Bug#740043: Powerline dans Debian

2014-05-10 Thread Jerome Charaoui
Le 2014-05-10 03:36, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
 The suggestion for powerline package should not pull vim, zsh, tmux and
 ipython. I don't really see a use case where a user will install vim
 because they installed powerline. powerline enhances vim but I don't
 think that vim enhances powerline.

Right, I've move them to an Enhances field instead.


 The licensing of the packaging usually match the licensing
 upstream. This is not mandatory but this allows upstream to use patches
 and modifications from the Debian package. Unless you have some reason
 to use GPL-3, stick to Expat.

Okay, I've changed the packaging license to Expat.


 Include a debian/watch file with a comment explaining that you are
 fetching from git because upstream doesn't make release. This will
 document the fact that you know about that.

Done.


 You need to add the build dependency to help2man.

Also done.


Thank you for this useful review! An updated package has been pushed to
mentors.

-- Jerome



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

2014-02-26 Thread Jerome Charaoui
 A NMU + new upstream release should be versioned with -0.1, e.g.
 iceowl-l10n 2.6.4-0.1.

Fixed.


 Some of the patches are empty; is this intentional?
 dpkg-source: warning: diff
 `iceowl-l10n-2.6.4/debian/patches/Brand-es-ES.patch' doesn't contain
 any patch
 dpkg-source: warning: diff
 `iceowl-l10n-2.6.4/debian/patches/Brand-it.patch' doesn't contain any
 patch

No, not intentional. I had to generate a new patchset to match the
updated upstream strings, and I must have left those out by mistake. Fixed.

I've uploaded an updated package to m.d.n.

If you feel further corrections or changes are needed, please let me know.

  -- Jerome



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#740043: RFS: powerline/0~20140216-1 [ITP]

2014-02-24 Thread Jerome Charaoui
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package powerline

 * Package name: powerline
   Version : 0~20140216-1
   Upstream Author : Kim Silkebækken
 * URL : https://github.com/Lokaltog/powerline
 * License : Expat
   Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  fonts-powerline - ultimate statusline/prompt utility (font)
  powerline  - ultimate statusline/prompt utility
  python-powerline - ultimate statusline/prompt utility (library)
  python-powerline-doc - ultimate statusline/prompt utility (documentation)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/powerline

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/powerline/powerline_0~20140216-1.dsc


Regards,
  Jerome Charaoui



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

2014-02-19 Thread Jerome Charaoui
reopen 737493
thanks

Hi,

I'm reopening this RFS as the maintainer has given the OK for a NMU to
experimental. See :
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693150#111

Package is still available for review at
http://mentors.debian.net/package/iceowl-l10n

Thanks.

  -- Jerome



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#739187: RFS: oh-my-zsh/0~20140211-1 [ITP]

2014-02-16 Thread Jerome Charaoui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package oh-my-zsh

 * Package name: oh-my-zsh
   Version : 0~20140211-1
   Upstream Author : Robby Russell and contributors
 * URL : https://github.com/robbyrussell/oh-my-zsh
 * License : Expat and others
   Section : shells

It builds those binary packages:

  oh-my-zsh  - framework for managing your zsh configuration

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/oh-my-zsh


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oh-my-zsh/oh-my-zsh_0~20140211-1.dsc


  Regards,
   Jerome Charaoui


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTAOaZAAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtMI5kIAK/qgbLJCa943AsK2ELDGoHG
75G30Z2jkm35ja0ngPz/1gPcBu3nqX5FhJDrjlWpkzyZE3B57a+ixmT8vPKx3Sqs
CzTWf5Wgtq3tiU79TVdIay2kXvNHUHUu8bdhqMipXzbQjQ4Qvy24TRmunQcoCCTi
pkeAGUiR/zwAPdJ5ZxDLXSffMfU0UMaFBU/oFuwdHTIovKrxXBu96J/1o3ftx/or
P9YC6Im2yOQBQSGXxOu86r2oNiTNeouscaq98AzkA0738n9KlndaI96a/NXpLSo9
FjkVEgYjCA0WZDBeM6SmWN9k2cVQ0PC3IS/WNghfCRw8pPpSCaMurL/TtjT55MA=
=g47D
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5300e69a.5080...@riseup.net



Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

2014-02-02 Thread Jerome Charaoui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package iceowl-l10n

 * Package name: iceowl-l10n
   Version : 2.6.4-1
   Upstream Author : Mozilla Calendar Project
 * URL : http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/projects/calendar/
 * License : MPL
   Section : localization

 It builds those binary packages:

iceowl-l10n-ca - Catalan/Valencian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-cs - Czech language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-da - Danish language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-de - German language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-en-gb - British English language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-es-ar - Spanish (Argentina) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-es-es - Spanish (Spain) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-et - Estonian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-eu - Basque language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-fi - Finnish language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-fr - French language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-fy-nl - Western Frisian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-ga-ie - Irish (Ireland) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-gd - Scottish Gaelic language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-hr - Croatian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-hu - Hungarian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-is - Icelandic language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-it - Italian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-ja - Japanese language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-ko - Korean language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-lt - Lithuanian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-nb-no - Bokmaal (Norway) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-nl - Dutch language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-nn-no - Nynorsk (Norway) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-pl - Polish language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-pt-pt - Portuguese (Portugal) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-ru - Russian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-sk - Slovak language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-zh-cn - Chinese (China) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-zh-tw - Chinese (Taiwan) language package for Iceowl


To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/iceowl-l10n


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iceowl-l10n/iceowl-l10n_2.6.4-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * New upstream version : 2.6.4 (Closes: #693150)
  * Rebase patches for new version
  * Dropped languages : Albanian, Bulgarian, Galician, Swedish, Turkish
Ukrainian


This is my first upload, I fully expect it will need (hopefully minor)
adjustments before being accepted. I will gladly work with my sponsor
to fix any issues that are raised.


