Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
On 7 September 2012 16:44, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 September 2012 16:38, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: [...] Hi Thomas, The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector. http://0install.net/install-source.html http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2 I have not yet looked any further than that. I can rename it if necessary (1.12 will have the new name upstream), but I don't think this needs to hold up the Debian package split, does it? Note that this bug is linked from the front page of http://0install.net (we need a sponsor from Debian to approve the change) if you need confirmation that upstream agrees with the rename. Hi Bart, Just to clarify: are you dealing with this package rename request, or do I need to ask on the mentors list? Thanks, -- Dr Thomas Leonardhttp://0install.net/ GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAG4opy8md9QaRdLnC=ZQ+GAU=ZSVGGvQgyb04az9xoi=dUwc=a...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
On 2 September 2012 16:51, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Peter, Sorry, my mistake, this should have been Hi Thomas. Hi Bart, No problem. Are there any issues with the package split and rename? Splitting the package really helps on servers. e.g. ~100 MB of dependencies for zeroinstall-injector vs ~1 MB for 0install-core on a minimal system (with Python). Thanks, -- Dr Thomas Leonardhttp://0install.net/ GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cag4opy-k+3c62ruvtsb6w+69e2a+snbypmvzbczif9f0opk...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: On 2 September 2012 16:51, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Peter, Sorry, my mistake, this should have been Hi Thomas. Hi Bart, No problem. Are there any issues with the package split and rename? Splitting the package really helps on servers. e.g. ~100 MB of dependencies for zeroinstall-injector vs ~1 MB for 0install-core on a minimal system (with Python). Hi Thomas, The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector. http://0install.net/install-source.html http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2 I have not yet looked any further than that. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120907153855.ga8...@master.debian.org
Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
On 7 September 2012 16:38, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: On 2 September 2012 16:51, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Peter, Sorry, my mistake, this should have been Hi Thomas. Hi Bart, No problem. Are there any issues with the package split and rename? Splitting the package really helps on servers. e.g. ~100 MB of dependencies for zeroinstall-injector vs ~1 MB for 0install-core on a minimal system (with Python). Hi Thomas, The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector. http://0install.net/install-source.html http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2 I have not yet looked any further than that. I can rename it if necessary (1.12 will have the new name upstream), but I don't think this needs to hold up the Debian package split, does it? Note that this bug is linked from the front page of http://0install.net (we need a sponsor from Debian to approve the change) if you need confirmation that upstream agrees with the rename. Thanks, -- Dr Thomas Leonardhttp://0install.net/ GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cag4opy86ypahz2vw1vefsf7bo-fiyuj9qfdnav7bukdwc14...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Hi Peter, The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector. http://0install.net/install-source.html http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2 Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120902154249.gb6...@master.debian.org
Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
On Sep 2, 2012 4:42 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: Hi Peter, The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector. http://0install.net/install-source.html http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2 Regards, Bart Martens Hi Bart. I'm the upstream maintainer (as well as the Debian packager) so there's no problem with renaming it. I can rename the upstream tarball too if it helps. Thanks,
Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Peter, Sorry, my mistake, this should have been Hi Thomas. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120902155137.gc6...@master.debian.org
Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector package
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. I have split it into separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. Could someone check it and approve the new package names? My previous mentor (Jens Peter Secher) is no longer a DD. It now builds these binary packages: 0install-core (contains the code) 0install (metapackage that depends on 0install-core and GTK) zeroinstall-injector (transitional package so that using the old package name still works) I updated the name as injector is no longer used, and the main command is now 0install. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/0install Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_1.11-1.dsc More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net. Regards, T. Leonard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827131726.2666.51981.report...@avi.home
