Bug#670064: marked as done (RFS: dylandotnet/11.2.9.2-1 [ITP] -- dylandotnet compiler)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:08:56 -0600 with message-id 87wr2fmdfr@marvin.43-1.org and subject line Re: RFS: dylandotnet/11.2.9.2-1 [ITP] -- dylandotnet compiler has caused the Debian Bug report #670064, regarding RFS: dylandotnet/11.2.9.2-1 [ITP] -- dylandotnet compiler to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 670064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670064 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dylandotnet * Package name: dylandotnet Version : 11.2.9.2-1 Upstream Author : Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com * URL : http://launchpad.net/dylandotnet * License : LGPL+3 Section : cli-mono It builds those binary packages: dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET compiler for CLI 2.0. dylandotnet-dev - These are the dylan.NET development tools. dylandotnet-doc - This is the dylan.NET documentation. dylandotnet4 - This is the dylan.NET compiler for CLI 4.0. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dylandotnet Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.9.2-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: dylandotnet (11.2.9.2-1) experimental; urgency=low * (Closes:626078) -- Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com Sun, 21 Apr 2012 18:57:04 +0100 Regards, Dylan Borg -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers precise-updates APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, 'precise-proposed'), (500, 'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic-pae (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- I'm closing this request as there hasn't been any follow-up on my earlier mail asking for more information. Ansgar ---End Message---
Bug#670064: RFS: dylandotnet/11.2.9.2-1 [ITP] -- dylandotnet compiler
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dylandotnet * Package name: dylandotnet Version : 11.2.9.2-1 Upstream Author : Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com * URL : http://launchpad.net/dylandotnet * License : LGPL+3 Section : cli-mono It builds those binary packages: dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET compiler for CLI 2.0. dylandotnet-dev - These are the dylan.NET development tools. dylandotnet-doc - This is the dylan.NET documentation. dylandotnet4 - This is the dylan.NET compiler for CLI 4.0. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dylandotnet Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.9.2-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: dylandotnet (11.2.9.2-1) experimental; urgency=low * (Closes:626078) -- Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com Sun, 21 Apr 2012 18:57:04 +0100 Regards, Dylan Borg -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers precise-updates APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, 'precise-proposed'), (500, 'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic-pae (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120422173115.21730.34847.reportbug@ubuntu-server
Bug#670064: RFS: dylandotnet/11.2.9.2-1 [ITP] -- dylandotnet compiler
tag 670064 + moreinfo block 626078 with 670064 Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com writes: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.9.2-1.dsc Half of the comments from [1] still seem to apply to the current package. In addition there are many file in the upstream tarball that should not be there such as backup copies or log files. Also the following is not a useful changelog entry: dylandotnet (11.2.9.2-1) experimental; urgency=low * (Closes:626078) -- Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com Sun, 21 Apr 2012 18:57:04 +0100 Please take a look at section 6.3 of the developer reference[2]. Please also read the part about the package description (6.2.1-3). Is the language the compiler is written for used anywhere? Regards, Ansgar [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/08/msg00554.html [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/index.en.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vhniddf@eisei.43-1.org
Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#670064: RFS: dylandotnet/11.2.9.2-1 [ITP] -- dylandotnet compiler
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 670064 + moreinfo Bug #670064 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: dylandotnet/11.2.9.2-1 [ITP] -- dylandotnet compiler Added tag(s) moreinfo. block 626078 with 670064 Bug #626078 [wnpp] ITP: dylandotnet -- This is the dylan.NET compiler. 626078 was not blocked by any bugs. 626078 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 626078: 670064 Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com writes: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.9.2-1.dsc Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Half of the comments from [1] still seem to apply to the current Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. package. In addition there are many file in the upstream tarball that Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. should not be there such as backup copies or log files. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 626078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626078 670064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670064 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133513544121570.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
RFS: dylandotnet
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dylandotnet. * Package name: dylandotnet Version : 11.2.7.4-2 Upstream Author : Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com * URL : https://launchpad.net/dylandotnet * License : GPL-3+ Section : cli-mono To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dylandotnet Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.7.4-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Dylan Borg
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
* Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com, 2011-08-22, 08:36: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dylandotnet Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.7.4-2.dsc Something is wrong with .orig.tar.gz: $ dpkg-source -x *.dsc gpgv: Signature made Fri Aug 19 23:23:42 2011 CEST using RSA key ID 696A439C gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on ./dylandotnet_11.2.7.4-2.dsc dpkg-source: error: File ./dylandotnet_11.2.7.4.orig.tar.gz has size 344 instead of expected 3697578 I suspect that this is a mentors.debian.net bug. :/ -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110822102450.gb2...@jwilk.net
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22.08.2011 12:24, Jakub Wilk wrote: I suspect that this is a mentors.debian.net bug. :/ Right, but that's only half of the story. Dylan did not upload any orig.tar.gz, so Mentors tried to fetch it from the Debian repository (which is a more or less useless hack I think), but failed as well. For some reasons the HTTP response code reply was hence threatened as Tarball. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUjKZAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxFgP/0Hqge3opJgBoHEmgurWrqZ9 Fezse33ukZXgTGIwbFJXuVOybKfMyF99GkE1po9RoCV9wTQSONtMnNDcmynTeOpj dAEcbwhizGCwLc692XmBAXQEabNXPBHila57DpaK7pg1BrY3qJeExiQ8cPVXWrx7 ensCKL6GGTxqXtBCwkgVBGN6fVS7mIcrJPCLUQ8kawecNtWZgEGBw00ZdEbeOLU/ FYYxi6rbdR6HUnoAE7z7y+iA29xvkayHZpmbjfYHxN6NUWSqbYZAGjux2VcYjE1U he/geBq9MWsEo6pK2+zuYV7Pah9Hmda09FGunzHYv/GokwLjgpvqW97uwAuYydk2 fc6Re7GnsgkNS4HifCRy9C8KM6OWqQt8DRvLn16uPNFetf21v5SN5lqM8CS7WrBo XbgZELUMDT4FbFk7G2sagbpRxou/6sINJoxop866bdgLEzCwkSQPiU9yrZ/xKgKq johcy1JIiM9LntgUYzuQp+KSWsQ0JcOG0dnGv7fLSEWARobiQKCMue7wlfwD0aSF mN5pNkvMSXWrYK2l4Jh/BcEc7QVdrmQzUWuyRz3p1p/27WJwoFla30MNe6+Wu9wC bCB+PRecZc9idTIrJuB9prK1s8azjrLSyCHuVCRafmYSRPV800u80ufGA0gfx3TE SHwEGkZHY6E+R+fdLY9N =26HQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e523299.50...@toell.net
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
