Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Help with watch file for ecopcr needed

2017-01-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:16:38PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> > Any idea how to properly download the upstream source tarball with
> > uscan?
> 
> could you please try:
> 
> opts=filenamemangle=s/.*\.tar\.gz\?ref=ecopcr_v?(\d\S+)/ecopcr-$1\.tar\.gz/g
> \
>   https://git.metabarcoding.org/obitools/ecopcr/tags?sort=updated_desc
> .*archive\.tar\.gz\?ref=ecopcr_v?(\d\S+)
> 
> This seems to have worked for me, I get a proper orig tarball.

Works - feel free to commit to Git in future cases. :-) 

Thanks

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Help with watch file for ecopcr needed

2017-01-11 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Andreas,

[...]
> Any idea how to properly download the upstream source tarball with
> uscan?

could you please try:

opts=filenamemangle=s/.*\.tar\.gz\?ref=ecopcr_v?(\d\S+)/ecopcr-$1\.tar\.gz/g
\
  https://git.metabarcoding.org/obitools/ecopcr/tags?sort=updated_desc
.*archive\.tar\.gz\?ref=ecopcr_v?(\d\S+)

This seems to have worked for me, I get a proper orig tarball.

Cheers
Sascha



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Help with watch file for ecopcr needed

2017-01-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

upstream of ecopcr has added release tags at my request in their
local gitlab instance.  I think I adapted d/watch[1] accordingly
but when doing

   uscan --verbose --force-download

it just says

uscan info:=> Package is up to date for from
  
https://git.metabarcoding.org/obitools/ecopcr/repository/archive.tar.gz?ref=ecopcr_v0.5.0
uscan info:=> Forcing download as requested
uscan info: Downloading upstream package: /obitools/ecopcr/tags/ecopcr_v0.5.0
uscan info: Requesting URL:
   
https://git.metabarcoding.org/obitools/ecopcr/repository/archive.tar.gz?ref=ecopcr_v0.5.0
uscan info: Successfully downloaded package: /obitools/ecopcr/tags/ecopcr_v0.5.0

... but there is nothing downloaded actually.  I verified that by using
wget sith the URL above the proper archive is downloaded.

Any idea how to properly download the upstream source tarball with
uscan?

Kind regards

  Andreas.

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/ecopcr.git/tree/debian/watch

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: Help with watch file needed

2015-01-29 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl
Thank you Eriberto. That fixed it.

Greetings
Peter

On 01/29/2015 02:56 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
 version=3
 opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg// \
 https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/releases
 .*/archive/LibVNCServer-(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ca8c23.4060...@autistici.org



Help with watch file needed

2015-01-28 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl
Hello!

Can someone help me with the watchfile for the current libvncserver
sourcepackage?

https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libvncserver

I am trying to package a new upstream version, but the current watchfile
cannot download/extract the newest upstream version. I already spend
some time trying to fix it, but honestly I am lost what the problem
could be.

I cloned the available git repository for this package at:
git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/libvncserver.git

When I try a gbp import-orig --uscan, I get the following error output:

gbp:info: Launching uscan...
Could not read
..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz: No such file
or directory at /usr/bin/mk-origtargz line 316.
uscan: error: mk-origtargz --package libvncserver --version 0.9.10
--compression gzip --directory .. --copyright-file debian/copyright
..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz gave error
exit status 2
gbp:error: Uscan failed - debug by running 'uscan --verbose'


uscan --verbose gives this:

-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:

opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//,filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz/libvncserver-$1\.tar\.gz/
https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/tags .*/LibVNCServer-(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
 /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz (0.9.10)
 /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.9.tar.gz (0.9.9)
 /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.2.tar.gz (0.9.8.2)
 /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.1.tar.gz (0.9.8.1)
 /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.tar.gz (0.9.8)
Newest version on remote site is 0.9.10, local version is 0.9.9+dfsg
 (mangled local version number 0.9.9)
 = Newer version available from

https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz
-- Downloading updated package
/LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz
-- Checking for common possible upstream OpenPGP signatures
Could not read
..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz: No such file
or directory at /usr/bin/mk-origtargz line 316.
uscan: error: mk-origtargz --package libvncserver --version 0.9.10
--compression gzip --directory .. --copyright-file debian/copyright
..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz gave error
exit status 2

The current maintainer (cc) seems to be busy. He also filed a RFA bug @
wnpp. I intent to adopt this package and already made some progress, but
I am lost on this.

Thank you and greetings.
Peter


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54c997e4.90...@autistici.org



Re: Help with watch file needed

2015-01-28 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Peter,

My suggestion:

version=3
opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg// \
https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/releases
.*/archive/LibVNCServer-(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz

Take care to use 'releases' instead 'tags' to allow the download.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2015-01-29 0:16 GMT-02:00 Peter Spiess-Knafl p...@autistici.org:
 Hello!

 Can someone help me with the watchfile for the current libvncserver
 sourcepackage?

 https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libvncserver

 I am trying to package a new upstream version, but the current watchfile
 cannot download/extract the newest upstream version. I already spend
 some time trying to fix it, but honestly I am lost what the problem
 could be.

 I cloned the available git repository for this package at:
 git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/libvncserver.git

 When I try a gbp import-orig --uscan, I get the following error output:

 gbp:info: Launching uscan...
 Could not read
 ..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz: No such file
 or directory at /usr/bin/mk-origtargz line 316.
 uscan: error: mk-origtargz --package libvncserver --version 0.9.10
 --compression gzip --directory .. --copyright-file debian/copyright
 ..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz gave error
 exit status 2
 gbp:error: Uscan failed - debug by running 'uscan --verbose'


 uscan --verbose gives this:

 -- Scanning for watchfiles in .
 -- Found watchfile in ./debian
 -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:

 opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//,filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz/libvncserver-$1\.tar\.gz/
 https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/tags .*/LibVNCServer-(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz
 -- Found the following matching hrefs:
  /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz (0.9.10)
  /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.9.tar.gz (0.9.9)
  /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.2.tar.gz (0.9.8.2)
  /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.1.tar.gz (0.9.8.1)
  /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.tar.gz (0.9.8)
 Newest version on remote site is 0.9.10, local version is 0.9.9+dfsg
  (mangled local version number 0.9.9)
  = Newer version available from

 https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz
 -- Downloading updated package
 /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz
 -- Checking for common possible upstream OpenPGP signatures
 Could not read
 ..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz: No such file
 or directory at /usr/bin/mk-origtargz line 316.
 uscan: error: mk-origtargz --package libvncserver --version 0.9.10
 --compression gzip --directory .. --copyright-file debian/copyright
 ..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz gave error
 exit status 2

 The current maintainer (cc) seems to be busy. He also filed a RFA bug @
 wnpp. I intent to adopt this package and already made some progress, but
 I am lost on this.

 Thank you and greetings.
 Peter


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54c997e4.90...@autistici.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJeuSLLq1Wqmo5Sv=uhtaognwuowvoy4_6gmgwacgf-...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-30 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday 29 June 2014 14:22:18 Daniel Lintott wrote:
 I don't know if this is the best method... but it seems to work.
 
 uversionmangle=s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/g

This will break as soon as any field of the version goes beyond 9:
a \d alone does not match '10'.

Given that upstream version begins with v, you may want to do:

uversionmangle=s/(v\d+)-/$1./

This way, uversionmangles deals only with the first field and leave the other 
alone. This is more robust to potential upstream changes.

HTH

-- 
 https://github.com/dod38fr/   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/  -o-   irc: dod at irc.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4985778.Uz3M8EFOYU@ylum



Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:21:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
 
 opts=s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/,filenamemangle=...
  uscan warning: unrecognised option s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/
 ...
  at least with uscan from latest devscripts this does not seem to
  work ...
 
