Re: Built-Using field
Hi! On 21-10-2015 18:02, Santiago Vila wrote: > > See the mp4h package currently in testing for an example. Apart from the example of mp4h also found in the bash package. The bash was specific glibc. Thanks for your help. cheers -- Giovani Ferreira http://softwarelivre.org/jova2 GNU/Linux user: 337388 GPG ID: 2375A66C
Re: Built-Using field
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:05:11PM -0200, Giovani Ferreira wrote: > I'll update the unhide package and I need help. > The package has a serious bug #769345, which is about statically-linked > glibc. According to the bug and Debian policy 7.8 is required the > Built-Using field in d/control. > How should I make this reference? See the mp4h package currently in testing for an example. > Another thing, the package has 4 lintian overrides this same problem. > I'll have to remove it? Yes, if you see that the fixed package without the lintian overrides does not make lintian to complain anymore, then it's ok to remove the overrides.
Built-Using field
Hello mentors, I'll update the unhide package and I need help. The package has a serious bug #769345, which is about statically-linked glibc. According to the bug and Debian policy 7.8 is required the Built-Using field in d/control. How should I make this reference? Another thing, the package has 4 lintian overrides this same problem. I'll have to remove it? regards, -- Giovani Ferreira http://softwarelivre.org/jova2 GNU/Linux user: 337388 GPG ID: 2375A66C