The dput command did not put up the orig.tar.gz. Could this be because I did a PPA upload beforehand? Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:42:33 +0200 From: deb...@toell.net To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: dylandotnet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22.08.2011 12:24, Jakub Wilk wrote: I suspect that this is a mentors.debian.net bug. :/ Right, but that's only half of the story. Dylan did not upload any orig.tar.gz, so Mentors tried to fetch it from the Debian repository (which is a more or less useless hack I think), but failed as well. For some reasons the HTTP response code reply was hence threatened as Tarball. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUjKZAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxFgP/0Hqge3opJgBoHEmgurWrqZ9 Fezse33ukZXgTGIwbFJXuVOybKfMyF99GkE1po9RoCV9wTQSONtMnNDcmynTeOpj dAEcbwhizGCwLc692XmBAXQEabNXPBHila57DpaK7pg1BrY3qJeExiQ8cPVXWrx7 ensCKL6GGTxqXtBCwkgVBGN6fVS7mIcrJPCLUQ8kawecNtWZgEGBw00ZdEbeOLU/ FYYxi6rbdR6HUnoAE7z7y+iA29xvkayHZpmbjfYHxN6NUWSqbYZAGjux2VcYjE1U he/geBq9MWsEo6pK2+zuYV7Pah9Hmda09FGunzHYv/GokwLjgpvqW97uwAuYydk2 fc6Re7GnsgkNS4HifCRy9C8KM6OWqQt8DRvLn16uPNFetf21v5SN5lqM8CS7WrBo XbgZELUMDT4FbFk7G2sagbpRxou/6sINJoxop866bdgLEzCwkSQPiU9yrZ/xKgKq johcy1JIiM9LntgUYzuQp+KSWsQ0JcOG0dnGv7fLSEWARobiQKCMue7wlfwD0aSF mN5pNkvMSXWrYK2l4Jh/BcEc7QVdrmQzUWuyRz3p1p/27WJwoFla30MNe6+Wu9wC bCB+PRecZc9idTIrJuB9prK1s8azjrLSyCHuVCRafmYSRPV800u80ufGA0gfx3TE SHwEGkZHY6E+R+fdLY9N =26HQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e523299.50...@toell.net
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
Does anyone have any idea why dput is always omiting the orig.tar.gz file during upload. I have tried to rebuild the source package but the original is still omitted from upload. Could the fact the orig.tar.gz was uploaded elsewhere be stopping further uploads of it? Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 From: borgdy...@hotmail.com To: deb...@toell.net; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: RFS: dylandotnet Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:31:41 +0200 The dput command did not put up the orig.tar.gz. Could this be because I did a PPA upload beforehand? Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:42:33 +0200 From: deb...@toell.net To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: dylandotnet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22.08.2011 12:24, Jakub Wilk wrote: I suspect that this is a mentors.debian.net bug. :/ Right, but that's only half of the story. Dylan did not upload any orig.tar.gz, so Mentors tried to fetch it from the Debian repository (which is a more or less useless hack I think), but failed as well. For some reasons the HTTP response code reply was hence threatened as Tarball. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUjKZAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxFgP/0Hqge3opJgBoHEmgurWrqZ9 Fezse33ukZXgTGIwbFJXuVOybKfMyF99GkE1po9RoCV9wTQSONtMnNDcmynTeOpj dAEcbwhizGCwLc692XmBAXQEabNXPBHila57DpaK7pg1BrY3qJeExiQ8cPVXWrx7 ensCKL6GGTxqXtBCwkgVBGN6fVS7mIcrJPCLUQ8kawecNtWZgEGBw00ZdEbeOLU/ FYYxi6rbdR6HUnoAE7z7y+iA29xvkayHZpmbjfYHxN6NUWSqbYZAGjux2VcYjE1U he/geBq9MWsEo6pK2+zuYV7Pah9Hmda09FGunzHYv/GokwLjgpvqW97uwAuYydk2 fc6Re7GnsgkNS4HifCRy9C8KM6OWqQt8DRvLn16uPNFetf21v5SN5lqM8CS7WrBo XbgZELUMDT4FbFk7G2sagbpRxou/6sINJoxop866bdgLEzCwkSQPiU9yrZ/xKgKq johcy1JIiM9LntgUYzuQp+KSWsQ0JcOG0dnGv7fLSEWARobiQKCMue7wlfwD0aSF mN5pNkvMSXWrYK2l4Jh/BcEc7QVdrmQzUWuyRz3p1p/27WJwoFla30MNe6+Wu9wC bCB+PRecZc9idTIrJuB9prK1s8azjrLSyCHuVCRafmYSRPV800u80ufGA0gfx3TE SHwEGkZHY6E+R+fdLY9N =26HQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e523299.50...@toell.net
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com wrote: Does anyone have any idea why dput is always omiting the orig.tar.gz file during upload. I have tried to rebuild the source package but the original is still omitted from upload. Could the fact the orig.tar.gz was uploaded elsewhere be stopping further uploads of it? Is it's debian version greater then 1? If it is, it will use -1's orig.tar.gz, so you don't have to keep uploading it, since the upstream version is the same. Last I knew, anyway. Someone feel free to correct me :) Paul Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 From: borgdy...@hotmail.com To: deb...@toell.net; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: RFS: dylandotnet Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:31:41 +0200 The dput command did not put up the orig.tar.gz. Could this be because I did a PPA upload beforehand? Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:42:33 +0200 From: deb...@toell.net To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: dylandotnet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22.08.2011 12:24, Jakub Wilk wrote: I suspect that this is a mentors.debian.net bug. :/ Right, but that's only half of the story. Dylan did not upload any orig.tar.gz, so Mentors tried to fetch it from the Debian repository (which is a more or less useless hack I think), but failed as well. For some reasons the HTTP response code reply was hence threatened as Tarball. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUjKZAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxFgP/0Hqge3opJgBoHEmgurWrqZ9 Fezse33ukZXgTGIwbFJXuVOybKfMyF99GkE1po9RoCV9wTQSONtMnNDcmynTeOpj dAEcbwhizGCwLc692XmBAXQEabNXPBHila57DpaK7pg1BrY3qJeExiQ8cPVXWrx7 ensCKL6GGTxqXtBCwkgVBGN6fVS7mIcrJPCLUQ8kawecNtWZgEGBw00ZdEbeOLU/ FYYxi6rbdR6HUnoAE7z7y+iA29xvkayHZpmbjfYHxN6NUWSqbYZAGjux2VcYjE1U he/geBq9MWsEo6pK2+zuYV7Pah9Hmda09FGunzHYv/GokwLjgpvqW97uwAuYydk2 fc6Re7GnsgkNS4HifCRy9C8KM6OWqQt8DRvLn16uPNFetf21v5SN5lqM8CS7WrBo XbgZELUMDT4FbFk7G2sagbpRxou/6sINJoxop866bdgLEzCwkSQPiU9yrZ/xKgKq johcy1JIiM9LntgUYzuQp+KSWsQ0JcOG0dnGv7fLSEWARobiQKCMue7wlfwD0aSF mN5pNkvMSXWrYK2l4Jh/BcEc7QVdrmQzUWuyRz3p1p/27WJwoFla30MNe6+Wu9wC bCB+PRecZc9idTIrJuB9prK1s8azjrLSyCHuVCRafmYSRPV800u80ufGA0gfx3TE SHwEGkZHY6E+R+fdLY9N =26HQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e523299.50...@toell.net -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cao6p2qsugynoyqfefvw3aiczteixidzardcsfpwk3mndtmu...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, and Dylan, On 22.08.2011 16:11, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Is it's debian version greater then 1? If it is, it will use -1's orig.tar.gz, so you don't have to keep uploading it, since the upstream version is the same. yes, that's the problem. Dylan is trying to upload an increased Debian revision (last upload was a -4). dpkg-genchanges does not include the orig.tar.gz in such cases unless you explicitly force dpkg-buildpackage to do so (give it -sa). Maybe we should refuse such uploads as the old mentors did as well. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUmTHAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtjQUP/iWx9ZKN11lM47TWVYdCLZF6 J8TYNHjJlMajSl+ae0le8NP4To/xwvgMr6U/Dv4CqjqOwYw2WaW4fa2hJOrIu/42 0oveUeYfQwuLtnOad4aqwt0QBrhYmr02yMm/UTPPwWY8vnNDPbWeWAtGvRoOsmN5 VVJKzIukUAR3FG/UyK0yi3uos7G6Uyg+fP9C8sqNlgKpuQE2R7OtMsbAzJVzW9OO U/9daiZzk4NCX8iPjIUGtFa1+EroepxhO+xWbS1iGmgikaE2O4RNZfkRbXsC/dZL x8FnqysZzOvBe2T58XAaUMOydAvbGNp3u9i2CRwpL8OM5uw2bEYwHeO8+Fdxe926 o6++MFd6Es2k2PS3h0G0+4Lk1KIl6E8Ri3ZebfaeS7pY+0UYj2yac94xPlR2AKGU XQYH7JsVmPy/yZeTAHIM3bp4TDvVah2fL17z5wpn8fZawuaYIsiDpkOQtp4yogsO wMGcok//r0oJ101zq/n2RXxfDIXKtVW5W9KH4C7SDnYydtZlc2wtH6Waf2iRG+Gb Bn6htVRbDMi0yCr/tP4/kGPLgS2jql4mo5gmllSAnxqScRZHP4HZbxVJuxSnwtbn Wfsrsh9prWfyEib7buJy+6IXLvEAqnxR0xpGQzgsC75kK2YY553lQSFkX+i72RXB MMhmqpX+88GgE8nYeoeQ =50VB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5264c7.3050...@toell.net
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
The -1 orig tarball was not uploaded to debian mentors but to another server. So for the current version it should upload it. Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 From: paul...@ubuntu.com Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:11:59 -0400 Subject: Re: RFS: dylandotnet To: borgdy...@hotmail.com CC: deb...@toell.net; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com wrote: Does anyone have any idea why dput is always omiting the orig.tar.gz file during upload. I have tried to rebuild the source package but the original is still omitted from upload. Could the fact the orig.tar.gz was uploaded elsewhere be stopping further uploads of it? Is it's debian version greater then 1? If it is, it will use -1's orig.tar.gz, so you don't have to keep uploading it, since the upstream version is the same. Last I knew, anyway. Someone feel free to correct me :) Paul Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 From: borgdy...@hotmail.com To: deb...