 You are missing the uversionmangle= option name.

yep, my eyes were opened earlier by PM. Stupid me.

However, the filenamemangle problem remains ... and I guess/hope
it was not only a stupid typo of mine.

Thanks for your patience

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140630124428.gc10...@an3as.eu



Help for watch file needed

2014-06-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

I have trouble fixing the watch file for r-other-bio3d at

  Vcs-Svn: 
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/R/r-other-bio3d/trunk/

At first I do not understand why uversionmangle=s/\./-/g does not work:

$ uscan --verbose --report
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   opts=uversionmangle=s/\./-/g 
http://thegrantlab.org/bio3d/download/download-bucket   .*bio3d-v([-.0-9]+)
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
 /bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2-0-1)
 /bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2-0-1)
Newest version on remote site is 2-0-1, local version is 2.0-1
 = remote site does not even have current version
-- Scan finished


Moreover I need some proper fileversionmangle which I failed to add.

Any help would be really appreciated.

Kind regards

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140629094347.gd6...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:43:47AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
 
 At first I do not understand why uversionmangle=s/\./-/g does not work:
 
 $ uscan --verbose --report
 -- Scanning for watchfiles in .
 -- Found watchfile in ./debian
 -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
opts=uversionmangle=s/\./-/g 
 http://thegrantlab.org/bio3d/download/download-bucket   .*bio3d-v([-.0-9]+)
 -- Found the following matching hrefs:
  /bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2-0-1)
  /bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2-0-1)
 Newest version on remote site is 2-0-1, local version is 2.0-1
  = remote site does not even have current version
 -- Scan finished

Hi Andreas,

shouldn't it be s/-/./g instead ?

Cheers,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140629095848.ga22...@falafel.plessy.net



Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-29 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu, 2014-06-29, 11:43:

I have trouble fixing the watch file for r-other-bio3d at

 Vcs-Svn: 
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/R/r-other-bio3d/trunk/

At first I do not understand why uversionmangle=s/\./-/g does not work:


You got it backwards. It should be: uversionmangle=s/-/./g

$ uscan --verbose --report
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
  opts=uversionmangle=s/-/./g 
http://thegrantlab.org/bio3d/download/download-bucket   .*bio3d-v([-.0-9]+)
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
/bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2.0.1)
/bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2.0.1)
Newest version on remote site is 2.0.1, local version is 2.0-1
= Newer version available from
   http://thegrantlab.org/bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1
-- Scan finished


Moreover I need some proper fileversionmangle which I failed to add.


No idea how to do this. (I have USCAN_SYMLINK=rename in my 
~/.devscripts. so I usually don't care about the original filename.) 


--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140629100420.ga2...@jwilk.net



Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jakub

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:04:20PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
 
 You got it backwards. It should be: uversionmangle=s/-/./g

No, I really want to substitute v2-0-1 to 2.0-1 as the
tarball on the download page

   http://thegrantlab.org/bio3d/download/download-bucket

as well as the Debian package are named.
 
 /bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2.0.1)
 /bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2.0.1)
 Newest version on remote site is 2.0.1, local version is 2.0-1
 = Newer version available from

 http://thegrantlab.org/bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1

But that's wrong since 2.0-1 is the latest upstream version and the
download should only happen via --force-download.

 
 Moreover I need some proper fileversionmangle which I failed to add.
 
 No idea how to do this. (I have USCAN_SYMLINK=rename in my
 ~/.devscripts. so I usually don't care about the original filename.)

The problem is that

   uscan --verbose --force-download

ends up in an error and my assumption is that this could / should be
fixed by a proper filenamemangle.

Kind regards

   Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140629130517.gb12...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-29 Thread Daniel Lintott
Hi Andreas,

On 29/06/14 14:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hi Jakub
 
 On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:04:20PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:

 You got it backwards. It should be: uversionmangle=s/-/./g
 
 No, I really want to substitute v2-0-1 to 2.0-1 as the
 tarball on the download page
 

I don't know if this is the best method... but it seems to work.

uversionmangle=s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/g

Regards,

Daniel Lintott



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-29 Thread Gert Wollny
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 15:05 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hi Jakub
 
 On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:04:20PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
  
  You got it backwards. It should be: uversionmangle=s/-/./g
 
 No, I really want to substitute v2-0-1 to 2.0-1 as the
 tarball on the download page

You could leave out the 'g', i.e. uversionmangle=s/-/./
then only the first '-' found is replaced. 

regards, 
Gert 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404048463.5125.1.camel@localhost.localdomain



Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:22:18PM +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote:
 Hi Andreas,
 
 On 29/06/14 14:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
  Hi Jakub
  
  On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:04:20PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
 
  You got it backwards. It should be: uversionmangle=s/-/./g
  
  No, I really want to substitute v2-0-1 to 2.0-1 as the
  tarball on the download page
  
 
 I don't know if this is the best method... but it seems to work.
 
 uversionmangle=s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/g

Hmmm,

$ uscan --verbose --report
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   
opts=s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/,filenamemangle=s/download-bucket.*bio3d-v(.*)$/r-other-bio3d_$1.tar.gz/
 http://thegrantlab.org/bio3d/download/download-bucket   .*bio3d-v([-.0-9]+)
uscan warning: unrecognised option s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
 /bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2-0-1)
 /bio3d/download/download-bucket?download=1:bio3d-v2-0-1 (2-0-1)
Newest version on remote site is 2-0-1, local version is 2.0-1
 = remote site does not even have current version
-- Scan finished


at least with uscan from latest devscripts this does not seem to
work ...


Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140629170428.gf12...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file needed

2014-06-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:

opts=s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/,filenamemangle=...
 uscan warning: unrecognised option s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/
...
 at least with uscan from latest devscripts this does not seem to
 work ...

You are missing the uversionmangle= option name.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/caktje6e6jktxamrehykkjpab67b4-jgfkhqduknmqmeuebc...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

2014-01-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:58:42AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
 It took me some time now, but I have another proposal:
 
 version=3
 opts=downloadurlmangle=s{([\d.]+)$}{$1/ssake_v$1-tar.gz},\
 filenamemangle=s{.+/([\d.]+)$}{ssake_v$1-tar.gz} \
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)
 
 which gives me a ../ssake_v3.8.1-tar.gz
 
 (You could also name it .tar.gz in the course of mangling.)

... which is what I did before uploading.

 Bonne soirée a Paris !

Merci

 Andreas.


-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140119120552.gg29...@an3as.eu



Help for watch file needed for ssake

2014-01-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

the current watch file for ssake fails finding any version.  The reason
is that the upstream download page

   http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases

has dedicated download pages for every single download tarball.  I tried
to fix this using the following watch file

version=3
opts=downloadurlmangle=s/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/
 \
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)


at least is able to detect the versions but I get

 $ uscan --verbose --report
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   
opts=downloadurlmangle=s/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/
  http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/2.0 (2.0)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/2.0 (2.0)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.8.1 (3.8.1)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.8.1 (3.8.1)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.8 (3.8)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.8 (3.8)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.7 (3.7)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.7 (3.7)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.6 (3.6)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.6 (3.6)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.5 (3.5)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.5 (3.5)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.4 (3.4)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.4 (3.4)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.2.1 (3.2.1)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.2.1 (3.2.1)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.2 (3.2)
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/3.2 (3.2)
uscan: In debian/watch, potentially unsafe or malformed downloadurlmangle 
pattern:
  's/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/' found. Skipping 
watchline
  http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)
-- Scan finished


Any help to fix the watch file?

