Re: I would like to renew my request to delay the removal of maitreya from testing.

2014-06-25 Thread Olly Betts
[Cc-ing #749974 since that's the relevant bug]

Thanks for your work on this, Paul.

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:40:15AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
 BUT! I have just checked packages.debian.org and I find that
 libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev which the new version of maitreya will depend on
 is still in experimental!

Uploading libwxsqlite3 to unstable would start the transition, so we're
currently waiting for the reverse dependencies to be ready.  Since
codelite has been ready for while, that means we're waiting for
guayadeque and ... you.

There's a partial patch from dmn for guayadeque, but no maintainer
response so far.

 Even if it were released to unstable
 immeadiately, it would take at least 10 days, by my understanding, for
 it to reach testing, and then 10 days for maitreya to follow.

As Niels says, the default urgency is now medium, which means 5 days,
and both packages could age concurrently rather than consecutively,
so it could actually just be 5 days if both were uploaded
simultaneously.

As he also says, the timer gets reset if you post a status update to
the ticket.

 I plan to grab the source for libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev from
 testing and see if I can get it to build under unstable.
  ^experimental?

You should just be able to build maitreya in an unstable chroot
set up to use experimental for packages which can't be provided by
unstable (due to a versioned BD or unstable not having the package).
Exactly how to set that up depends on what tool you're using to do the
building in a clean chroot.

Cheers,
Olly


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140625070423.gl8...@survex.com



I would like to renew my request to delay the removal of maitreya from testing.

2014-06-24 Thread Paul Elliott
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:04:28PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
 On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:45:19AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
  Is there any way the removal of maitreya from testing
  can be delayed until after the new version of sqlite3
  becomes available in unstable?
 
 That shouldn't be a concern - the autorm is 4 weeks off, and there are
 only 3 dependent packages in the wxsqlite3 transition.  And looking at
 the buildd status for wxsqlite3 for experimental, I see the updated
 package has built everywhere but sparc, and sparc is not currently taken
 into account for testing migration, so it looks ready to me.
 
 Laszlo: Are you ready for an upload to unstable when we get a go from
 the release team?  If so, we should file a transition bug (I'm happy to
 file it on your behalf if that gets things moving along more
 efficiently).
 
 Paul: I've now filed the wxwidgets3.0 transition bug for maitreya which 
 I promised you in a previous mail in this thread.  It looks like there
 are a few changes needed for wxwidgets3.0 support (I included a partial
 patch).
 

The package upstream has just finished updating the package and
I am now working to use that new upstream release which
has been modified to use wxwidgets3.0. It should not take
long if I do not run into problems.

BUT! I have just checked packages.debian.org and I find that
libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev which the new version of maitreya will depend on
is still in experimental! Even if it were released to unstable
immeadiately, it would take at least 10 days, by my understanding, for
it to reach testing, and then 10 days for maitreya to follow.

Therefore, I would like to request additional delay to sometime
after libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev reaches testing. As matters
now stand there is no way I can reach the deadline of 
-- maitreya 7.0.5-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-06-28 --
due to factors outside of my control!


I plan to grab the source for libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev from
testing and see if I can get it to build under unstable.

I then should be able to test my new version of maitreya,
but even if all this works, I still will have to wait till it
actually reaches unstable before I can ask Jaldhar H. Vyas to
upload.

Thank You for considering my request.


 Cheers,
 Olly

-- 
Paul Elliott   1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com   PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/   Austin TX 78758-3117
---
Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto systems are one
of the few things that you can rely on. Unfortunately, endpoint
security is so terrifically weak that NSA can frequently find ways
around it. Edward Snowden


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: I would like to renew my request to delay the removal of maitreya from testing.

2014-06-24 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-06-25 07:40, Paul Elliott wrote:
 [...]
 
 Therefore, I would like to request additional delay to sometime
 after libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev reaches testing. As matters
 now stand there is no way I can reach the deadline of 
 -- maitreya 7.0.5-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-06-28 --
 due to factors outside of my control!
 
 [...]
 
 Thank You for considering my request.
 

Send a status update to #749974.  It will reset the timer.

Also, when you close the bug in an upload, the timer will be reset.
Provided the new version is not stalled considerably beyond the normal
migration delay, it should make it well before the timer.

Finally, the default urgency for package updates is medium.  So unless
you choose low yourself[1], the delay is only 5 days.

~Niels

[1] Or use dch from stable and don't correct it.  It is too old to know
about this rule.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aa62a0.1030...@thykier.net