Re: [done] Re: RFS: unetbootin (New upstream release)
On 01/29/2012 04:11 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Hi, On 2012-01-29 02:02, Muneeb Shaikh wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unetbootin/unetbootin_568-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks. The Git repository is at: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/unetbootin.git;a=summary Btw, it doesn't work for me right now. I'm not sure, but git.debian.org seems to be down as of now. Alternative Git repo, if you want to check, is here: https://github.com/iammuneeb/unetbootin-debian P.S. You can me directly for subsequent upload requests. Sure, I'll keep that in mind from next time. :) -Muneeb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f252606.1060...@gmail.com
RFS: unetbootin (New upstream release)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package unetbootin. * Package name: unetbootin Version : 568-1 Upstream Author : Geza Kovacs geza0kov...@gmail.com * URL : http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPLv2 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: unetbootin - installer of Linux/BSD distributions to a partition or USB drive unetbootin-translations - translations for the unetbootin distribution installer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/unetbootin Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unetbootin/unetbootin_568-1.dsc The Git repository is at: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/unetbootin.git;a=summary I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Muneeb Shaikh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f245b7a.7020...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: unetbootin
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org wrote: Hi Muneeb, On 2011-12-08 03:50, Muneeb Shaikh wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unetbootin/unetbootin_565-1.dsc 1) you bumped debhelper build-dependency version from 7 to 8, why? Also, changes like this should be always documented in debian/changelog. Actually it's not required right away, but from future perspective I changed that. I was actually confused whether to include that in changelog. I'll do this from next releases. 2) you removed a build-dependency version of libqt4-dev (which was = 4.2). That's fine, but should me mentioned in the debian/changelog, preferrably with a short explanation why it should be safe. libqt4-dev doesn't need a version to be specified. So it was removed. Again due to confusion I didn't include. I'll take note of it. The Git repository us at: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/unetbootin.git;a=summary By the way, it's good you use a repository, but it's not good you merged all your debian/ changes into a single commit which is not easier to review than a .dsc. Actually I'm doing all the changes and testing in separate directory and if all works well, I apply those changes in Git repository. (it's fear of making mistake which restricts myself doing changes in Git repo ;) ) I'll try to commit changes as soon as I make some changes. I have made the changes according to the review and the new packages is at: http://mentors.debian.net/package/unetbootin The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unetbootin/unetbootin_565-2.dsc The Git repository is at: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/unetbootin.git;a=summary -Muneeb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cafpklua7xkgx94wcnahcc1exledjdpd5yfm99ww0k14pzel...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: unetbootin
On 12/10/2011 07:58 PM, Boris Pek wrote: Unlike Subversion `git commit` is local. You can do a lot of commits and changes in commits before push them into git server. For example: * you can edit commit (git commit --amend -a) if you think that it is bad * you can combine few commits * and etc... Moreover do not forget that you can have local and public branches. And this is the correct way of using git: master branch for completed things and temporary branches for working process. Git is very powerful. Just learn its features... Thanks Boris, Yes, Git is very powerful, I'm learning Git as well. I'm using branching, merging, rebasing features on my projects, but I'm just afraid of using them in unetbootin repo. But now I'll be trying to use these features. -Muneeb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ee3791a.3020...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: unetbootin