Kind regards

  Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118155513.gf14...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

2014-01-18 Thread Eriberto
A simple solution:

version=3
http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases
.*/ssake/releases/(\d\S*)

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014/1/18 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:

 Any help to fix the watch file?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjeracoh0ptbvggot+3cxjy-s-zk+kcrwg8a-zvgavk...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

2014-01-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Eriberto,

thanks for you quick response,

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 02:04:04PM -0200, Eriberto wrote:
 A simple solution:
 
 version=3
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases
 .*/ssake/releases/(\d\S*)

I tested this but this only drops a single file named

   3.8.1

containing the html code of the download page on my hard disk.

Kind regards

  Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118162035.gh14...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

2014-01-18 Thread Eriberto
Sorry. My last solution is very simplist and doesn't allow downloads.

Please, try it:

version=3
http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)/
ssake_v(\d\S*)-tar.gz

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014/1/18 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:
 A simple solution:

 version=3
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases
 .*/ssake/releases/(\d\S*)

 Cheers,

 Eriberto


 2014/1/18 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:

 Any help to fix the watch file?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJccakFoBSipP1GX9dq2=qybo-9xxnp14nsroegq7qa...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

2014-01-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:55:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:

 version=3
 opts=downloadurlmangle=s/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/
  \
  http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)

 uscan: In debian/watch, potentially unsafe or malformed downloadurlmangle 
 pattern:
   's/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/' found. 
 Skipping watchline
   http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)
 -- Scan finished

The following seems to work:

version=3
opts=downloadurlmangle=s{([\d.]+)$}{$/ssake_v$1-tar.gz}g \
 http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Derek Patton: Bright Grey


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

2014-01-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 06:49:25PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
 On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:55:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
 
  uscan: In debian/watch, potentially unsafe or malformed downloadurlmangle 
  pattern:
's/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/' found. 
  Skipping watchline
http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)
  -- Scan finished
 
 The following seems to work:
 
 version=3
 opts=downloadurlmangle=s{([\d.]+)$}{$/ssake_v$1-tar.gz}g \
  http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)

Hmmm, it just drops the tarball named

   3.8.1

(simply the version number as file name) and I failed to add a proper
filenamemangle statement. :-(  However, this solution has the advantage
that it really prints all available versions (which is not the case in
his suggestion and the renaming / linking to orig.tar.gz is necessary
as well).

Thanks for your patience and greetings from MiniDebConf in Paris

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118225443.ga8...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

2014-01-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:54:43 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:

  The following seems to work:
  
  version=3
  opts=downloadurlmangle=s{([\d.]+)$}{$/ssake_v$1-tar.gz}g \
   http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)
 
 Hmmm, it just drops the tarball named
 
3.8.1
 
 (simply the version number as file name) 

Ouch, sorry, I was deluded by uscan's output which pointed to the
write location.

 and I failed to add a proper
 filenamemangle statement. :-(  

It took me some time now, but I have another proposal:

version=3
opts=downloadurlmangle=s{([\d.]+)$}{$1/ssake_v$1-tar.gz},\
filenamemangle=s{.+/([\d.]+)$}{ssake_v$1-tar.gz} \
http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)

which gives me a ../ssake_v3.8.1-tar.gz

(You could also name it .tar.gz in the course of mangling.)

 Thanks for your patience and greetings from MiniDebConf in Paris

Bonne soirée a Paris !
:)

gregor


-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Dire Straits: Romeo And Juliet


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Need help for watch file

2012-09-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

to enable properly downloading the volview sources I tried the following
watch file:

version=3
opts=\
dversionmangle=s/[~\+]dfsg//,\
downloadurlmangle=s/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc.tar.gz/,\
filenamemangle=s/VolView(-[\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc$1.tar.gz/ \
http://www.kitware.com/products/vvdownload.html \
http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh

$ /usr/bin/uscan --verbose --force-download
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   
opts=dversionmangle=s/[~\+]dfsg//,downloadurlmangle=s/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc.tar.gz/,filenamemangle=s/VolView(-[\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc$1.tar.gz/
 http://www.kitware.com/products/vvdownload.html 
http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
 http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-3.4-Linux-x86_64.sh
 http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-3.4-Linux-x86_64.sh
 http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-3.4-Linux-x86_64.sh
Newest version on remote site is 3.4, local version is 3.4+dfsg
 (mangled local version number 3.4)
 = Package is up to date
Newest version on remote site is 3.4, local version is 3.4+dfsg
 (mangled local version number 3.4)
 = Forcing download as requested
-- Downloading updated package 
http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz
uscan warning: ../http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz 
does not appear to be a compressed file;
the file command says: ERROR: cannot open 
`../http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz' (No such file 
or directory)

Not processing this file any further!
-- Scan finished


If I leave out the filenamemangle option the correct file is downloaded
- but it is named *.sh which is a bit stupid for a tar.gz.  Any hint
(besides bothering upstream ... somebody from kitware in CC - Luis it
would help if you could care for a properly numbered downloadable tarball.)

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120914142133.ga14...@an3as.eu



Re: Need help for watch file

2012-09-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 04:21:33PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
 
 version=3
 opts=\
 dversionmangle=s/[~\+]dfsg//,\
 downloadurlmangle=s/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc.tar.gz/,\
 filenamemangle=s/VolView(-[\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc$1.tar.gz/ \
 http://www.kitware.com/products/vvdownload.html \
 http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh
 
 -- Downloading updated package 
 http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz
 uscan warning: ../http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz 
 does not appear to be a compressed file;
 the file command says: ERROR: cannot open 
 `../http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz' (No such file 
 or directory)
 

Hi Andreas,

the problem here is that uscan sees the file name as:

  http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-3.4-Linux-x86_64.sh

Your filenamemangle regular expression turns it into:

  http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz

A second expression is needed to remove the URL part. With the following,

  
filenamemangle=s/VolView(-[\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc$1.tar.gz/;s|http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/||

Uscan now sees the file name as

  VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz

Have a nice week-end,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120915004102.ga31...@falafel.plessy.net



Re: Need help for watch file

2012-08-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:12:08AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 
 Best ask them to fix that and point them at our upstream guide while
 you are at it:
 
 http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide

Right, but I guess chances are low ...
 
  However, there should be some chance to drain the current version from other
  files on this page.  Any help would be welcome because I failed terribly
  trying to use some mangling options.
 
 This would work but uscan doesn't like the file that gets downloaded:

I fixed this[1] in connection with the proposed uscan changes to enable
deletion of files (see bug #685787).
 
 version=3
 opts=downloadurlmangle=s/MRIConvert_.*/mriconvert_sources.zip/ \
  
 http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/MRIConvert_x86-([\d\.]+-r\d+)\.tar\.gz

Hmmm, I tried this

opts=dversionmangle=s/([\d.]+)\.(\d+)/$1-r$2/,downloadurlmangle=s/MRIConvert_.*/mriconvert_sources.zip/
 \
  
http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/MRIConvert_x86-([\d\.]+-r\d+)\.tar\.gz

which ends up with version 2.0-r235.  I know that dversionmangle is the
wrong approach and it rather should be
   uversionmangle=s/([\d.]+)-r(\d+)/$1.$2/
but if I try this I do not get a match on the given download page.
 
Kind regards

  Andreas.

[1] 
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/tille/devscripts.git;a=commit;h=cc44217883219e7c9bb0875f75aebc4ecec59e63
 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120828092728.ga27...@an3as.eu



Re: Need help for watch file

2012-08-28 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:27:28 Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hmmm, I tried this
 
 opts=dversionmangle=s/([\d.]+)\.(\d+)/$1-r$2/,downloadurlmangle=s/MRIConver
 t_.*/mriconvert_sources.zip/ \
 http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/MRIConvert_x86-([\d\.]+-r\d+)\
 .tar\.gz
 
 which ends up with version 2.0-r235.  I know that dversionmangle is the
 wrong approach and it rather should be
uversionmangle=s/([\d.]+)-r(\d+)/$1.$2/
 but if I try this I do not get a match on the given download page.
 