@toell.net; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: RFS: dylandotnet Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:31:41 +0200 The dput command did not put up the orig.tar.gz. Could this be because I did a PPA upload beforehand? Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:42:33 +0200 From: deb...@toell.net To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: dylandotnet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22.08.2011 12:24, Jakub Wilk wrote: I suspect that this is a mentors.debian.net bug. :/ Right, but that's only half of the story. Dylan did not upload any orig.tar.gz, so Mentors tried to fetch it from the Debian repository (which is a more or less useless hack I think), but failed as well. For some reasons the HTTP response code reply was hence threatened as Tarball. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUjKZAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxFgP/0Hqge3opJgBoHEmgurWrqZ9 Fezse33ukZXgTGIwbFJXuVOybKfMyF99GkE1po9RoCV9wTQSONtMnNDcmynTeOpj dAEcbwhizGCwLc692XmBAXQEabNXPBHila57DpaK7pg1BrY3qJeExiQ8cPVXWrx7 ensCKL6GGTxqXtBCwkgVBGN6fVS7mIcrJPCLUQ8kawecNtWZgEGBw00ZdEbeOLU/ FYYxi6rbdR6HUnoAE7z7y+iA29xvkayHZpmbjfYHxN6NUWSqbYZAGjux2VcYjE1U he/geBq9MWsEo6pK2+zuYV7Pah9Hmda09FGunzHYv/GokwLjgpvqW97uwAuYydk2 fc6Re7GnsgkNS4HifCRy9C8KM6OWqQt8DRvLn16uPNFetf21v5SN5lqM8CS7WrBo XbgZELUMDT4FbFk7G2sagbpRxou/6sINJoxop866bdgLEzCwkSQPiU9yrZ/xKgKq johcy1JIiM9LntgUYzuQp+KSWsQ0JcOG0dnGv7fLSEWARobiQKCMue7wlfwD0aSF mN5pNkvMSXWrYK2l4Jh/BcEc7QVdrmQzUWuyRz3p1p/27WJwoFla30MNe6+Wu9wC bCB+PRecZc9idTIrJuB9prK1s8azjrLSyCHuVCRafmYSRPV800u80ufGA0gfx3TE SHwEGkZHY6E+R+fdLY9N =26HQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e523299.50...@toell.net -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
Thanks to Arno. The -sa worked fine. Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:16:39 +0200 From: deb...@toell.net To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: dylandotnet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, and Dylan, On 22.08.2011 16:11, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Is it's debian version greater then 1? If it is, it will use -1's orig.tar.gz, so you don't have to keep uploading it, since the upstream version is the same. yes, that's the problem. Dylan is trying to upload an increased Debian revision (last upload was a -4). dpkg-genchanges does not include the orig.tar.gz in such cases unless you explicitly force dpkg-buildpackage to do so (give it -sa). Maybe we should refuse such uploads as the old mentors did as well. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUmTHAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtjQUP/iWx9ZKN11lM47TWVYdCLZF6 J8TYNHjJlMajSl+ae0le8NP4To/xwvgMr6U/Dv4CqjqOwYw2WaW4fa2hJOrIu/42 0oveUeYfQwuLtnOad4aqwt0QBrhYmr02yMm/UTPPwWY8vnNDPbWeWAtGvRoOsmN5 VVJKzIukUAR3FG/UyK0yi3uos7G6Uyg+fP9C8sqNlgKpuQE2R7OtMsbAzJVzW9OO U/9daiZzk4NCX8iPjIUGtFa1+EroepxhO+xWbS1iGmgikaE2O4RNZfkRbXsC/dZL x8FnqysZzOvBe2T58XAaUMOydAvbGNp3u9i2CRwpL8OM5uw2bEYwHeO8+Fdxe926 o6++MFd6Es2k2PS3h0G0+4Lk1KIl6E8Ri3ZebfaeS7pY+0UYj2yac94xPlR2AKGU XQYH7JsVmPy/yZeTAHIM3bp4TDvVah2fL17z5wpn8fZawuaYIsiDpkOQtp4yogsO wMGcok//r0oJ101zq/n2RXxfDIXKtVW5W9KH4C7SDnYydtZlc2wtH6Waf2iRG+Gb Bn6htVRbDMi0yCr/tP4/kGPLgS2jql4mo5gmllSAnxqScRZHP4HZbxVJuxSnwtbn Wfsrsh9prWfyEib7buJy+6IXLvEAqnxR0xpGQzgsC75kK2YY553lQSFkX+i72RXB MMhmqpX+88GgE8nYeoeQ =50VB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5264c7.3050...@toell.net
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
The new package now with a -5 has been succesfuly uploaded to mentors complete with original source. Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 From: borgdy...@hotmail.com To: deb...@toell.net; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: RFS: dylandotnet Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:42:06 +0200 Thanks to Arno. The -sa worked fine. Regards, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com borgdyl...@gmail.com +00356 99214902 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:16:39 +0200 From: deb...