Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
Charles Plessy wrote: Dear Mentors, I was just wondering if there was a tool accsssible to non-DDs, that would allow to get the list of packages that have been uploaded more than 10 days ago, but never built on a given architecture. I am about to write an email to the buildd admin of mips and mipsel to ask for my packages to be built but before I would like to see if I am just unlucky, or if this is a more general dysfunctioning. What about checking on http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=PACKAGE ? Have a nice day, Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
On 05/02/2008, Charles Plessy wrote: I was just wondering if there was a tool accsssible to non-DDs, that would allow to get the list of packages that have been uploaded more than 10 days ago, d-d-c might help? but never built on a given architecture. Not that I know. You probably want to check the queues on buildd.net, which should give you an overview of the state of each port. I am about to write an email to the buildd admin of mips and mipsel to ask for my packages to be built but before I would like to see if I am just unlucky, or if this is a more general dysfunctioning. mipsel has a huge backlog, and ISTR that mips too. Nothing related to your particular packages, I'd say. Remarks based on some packages of mine, and of some packages I've been more or less tracking during the last weeks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgp9lOxcHxyNs.pgp Description: PGP signature
List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
Dear Mentors, I was just wondering if there was a tool accsssible to non-DDs, that would allow to get the list of packages that have been uploaded more than 10 days ago, but never built on a given architecture. I am about to write an email to the buildd admin of mips and mipsel to ask for my packages to be built but before I would like to see if I am just unlucky, or if this is a more general dysfunctioning. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian-Med packaging team Wakō, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
Hi On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:38:29 +0900 Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just wondering if there was a tool accsssible to non-DDs, that would allow to get the list of packages that have been uploaded more than 10 days ago, but never built on a given architecture. I am about to write an email to the buildd admin of mips and mipsel to ask for my packages to be built but before I would like to see if I am just unlucky, or if this is a more general dysfunctioning. You mean something like these: http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=mipselstate=Needs-Build http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=mipsstate=Needs-Build So you can see you are not alone :-). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
[CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], because the problem has not been raised there yet.] Charles Plessy wrote: I was just wondering if there was a tool accsssible to non-DDs, that would allow to get the list of packages that have been uploaded more than 10 days ago, but never built on a given architecture. I am about to write an email to the buildd admin of mips and mipsel to ask for my packages to be built but before I would like to see if I am just unlucky, or if this is a more general dysfunctioning. Le Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:46:20PM -0600, Raphael Geissert a écrit : What about checking on http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=PACKAGE ? Le Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:46:43AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : mipsel has a huge backlog, and ISTR that mips too. Nothing related to your particular packages, I'd say. Remarks based on some packages of mine, and of some packages I've been more or less tracking during the last weeks. Le Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:49:09AM +0900, Michal Čihař a écrit : You mean something like these: http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=mipselstate=Needs-Build http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=mipsstate=Needs-Build So you can see you are not alone :-). Hi all, thanks for all your ansers. At the beginning I thought that the problem was that the buildds were ignoring some packages, but finally it is only seems that they are not keeping up. So in conclusion, we have nothing else to do than hoping that the buildds will restart keeping up some day, or is it time to ask on debian-release that packages not up to date on these arches are allowed to migrate in testing anyway ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wakō, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:09:21AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
So in conclusion, we have nothing else to do than hoping that the
buildds will restart keeping up some day, or is it time to ask on
debian-release that packages not up to date on these arches are allowed
to migrate in testing anyway ?
Or you could look for a suitable mips machine that could be used to
help the existing buildd's!
I did ask around here but no one seemed to have one.
(Off-topic, but anyway...)
Having a mipsel machine would help with debugging many things as
well. For example, the most recent are:
lam FTBFSing on mipsel due to a gcc bug:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=lamver=7.1.2-1.1arch=mipselstamp=1202167930file=logas=raw
lapack FTBFSing on mips due to a mysterious reason:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=lapackver=3.1.1-0.2arch=mipsstamp=1202168381file=logas=raw
If I get enough money later in life, I'm definitely buying one of
these machines, _just_ for testing out stuff and doing a dput/dupload
of packages built on them. Would look awesome to stand apart with a
mips(el) or s390 upload, when others are doing only
source+{i386,amd64}. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
Hello, On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote: So in conclusion, we have nothing else to do than hoping that the buildds will restart keeping up some day, or is it time to ask on debian-release that packages not up to date on these arches are allowed to migrate in testing anyway ? Or you could look for a suitable mips machine that could be used to help the existing buildd's! I did ask around here but no one seemed to have one. Regards, Kapil. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
lam FTBFSing on mipsel due to a gcc bug:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=lamver=7.1.2-1.1arch=mipselstamp=1202167930file=logas=raw
Enjoy 4.3 series… An IMHO interesting test would be trying to get it
built with 4.2.
lapack FTBFSing on mips due to a mysterious reason:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=lapackver=3.1.1-0.2arch=mipsstamp=1202168381file=logas=raw
Maybe killed from outside, not necessarily a compiler error like the
first one.