The following would work with uscan --rename --repack:

##
opts=\
uversionmangle=s/([\d.]+)-r(\d+)/$1.$2/,\
downloadurlmangle=s/MRIConvert_.*/mriconvert_sources.zip/,\
filenamemangle=s/.*/orig.zip/,\
 
http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/MRIConvert_x86-([\d\.]+-r\d+)\.tar\.gz
##

Hack-ish and perhaps ugly but works... 

Indeed the best would be to try convincing upstream to rename source archive...

Cheers,
Dmitry.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Need help for watch file

2012-08-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

the watch file for the mriconvert package[1] is obviosely not working because

   http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/

upstream does not mind numbering its mriconvert_sources.zip sources.
However, there should be some chance to drain the current version from other
files on this page.  Any help would be welcome because I failed terribly
trying to use some mangling options.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

[1] Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/mriconvert/trunk/

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827154738.gf3...@an3as.eu



Re: Need help for watch file

2012-08-27 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:47:38PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hi,
 
 the watch file for the mriconvert package[1] is obviosely not working because
 
http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/
 
 upstream does not mind numbering its mriconvert_sources.zip sources.
 However, there should be some chance to drain the current version from other
 files on this page.  Any help would be welcome because I failed terribly
 trying to use some mangling options.

You could simply write a watch file for one of the binaries that have a version
number.  Then the watch file can be used to track newer upstream releases, not
for downloading the newest source code.

Regards,

Bart Martens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827155850.ga5...@master.debian.org



Re: Need help for watch file

2012-08-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:

 the watch file for the mriconvert package[1] is obviosely not working because

http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/

 upstream does not mind numbering its mriconvert_sources.zip sources.

Best ask them to fix that and point them at our upstream guide while
you are at it:

http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide

 However, there should be some chance to drain the current version from other
 files on this page.  Any help would be welcome because I failed terribly
 trying to use some mangling options.

This would work but uscan doesn't like the file that gets downloaded:

version=3
opts=downloadurlmangle=s/MRIConvert_.*/mriconvert_sources.zip/ \
 
http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/MRIConvert_x86-([\d\.]+-r\d+)\.tar\.gz

Best ask upstream to use a tarball instead of a zip file too.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6f4_7zf2gyp97zbm8iqt_2ovd0r2avaseobxm829mr...@mail.gmail.com



Help with watch file for OBS?

2012-04-14 Thread Paul Elliott

My tarball is on the OBS. I want to write a watch file for it.

My procedure to get the file is:
look in:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=libreoffice-converterproject=LibreOffice:Unstable

For strings that look like:

a 
href=https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/LibreOffice:Unstable/libreoffice-converter/libreoffice-
converter-3.3.tar.bz2?rev=2dffadb97b188c6bc4c0037f1d4c446damp;

The 3.3 is the version number the part that can vary.

?rev=BLAH

must be thrown away to get
https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/LibreOffice:Unstable/libreoffice-converter/libreoffice-converter-3.3.tar.bz2

Which can be downloaded with wget.

My current watch file reads:

version=3

opts=filenamemangle=s/(.*)\?rev=.*/$1/ \
https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=libreoffice-converterproject=LibreOffice:Unstable
 \
https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/LibreOffice:Unstable/libreoffice-converter/libreoffice-converter-(\d\.\d)\.tar\.bz2

It does not find a match.

What am I doing wrong?

If I can get this working, I will post it so everyone can have watch files for 
OBS.



-- 
Paul Elliott   1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com   PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/   Austin TX 78758-3117


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Help with watch file for OBS?

2012-04-14 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:56:19 -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:

 My current watch file reads:
 
 version=3
 
 opts=filenamemangle=s/(.*)\?rev=.*/$1/ \
 https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=libreoffice-converterproject=LibreOffice:Unstable
 \
 https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/LibreOffice:Unstable/libreoffice-converter/libreoffice-converter-(\d\.\d)\.tar\.bz2
 
 It does not find a match.

Add \?rev=.* at the end.

Also, I would suggest to simplify the filenamemangle:

s/\?rev=.*//

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Denoiser: help fro watch file wanted

2011-03-01 Thread Dario Minnucci

Hi Andreas,

On 02/26/2011 09:47 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:22:19AM +0100, Dario Minnucci wrote:
 This is working for me...

 version=3
 opts=dversionmangle=s/([0-9])\.([0-9])\.([0-9])\.([0-9])/$1\.$2$3$4/g \
http://www.microbio.me/denoiser/Denoiser_([.0-9]+)\.tgz \
debian debian/get-orig-source
 
 I agree that this might work for the current latest version, but is
 this save for versions like 0.9 and 0.91?
  

I think remote version numbers like 0.9 or 0.91 are smaller than current 0.851
Which versions numbers are expected from upstream?

$ uscan --report-status
Processing watchfile line for package denoiser...
Newest version on remote site is 0.851, local version is 0.8.5.1
 (mangled local version number 0.851)
 = Package is up to date


A problem will apperars if you get a remote version like 0.8513, the last '3' 
is not handled by
dversionmangle.


Regards,


PS: You can drop the 'g' from the first RE I've posted.


-- 
 Dario Minnucci mid...@debian.org
 Phone: +34 902021030 | Fax: +34 902024417
 Key fingerprint = BAA1 7AAF B21D 6567 D457  D67D A82F BB83 F3D5 7033




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Denoiser: help fro watch file wanted

2011-02-26 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:22:19AM +0100, Dario Minnucci wrote:
 This is working for me...
 
 version=3
 opts=dversionmangle=s/([0-9])\.([0-9])\.([0-9])\.([0-9])/$1\.$2$3$4/g \
http://www.microbio.me/denoiser/Denoiser_([.0-9]+)\.tgz \
debian debian/get-orig-source

I agree that this might work for the current latest version, but is
this save for versions like 0.9 and 0.91?
 
Kind regards

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110226204753.ge31...@an3as.eu



Denoiser: help fro watch file wanted

2011-02-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

I tried to enhance the watch file for denoiser at

   svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/denoiser/trunk/debian

but failed.  I have no idea how to replace the '.' except the first one
in a mangle statement.

Any help is welcome

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110225181308.ga31...@an3as.eu



Re: Denoiser: help fro watch file wanted

2011-02-25 Thread Dario Minnucci

Hi Andreas,

On 02/25/2011 07:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I tried to enhance the watch file for denoiser at
 
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/denoiser/trunk/debian
 
 but failed.  I have no idea how to replace the '.' except the first one
 in a mangle statement.
 
 Any help is welcome
 
 Andreas.
 

This is working for me...

version=3
opts=dversionmangle=s/([0-9])\.([0-9])\.([0-9])\.([0-9])/$1\.$2$3$4/g \
   http://www.microbio.me/denoiser/Denoiser_([.0-9]+)\.tgz \
   debian debian/get-orig-source


$ uscan --report-status
Processing watchfile line for package denoiser...
Newest version on remote site is 0.851, local version is 0.8.5.1
 (mangled local version number 0.851)
 = Package is up to date


Regards,

-- 
 Dario Minnucci mid...@debian.org
 Phone: +34 902021030 | Fax: +34 902024417
 Key fingerprint = BAA1 7AAF B21D 6567 D457  D67D A82F BB83 F3D5 7033




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:53:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
  16 packages use it, there should be none.
 
  May I ask why ?
 
