Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-03-03 Thread Stephen M. Webb

On 02/26/2012 01:19 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:


http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc



E: libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev: arch-dependent-file-not-in-arch-specific-directory 
usr/bin/atlas_convert


Fixed: I had also missed that.


I also noticed a typo in the package description for
libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev: developmentfiles misses a space.


Nice catch.  Fixed.

I have also updated to policy version 3.9.3 (no changes required).

Uploaded a new source package to the mentors archive as above.

Thanks.


--
Stephen M. Webb  stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f52410e.3030...@bregmasoft.ca



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-03-03 Thread Stephen M. Webb

On 02/26/2012 01:19 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:


http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc



E: libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev: arch-dependent-file-not-in-arch-specific-directory 
usr/bin/atlas_convert


Fixed: I had also missed that.


I also noticed a typo in the package description for
libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev: developmentfiles misses a space.


Nice catch.  Fixed.

I have also updated to policy version 3.9.3 (no changes required).

Uploaded a new source package to the mentors archive as above.

Thanks.


--
Stephen M. Webb  stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f524134.8000...@bregmasoft.ca



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-26 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi,

Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
 On 02/12/2012 05:49 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 Stephen M. Webbstephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca  writes:
   * There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example.
 [...]
 I have reworded debian/changelog for clarification and added a clause to
 debian/copyright for the example files.  A new source package has been
 uploaded to mentors.debian.net.

 Please don't assume specific versions of licenses if upstream does not
 say so (debian/copyright says GFDL-1.3+ while the example files in the
 tarball say just GFDL unless I missed something). Also you mentioned the
 LGPL-2.1 instead of the GFDL later.

 Upstream has been unable to clarify the licensing of the particular
 source in question (the original author is out of contact) and has
 suggested it be removed from the source tarball, since it is neither
 built nor packaged.  Is this a preferred alternative?

I think it is fine to just document that it is released under a GFDL
license (any version) and add a note that we assume there are no
invariant sections, no front cover and no back cover texts.  The GFDL
even states so: If the Document does not specify a version number of
this License, you may choose any version ever published (not as a draft)
by the Free Software Foundation. and If the Document does not identify
any Invariant Sections then there are none. (and I assume the same
holds for cover texts).

So I would use something like:

Files: tutorial/example/*
Copyright: 2000, Stefanus Du Toit
License: GFDL-NIV-1.0+
 This file is covered by the GNU Free Documentation License.
 .
 On Debian systems the full text of the GNU Free Documentation License
 can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL'.
Comment:
 No invariant sections, no front cover and no back cover texts are given.

Maybe refer to a specific version instead, but as we don't have versions
1.0 or 1.1 in common-licenses, you would have to refer to 1.2 or 1.3.

Regards,
Ansgar



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehthrfmo@deep-thought.43-1.org



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-26 Thread Stephen M. Webb

On 02/26/2012 06:35 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:


I think it is fine to just document that it is released under a GFDL
license (any version) and add a note that we assume there are no
invariant sections, no front cover and no back cover texts.


I have modified the debian/copyright file as suggested and uploaded a 
new source package to mentors.debian.net.


   dget -x
 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc


Thanks

--
Stephen M. Webb  stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4a6718.2090...@bregmasoft.ca



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-26 Thread Stephen M. Webb

On 02/26/2012 06:35 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:


I think it is fine to just document that it is released under a GFDL
license (any version) and add a note that we assume there are no
invariant sections, no front cover and no back cover texts.


I have modified the debian/copyright file as suggested and uploaded a 
new source package to mentors.debian.net.



  dget -x


http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc

Thanks

--
Stephen M. Webb  stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4a6730.4010...@bregmasoft.ca



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-26 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi,

Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc

The new lintian version made me aware of another problem I had missed:

E: libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev: arch-dependent-file-not-in-arch-specific-directory 
usr/bin/atlas_convert
N:
N:   This package is Multi-Arch same, but it installs an ELF binary in
N:   the directory that is not architecture-specific.
N:   
N:   Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec for details.
N:   
N:   Severity: serious, Certainty: possible
N:   
N:   Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb

The easiest solution would be to just leave the Multi-Arch field for
now, otherwise it would need to go to an extra package.  But I am not
sure if that is worth it.

I also noticed a typo in the package description for
libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev: developmentfiles misses a space.

Regards,
Ansgar



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y5rpo3si@deep-thought.43-1.org



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-16 Thread Stephen M. Webb

On 02/12/2012 05:49 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

Hi,

Stephen M. Webbstephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca  writes:

  * There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example.

[...]

I have reworded debian/changelog for clarification and added a clause to
debian/copyright for the example files.  A new source package has been
uploaded to mentors.debian.net.