On 12/10/2011 11:49 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: On 2011-12-10 18:54, Muneeb Shaikh wrote: 1) you bumped debhelper build-dependency version from 7 to 8, why? Also, changes like this should be always documented in debian/changelog. Actually it's not required right away, but from future perspective I changed that. This is generally not a valid reason. For example, this makes it impossible to build the package on the system which has debhelper v7 installed, for no reason. In the changelog of 565-2 you wrote: Bumped debhelper version to 8 which should be required in future. Required by whom? In what future? I don't get what did you meant. Please explain (here in the list discussion). Or, alternatively, just revert this change. Okay, According to the suggestion I have reverted back the change as it's not required. The new packages is at: http://mentors.debian.net/package/unetbootin The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unetbootin/unetbootin_565-3.dsc The Git repository is at: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/unetbootin.git;a=summary -Muneeb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ee3ef5b.5070...@gmail.com
RFS: unetbootin (New upsteream release, bugfixes)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package unetbootin. * Package name : unetbootin Version : 565-1 Upstream Author : Geza Kovacs geza0kov...@gmail.com * URL : http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ * License: GPLv2 Section : utils Changelog: * New upstream release. * Menu entry with icon. (Closes: 635013) * Only build for architectures where syslinux is available. (Closes: 649102) * debian/copyright - Updated headers to machine readable format and updated license. It builds those binary packages: unetbootin - installer of Linux/BSD distributions to a partition or USB drive unetbootin-translations - translations for unetbootin distribution installer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/unetbootin Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unetbootin/unetbootin_565-1.dsc The Git repository us at: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/unetbootin.git;a=summary I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Muneeb Shaikh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cafpklucnrh3d9bdmipmqy2ijtpdxowzqte586ormsd2ptq4...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [done] Re: RFS: unetbootin
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org wrote: On 2011-11-20 05:58, Muneeb Shaikh wrote: Point noted. I have bumped the debian revision, it's now 563-2. Uploaded. Thank you for the contribution. Thank you very much for sponsoring the package and getting it in debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFpKLuDqGCkqkN=enbngpq3mum6jxfysdo4viih3axq--5d...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: unetbootin
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org wrote: Hi Muneeb, Hi Eugene, Here's my review: Thanks for the review. 1) debian/changelog should include the entry for already uploaded version 555-1; Oh sorry! I didn't notice the version in unstable. I just started working on the source from collab-maint thinking it as latest. Now added the entry from changelog of version 555-1 2) you switched to a source format '3.0 (quilt)' but didn't mention this in the debian/changelog. Fixed the changelog. I will upload the package if you fix these two. Note: I want a bumped Debian revision after an every review for packages that I sponsor. Point noted. I have bumped the debian revision, it's now 563-2. Package Information URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/unetbootin Source Repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/unetbootin.git Please review the changes I have made. Thank you for your quick response. -Muneeb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFpKLuARaM6aT11k5n70FScOFoad4Nh=pv-r60tw2k19thp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [DRE-maint] RFS: ruby-omniauth
On Saturday 27 August 2011 01:13 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 27/08/11 at 03:08 +0530, Muneeb Shaikh wrote: Hi, The gem has dependencies on oa-basic (= 0.2.6), oa-enterprise (= 0.2.6), oa-core (= 0.2.6), oa-more (= 0.2.6), oa-oauth (= 0.2.6), oa-openid (= 0.2.6). Are you sure that the package can work standalone like that? If it's the case, please remove the commented line in debian/control This package builds fine in pbuilder environment. The packages you mentioned are already there bundled with this but I'll have to check whether they get installed or not. In debian/copyright, you need to state the license for Files:* and Files: debian/*. Sorry it was my mistake I didn't used lintian from git which now gives warning about DEP-5 implementation Why do you patch the gemspec for the description? if the description is not suitable for the debian package, you should change it in debian/control directly. FIXME in ruby-omniauth.docs Again this is my mistake, I'll change that. Ah, now I see that the package builds several gems. I don't think that it's a layout that we support at the moment, so it might require changes in gem2deb itself. Antonio, what do you think? - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5a5530.7090...@gmail.com