 It should be pretty obvious: less work for Debian and others:
 
 less work for ...
 ...

But more work for package maintainers because these redirectors are
quite useful to keep your watch file simple (and thus less error prone).
For me the reasoning to not have a googlecode redirector while having sf
and githup redirector does not sound logical except if your include all
redirectors in general into this.

 Probably the best
 way to deal with that is to add code to uscan to do add the right opts
 rather than creating redirect sites. It looks like even sf.net could
 now be automatically scanned with the right downloadurlmangle and
 filenamemangle options.

This would be cool because it would make my more work for package
maintainers argument moot by solving your arguments as well.

Kind regards and thanks for the clarification

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100714065338.ga4...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:

 But more work for package maintainers because these redirectors are
 quite useful to keep your watch file simple (and thus less error prone).
 For me the reasoning to not have a googlecode redirector while having sf
 and githup redirector does not sound logical except if your include all
 redirectors in general into this.

Yes, Raphael was saying that all redirectors are bad, not that the
only the googlecode one was bad.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilgmuovmkdm0bbsjdxp51zqop7wgds9qptjq...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:48:52 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:

 David Paleino wrote:
 
  On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:02:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
  
  On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
  
   I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working.
  
  Sounds like Google changed their HTML again, which broke the redirector
  too:
  
  http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/
 
 Please do not continue spreading the use of that redirector. Just because 
 there's one for sourceforge it doesn't mean it is okay to have one for other 
 hosting services. We ideally want *none*.
 
 Also, I never saw a reply to Iustin Pop's email (basically saying nobody had 
 actually contacted google code.)

I don't really remember such a mail, I must've missed it. Going to look back
into the archives.

 Neither a +1 or something to the ticket[1] opened by somebody else.
 
 [1] http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=4042

I replied to #581622 though.

However, trying to stay safe on the right side, I added a comment now.

  I would've had tons of emails from angry users asking why it didn't work,
  if the redirector was actually broken :)
 
 16 packages use it, there should be none.

I'd say patches welcome, but I'm not the uscan maintainer.
Only when uscan will support googlecode out of the box, or Google says it's not
a desired thing, I'll shut the service down.

If Google changes again, I find it better to change code in one place than in
tons of debian/watch files.

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:53:20 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:

 On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org wrote:
  Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 15:48:52, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
   http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/
 
  Please do not continue spreading the use of that redirector. Just because
  there's one for sourceforge it doesn't mean it is okay to have one for
  other  hosting services. We ideally want *none*.
 
  (...)
 
   I would've had tons of emails from angry users asking why it didn't work,
   if the redirector was actually broken :)
 
  16 packages use it, there should be none.
 
  May I ask why ?
 
 It should be pretty obvious: less work for Debian and others:
 
 less work for Debian nameservers

Than explain me why we have wesnoth.*, tinc.*, meetbot.*, joy.* and others.
I don't care for them, but since you believe nameservers are having a hard time
keeping up.../ironic ;)

 [..]
 It does mean more work for Google since they have to inform every
 engineer working on the download stuff of the need to keep URL schemes
 useful for autodownloaders.

Not true, a redirector is meant to change and adhere to the upstream website.
This is, if Google changes again, I'll change the redirector (instead of
maintainers changing debian/watch files).

 There 3 redirectors curently (sf, github, and google code) and all of
 them have been around for a while,

googlecode.debian.net has been around for a bit more than one month, I wouldn't
say that's anything comparable to the time sf and github ones have been up.

 I'm skeptical that any of these systems are going to change for us any time
 soon. Probably the best way to deal with that is to add code to uscan to do
 add the right opts rather than creating redirect sites. It looks like even
 sf.net could now be automatically scanned with the right downloadurlmangle and
 filenamemangle options.

Are you volunteering to make a patch for uscan? ;)

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:31:26AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
 If Google changes again, I find it better to change code in one place than in
 tons of debian/watch files.

Well, 16 (+1 in NEW queue now ;-)) are not really tons.  IMHO the main
advantage of redirectors in general (or equivalently a better uscan) is
that you can fix a change at the target site without any new package
upload.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100714074336.ga7...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:43:36 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

 On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:31:26AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
  If Google changes again, I find it better to change code in one place than
  in tons of debian/watch files.
 
 Well, 16 (+1 in NEW queue now ;-)) are not really tons.

From Apache's access.log files (access_concat is the concatenation of all the
rotated log files):

$ grep GET /p/ access_concat.log | \
 sed -n 's...@.* GET /p/\([^/ ]*\).*HTTP/.* 200 @\1@p' | \
 sort -u | wc -l
88

(I only get URLs which return a 200 HTTP-code, i.e. the package exists in
GoogleCode).

Maybe 16+1 uploaded, and others ready in repositories tracked by PET.
Also, it's being used by Ubuntu folks (I have some uscans with Ubuntu versions
in the log).

It's a hack, but I believe it gives the correct result. I should make
some better stats, I know :)

David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-13 Thread Raphael Geissert
David Paleino wrote:

 On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:02:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 
 On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
 
  I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working.
 
 Sounds like Google changed their HTML again, which broke the redirector
 too:
 
 http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/

Please do not continue spreading the use of that redirector. Just because 
there's one for sourceforge it doesn't mean it is okay to have one for other 
hosting services. We ideally want *none*.

Also, I never saw a reply to Iustin Pop's email (basically saying nobody had 
actually contacted google code.) Neither a +1 or something to the 
ticket[1] opened by somebody else.

[1] http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=4042

 I would've had tons of emails from angry users asking why it didn't work,
 if the redirector was actually broken :)

16 packages use it, there should be none.

Regards,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i1ijfc$k0...@dough.gmane.org



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-13 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 15:48:52, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
  http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/
 
 Please do not continue spreading the use of that redirector. Just because 
 there's one for sourceforge it doesn't mean it is okay to have one for
 other  hosting services. We ideally want *none*.

(...)

  I would've had tons of emails from angry users asking why it didn't work,
  if the redirector was actually broken :)
 
 16 packages use it, there should be none.

May I ask why ?

Romain


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007131728.37748.to...@rastageeks.org



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org wrote:
 Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 15:48:52, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
  http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/

 Please do not continue spreading the use of that redirector. Just because
 there's one for sourceforge it doesn't mean it is okay to have one for
 other  hosting services. We ideally want *none*.

 (...)

  I would've had tons of emails from angry users asking why it didn't work,
  if the redirector was actually broken :)

 16 packages use it, there should be none.

 May I ask why ?

It should be pretty obvious: less work for Debian and others:

less work for Debian nameservers

less work for the person maintaining the redirector

less work for the server hosting the redirector

less points of failure for uscan/DEHS and thus less work for the DEHS
maintainer and uscan users in figuring out failures.

less work for any other distros that do all of the above

It does mean more work for Google since they have to inform every
engineer working on the download stuff of the need to keep URL schemes
useful for autodownloaders.

There 3 redirectors curently (sf, github, and google code) and all of
them have been around for a while, I'm skeptical that any of these
systems are going to change for us any time soon. Probably the best
way to deal with that is to add code to uscan to do add the right opts
rather than creating redirect sites. It looks like even sf.net could
now be automatically scanned with the right downloadurlmangle and
filenamemangle options.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimvbkccbboit1mo4yzcryvluk2df-ot0qgij...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-13 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi,

Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 20:53:20, Paul Wise a écrit :
 It does mean more work for Google since they have to inform every
 engineer working on the download stuff of the need to keep URL schemes
 useful for autodownloaders.

Well, I am not sure they want to allow this as well..

 There 3 redirectors curently (sf, github, and google code) and all of
 them have been around for a while, I'm skeptical that any of these
 systems are going to change for us any time soon. Probably the best
 way to deal with that is to add code to uscan to do add the right opts
 rather than creating redirect sites.

