Bug#960972: RFS: cellwriter/1.3.6-2 [QA] -- grid-entry handwriting input panel
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cellwriter" * Package name: cellwriter Version : 1.3.6-2 Upstream Author : Michael Levin * URL : https://github.com/risujin/cellwriter * License : GPL-2+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/cellwriter Section : gnome It builds those binary packages: cellwriter - grid-entry handwriting input panel To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/cellwriter Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cellwriter/cellwriter_1.3.6-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. . [ Debian Janitor ] * Trim trailing whitespace. * Bump debhelper from old 11 to 12. * Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Submit, Repository. * Fix day-of-week for changelog entries 1.3.4-1, 1.3.3-1, 1.3.1-1, 1.3.0-1. . [ Sudip Mukherjee ] * Fix FTBFS with gcc-10. (Closes: #957075) * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0 * Update compat level to 13. -- Regards Sudip
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 20:12:56 -0300 Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And it's not necessary to have Encoding=UTF-8 in cellwriter.desktop. That may come back and bite you if cellwriter.desktop contains translated strings (as it should). $ desktop-file-validate desktop/gpe-expenses.desktop desktop/gpe-expenses.desktop: error: required key Encoding not found I would recommend reinstating the Encoding line and testing all future desktop files with desktop-file-validate, part of desktop-file-utils. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpSjIJr8oqk5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Hi! On 9/9/07, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And it's not necessary to have Encoding=UTF-8 in cellwriter.desktop. I would recommend reinstating the Encoding line and testing all future desktop files with desktop-file-validate, part of desktop-file-utils. Isn't it deprecated? http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/1.0/apc.html Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
I modified the source a bit to make it compile in Etch and built with cowbuilder for this upload (1.0.2-1). On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 22:43 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: # Add here any variable or target overrides you need. As a suggestion, remove this line. Done. It's not necessary to install README (this info is already on the package description and on the manpage). AUTHORS is also included on debian/copyright, so I don't see a need to install it too. It's a GNU standard to have it, so why not? I've actually just added some information to the README which isn't mentioned anywhere else. I strongly recommend to you create a debian/menu file. Done. All the files inside your tarball have the execution bit set. It's not need to have all the files executable (just a suggestion for your next release). An unfortunate side-effect of compiling on a FAT partition (I dual boot). I've recompiled on an EXT3 and hopefully set all the permissions correctly this time. And I have tested cellwriter and it's not working :-( While training its input, the letters don't get darker with training. Any ideas why it's happening? It would be unusual for there to be a bug there. The letters get darker gradually, it's not very noticeable. When you draw a letter, you must move the mouse out of the box so that the ink disappears. If you train the program this way, click Finish, write something and your input isn't recognized, it still doesn't mean that the training is broken. If you draw an input character that is very different from the training samples, CellWriter will reject it. Most often this happens when someone trains a character by drawing it twice without moving the pointer out of the box (so the program expects you to draw that character twice this way every time!) or if you put a dot where there shouldn't be one on accident. -- Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Hi! On 9/8/07, Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not necessary to install README (this info is already on the package description and on the manpage). AUTHORS is also included on debian/copyright, so I don't see a need to install it too. It's a GNU standard to have it, so why not? I've actually just added some information to the README which isn't mentioned anywhere else. There is no problem in installing README and AUTHORS. It's just not necessary to install a README that contains instructions to compile and install the program (since the user will get a package ready to use, without needing to compile, install, etc), right? The same thing with AUTHORS. The content of this file is already included on debian/copyright. You will just get duplicated data if you install it. I strongly recommend to you create a debian/menu file. Done. Section of your menu file should be Applications/Accessibility And it's not necessary to have Encoding=UTF-8 in cellwriter.desktop. And I have tested cellwriter and it's not working :-( While training its input, the letters don't get darker with training. Any ideas why it's happening? It would be unusual for there to be a bug there. The letters get darker gradually, it's not very noticeable. When you draw a letter, you must move the mouse out of the box so that the ink disappears. Hum... I see no ink when I draw anything on the boxes :-/ Does it need something from Gnome to work properly? (I am using Window Maker). I have tried compiling it with --disable-gnome, but nothing seems to change. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 20:12 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: There is no problem in installing README and AUTHORS. It's just not necessary to install a README that contains instructions to compile and install the program (since the user will get a package ready to use, without needing to compile, install, etc), right? I agree but this is default behavior for Automake and I haven't found a way to turn it off. Section of your menu file should be Applications/Accessibility Done. I should point out that I was using what appears to be an outdated (year old?) policy manual that needs updating: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/ch2.html And it's not necessary to have Encoding=UTF-8 in cellwriter.desktop. Done. Hum... I see no ink when I draw anything on the boxes :-/ Does it need something from Gnome to work properly? (I am using Window Maker). I have tried compiling it with --disable-gnome, but nothing seems to change. I can think of two possible issues: 1) XInput is not supported? 2) Your Window Manager won't give motion/button events to a window that refuses focus GTK allows the creation of GtkWindows that do not grab focus. For CellWriter, this is critical because it needs to generate keystrokes to send out to a different window you have in focus. Possibly your window manager doesn't give CellWriter the events it needs to function. CellWriter works on Metacity and XFWM. I will download a few different window managers and see if others have issues. I'll look for a workaround but in the meantime, I don't think this issue should prevent the upload of the package. CellWriter is positioned as a kind of GNOME utility anyway, you use a custom WM at your own risk. :| -- Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 20:12 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: Hum... I see no ink when I draw anything on the boxes :-/ Does it need something from Gnome to work properly? (I am using Window Maker). I have tried compiling it with --disable-gnome, but nothing seems to change. Hmm. I seem to have placed the blame on Window Maker too early. I just ran it and CellWriter worked fine. Can you give me any more hints to go on? -- Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Hi Michael! Your package looks good. There are only 3 small things that you may want to do (or you can do them on a latter version of your package). On 9/8/07, Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 20:12 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: There is no problem in installing README and AUTHORS. It's just not necessary to install a README that contains instructions to compile and install the program (since the user will get a package ready to use, without needing to compile, install, etc), right? I agree but this is default behavior for Automake and I haven't found a way to turn it off. You don't need to remove them from your source package. You can just not install them. With CDBS you need to use this in debian/rules, after the includes: DEB_INSTALL_DOCS_ALL := TODO Then CDBS will only install the TODO file (leaving README and AUTHORS without being installed, for example). I should point out that I was using what appears to be an outdated (year old?) policy manual that needs updating: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/ch2.html The latest version of lintian will catch this old menu format. You can also read /usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz, from menu package version 2.1.35 And it's not necessary to have Encoding=UTF-8 in cellwriter.desktop. Done. It's not wrong to modify a file directly (like you did with cellwriter.desktop), but it's good to keep all your changes inside the debian/ dir. If you need to modify a file, you can patch it (using dpatch, quilt, simple-patch-system, or something else that you like). And the last thing is change command=cellwriter to command=/usr/bin/cellwriter in your debian/menu file. If you want to fix debian/rules to install only the necessary docs, use a patch system (for cellwriter.desktop) and change the menu file, then perfect. Otherwise I can upload the package if you don't want to change them now (as I said before, your package isn't wrong if you don't change this). (I will reply the other email only to you as debian-mentors isn't the place to we talk about this, OK?) Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06/09/2007): You know, that bugs can be merged? I got an email from BTS saying the two reports were merged by someone already. However, they both still show up in the bugs list and I'm not sure which bug number they were merged into so I'm leaving the ChangeLog as is. They are merged, fullstop. No “master” bug or “duplicates”, just close both in the changelog and you're done. You don't even need to close both. Just close whichever one you feel like closing and the other will be closed as well. Don Armstrong -- [A] theory is falsifiable [(and therefore scientific) only] if the class of its potential falsifiers is not empty. -- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ §21 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Hi Michael! On 9/7/07, Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, your debian/copyright is basically empty and (maybe) you need to review debian/rules. Fixed the copyright. The rules file works fine as far as I can tell. I know that it's working, but I only asked because of this line on debian/rules: # Add here any variable or target overrides you need. As a suggestion, remove this line. It's not necessary to install README (this info is already on the package description and on the manpage). AUTHORS is also included on debian/copyright, so I don't see a need to install it too. I strongly recommend to you create a debian/menu file. All the files inside your tarball have the execution bit set. It's not need to have all the files executable (just a suggestion for your next release). And I have tested cellwriter and it's not working :-( While training its input, the letters don't get darker with training. Any ideas why it's happening? Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Thanks for taking a look at my package. On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 13:03 +1000, Paul Wise wrote: Firstly, please make a non-native package (diff.gz and orig.tar.gz instead of just a tar.gz). Done. Please file an intent to package bug and close it in the changelog: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l1 Accidentally filed two (#441087, #441088) but the changelog closes both of them. Looks like you forgot to build-depend on x11proto-xext-dev. I was missing a dependency on libxtst-dev, it should build now. As upstream, you should fix these gcc warnings: Done. I've reuploaded the package with these changes. -- Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Michael Levin wrote: Accidentally filed two (#441087, #441088) but the changelog closes both of them. You know, that bugs can be merged? Regards, Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Hi Michael! On 9/6/07, Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've reuploaded the package with these changes. You are using a different source code than the original one (md5sum of them): abfc4789241a09b14a99f27f7d5c5566 cellwriter-1.0.0.tar.gz d1dad3e165314efe605469e015548820 cellwriter_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz You just need to get your cellwriter-1.0.0.tar.gz and rename it as cellwriter_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz Generally nothing else is needed. Also, your debian/copyright is basically empty and (maybe) you need to review debian/rules. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06/09/2007): You know, that bugs can be merged? I got an email from BTS saying the two reports were merged by someone already. However, they both still show up in the bugs list and I'm not sure which bug number they were merged into so I'm leaving the ChangeLog as is. They are merged, fullstop. No “master” bug or “duplicates”, just close both in the changelog and you're done. The order matters when one uses the “forcemerge” command, though. -- Cyril Brulebois pgpJu3Fpipp2h.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:29 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: Michael Levin wrote: Accidentally filed two (#441087, #441088) but the changelog closes both of them. You know, that bugs can be merged? I got an email from BTS saying the two reports were merged by someone already. However, they both still show up in the bugs list and I'm not sure which bug number they were merged into so I'm leaving the ChangeLog as is. On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 15:56 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: You are using a different source code than the original one (md5sum of them): abfc4789241a09b14a99f27f7d5c5566 cellwriter-1.0.0.tar.gz d1dad3e165314efe605469e015548820 cellwriter_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz Uploaded the updated source as 1.0.1 so now the original source and the tarball on the website match up. Also, your debian/copyright is basically empty and (maybe) you need to review debian/rules. Fixed the copyright. The rules file works fine as far as I can tell. -- Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:47 -0500, Michael Levin wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package cellwriter. * Package name: cellwriter Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : me * URL : http://risujin.org * License : GPL Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: cellwriter - grid-entry handwriting input panel The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cellwriter - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cellwriter/cellwriter_1.0.0.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Sorry about bumping this but since there hasn't been any reply for two weeks I wanted to ask for a sponsor again. Debian currently has no handwriting recognition software in it's repositories. CellWriter would be the first such program and would help Tablet PC users to run Debian. Some kind Ubuntu users can attest to the quality of the program: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=489808page=2 Could someone upload my package please? -- Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On 9/6/07, Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cellwriter/cellwriter_1.0.0.dsc Could someone upload my package please? Firstly, please make a non-native package (diff.gz and orig.tar.gz instead of just a tar.gz). Please file an intent to package bug and close it in the changelog: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l1 Your package fails to build in a clean chroot (I tried in cowbuilder): cc -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -DPKGDATADIR=\/usr/share/cellwriter\ -g -Wall -O2 -o cellwriter main.o window.o unix.o cellwidget.o recognize.o stroke.o options.o averages.o wordfreq.o preprocess.o -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXrender -lXinerama -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXfixes -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lX11 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lbonobo-2 -lbonobo-activation -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lORBit-2 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lm unix.o: In function `key_event_send_bksp': /tmp/buildd/cellwriter-1.0.0/src/unix.c:250: undefined reference to `XTestFakeKeyEvent' unix.o: In function `type_key': /tmp/buildd/cellwriter-1.0.0/src/unix.c:59: undefined reference to `XTestFakeKeyEvent' /tmp/buildd/cellwriter-1.0.0/src/unix.c:60: undefined reference to `XTestFakeKeyEvent' unix.o: In function `key_event_send': /tmp/buildd/cellwriter-1.0.0/src/unix.c:206: undefined reference to `XTestFakeKeyEvent' /tmp/buildd/cellwriter-1.0.0/src/unix.c:209: undefined reference to `XTestFakeKeyEvent' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [cellwriter] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/cellwriter-1.0.0' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/cellwriter-1.0.0' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package Looks like you forgot to build-depend on x11proto-xext-dev. Please check your package builds in a clean chroot before asking for a sponsor (use sbuild/pbuilder/cowbuilder/qemubuilder or for that). As upstream, you should fix these gcc warnings: src/cellwidget.c: In function 'pack_cells': src/cellwidget.c:544: warning: 'break_j' may be used uninitialized in this function src/cellwidget.c:544: note: 'break_j' was declared here src/preprocess.c: In function 'greedy_map': src/preprocess.c:84: warning: 'best_j' may be used uninitialized in this function src/preprocess.c:84: warning: 'last_j' may be used uninitialized in this function src/preprocess.c:82: warning: 'penalty' may be used uninitialized in this function src/preprocess.c:82: warning: 'best_value' may be used uninitialized in this function src/preprocess.c:82: warning: 'best_reach' may be used uninitialized in this function Thankyou for creating this software and for packaging it for Debian. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: cellwriter