Regards,
  Jerome Charaoui

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS7yFOAAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtMFCYIAIHSDgXW1u2bqaWP7m/h/Qxr
ZFr2JudNypusyPQyDQea6t/YOS5pDJGMY/A8I8RluCZfUZ1OS4kbwiMvdp4uAMFZ
Y57osNGLKEOT20a8vbB1iT/N/9mqm6zCsTemOH8JnVkt7wjC79S+my9HIeAAnLP8
iDoIvYuUwPoeo+tFPoH8EgH9rmzd+O5C+Oki2igC8azcjbGDDJidvGhDSQ8qcsNS
wB56Fl7RbyepyUON3c99qUJfidfbRtcb/0bUpV8/tuTblHRXo/f5t2IAET7hq0Ev
lcooJnosBEeNObeSo1JqXAyQbzYyjZnmEivR4fNYnjBhJOzaIWx5vLqUrLOwMrc=
=SpTe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ef214e.8040...@riseup.net



Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

2014-02-02 Thread Jerome Charaoui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Le 2014-02-03 00:08, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
 Have you tried contacting the current maintainer prior to sending
 out this RFS? If they haven't responded in a timely manner, please
 ping the MIA team and go through the MIA process; if they did reply
 and simply don't have time to update their package, please get them
 to say so on a public list / bug report and include a link to it in
 your RFS bug. Otherwise, this would be considered a hostile NMU.

As the maintainer is listed in LowThresholdNmu, I thought it would be
okay to upload without delay. And I did leave a note in bug #693150
announcing my intention and asking for feedback. Could the upload still
be considered as such in light of this?

Thanks,

 -- Jerome


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS7yc7AAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtMoOwH/isKBzQSsXwE9mtsXjHx7Gxf
nUJRKzc+cyb26pT6iucFc3dPHdvm8Y07Nk50Mkt+bXGWRB4nRPBoFQE2I0sWk+Cp
yyOy042Gd3ltoxvt/iYJz6tUkO5gXK85VGfrux5W1HPCTx5K8yv1lpnLDaPvryKv
ZXr5sZDm8/pZPJH8EvlieEHVQckSuHEoa1eiopNCnf9rJk+ZjD6WsbWLU47j6VK3
W6EOza/VXSwTDOnMFMQcEL4hY4hM96NjQjsogjJ1A+pEQHrNhU8jeiujwl662AzB
8qKIiS0cIuEPIKpit13afC8yf6ImnFiPDx12bZ141+2PgMYuxJOj2gftUVkB8HM=
=Q85O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ef273b.9050...@riseup.net



Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

2014-02-02 Thread Jerome Charaoui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Le 2014-02-03 00:27, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
 On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jerome Charaoui jer...@riseup.net
 wrote:
 Le 2014-02-03 00:08, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
 Have you tried contacting the current maintainer prior to
 sending out this RFS? If they haven't responded in a timely
 manner, please ping the MIA team and go through the MIA
 process; if they did reply and simply don't have time to update
 their package, please get them to say so on a public list / bug
 report and include a link to it in your RFS bug. Otherwise,
 this would be considered a hostile NMU.
 
 As the maintainer is listed in LowThresholdNmu, I thought it
 would be okay to upload without delay. And I did leave a note in
 bug #693150 announcing my intention and asking for feedback.
 Could the upload still be considered as such in light of this?
 
 No, low threshold NMUs doesn't give an unconditional license to
 upload new upstream releases and/or make 0-day uploads (it's also
 never been formalized in Policy, so there aren't exactly any
 clear-cut rules as to what low threshold NMUs do allow...).

This release was published upstream on Dec. 11, 2013 [1], so it's not
exactly a 0-day upload. Also, the last release packaged by the
maintainer was only uploaded over a year ago.

I followed the conditions outlined on LowThresholdNmu, which is :
upload must fix one or more bugs and publishing without delay is
acceptable. I would expect the maintainers who signed-on to agree with
these terms, which seem clear enough to me. However I was not aware
that this whole procedure wasn't sanctioned by the Debian Policy, so
thanks for bringing that up.


 Again, please try to get in contact with the maintainer, and if
 that fails, get in touch with the MIA team to get this package
 orphaned so you can adopt it and properly maintain it.

I did contact the maintainer [2]. albeit only very shortly before
uploading. Again, my understanding of the conditions in
LowThresholdNmu was that this procedure was acceptable.

In any event, I understand that a NMU is an exceptional procedure and
that LowThresholdNmu rules are not universally recognized, so I will
close this RFS and allow more time for the maintainer to respond.

Thanks,

  -- Jerome


[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/lightning/versions/
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693150#96

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS7zL6AAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtM8uUH/jlLgD924X8HZXh5ksAaQilE
qyKobvDNjU3uGdkerN4cqWKmRJSxmJd9Gi/TKuhNLAvtwnLj1RI0E09O7IKd4sV1
DWb6jGhDsNV1jzurYb+cE7wFl812ZelIn2BhcIZDlAXRJhUUVdYh3lRBozJCLGdv
IedJXcejuaDd9HuV3Eu7Wwy9Clj1cWboadM064WcU//WB1iysJ0bOrCKPytJVzk/
l+dvbGGKpHYEj12fEqOm2TJbw4YlsDL3/kh911OAGVMFz+/mUYpsI6/0kgNAwwK3
FZWOpOwy1ceGf3rIzy/C0TbnhWPbaKlKtPHHB1Wrxyiwl/lxKE3V52LrpeQe8R8=
=Q9Dd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ef32fa.8050...@riseup.net