That would be ideal because redirectors can also be a good factorization to 
avoid having the same arcane tricks in every watch file that needs to check a 
major download provider..


Romain


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007132119.53900.to...@rastageeks.org



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-10 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 05:28:57PM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
 version=3
 opts=\
 downloadurlmangle=s|.*[?]name=(.*?).*|http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1|,\
 filenamemangle=s|[^/]+[?]name=(.*?).*|$1| \
 http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/detail[?]name=freediams_([0-9.]+).orig.tar.gz.*

Works.  Thanks

   ANdreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100710161550.ge8...@an3as.eu



Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working.
For FreeDiams I tried

version=3
http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \
  http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/freediams_([.\d]+).*\.tar\.gz

but uscan does not find any matching entry - probably because all this
JavaScript which is now injected in this page.  Some time ago the watch
file worked this way.

Any idea?

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709075820.ga5...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:

 I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working.

Sounds like Google changed their HTML again, which broke the redirector too:

http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimxsxsrcp_kzwkq47dt-cgrmfwcqwnwi_kju...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:58:20AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,

I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working.
For FreeDiams I tried

version=3
http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \
  http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/freediams_([.\d]+).*\.tar\.gz

but uscan does not find any matching entry - probably because all this
JavaScript which is now injected in this page.  Some time ago the watch
file worked this way.

Any idea?

I just did it for irqbalance.

cat debian/watch 
version=3
http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/downloads/list \
.*irqbalance-([\d\.]+).tbz2.*

Kind regards

Cheers!

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread Paul Wise
2010/7/9 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org:

 I just did it for irqbalance.

 cat debian/watch
 version=3
 http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/downloads/list \
 .*irqbalance-([\d\.]+).tbz2.*

You'll need a downloadurlmangle too:

version=3
opts=downloadurlmangle=s_^.*name=([^]*).*_http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1_
\
http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \
.*name=freediams_([\d\.]+)\.orig\.tar\.gz.*

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikmukpa5jl3pzttfund2xbogyhc26poxoz7y...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 06:10:16PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
 I just did it for irqbalance.
 
 cat debian/watch 
 version=3
 http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/downloads/list \
 .*irqbalance-([\d\.]+).tbz2.*

According to this example this works

ersion=3
http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \
  .*freediams_([.\d]+).*\.tar\.gz.*


for *detecting* that there is actually a new version, but it does not
download from the server.  Is this possibly connected to the problem
that upstream names his tarball just orig.tar.gz (I told him not to do
this - but this might take just some more releases ;-))?

Newest version on remote site is 0.4.2., local version is 0.4.0
 = detail already in package directory
-- Scan finished

Thanks for your help anyway

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709083644.ga6...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:13:55PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 You'll need a downloadurlmangle too:
 
 version=3
 opts=downloadurlmangle=s_^.*name=([^]*).*_http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1_
 \
 http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \
 .*name=freediams_([\d\.]+)\.orig\.tar\.gz.*


$ uscan --verbose --verbose
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   
opts=downloadurlmangle=s_^.*name=([^]*).*_http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1_
   http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list 
.*name=freediams_([\d\.]+)\.orig\.tar\.gz.*
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
 detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
 detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gzamp;can=2amp;q=
Newest version on remote site is 0.4.2, local version is 0.4.0
 = detail already in package directory
-- Scan finished


Unfortunately no downloads are happening (but see my last mail
because of the orig.tar.gz naming issue).

Kind regards

 Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709084037.gb6...@an3as.eu



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread Christian Kastner
On 07/09/2010 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working.
 For FreeDiams I tried
 
 version=3
 http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \
   http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/freediams_([.\d]+).*\.tar\.gz
 
 but uscan does not find any matching entry - probably because all this
 JavaScript which is now injected in this page.  Some time ago the watch
 file worked this way.

version=3
opts=\
downloadurlmangle=s|.*[?]name=(.*?).*|http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1|,\
filenamemangle=s|[^/]+[?]name=(.*?).*|$1| \
http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/detail[?]name=freediams_([0-9.]+).orig.tar.gz.*

Taken from #581622 [qa.debian.org] Please provide a code.google.com redirector

Regards,
Christian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c374039.4020...@kvr.at



Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread David Paleino
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:02:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:

 On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
 
  I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working.
 
 Sounds like Google changed their HTML again, which broke the redirector too:
 
 http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/

Nope, it works. You have a typo there:

  http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedforms/

I would've had tons of emails from angry users asking why it didn't work, if
the redirector was actually broken :)

David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-09 Thread David Paleino
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:35:40 +0200, David Paleino wrote:

 On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:02:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
  
   I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working.
  
  Sounds like Google changed their HTML again, which broke the redirector too:
  
  http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/
 
 Nope, it works. You have a typo there:
 
   http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedforms/

(yes, I know, I should make a friendlier Project not found page :))

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-11 Thread Name Name
 This is a good starting point. Using filenamemangle anddownloadurlmangle you 
 can use the above for a working
 watch file. Iattached it. As long as upstreams stays with this scheme 
 (besides it isa dead project), this should
 work.

Thank you for the watch file, Daniel. My primary machine is having some 
technical problems, so I can't test it out right now, but I will include it in 
the next xevil release.

-Brandon



  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-05 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2008, 16:31 -0700 schrieb Brandon:
 Creating a separate script wouldn't really make much sense in my case.
 I was only fixing the watch file as a formality. Upstream is dead, so I
 wouldn't be using it, but it would satisfy projects like dehs, and my
 QA page warns me about my broken watch file.
 
 I think I will just use the watch file that I mentioned in my original
 post. This one:
 version=3
 http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/download.html (.*)/download_stable.shtml

This is a good starting point. Using filenamemangle and
downloadurlmangle you can use the above for a working watch file. I
attached it. As long as upstreams stays with this scheme (besides it is
a dead project), this should work.

Regards, Daniel


watch
Description: application/fluid


Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-03 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080902 22:31]:
 Also, xevil is a dead project. The latest release was years ago, and
 Satan doesn't respond to email. Would you guys recommend not having a
 watch file?

I think especially with dead upstream a watch file is usefull. If
upstream is active and knows you exists or you are on the webpage
from time to time, then you will notice yourself. If upstream just
wakes up, puts a new version and vanishes again then a watch file
is almost the only chance you have to detect it...

Also email addresses often change, sometimes it helps to look for
other projects of the same person to see if there are other addresses
now (sometimes there is even a mailinglist there also dedicated to the
old project but not listed on the old project page directly).

Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
-- 
Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools are available!
Niklaus Wirth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-02 Thread Brandon
I am attempting to write a watch file for my debian package, xevil.

Here is how I would direct a human to find the latest version:
1) Go to: http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/download.html
2) Click on the Stable version link
3) Click on the Xevil link

Here is what I have of my watch file so far:
version=3
http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/download.html (.*)/download_stable.shtml

That is the watch file equivalent to Step 1 and 2 above. Unfortunately,
I don't know how to continue. How do I get subsequent lines to remember
the results of previous lines? Like assigning variables in a script or
program?

The current upstream is:
http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
Unfortunatley, the following watch line won't work:
http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc(*.).zip
because directory listings are (403) forbidden.

Also, xevil is a dead project. The latest release was years ago, and
Satan doesn't respond to email. Would you guys recommend not having a
watch file? Even if so, I would really like to know how I would solve
this problem, if it needed solving. For the future.

-Brandon


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-02 Thread Mauro Lizaur
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008, Brandon wrote:
 The current upstream is:
 http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
 Unfortunatley, the following watch line won't work:
 http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc(*.).zip
 because directory listings are (403) forbidden.
 
