Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package) (Second try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-02-06 21:40, Daniel Echeverry wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-5 of my package 9menu. It builds these binary packages: 9menu - Creates X menus from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu/9menu_1.8-5.dsc Fix comment from DACA[1] new service [1]:http://qa.debian.org/daca/cppcheck/sid/9menu_1.8-4.html I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards daniel echeverry Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian and sorry for the wait. :) ~Niels -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNUBb8AAoJEAVLu599gGRCn8EP/2U4FJPp+PhK/rZydrox9TMI /qAjqkTR25yk1OTYjSeMSXN2OCK9dXJsUNia3tnlu71eopD5ss/Hm2d+4gm+u2DB ScF8jVqQYaZ1xJytQB2RmYdbqWquA3YPRhaOcA1FJnucHzYD/4L0vDEPRLuZ60Qt J4kVXo/jo2bvAiAvI1mtx8X6FkN7R3m5fR7pj6CWzeNZGig0i2bW/tR6nKAl6AA0 qAt22EWQXlwK40OvQh/NHaNq+sdbq8cHI0MzmydCjhgzo78ATW4Abl6zanwmyRCP 9/Tst8EGQWw3qrdhRYfDRnaH2QPi0kCOJ8rARyCtBJgJQYWGqdu4P4fznhscmg+p T/OROAX4FdUp6yRHQS6u1EP8i8yKs8s3kupu/WH/k8faFqh+U5p5nJlggEXgf3Du vj3HhGVu5AyaNQEGW5SlXupLeHXtUWS9nTfIPzucSu3jjNdEd3tT594Mv0VsEgNT OZMH81t9h2S7+upsIFhN5Nz2QnEGyzduBkyLgi2WdeXmuZbe3vqxJJX9hcCWu+qR uZIRSUoXYPHYNQAPUxtFATnULqJl3gI/Nxxzf1iAaifkbrsBodRSTNPZmwDgb35x 0koSM70unHzyUs+un3ewTWjWXOlgjdHHmGysHqw1Q0xAJbWIfttRMJHUkT7qd7Z+ hZuJ1yI9AqHESTcwf16q =h8ul -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5016fc.7040...@thykier.net
RFS: 9menu (updated package) (Second try)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-5 of my package 9menu. It builds these binary packages: 9menu - Creates X menus from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu/9menu_1.8-5.dsc Fix comment from DACA[1] new service [1]:http://qa.debian.org/daca/cppcheck/sid/9menu_1.8-4.html I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards daniel echeverry -- Epsilon http://www.rinconinformatico.net http://www.fitnessdeportes.com http://www.dragonjar.org Linux user: #477840 Debian user -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin6crc_3waqvzaezvkhvjznj5exjmyozrkmq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)
Hi, · Does the README provide any information relevant to the user that is not already provided elsewhere (e.g. in the copyright file)? If not, it should not be installed. I think that the README file is very important in any package, the README file has important descriptive information and explain what each file does But is this true for this package's README file? The paragraph describing the program is included in both the package description and the man page as well, the list of files is not relevant: with one exception (two with README) they are not included in the binary package. And the license is already included in the copyright file. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hg9cb0j@marvin.43-1.org
Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)
On 19/11/10 15:29, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, · Does the README provide any information relevant to the user that is not already provided elsewhere (e.g. in the copyright file)? If not, it should not be installed. I think that the README file is very important in any package, the README file has important descriptive information and explain what each file does But is this true for this package's README file? The paragraph describing the program is included in both the package description and the man page as well, the list of files is not relevant: with one exception (two with README) they are not included in the binary package. And the license is already included in the copyright file. OK, remove the 9menu.docs. Please check out again: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu/9menu_1.8-4.dsc Regards Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ce6e98a.20...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)
Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com writes:
OK, remove the 9menu.docs. Please check out again:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu/9menu_1.8-4.dsc
Uploaded with one minor change (chmod -x debian/{patches,format}/*;
somehow this sneaked in with the last upload).
Thanks for your work :-)
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y68pasvo@marvin.43-1.org
Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)
Hi, epsilon epsilo...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-4 of my package 9menu. Some comments: · Does the README provide any information relevant to the user that is not already provided elsewhere (e.g. in the copyright file)? If not, it should not be installed. · The older patches still have a dpatch header. It would be nice if they instead had an informative header similar to the one in your patch 06_Imakefile.diff. · About the changelog entries: Please do not just mention which files you touched (that can be seen in the diff), but describe a bit what (and why) you changed something. Especially group things you write by changes, not by file names: * Do not link with Xext: we do not use it. - Remove libxext-dev from Build-Depends. - New patch: 06_Imakefile.diff is more informative than * debian/control + Removed libxext-dev in B-D, it's not necessary * debian/patches/06_Imakefile.diff + Added, to fix dpkg-shlibdeps: warning where other people have to find the connection themselves. (Same for the switch from override_* targets to files in debian/.) Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zktcryd8@marvin.43-1.org
Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)
Hi! · Does the README provide any information relevant to the user that is not already provided elsewhere (e.g. in the copyright file)? If not, it should not be installed. I think that the README file is very important in any package, the README file has important descriptive information and explain what each file does · The older patches still have a dpatch header. It would be nice if they instead had an informative header similar to the one in your patch 06_Imakefile.diff. Done! · About the changelog entries: Please do not just mention which files you touched (that can be seen in the diff), but describe a bit what (and why) you changed something. Especially group things you write by changes, not by file names: * Do not link with Xext: we do not use it. - Remove libxext-dev from Build-Depends. - New patch: 06_Imakefile.diff is more informative than * debian/control + Removed libxext-dev in B-D, it's not necessary * debian/patches/06_Imakefile.diff + Added, to fix dpkg-shlibdeps: warning where other people have to find the connection themselves. (Same for the switch from override_* targets to files in debian/.) Done! Please Checkout: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu/9menu_1.8-4.dsc Regards Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ce0d9ec.3030...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)
Hi, epsilon wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-4 of my package 9menu. It builds these binary packages: 9menu - Creates X menus from the shell You can further simplify your debian/rules file by letting debhelper know what to do through files in debian/ instead of overrides. For example, instead of overriding dh_clean, you can list additional files to be removed in debian/clean. Same thing for dh_installman and dh_installdocs. Cheers, -- Benoît Knecht -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101113142557.gd3...@debian.lan
RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-4 of my package 9menu. It builds these binary packages: 9menu - Creates X menus from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu/9menu_1.8-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards daniel echeverry http://www.rinconinformatico.net