If I get enough money later in life, I'm definitely buying one of
these machines, _just_ for testing out stuff and doing a
dput/dupload of packages built on them.
Porter machines could help, anyway. Depending on the architectures,
there are some of them available (at least for DDs). Some nice people
even offer access to their architectures to mere contributors (hppa,
kfreebsd-*, for example).
Would look awesome to stand apart with a mips(el) or s390 upload,
when others are doing only source+{i386,amd64}. :-)
You're forgetting powerpc uploads anyway. :p
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpAudAZWrfYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
(Removing CC to debian-mips, as your last mail got the point across).
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:01:55AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
lam FTBFSing on mipsel due to a gcc bug:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=lamver=7.1.2-1.1arch=mipselstamp=1202167930file=logas=raw
Enjoy 4.3 series... An IMHO interesting test would be trying to get it
built with 4.2.
While I'd love to, this is a job for Debian (mips) man!. What I mean
is, someone has to do this on a machine and tell me if this is a
regression (since doko has ruled out the possiblity of GCC 4.2 being
the preferred build toolchain component, we have confirm that it's a
regression).
lapack FTBFSing on mips due to a mysterious reason:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=lapackver=3.1.1-0.2arch=mipsstamp=1202168381file=logas=raw
Maybe killed from outside, not necessarily a compiler error like the
first one.
Possible, since it doesn't look like this:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=lapackarch=s390ver=3.0.2531a-1.2stamp=1202005519file=logas=raw
That is outright mysterious, though the blame goes on gcc
there. Again, this (according to knowledgeable people) is a gcc
bug. doko is working on fixing it (or working around it temporarily).
If I get enough money later in life, I'm definitely buying one of
these machines, _just_ for testing out stuff and doing a
dput/dupload of packages built on them.
Porter machines could help, anyway. Depending on the architectures,
there are some of them available (at least for DDs). Some nice people
even offer access to their architectures to mere contributors (hppa,
kfreebsd-*, for example).
True. And another thing I wish to place on record is my appreciation
and gratitude to the porters who help keep a mammoth distribution sane
on so many architectures.
Would look awesome to stand apart with a mips(el) or s390 upload,
when others are doing only source+{i386,amd64}. :-)
You're forgetting powerpc uploads anyway. :p
Accepted; I've seen a few people do that. But an esoteric (from my
POV) architecture would be too cool! :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote: (Removing CC to debian-mips, as your last mail got the point across). Well, that was on purpose… Enjoy 4.3 series... An IMHO interesting test would be trying to get it built with 4.2. While I'd love to, this is a job for Debian (mips) man!. What I mean is, someone has to do this on a machine and tell me if this is a regression (since doko has ruled out the possiblity of GCC 4.2 being the preferred build toolchain component, we have confirm that it's a regression). … since I'd bet it's more likely to have a subscriber of -mips than a subscriber of -mentors be able to do so, that's why I replied with a cross-post. You might want to try [EMAIL PROTECTED], but looks to me you might have more chance by asking the -mips subscribers. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgpmx7ObiBLxq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:21:24AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote: (Removing CC to debian-mips, as your last mail got the point across). Well, that was on purpose... I know, and that was the right thing. Enjoy 4.3 series... An IMHO interesting test would be trying to get it built with 4.2. While I'd love to, this is a job for Debian (mips) man!. What I mean is, someone has to do this on a machine and tell me if this is a regression (since doko has ruled out the possiblity of GCC 4.2 being the preferred build toolchain component, we have confirm that it's a regression). ... since I'd bet it's more likely to have a subscriber of -mips than a subscriber of -mentors be able to do so, that's why I replied with a cross-post. You might want to try [EMAIL PROTECTED], but looks to me you might have more chance by asking the -mips subscribers. I am thankful to you for doing so, which is why I said you got the point across (to the right people). :-) Just to confirm, is it considered all right to mail debian-port for help on debugging architecture specific problems? I guess people who listen wouldn't mind helping out, would they? Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