 Also, xevil is a dead project. The latest release was years ago, and
 Satan doesn't respond to email. Would you guys recommend not having a
 watch file? Even if so, I would really like to know how I would solve
 this problem, if it needed solving. For the future.
 
 -Brandon

Hi Brandon,
If xevil is a 'dead project' having a watch file that doesn't do anything
isn't very helpful either. Instead consider adding a lintian override or an
empty watch file explaining why the watchfile is missing.

BTW, IANADD, so listen to other opinions before doing something.

Regards,
Mauro

-- 
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lusers.com.ar/
2B82 A38D 1BA5 847A A74D  6C34 6AB7 9ED6 C8FD F9C1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-02 Thread Daniel Moerner
I think your approach to the debian/watch file is sort of off, which
explains why it isn't working.  You want to point it to a webpage
where it can get hrefs that match the given regular expression, so you
want the website to actually be specified as download_stable.shtml.
Something like this basically works and can be fine-tuned with a
better match for the source package:

version=3
http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/2.02r2/download_stable.shtml \
   (.*)\.zip

This complains about the version name but at least works:

-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
  http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/2.02r2/download_stable.shtml  (.*)\.zip
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
dpkg: version 'http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2'
has bad syntax: epoch in version is not number
Newest version on remote site is
http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2, local version is
2.02r2
dpkg: version 'http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2'
has bad syntax: epoch in version is not number
 = Newer version available from
   http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
-- Downloading updated package xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
-- Successfully downloaded updated package xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
-- Scan finished

Cheers,
Daniel Moerner


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-02 Thread Brandon
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 14:25:04 -0700
Daniel Moerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think your approach to the debian/watch file is sort of off, which
 explains why it isn't working.  You want to point it to a webpage
 where it can get hrefs that match the given regular expression, so you
 want the website to actually be specified as download_stable.shtml.
 Something like this basically works and can be fine-tuned with a
 better match for the source package:
 
 version=3
 http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/2.02r2/download_stable.shtml \
(.*)\.zip
 
 This complains about the version name but at least works:
 
 -- Scanning for watchfiles in .
 -- Found watchfile in ./debian
 -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/2.02r2/download_stable.shtml
 (.*)\.zip -- Found the following matching hrefs:
 http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
 dpkg: version 'http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2'
 has bad syntax: epoch in version is not number
 Newest version on remote site is
 http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2, local version is
 2.02r2
 dpkg: version 'http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2'
 has bad syntax: epoch in version is not number
  = Newer version available from
http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
 -- Downloading updated package xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
 -- Successfully downloaded updated package xevilsrc2.02r2.zip
 -- Scan finished
 
 Cheers,
 Daniel Moerner

The watch file you suggest has more problems than you noticed.
1) Did you notice how your watch line actually includes the current
version number? 2.02r2? That won't work for (hypothetical) future
versions.
2) uscan complains about the version name because it is wrong. We can
fix it by using this line instead:
http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/2.02r2/download_stable.shtml \
http://www.xevil.com/download/stable/xevilsrc(.*).zip Unfortunately,
this fix still has the problem of the current version number (2.02r2)
being in the watch file.

The whole reason I'm trouble is because you have to download
http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/download.html in order to know what the
latest version is, and the xevil source archive is not mentioned on
that page.

This would be an easy problem to solve with a script. It would just be
a few lines, and not much hassle. Unfortunately, watch files, being very
simple, seem to be completely unable to solve the partiular instance
where both of the following are true (such as in this case)
1) Directory listings on upstream server are forbidden
2) Source archive is not mentioned in href on page where you find out
the latest version number

I think this problem may be unsolvable, short of creating a new watch
file format (version 4).

-Brandon


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-02 Thread Daniel Moerner
You are correct: my solution obviously doesn't work, since I didn't
read carefully enough.

 This would be an easy problem to solve with a script. It would just be
 a few lines, and not much hassle.

Russ Allbery's blog suggests a get-orig-source debian/rules target
that he uses for packaging his own scripts:

http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/debian/build-tools.html#scripts

I'm not sure if this is kosher with regards to the debian/rules file
of a package meant to go into the actual Debian archive, but it's at
least something to consider if you want to script the grabbing of the
file, which debian/watch of course does not support.

Daniel Moerner


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-02 Thread Brandon
Creating a separate script wouldn't really make much sense in my case.
I was only fixing the watch file as a formality. Upstream is dead, so I
wouldn't be using it, but it would satisfy projects like dehs, and my
QA page warns me about my broken watch file.

I think I will just use the watch file that I mentioned in my original
post. This one:
version=3
http://www.xevil.com/xevil/dev/download.html (.*)/download_stable.shtml

It won't download the latest version (it downloads
download_stable.shtml) But it checks the version just fine. I'll make
a note in the watch file, saying what it can do, what it can't, and why
that should be OK.

Thanks for your help.

If anyone knows how to make my watch file download the correct file,
that would be great. I think it is impossible, though.

I have one more question about watch files. If I were to delete the
watch file (maybe upstream website will be taken down in the future?),
is there anything special I should do to override the missing
watch file warnings? Is there a signal to sites like dehs that a watch
file would be inappropriate for a specific project?

-Brandon


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-02 Thread Ben Finney
Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I have one more question about watch files. If I were to delete the
 watch file (maybe upstream website will be taken down in the future?),
 is there anything special I should do to override the missing
 watch file warnings? Is there a signal to sites like dehs that a watch
 file would be inappropriate for a specific project?

I'm of the opinion that the right solution in such cases is not to
override the warning, but to make the watch file consist entirely of
comments explaining the situation.

DEHS and lintian will both handle that correctly (i.e. not complain),
and DEHS will use the comments as an explanation on the generated web
page.

-- 
 \  The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But |
  `\ the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound |
_o__)  truth. —Niels Bohr |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Need help writing watch file for unusual, troublesome case.

2008-09-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Also, xevil is a dead project. The latest release was years ago, and
 Satan doesn't respond to email. Would you guys recommend not having a
 watch file? Even if so, I would really like to know how I would solve
 this problem, if it needed solving. For the future.

Having dead projects in Debian isn't really a good idea, please fork
the upstream code. I saw the comment at the bottom of this page, you
might want to contact that guy to get him to help out:

http://freshmeat.net/projects/xevil/

Please put it on one of the public project hosting sites
(gna/savannah/sf/launchpad) so it can be more easily hijacked if you
abandon it in the future. Please also use a DVCS like git so that it
is easier for external people to backup the version control history.

Also, you might want to join the Debian Games Team if you haven't
already and maintain the packaging there.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help with watch file -- versions based on different libraries

2008-02-12 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello,

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, I wrote:
 I've been trying to write a watch file for flpsed.

First of all sorry for hijacking the thread.

Secondly, it is amazing how writing down one's problem
makes it clear how to solve it!

 As far as I can see the author's logic for this somewhat bizarre
 numbering is the hope that by the time 0.5.x needs enough revisions
 to cross 0.6, everyone will be using fltk2.x anyway.

Given this logic, I suppose the natural choice for the watch file
would be to use 0.5.* as the pattern that needs to be matched!

Thanks anyway.

Regards,

Kapil.
--



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Help with watch file -- versions based on different libraries

2008-02-12 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello,

I've been trying to write a watch file for flpsed.

The upstream home page is at
http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html

This lists two versions of flpsed based on which version of the
library fltk is being used. Since Debian only has fltk1.1.x at
the moment, I can package only flpsed 0.5.0.

However, any watch file I can cook up prefers 0.6.0 to this version.

