Re: RFS: command-not-found
Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:46:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear mentors, [..] It builds these binary packages: command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactive bash sessions command-not-found-data - Set of data files for command-not-found I just built and installed it. There is some funny whitespace in between the messages: === $ inetd Command 'inetd' is available in '/usr/sbin/inetd' The command could not be located because '/usr/sbin' is not i ncluded in the PATH environment variable. This is most likely caused by the lack of administ rative priviledges associated with your user account. bash: inetd: command not found === i ncluded - included administ rative - administrative priviledges - privileges Fixed. I would like to merge the fix. Do you maintain the package is some version control system? We use bzr so it might be a good fit for you too to make merging easy. Did you talk to the Ubuntu maintainer already? Perhaps it make sense to join forces so that only one package is built? He's CCed, so: mvo: What's your opinion? I would really like to, but this can only work if we have a seperate command-not-found-data source package because the mapping of binary-package will differ from ubuntu to debian (even if it is only a very minor difference in most cases). As far as policy concerns, while it is not terribly common for -data packages to have sperate source packages, it is entriely allowable. The main package can (assuming no differenced in Debian/Ubuntu policies) can automatically migrate from debian unstable (or however that system works), or have the same packed re-uploaded to Ubuntu. One potential inconvience is that users are likely to report bugsd on the wrong package in the BTS in some cases (main package wehn the bug is in the data package), but that is not really a problem. Bugs can be re-assigned fairly easily. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: command-not-found
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:46:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear mentors, [..] It builds these binary packages: command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactive bash sessions command-not-found-data - Set of data files for command-not-found I just built and installed it. There is some funny whitespace in between the messages: === $ inetd Command 'inetd' is available in '/usr/sbin/inetd' The command could not be located because '/usr/sbin' is not i ncluded in the PATH environment variable. This is most likely caused by the lack of administ rative priviledges associated with your user account. bash: inetd: command not found === i ncluded - included administ rative - administrative priviledges - privileges Fixed. I would like to merge the fix. Do you maintain the package is some version control system? We use bzr so it might be a good fit for you too to make merging easy. Did you talk to the Ubuntu maintainer already? Perhaps it make sense to join forces so that only one package is built? He's CCed, so: mvo: What's your opinion? I would really like to, but this can only work if we have a seperate command-not-found-data source package because the mapping of binary-package will differ from ubuntu to debian (even if it is only a very minor difference in most cases). Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: command-not-found
Justin Pryzby wrote: How does it compare with auto-apt? This a shell-only implementation whereas auto-apt will find things which are accessed otherwise (perhaps not bad). command-not-found is very similar to auto-apt check, but command-not-found is easier and targeted at the end user. And it gives more detailed output, like instructions on how to install the package. -- Julian Andres Klode IRC Nickname: juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode) Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049) Debian Wiki:http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode Ubuntu Wiki:http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode In Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~juliank Packages Overv: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Languages: German, English, [bit French] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: command-not-found
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package command-not-found. * Package name: command-not-found Version : 0.2.4+debian-1 Upstream Author : Zygmunt Krynicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : https://launchpad.net/command-not-found * License : GPL Section : admin It builds these binary packages: command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactive bash sessions command-not-found-data - Set of data files for command-not-found The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 418613 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/command-not-found - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/command-not-found/command-not-found_0.2.4+debian-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Julian Andres Klode -- Julian Andres Klode IRC Nickname: juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode) Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049) Debian Wiki:http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode Ubuntu Wiki:http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode In Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~juliank Packages Overv: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Languages: German, English, [bit French] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: command-not-found
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package command-not-found. * Package name: command-not-found Version : 0.2.4+debian-1 Upstream Author : Zygmunt Krynicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : https://launchpad.net/command-not-found * License : GPL Section : admin Not sure. Perhaps shell as a section might match better. It builds these binary packages: command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactive bash sessions command-not-found-data - Set of data files for command-not-found I just built and installed it. There is some funny whitespace in between the messages: === $ inetd Command 'inetd' is available in '/usr/sbin/inetd' The command could not be located because '/usr/sbin' is not i ncluded in the PATH environment variable. This is most likely caused by the lack of administ rative priviledges associated with your user account. bash: inetd: command not found === i ncluded - included administ rative - administrative priviledges - privileges Did you talk to the Ubuntu maintainer already? Perhaps it make sense to join forces so that only one package is built? Christoph -- Peer review means that you can feel better because someone else missed the problem, too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: command-not-found
Christoph Haas wrote: On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package command-not-found. * Package name: command-not-found Version : 0.2.4+debian-1 Upstream Author : Zygmunt Krynicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : https://launchpad.net/command-not-found * License : GPL Section : admin Not sure. Perhaps shell as a section might match better. It builds these binary packages: command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactive bash sessions command-not-found-data - Set of data files for command-not-found I just built and installed it. There is some funny whitespace in between the messages: === $ inetd Command 'inetd' is available in '/usr/sbin/inetd' The command could not be located because '/usr/sbin' is not i ncluded in the PATH environment variable. This is most likely caused by the lack of administ rative priviledges associated with your user account. bash: inetd: command not found === i ncluded - included administ rative - administrative priviledges - privileges Fixed. Did you talk to the Ubuntu maintainer already? Perhaps it make sense to join forces so that only one package is built? He's CCed, so: mvo: What's your opinion? -- Julian Andres Klode IRC Nickname: juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode) Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049) Debian Wiki:http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode Ubuntu Wiki:http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode In Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~juliank Packages Overv: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Languages: German, English, [bit French] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: command-not-found
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package command-not-found. * Package name: command-not-found Version : 0.2.4+debian-1 Upstream Author : Zygmunt Krynicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : https://launchpad.net/command-not-found * License : GPL Section : admin It builds these binary packages: command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactive bash sessions How does it compare with auto-apt? This a shell-only implementation whereas auto-apt will find things which are accessed otherwise (perhaps not bad). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
