Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2016-01-21 Thread Pali Rohár 
On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> > > I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source
> > > code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching.
> > > 
> > > Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original
> > > source code which patch modify changes.
> > > 
> > > And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
> > > reduce patches if they are not really needed?
> > 
> > I think it's appropriate to apply a patch (and submit it upstream) in
> > this case, as this is certainly a bug in the upstream makefile, and it
> > should be fixed.
> 
> Ok. I can send patch to upstream project which fix compilation (on
> debian). But, what is wrong with my original (and current) version which
> use pmake and does not need patching original software?

So what is current state? I would like to know what is wrong with my
approach and if is really wrong...

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2016-01-05 Thread Pali Rohár 
On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> > > I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source
> > > code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching.
> > > 
> > > Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original
> > > source code which patch modify changes.
> > > 
> > > And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
> > > reduce patches if they are not really needed?
> > 
> > I think it's appropriate to apply a patch (and submit it upstream) in
> > this case, as this is certainly a bug in the upstream makefile, and it
> > should be fixed.
> 
> Ok. I can send patch to upstream project which fix compilation (on
> debian). But, what is wrong with my original (and current) version which
> use pmake and does not need patching original software?

Andrew: ping

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-17 Thread Pali Rohár 
On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> > I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source
> > code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching.
> > 
> > Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original
> > source code which patch modify changes.
> > 
> > And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
> > reduce patches if they are not really needed?
> 
> I think it's appropriate to apply a patch (and submit it upstream) in
> this case, as this is certainly a bug in the upstream makefile, and it
> should be fixed.

Ok. I can send patch to upstream project which fix compilation (on
debian). But, what is wrong with my original (and current) version which
use pmake and does not need patching original software?

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-14 Thread Pali Rohár 
On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> you just dropping the patch into the right place.

I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source
code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching.

Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original
source code which patch modify changes.

And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
reduce patches if they are not really needed?

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-14 Thread Andrew Shadura 
On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
>> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source
> code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching.
> 
> Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original
> source code which patch modify changes.
> 
> And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
> reduce patches if they are not really needed?

I think it's appropriate to apply a patch (and submit it upstream) in
this case, as this is certainly a bug in the upstream makefile, and it
should be fixed.

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrew

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-11 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna 
Hi Pali, can you please reupload?

Andrew are you still interested in looking at it?

cheers,

G.


>Hi Gianfranco, I did not updated package because I did not know that

>some step is needed to do. My last uploaded version worked and I thought
>that it was OK.

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-11 Thread Pali Rohár 
On Wednesday 09 December 2015 18:05:29 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:40:21 + Bart Martens
>  wrote:
> > Package udfclient has been removed from mentors.
> > 
> > 
> Hi Pali, did you forget to update the package?
> 
> cheers,
> 
> G.
> 

Hi Gianfranco, I did not updated package because I did not know that
some step is needed to do. My last uploaded version worked and I thought
that it was OK.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-11 Thread Andrew Shadura 
On 11 December 2015 at 12:58, Gianfranco Costamagna
 wrote:
> Hi Pali, can you please reupload?
>
> Andrew are you still interested in looking at it?

Gianfranco, if you wish to sponsor it, please go ahead. And please
make sure Pali uses the feature of bmake package I developed for his
specific use case ;)

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrew

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-11 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna 

Hi Andrew,

>Gianfranco, if you wish to sponsor it, please go ahead. And please
>make sure Pali uses the feature of bmake package I developed for his
>specific use case ;)


I'm not a bmake-savvy person, I don't think I'll be able to check if the 
packaging
is really error prone...

cheers,

G.

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-11 Thread Pali Rohár 
Now I uploaded my last version of udfclient to mentors again.

But I did not used bmake for two reasons:

1) I have older Debian and Ubuntu systems which do not support bmake, so 
cannot test or use that package

2) It needs to patch original tarball, my debian/rules file is also 
short and does not need to patch software just for compilation

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-11 Thread Andrew Shadura 
On 11 December 2015 at 18:01, Pali Rohár  wrote:
> Now I uploaded my last version of udfclient to mentors again.
>
> But I did not used bmake for two reasons:
>
> 1) I have older Debian and Ubuntu systems which do not support bmake, so
> cannot test or use that package
>
> 2) It needs to patch original tarball, my debian/rules file is also
> short and does not need to patch software just for compilation

Please install the latest bmake and use it (you have to build and test
your package on unstable anyway!), and it's not a big deal to patch
the Makefile after all, you just dropping the patch into the right
place.

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrew

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:40:21 + Bart Martens
 wrote:
> Package udfclient has been removed from mentors.
> 
> 
Hi Pali, did you forget to update the package?

cheers,

G.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=yxMb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-