Re: [DRE-maint] RFS: ruby-omniauth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sunday 28 August 2011 09:32 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: On 27/08/11 at 03:08 +0530, Muneeb Shaikh wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ruby-omniauth. * Package name: ruby-omniauth Version : 0.2.6-1 Upstream Author : Michael Bleigh mich...@intridea.com, Erik Michaels-Ober sfe...@gmail.com * URL : http://github.com/intridea/omniauth * License : MIT Section : ruby It builds those binary packages: ruby-omniauth - Rack middleware for standardized multi-provider authentication To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ruby-omniauth Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ruby-omniauth/ruby-omniauth_0.2.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Hi, The gem has dependencies on oa-basic (= 0.2.6), oa-enterprise (= 0.2.6), oa-core (= 0.2.6), oa-more (= 0.2.6), oa-oauth (= 0.2.6), oa-openid (= 0.2.6). Are you sure that the package can work standalone like that? If it's the case, please remove the commented line in debian/control I doubt it will work the way it is now: $ cat lib/omniauth.rb require 'omniauth/core' require 'omniauth/basic' require 'omniauth/oauth' require 'omniauth/openid' require 'omniauth/enterprise' require 'omniauth/more' Ah, now I see that the package builds several gems. I don't think that it's a layout that we support at the moment, so it might require changes in gem2deb itself. Antonio, what do you think? I'm not sure yet about the best way to support this, or even about supporting it directly at all. The problem is that each package has a different strategy for implementing multiple package. For example this one package has both code under lib/ _and_ subpackages under subdirectories. What I would do is keep using gem2deb but add a special installation step before the default gem2deb installation step, something like this: PACKAGES = \ oa-basic \ oa-core \ oa-enterprise \ oa-more \ oa-oauth \ oa-openid override_dh_auto_install: for pkg in $(PACKAGES); do dh_install -p ruby-$$pkg $$pkg/lib/* /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby; done dh_auto_install Of course, you will need to add the appropriate binary package stanzas to debian/control, and check the dependencies for each sub-package, and make sure the tests for all of them are run during package build. I'll try to do this modification and see if it works though I'm totally new in this I'll try my best. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOWlYUAAoJEJfoSJNlYL1R02kP/1J7/uqbVk0ZMZcrUjufl/9g tNeh+lrgePzkvZj6/GyRM8eZzBTDUUwf5V0nfLl4JcZqQcddhEDxwBTZ2zo+Rg6+ 2GDSIBQPBbOVSqr/Q9Ja+lBn1UoFdh2GcOucwiGE51G3inPI7wabUhARXxFVwko9 bEFrYk/LkO99Sre0yBeSETzBnNeb+q2MinMX1TPwsJ13c09uYD4hA4ONXibJjLgQ kMdtsHALWxRj1LVdPD3wJYTBgrP49oPO7wbAt7i5T3fT2LhDn6tRT1uzz0Xn8JKP yv/VmY1LZIE6krcEjOIuNtpcahc1hlRBHqLToVgKEoG+yrRQycAdcleEzH/qmT2t h/Cl6vUKM2YjvlAc6WS4+83q0w7VROOAEMlzKeH+ZpFCvMJu/o6rS5xAXET0cKQv 2OxcEZNDBinD/o9OtO9HycfaJ33r0h0n7oWkBjOUDomA51YN2LoDGrVcuZCPyxpQ 0BNBzgCdha5SUZtfxyebVZJ99lNk9hWuiQncDq76pq99i22D6Mq+hluIoz7yJitL kd9SmsntINWuyZ+rJFhr5oL6tVnRrpwOVBjtyxGXNfOgqwrFTGTv9NdCA5DwsGrT 46QPlKOBmKOjgj6kIZAGjYxWlkO+5JrFJXXJN3iAaSixh/exm0hYLWrOdjLzLJmh Bu38nF3gAIWbS1gFVpW/ =xFAz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5a562d.7010...@gmail.com
RFS: ruby-omniauth
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ruby-omniauth. * Package name: ruby-omniauth Version : 0.2.6-1 Upstream Author : Michael Bleigh mich...@intridea.com, Erik Michaels-Ober sfe...@gmail.com * URL : http://github.com/intridea/omniauth * License : MIT Section : ruby It builds those binary packages: ruby-omniauth - Rack middleware for standardized multi-provider authentication To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ruby-omniauth Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ruby-omniauth/ruby-omniauth_0.2.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Muneeb Shaikh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e581252.3070...@gmail.com
