Bug#923340: RFS: dwarves-dfsg/1.12-2 (RC)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 02:10:06PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:33:43AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:15:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:06:18PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > > * Package name: dwarves-dfsg > > > > Version : 1.12-2 > > > > > * Update copyright to copyright-format/1.0. Closes: #919356. > > > > The new copyright file contains references to GPL-2.0-only and > > > GPL-2.0-or-later without defining them. > > > > According to https://spdx.org/licenses/ they are defined and supersede > > GPL-2 and GPL-2+ now deprecated (maybe I should file a bug). OTOH I'm > > reading that as long as copyright-format is not updated, new ones should > > not be used. > > SPDX has nothing to the copyright-format. The latter doesn't care about > short names at all, merely that 1. every file has a license, and 2. every > license is defined. > > Thus, "GPL-2", "GPL-2+", "GPL-2.0-only", "GPL-2.0-or-later", "Meow-meow" > and "Cthulhu-fhtagn" have exactly the same meaning: they're merely > identifiers that need to be defined elsewhere in the file. Obviously, > for human readers we still want GPL to mean GPL -- but it's a syntax vs > content distinction. Got it, in my mind the two things were related. There is even a paragraph that says "For SPDX compatibility, versions with trailing dot-zeroes are considered to be equivalent to versions without (e.g., “2.0.0” is considered equal to “2.0” and “2”)." but I cannot ignore the one saying: "Use of a standard short name does not override the Debian Policy requirement to include the full license text in debian/copyright, nor any requirements in the license of the work regarding reproduction of legal notices. This information must still be included in the License field, either in a stand-alone License paragraph or in the relevant files paragraph." > > I spent quite some time in trying to understand what lintian tries > > to tell me here. I verified that reshuffling the file does not help > > either, these errors stay in a similar location, as if lintian had some > > bug somewhere. > > "references a license, for which no standalone license paragraph exists" I evidently read too little and assumed too much. > > I'm uploaded a new version with GPL-2/GPL-2+, should be available shortly. > > I don't see it on mentors yet... I rewrote history and pushed a new 1.12-2 release to mentors. Thanks again for the feedback. Regards, Domenico -- 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#923340: RFS: dwarves-dfsg/1.12-2 (RC)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:33:43AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:15:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:06:18PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > * Package name: dwarves-dfsg > > > Version : 1.12-2 > > > * Update copyright to copyright-format/1.0. Closes: #919356. > > The new copyright file contains references to GPL-2.0-only and > > GPL-2.0-or-later without defining them. > > According to https://spdx.org/licenses/ they are defined and supersede > GPL-2 and GPL-2+ now deprecated (maybe I should file a bug). OTOH I'm > reading that as long as copyright-format is not updated, new ones should > not be used. SPDX has nothing to the copyright-format. The latter doesn't care about short names at all, merely that 1. every file has a license, and 2. every license is defined. Thus, "GPL-2", "GPL-2+", "GPL-2.0-only", "GPL-2.0-or-later", "Meow-meow" and "Cthulhu-fhtagn" have exactly the same meaning: they're merely identifiers that need to be defined elsewhere in the file. Obviously, for human readers we still want GPL to mean GPL -- but it's a syntax vs content distinction. > Anyway, this is what I get if I switch to GPL-2 and GPL-2+ everywhere: > > W: dwarves-dfsg source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2+ > (paragraph at line 102) > N: > N:The files paragraph in the machine readable copyright file references a > N:license, for which no standalone license paragraph exists. > N: > N:Refer to > N:https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ for > N:details. > N: > N:Severity: normal, Certainty: possible > N: > N:Check: source-copyright, Type: source > N: > W: dwarves-dfsg source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2 > (paragraph at line 94) So it does if you say "GPL-2.0-only" or "GPL-2.0-or-later"... > I spent quite some time in trying to understand what lintian tries > to tell me here. I verified that reshuffling the file does not help > either, these errors stay in a similar location, as if lintian had some > bug somewhere. "references a license, for which no standalone license paragraph exists" > I'm uploaded a new version with GPL-2/GPL-2+, should be available shortly. I don't see it on mentors yet... Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Have you accepted Khorne as your lord and saviour? ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#923340: RFS: dwarves-dfsg/1.12-2 (RC)
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:15:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:06:18PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > * Package name: dwarves-dfsg > > Version : 1.12-2 > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > dwarves-dfsg (1.12-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > * Convert to dh. > > * Fix Homepage and Vcs-Git. > > * Fix depends on debhelper >= 10. > > * Remove trailing spaces from the Debian changelog. > > * Update copyright to copyright-format/1.0. Closes: #919356. > > Hi! Hi, > The new copyright file contains references to GPL-2.0-only and > GPL-2.0-or-later without defining them. According to https://spdx.org/licenses/ they are defined and supersede GPL-2 and GPL-2+ now deprecated (maybe I should file a bug). OTOH I'm reading that as long as copyright-format is not updated, new ones should not be used. Anyway, this is what I get if I switch to GPL-2 and GPL-2+ everywhere: W: dwarves-dfsg source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2+ (paragraph at line 102) N: N:The files paragraph in the machine readable copyright file references a N:license, for which no standalone license paragraph exists. N: N:Refer to N:https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ for N:details. N: N:Severity: normal, Certainty: possible N: N:Check: source-copyright, Type: source N: W: dwarves-dfsg source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2 (paragraph at line 94) I spent quite some time in trying to understand what lintian tries to tell me here. I verified that reshuffling the file does not help either, these errors stay in a similar location, as if lintian had some bug somewhere. I also expected they to be repeated as many times as in the files (yes, I'm using --no-tag-display-limit -i) but they are not and so at certain point I gave up. I'm uploaded a new version with GPL-2/GPL-2+, should be available shortly. Thanks for reviewing. Regards, Domenico -- 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#923340: RFS: dwarves-dfsg/1.12-2 (RC)
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:06:18PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > * Package name: dwarves-dfsg > Version : 1.12-2 > Changes since the last upload: > > dwarves-dfsg (1.12-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Convert to dh. > * Fix Homepage and Vcs-Git. > * Fix depends on debhelper >= 10. > * Remove trailing spaces from the Debian changelog. > * Update copyright to copyright-format/1.0. Closes: #919356. Hi! The new copyright file contains references to GPL-2.0-only and GPL-2.0-or-later without defining them. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Have you accepted Khorne as your lord and saviour? ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#923340: RFS: dwarves-dfsg/1.12-2 (RC)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear all, I'm looking for a sponsor for this package: * Package name: dwarves-dfsg Version : 1.12-2 Upstream Author : Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo * URL : http://acmel.wordpress.com * License : GPLv2 Section : utils It builds these binary packages: dwarves - set of advanced DWARF utilities dwarves-dbgsym- debug symbols for dwarves To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dwarves-dfsg Alternatively, you can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwarves-dfsg/dwarves-dfsg_1.12-2.dsc More information can be obtained from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/ Changes since the last upload: dwarves-dfsg (1.12-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Convert to dh. * Fix Homepage and Vcs-Git. * Fix depends on debhelper >= 10. * Remove trailing spaces from the Debian changelog. * Update copyright to copyright-format/1.0. Closes: #919356. -- Domenico Andreoli Wed, 26 Dec 2018 17:40:31 +0100 Kind regards, Domenico -- 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13
