Bug#962091: RFS: xine-ui/0.99.12-1 [QA] -- xine video player, user interface

2020-06-10 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
Hi, and thanks for the review.

lør. 6. jun. 2020 kl. 11:41 skrev Adrian Bunk :
>
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 08:04:45AM +, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
> >...
> > Changes since the last upload:
> >...
> >* d/rules
> >  - Change to dh-sequence
> >...
> >* d/control
> >...
> >  - Remove unnecessary Depends field
> >...
>
> This was necessary, it was just broken by your debian/rules rewrite.
> This RC regression can easily be reproduced with aaxine.
>
> For the debian/rules change, please verify that the changed package
> does not contain any unexpected changes from the original one.
> This means first understanding what the old debian/rules did.
> I can immediately find two things that were done in the old debian/rules
> but are missing in the new one.
>

I re added  the dependency fields in d/control, dh_xine, and
dh_compress targets in d/rules, which shouldn't have been removed,
thanks for spotting that. I also added back dh_installchangelog,
I'm still not sure if anything is actually using this symlink, but it
is consistent with the previous version.

> >* Add fix_spelling_error.patch
> >...

I've updated the .pot file and .po files as well, I believe that should fix it.

>
> This is a translated string, such a change breaks all translations of
> this string.
>
> > Regards,
> > Håvard
>
> cu
> Adrian

Regards,
Håvard



Bug#962091: RFS: xine-ui/0.99.12-1 [QA] -- xine video player, user interface

2020-06-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 08:04:45AM +, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>...
>* d/rules
>  - Change to dh-sequence
>...
>* d/control
>...
>  - Remove unnecessary Depends field
>...

This was necessary, it was just broken by your debian/rules rewrite.
This RC regression can easily be reproduced with aaxine.

For the debian/rules change, please verify that the changed package
does not contain any unexpected changes from the original one.
This means first understanding what the old debian/rules did.
I can immediately find two things that were done in the old debian/rules
but are missing in the new one.

>* Add fix_spelling_error.patch
>...

This is a translated string, such a change breaks all translations of 
this string.

> Regards,
> Håvard

cu
Adrian



Bug#962091: RFS: xine-ui/0.99.12-1 [QA] -- xine video player, user interface

2020-06-03 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xine-ui"

 * Package name: xine-ui
   Version : 0.99.12-1
   Upstream Author : xine-de...@lists.sf.net
 * URL : https://xine-project.org/
 * License : GPL-2+
 * Vcs : None
   Section : video

It builds those binary packages:

  xine-ui - xine video player, user interface (X11 gui)
  xine-console - xine video player, user interface

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/xine-ui

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xine-ui/xine-ui_0.99.12-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * QA upload.
   * New upstream release.
   * Orphan the package see: #881516
   * Update d/watch
   * d/copyright: rewrite using copyright-format 1.0 and add
 some missing attributions
   * d/rules
 - Change to dh-sequence
 - Add hardening options
 - Fix FTCBFS, original patch by Helmut Grohne Closes: #881790
   * d/control
 - Change to debhelper-compat
 - Bump debhelper to 13
 - Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
 - Change to secure URI on homepage
 - Remove Vcs-* fields
 - Add Rules-Requires-Root: no
 - Update short description.
 - Remove unnecessary Depends field
   * Remove unused entry debian/source/include-binaries
   * Split xine-ui.mime into two files.
   * Remove whitespace from d/changelog
   * Add fix_macro_in_manpage.patch
   * Add fix_spelling_error.patch

I'm unsure about the invocation of the postinst script, though the end
result should be correct.

Regards,
Håvard