@toell.net To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: dylandotnet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, and Dylan, On 22.08.2011 16:11, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Is it's debian version greater then 1? If it is, it will use -1's orig.tar.gz, so you don't have to keep uploading it, since the upstream version is the same. yes, that's the problem. Dylan is trying to upload an increased Debian revision (last upload was a -4). dpkg-genchanges does not include the orig.tar.gz in such cases unless you explicitly force dpkg-buildpackage to do so (give it -sa). Maybe we should refuse such uploads as the old mentors did as well. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUmTHAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtjQUP/iWx9ZKN11lM47TWVYdCLZF6 J8TYNHjJlMajSl+ae0le8NP4To/xwvgMr6U/Dv4CqjqOwYw2WaW4fa2hJOrIu/42 0oveUeYfQwuLtnOad4aqwt0QBrhYmr02yMm/UTPPwWY8vnNDPbWeWAtGvRoOsmN5 VVJKzIukUAR3FG/UyK0yi3uos7G6Uyg+fP9C8sqNlgKpuQE2R7OtMsbAzJVzW9OO U/9daiZzk4NCX8iPjIUGtFa1+EroepxhO+xWbS1iGmgikaE2O4RNZfkRbXsC/dZL x8FnqysZzOvBe2T58XAaUMOydAvbGNp3u9i2CRwpL8OM5uw2bEYwHeO8+Fdxe926 o6++MFd6Es2k2PS3h0G0+4Lk1KIl6E8Ri3ZebfaeS7pY+0UYj2yac94xPlR2AKGU XQYH7JsVmPy/yZeTAHIM3bp4TDvVah2fL17z5wpn8fZawuaYIsiDpkOQtp4yogsO wMGcok//r0oJ101zq/n2RXxfDIXKtVW5W9KH4C7SDnYydtZlc2wtH6Waf2iRG+Gb Bn6htVRbDMi0yCr/tP4/kGPLgS2jql4mo5gmllSAnxqScRZHP4HZbxVJuxSnwtbn Wfsrsh9prWfyEib7buJy+6IXLvEAqnxR0xpGQzgsC75kK2YY553lQSFkX+i72RXB MMhmqpX+88GgE8nYeoeQ =50VB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5264c7.3050...@toell.net
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
Hi, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com writes: The new package now with a -5 has been succesfuly uploaded to mentors complete with original source. While I will not sponsor your package as I neither know nor care about .Net, I did take a short look at it and noticed several problems: - The source for several files is missing from the package, at least one file seems to be copyright by Microsoft. Shared libraries available in other packages should be used instead of bundling an embedded copy. In any case, all licenses and copyright holders need to be documented in debian/copyright. - I'm also not sure that the binaries will actually be built from source during the build process as, for example, the source files (*.dyl) include references to other source files using absolute paths. - The upstream tarball includes quite a lot of files that are generated by ./configure (such as Makefile, config.log and others). - Why does the package build-depend on devscripts? Why on autotools-dev? - You seem to misunderstand what debian/watch is used for. It should look for new upstream releases and is unrelated to the package being in the Debian archive. See uscan(1) for details. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obzhf5st@deep-thought.43-1.org
RFS: dylandotnet
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dylandotnet. * Package name: dylandotnet Version : 11.2.7.4-2 Upstream Author : Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com * URL : https://launchpad.net/dylandotnet * License : GPL-3+ Section : cli-mono To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dylandotnet Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.7.4-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Dylan Borg
RFS: dylandotnet (updated package(rules and changelog and bug close)
From: Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: dylandotnet (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 11.2.7.1-3 of my package dylandotnet. It builds these binary packages: dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET compiler to be run on the Mono framework. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 626078 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.7.1-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Dylan Borg Dylan
RFS: dylandotnet
From: Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: dylandotnet Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dylandotnet. * Package name: dylandotnet Version : 11.2.6-2 Upstream Author : Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com * URL : http://launchpad.net/dylandotnet * License : GNU GPL v2 Section : devel Programming Language: dylan.NET itself(i.e. a self-hosting compiler) It builds these binary packages: dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET compiler The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: to give a new Mono language to the communities of Debian and Ubuntu. I intend to maintain and package the software myself since I am its author. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.6-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Dylan Borg
