Bug#1030571: RFS: vfu/5.07-2 -- Versatile text-based file-manager (common files)
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 13:28:45 +0300 Boian Bonev wrote: > This was intended to happen before the freeze, and it was -1 at that > time. Time was not enough and that couldn't happen, then I made another > -1 upload, excluding the introduction of new binary packages and only > bumped this to -2 It should still be -1 > because a new upstream release will come in the > meantime and the target now is unstable after the release. Tagging moreinfo then, remove it when you say it is now time for the upload (after the release.) -- tobi
Bug#1030571: RFS: vfu/5.07-2 -- Versatile text-based file-manager (common files)
Hi, On Wed, 2023-04-05 at 14:13 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > > vfu (5.07-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > * New upstream release 5.07 > > A -2 revision can never have that changelog entry. > This does not seem to be a targeted fix, so cannot go to unstable > during freeze. > Maybe you want to target experimental? This was intended to happen before the freeze, and it was -1 at that time. Time was not enough and that couldn't happen, then I made another -1 upload, excluding the introduction of new binary packages and only bumped this to -2 because a new upstream release will come in the meantime and the target now is unstable after the release. I see no point to upload to experimental - this is not a library and nothing else depends on it. With best regards, b. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1030571: RFS: vfu/5.07-2 -- Versatile text-based file-manager (common files)
> vfu (5.07-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New upstream release 5.07 A -2 revision can never have that changelog entry. This does not seem to be a targeted fix, so cannot go to unstable during freeze. Maybe you want to target experimental?