As far as I can see the author's logic for this somewhat bizarre
numbering is the hope that by the time 0.5.x needs enough revisions
to cross 0.6, everyone will be using fltk2.x anyway.

Any solutions?

Regards,

Kapil.
--


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Help with watch file -- pre-release upstream versions

2008-02-11 Thread Székelyi Szabolcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leo costela Antunes wrote:
 Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
 What's the usual way of handling preX upstream version numbers in
 watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer
 than 1.0.

 Perhaps mangling the upstream version to use the tilde (~) as a
 separator? But I don't really know if uscan even recognizes it...

Thanks to all, it works this way.

- --
cc


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHsL0XGJRwVVqzMkMRAq/jAJ9FhO+irUtptNuuepW4AxBrgeAD2gCdEOxq
zS0+5kZ1owexjkXz6qqAG/Q=
=QW7T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help with watch file -- pre-release upstream versions

2008-02-11 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, den 11.02.2008, 02:23 +0100 schrieb Székelyi Szabolcs:

 What's the usual way of handling preX upstream version numbers in
 watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer
 than 1.0.

IMO you have two options:

1) Ignore the pre-versions by a rule like

http://domain.tld/foobar-([\d.]+)\.tar\.gz

if you are not going to package pre-releases. This will exclude all
versions including a pre term after the version number.

2) Use a uversionsmnagle:

opts=uversinmangle=s/pre/~pre/ \
  http://domain.tld/foobar-(.+)\.tar\.gz

Regards, Daniel



Help with watch file -- pre-release upstream versions

2008-02-10 Thread Székelyi Szabolcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi mentors,

What's the usual way of handling preX upstream version numbers in
watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer
than 1.0.

Thanks,
- --
cc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHr6OsGJRwVVqzMkMRAkGJAJ9vz5f/dhC35Himh3yVF//w4PLXdQCdGSbo
mZRhO3+yq2PIqkwxA4iNWvQ=
=3dvl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help with watch file -- pre-release upstream versions

2008-02-10 Thread Leo costela Antunes
Hi,

Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
 What's the usual way of handling preX upstream version numbers in
 watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer
 than 1.0.

Perhaps mangling the upstream version to use the tilde (~) as a
separator? But I don't really know if uscan even recognizes it...

Cheers

-- 
Leo costela Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Help with watch file -- pre-release upstream versions

2008-02-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Székelyi Szabolcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 What's the usual way of handling preX upstream version numbers in
 watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer
 than 1.0.

opts=uversionmangle=s/pre/~pre/

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/



Re: Help with watch file

2006-08-05 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello Nelson,

On Sat, 05 Aug 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
 On 8/4/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  So I guess the watch file syntax is correct. Maybe some network
  problem at your side or at ftp.genetics.wustl.edu?
 
 Consider passive mode on/off ?
 
 Yes, it was this.
 Using uscan --pasv --verbose with uscan from Sid and from Sarge it worked.
 
 But why on my system it is not working without --pasv? Everybody else
 (that answered) just used uscan --verbose and it worked...
 Can somebody, please, explain this to me?

Pssobile reasons.

1. You are using an ftp proxy setting for libwww-perl.

2. Your network has a transparent proxy setup.

One way to diagnose what is the problem is to try a standard ftp
client like ftp or ncftp. If that works without passive mode then
it is likely that (1) is the reason.

Hope this helps,

Kapil.
--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help with watch file

2006-08-05 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira

Hi!

On 8/5/06, Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 But why on my system it is not working without --pasv? Everybody else
 (that answered) just used uscan --verbose and it worked...
 Can somebody, please, explain this to me?

2. Your network has a transparent proxy setup.


This one is the guilty! :-)

Thank you very much, Kapil!

Best regards,
Nelson


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Help with watch file

2006-08-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira

Hi mentors!

I have one watch file with the following lines:

version=3
ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz

Doing an uscan --verbose, I get:

$ uscan --verbose
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
  ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
uscan warning: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line
 ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
-- Scan finished

I have tried everything to make this watch file works, but without success :-(

What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP directory, with
files like ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-1.9g.tar.gz?

Thank you very much!

Nelson


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help with watch file

2006-08-04 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
 Hi mentors!
 
 I have one watch file with the following lines:
 
 version=3
 ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
 
 Doing an uscan --verbose, I get:
 
 $ uscan --verbose
 -- Scanning for watchfiles in .
 -- Found watchfile in ./debian
 -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
 uscan warning: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line
  ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
 -- Scan finished
 
 I have tried everything to make this watch file works, but without
 success :-(
 
 What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP directory, with
 files like
 ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-1.9g.tar.gz?
 
 Thank you very much!
 
 Nelson
 
 

Add debian uupdate (without quotes) at the end of the line in the
watch file.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Help with watch file

2006-08-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira

Hi!

On 8/4/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP directory, with
 files like
 ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-1.9g.tar.gz?

Add debian uupdate (without quotes) at the end of the line in the
watch file.


Still not :-(

$ uscan --verbose
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
  ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
debian uupdate
uscan warning: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line
 ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
debian uupdate
-- Scan finished

Nelson


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help with watch file

2006-08-04 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:08:50PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
 Hi!
 
 On 8/4/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP directory, with
  files like
  ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-1.9g.tar.gz?
 
 Add debian uupdate (without quotes) at the end of the line in the
 watch file.
 
 Still not :-(
 
 $ uscan --verbose
 -- Scanning for watchfiles in .
 -- Found watchfile in ./debian
 -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
 debian uupdate
 uscan warning: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line
  ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
 debian uupdate
 -- Scan finished
 
 Nelson
 
Interesting.  Using version=2 or version=3 with uscan on Sarge works
perfectly for me.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Help with watch file

2006-08-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:45:42 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:

 I have one watch file with the following lines:
 
 version=3
 ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
 
 Doing an uscan --verbose, I get:
[..]
 What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP directory, with
 files like ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-1.9g.tar.gz?

Interesting. I just took your exact lines, created a fake
debian/changelog (with version 1.9f-7) and got:

$ uscan --verbose
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
   ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
-- Found the following matching files:
 squid-1.9a.tar.gz
 squid-1.9b.tar.gz
 squid-1.9c.tar.gz
 squid-1.9d.tar.gz
 squid-1.9e.tar.gz
 squid-1.9f.tar.gz
 squid-1.9g.tar.gz
Newest version on remote site is 1.9g, local version is 1.9f
 = Newer version available from
ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-1.9g.tar.gz
-- Downloading updated package squid-1.9g.tar.gz
...

So I guess the watch file syntax is correct. Maybe some network
problem at your side or at ftp.genetics.wustl.edu?


gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
   `-NP: Tom Waits: All the World Is Green


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Help with watch file

2006-08-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.05.0010 +0100]:
 So I guess the watch file syntax is correct. Maybe some network
 problem at your side or at ftp.genetics.wustl.edu?

Consider passive mode on/off ?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
this product is under strict quality contril with perfect packing and
quality when leving the factory.please keep away from damp.high
temperature or sun expose.If found any detectives when purchasing.
please return the productby airmail to our administration section and
inform the time, place.and store of this purchase for our
improvement.We shall give you a satisfactory reply.Thanks for your
patronage and welcome your comments.
 -- http://www.engrish.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Help with watch file

2006-08-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira

Hi!

On 8/4/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So I guess the watch file syntax is correct. Maybe some network
 problem at your side or at ftp.genetics.wustl.edu?

Consider passive mode on/off ?


Yes, it was this.
Using uscan --pasv --verbose with uscan from Sid and from Sarge it worked.

But why on my system it is not working without --pasv? Everybody else
(that answered) just used uscan --verbose and it worked...
Can somebody, please, explain this to me?

Thank you!

Nelson


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]