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
On Sat, 14 May 2011 11:32:19 +0200, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com wrote: It builds these binary packages: dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET compiler Hi Dylan; It seems like your package ships several .dll files that are not rebuilt during the package build process. By policy 2.2.1, your package must be buildable from source using tools in main; the easiest way to demonstrate this is to do it. I'm not a .NET expert, but I was also not sure that the the .DLL files are really architecture independant. Your package has some lintian warnings and errors: W: dylandotnet: extended-description-line-too-long E: dylandotnet: depends-on-metapackage depends: mono-complete W: dylandotnet: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 1 W: dylandotnet: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/dylandotnet E: dylandotnet: helper-templates-in-copyright E: dylandotnet: helper-templates-in-copyright E: dylandotnet: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate Note that debian/copyright is crucial for a package to be accepted into the archive. Aside from lintians complaints, your description also didn't really help me understand what the package is. Please see http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-synopsis http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-desc For some hints about writing a short and long description. Remember your audience is likely not expert in .NET I found the phrase This compiler when ready a bit discouraging; is the compiler useful for something now? It would be good to clarify if your package has anything to do with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dylan_(programming_language) I'm guessing not, but this is the default when I hear dylan and programming language. You may also want to look for feedback/sponsorship from the debian mono team. pkg-mono-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hb8xfqsk.fsf@zancas.localnet
RFS: dylandotnet (updated package)
From: Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: dylandotnet (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 11.2.7.1-1 of my package dylandotnet. It builds these binary packages: dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET compiler The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.7.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Dylan Borg Dylan
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
I took the liberty of redirecting this reply back to the list. You may want to bounce your original message to the list as well. In general, please direct the discussion to the list. I'm not sure why lintian does not catch this, but your changelog needs work. - target should be debian unstable, not ubuntu. - Your closes line is wrong, it should not be part of the line with urgency=low. - Your changelog should also close a Debian ITP bug, since that is the right place to have a discussion about whether a proposed package is suitable for Debian. On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:25:52 +0200, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com wrote: My target audience is a .NET aware audience, this package contains a compiler after all. You still need to provide a description that is useful for debian users in general. The .dlls are binary and platform independent(it is in the ECMA 335 spec). OK. Right now the current dylan.NET compiler is only runnable on windows. [...] Because the build cannot happen on Linux currently I ship the dlls ready made. Then I think you will have to target contrib rather than Debian main until you can build in Debian. See policy 2.2.2 for an explanation. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-contrib MS-Windows certainly counts as a non-free package ;). The method inners are being worked on but I wish the packaging and the already completed parts to be tried on and bugs filed to me. Do you think there is enough audience to justify uploading to Debian at this time? What would this audience be? It does not have to do with the Dylan programming language. Right, so please add that to your long description. All the best, David pgpINqaECUemM.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