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package cellwriter. * Package name: cellwriter Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : me * URL : http://risujin.org * License : GPL Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: cellwriter - grid-entry handwriting input panel The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cellwriter - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cellwriter/cellwriter_1.0.0.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards -- Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:47 -0500, Michael Levin wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package cellwriter. Just some /really/ small points: * debian/copyright doesn't contain where you downloaded the tarball from. * debian/dirs is no longer needed. * debian/control has a format for homepage URLs, which is *two* spaces then Homepage: http://www.example.com/; * debian/docs isn't strictly necessary as the filenames specified will get installed by default, but I'm just being picky here! Other than that the _packaging_ looks alright. -- Jonny Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 22:38 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote: * debian/copyright doesn't contain where you downloaded the tarball from. Because I didn't download it from anywhere. :) I don't want to break the mold though, I'll add that part back in. * debian/control has a format for homepage URLs, which is *two* spaces then Homepage: http://www.example.com/; I can't find mention of this in either the Policy or the New Maintainer's guide, how is that supposed to look? Does that go in the description or is that one of the control lines (if so, why two spaces in front of it..?) Other than that the _packaging_ looks alright. Thanks for taking a look. -- Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
Nice to see how I sent the wrong email :-( Hi! On 8/21/07, Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 22:38 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote: * debian/control has a format for homepage URLs, which is *two* spaces then Homepage: http://www.example.com/; I can't find mention of this in either the Policy or the New Maintainer's guide, how is that supposed to look? Does that go in the description or is that one of the control lines (if so, why two spaces in front of it..?) The homepage *recommendation* is available here: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-upstream-info It isn't mandatory to use two spaces followed by Homepage: http://somesite I have the impression that when we say You need to use this on your package, people (mainly new people) think that this is the correct thing to do (while there isn't (yet) a consensus about the homepage field). People looking at this will think that it's needed to use this format, while in fact it isn't. It's just a recommendation. There is nothing saying Use like this because all other formats are wrong. There is a recent discussion about this topic here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/08/msg00805.html In short: it's not wrong to use Homepage with one space, or use URL or whatever. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:12:46AM +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 17:37 -0500, Michael Levin wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 22:38 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote: * debian/control has a format for homepage URLs, which is *two* spaces then Homepage: http://www.example.com/; I can't find mention of this in either the Policy or the New Maintainer's guide, how is that supposed to look? Does that go in the description or is that one of the control lines (if so, why two spaces in front of it..?) Mm, I've tried to find the mailing list post *I* first read it in lots of times, but have always failed. It's not policy, but I think most do Well it may have been me (perhaps earlier than these). http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/12/msg00059.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/12/msg00084.html Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: cellwriter
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 00:12 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
Package: cellwriter
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: grid-entry handwriting input panel
CellWriter is a grid-entry natural handwriting input panel.
As you write characters into the cells, your writing is instantly
recognized at the character level. When you press 'Enter' on the panel,
the input you entered is sent to the currently focused application as
if typed on the keyboard.
.
* Writer-dependent, learns your handwriting for reliable recognition
* Correcting preprocessor algorithms account for digitizer noise,
differing stroke order, direction, and number of strokes
* Unicode support enables you to write in your native language
.
Homepage: http://risujin.org/cellwriter
Okay, I've made the changes and reuploaded the package. I suppose it's
still an open question whether the _program_ itself is following Debian
guidelines.
Is my package ready for a sponsor?
--
Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