Please don't assume specific versions of licenses if upstream does not
say so (debian/copyright says GFDL-1.3+ while the example files in the
tarball say just GFDL unless I missed something). Also you mentioned the
LGPL-2.1 instead of the GFDL later.


Upstream has been unable to clarify the licensing of the particular 
source in question (the original author is out of contact) and has 
suggested it be removed from the source tarball, since it is neither 
built nor packaged.  Is this a preferred alternative?



--
Stephen M. Webb  stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3d59ea.3000...@bregmasoft.ca



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-12 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi,

Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
  * There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example.
[...]
 I have reworded debian/changelog for clarification and added a clause to
 debian/copyright for the example files.  A new source package has been
 uploaded to mentors.debian.net.

Please don't assume specific versions of licenses if upstream does not
say so (debian/copyright says GFDL-1.3+ while the example files in the
tarball say just GFDL unless I missed something). Also you mentioned the
LGPL-2.1 instead of the GFDL later.

Ansgar



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d39kfhrp@deep-thought.43-1.org



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-11 Thread Stephen M. Webb
On 02/10/2012 05:18 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

   dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc
 
  * There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example.
 
 debian/changelog:
 
  * typo: rpsth - rpath
 
  * What does updated the -doc package files mean?
 
  * Why more in added more zlib and libbz build dependencies?

I have reworded debian/changelog for clarification and added a clause to
debian/copyright for the example files.  A new source package has been
uploaded to mentors.debian.net.

 Minor upstream nitpicks:
 
  * I find it helpful if license statements include the version of the
 license explicitly (as the example ones in the GPL do), same for
 explicitly stating that there are no invariant sections etc.
 
  * README claims this was atlas-c++ 0.7.x which does not seem to be true.

I will bring these issues up with the upstream.  They have a number of
similar issues in other parts of their software suite.


-- 
Stephen M. Webb  stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f36693d.2000...@bregmasoft.ca



Processed: Re: Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 658065 + confirmed
Bug #658065 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge 
wire protocol library
Added tag(s) confirmed.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
658065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132891228918139.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-10 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
tag 658065 + confirmed
thanks

Hi,

Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package atlas-cpp:
 
   dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc

 * There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example.

debian/changelog:

 * typo: rpsth - rpath

 * What does updated the -doc package files mean?

 * Why more in added more zlib and libbz build dependencies?

Minor upstream nitpicks:

 * I find it helpful if license statements include the version of the
license explicitly (as the example ones in the GPL do), same for
explicitly stating that there are no invariant sections etc.

 * README claims this was atlas-c++ 0.7.x which does not seem to be true.

Regards,
Ansgar



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwei5o4i@deep-thought.43-1.org



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-06 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
owner 658065 !
thanks

Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
   dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc

 I have modified this package to fix missing or added inline symbols on
 additional non-x86 architectures.  I have uploaded a new source package
 to the same URL.

I'll try to take a look at this, may take some days until I have time to
do so.

Ansgar



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mx8v7oid@deep-thought.43-1.org



Processed: Re: Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 owner 658065 !
Bug #658065 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge 
wire protocol library
Owner recorded as Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
658065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132855633313457.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-02-05 Thread Stephen M. Webb
On 01/30/2012 10:12 PM, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal
 
 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package atlas-cpp:
 
   dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc

I have modified this package to fix missing or added inline symbols on
additional non-x86 architectures.  I have uploaded a new source package
to the same URL.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2f190b.4090...@bregmasoft.ca



Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library

2012-01-30 Thread Stephen M. Webb
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package atlas-cpp:

  dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc

It builds these binary packages:
  libatlas-cpp-0.6-1 - World Forge wire protocol library - runtime libs
  libatlas-cpp-0.6-1-dbg - World Forge wire protocol library - debugging
libs
  libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev - World Forge wire protocol library - developer files
  libatlas-cpp-doc - World Forge wire protocol library - documentation

  More information about atlas-cpp can be obtained from
http://worldforge.org/dev/eng/libraries/atlas_cpp

  Changes since the last upload:

 atlas-cpp (0.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream release
   * new maintainer (Debian games team) (closes: #653950)
   * converted to 3.0 (quilt) source format
   * updated Standards-Version to 3.9.2
   * debian/control: added Vcs- fields
   * regenerate the autotools at build time to fix rpsth problems
   * debian/libatlas-cpp-0.6-1.symbols: added
   * updated the -doc package files
   * removed unneeded patches
   * added a manpage for the atlas_convert tool
   * added lintian override for multiple DSOs in package
   * added more zlib and libbz build dependencies
   * debian/rules: convert to use dh build sequencer
   * use xz compression for packaging
   * moved to debhelper compat level 9
   * debian/copyright: convert to DEP-5 format


Regards,
Stephen M. Webb  stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f275c2f.1090...@bregmasoft.ca