gCff4tv wm45P2OojpNqIqubyNlak6M= =enob -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Changes to copyright file upon package adoption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes. Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to reflect new maintainership? Thanks in advance. - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA4E/1LSX61ZxOtagRAm7dAJ9DRP1X4WqfZt9X2/Uapjw3dKWDrQCgjBn0 QBX2TVoXHgm0Q0go22eFF0o= =kLxF -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Changes to copyright file upon package adoption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes. Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to reflect new maintainership? Thanks in advance. - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA4E/1LSX61ZxOtagRAm7dAJ9DRP1X4WqfZt9X2/Uapjw3dKWDrQCgjBn0 QBX2TVoXHgm0Q0go22eFF0o= =kLxF -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RFS: hearts - a KDE card game
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 28 May 2004 20:41, Chris Anderson wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:29:54PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: I'm looking for a sponsor for hearts, since my sponsor of another package of mine is currently burdened with other work. Name: hearts License: GPL Upstream site: http://hearts.luispedro.org/ My package: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~frda/debian/hearts/ Hearts seems like too generic of a name for the package. I tend to agree, but I dislike the idea of having a package with a different name than that of the upstream name. I've told the upstream author that it might not be possible to have hearts enter Debian, unless the package gets another less generic name. I suggested khearts to him and he gave me a green light, so I can only hope to will consider changing the upstream name as well. So I think I will rebuild the package under the khearts name (and mention the name diversion in README.debian and in the package description). - -- Frederik Dannemare | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dannemare.net GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAuO18LSX61ZxOtagRAr2YAJ0SCSns75FDt36ze4T7QSW+FGdASQCghoHm Cs62ckQgB5o+lZVd+R5hTA8= =LWhO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RFS: hearts - a KDE card game
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 28 May 2004 20:41, Chris Anderson wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:29:54PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: I'm looking for a sponsor for hearts, since my sponsor of another package of mine is currently burdened with other work. Name: hearts License: GPL Upstream site: http://hearts.luispedro.org/ My package: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~frda/debian/hearts/ Hearts seems like too generic of a name for the package. I tend to agree, but I dislike the idea of having a package with a different name than that of the upstream name. I've told the upstream author that it might not be possible to have hearts enter Debian, unless the package gets another less generic name. I suggested khearts to him and he gave me a green light, so I can only hope to will consider changing the upstream name as well. So I think I will rebuild the package under the khearts name (and mention the name diversion in README.debian and in the package description). - -- Frederik Dannemare | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dannemare.net GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAuO18LSX61ZxOtagRAr2YAJ0SCSns75FDt36ze4T7QSW+FGdASQCghoHm Cs62ckQgB5o+lZVd+R5hTA8= =LWhO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS: hearts - KDE card game
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for hearts, since my sponsor of another package of mine is currently burdened with other work. Name: hearts License: GPL Upstream site: http://hearts.luispedro.org/ My package: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~frda/debian/hearts/ Description: KDE card game for four persons Hearts is a trick-taking, point-accumulating card game for four players, where certain cards have a points value. The objective of the game is to obtain the fewest points. Hearts has (beta) support for network play to allow multiple humans to play against each other. You can also play against computer opponents to make up the numbers. - -- Frederik Dannemare | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dannemare.net GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAt0doLSX61ZxOtagRAgiBAKCMAwVa2A2/Nv58UcpX17CjFfpzawCdGqUf x4CUAy39kBzeMZSxJk92b+s= =M/l5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS: hearts - a KDE card game
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for hearts, since my sponsor of another package of mine is currently burdened with other work. Name: hearts License: GPL Upstream site: http://hearts.luispedro.org/ My package: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~frda/debian/hearts/ Description: KDE card game for four persons Hearts is a trick-taking, point-accumulating card game for four players, where certain cards have a points value. The objective of the game is to obtain the fewest points. Hearts has (beta) support for network play to allow multiple humans to play against each other. You can also play against computer opponents to make up the numbers. - -- Frederik Dannemare | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dannemare.net GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAt2kELSX61ZxOtagRAp9sAJ94TIWdke9vLO8sTlTVXQJ9vcnAAgCfWCOJ V58IEbs3TsOqL/tsDzuIr+w= =6phh -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS: hearts - KDE card game
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for hearts, since my sponsor of another package of mine is currently burdened with other work. Name: hearts License: GPL Upstream site: http://hearts.luispedro.org/ My package: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~frda/debian/hearts/ Description: KDE card game for four persons Hearts is a trick-taking, point-accumulating card game for four players, where certain cards have a points value. The objective of the game is to obtain the fewest points. Hearts has (beta) support for network play to allow multiple humans to play against each other. You can also play against computer opponents to make up the numbers. - -- Frederik Dannemare | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dannemare.net GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAt0doLSX61ZxOtagRAgiBAKCMAwVa2A2/Nv58UcpX17CjFfpzawCdGqUf x4CUAy39kBzeMZSxJk92b+s= =M/l5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS: hearts - a KDE card game
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for hearts, since my sponsor of another package of mine is currently burdened with other work. Name: hearts License: GPL Upstream site: http://hearts.luispedro.org/ My package: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~frda/debian/hearts/ Description: KDE card game for four persons Hearts is a trick-taking, point-accumulating card game for four players, where certain cards have a points value. The objective of the game is to obtain the fewest points. Hearts has (beta) support for network play to allow multiple humans to play against each other. You can also play against computer opponents to make up the numbers. - -- Frederik Dannemare | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dannemare.net GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAt2kELSX61ZxOtagRAp9sAJ94TIWdke9vLO8sTlTVXQJ9vcnAAgCfWCOJ V58IEbs3TsOqL/tsDzuIr+w= =6phh -END PGP SIGNATURE-
ITP: hearts (Bug#247493)
Hi, I intend to package this card game which is called 'hearts' by the upstream author. My questions now is: can I use this name for my Debian package as well, or do you consider the word 'hearts' not being unique enough for a Debian package? B/R, Frederik Dannemare
ITP: hearts (Bug#247493)
Hi, I intend to package this card game which is called 'hearts' by the upstream author. My questions now is: can I use this name for my Debian package as well, or do you consider the word 'hearts' not being unique enough for a Debian package? B/R, Frederik Dannemare -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