I have updated the package(the debian dir only). The packagge is opens ource. Open source software can run on Windows!...remove the misconception that Windows software always must cost money. Dylan From: brem...@debian.org To: borgdy...@hotmail.com CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: RFS: dylandotnet Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 11:08:48 -0300 I took the liberty of redirecting this reply back to the list. You may want to bounce your original message to the list as well. In general, please direct the discussion to the list. I'm not sure why lintian does not catch this, but your changelog needs work. - target should be debian unstable, not ubuntu. - Your closes line is wrong, it should not be part of the line with urgency=low. - Your changelog should also close a Debian ITP bug, since that is the right place to have a discussion about whether a proposed package is suitable for Debian. On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:25:52 +0200, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com wrote: My target audience is a .NET aware audience, this package contains a compiler after all. You still need to provide a description that is useful for debian users in general. The .dlls are binary and platform independent(it is in the ECMA 335 spec). OK. Right now the current dylan.NET compiler is only runnable on windows. [...] Because the build cannot happen on Linux currently I ship the dlls ready made. Then I think you will have to target contrib rather than Debian main until you can build in Debian. See policy 2.2.2 for an explanation. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-contrib MS-Windows certainly counts as a non-free package ;). The method inners are being worked on but I wish the packaging and the already completed parts to be tried on and bugs filed to me. Do you think there is enough audience to justify uploading to Debian at this time? What would this audience be? It does not have to do with the Dylan programming language. Right, so please add that to your long description. All the best, David
RFS: dylandotnet (updated package 11.2.7.1-2)
From: Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: dylandotnet (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 11.2.7.1-2 of my package dylandotnet. It builds these binary packages: dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET compiler to be run on the Mono framework. The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.7.1-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Dylan Borg Dylan
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
On Sat, 14 May 2011 16:34:14 +0200, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com wrote: I have updated the package(the debian dir only). The packagge is opens ource. Open source software can run on Windows!...remove the misconception that Windows software always must cost money. Hi Dylan; non-free is used in Debian in a technical sense to refer to software that does not mee the Debian Free Software Guidelines. In order to be included in Debian main, not only must your software be DFSG free, but it must be buildable using only DFSG free tools. Since your software only builds on Windows so far, it can't be built only with DFSG free tools. This is why I referred you to specific sections of Debian policy. In my opinion, you should also address the question of what-kind/how large of an audience your package would have. You have to remember that you are in the position of selling your package to a potential sponsor, and there are many packages and people clamouring for attention. David pgpMeW3PcBM1V.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
As my audience I would like people wanting to work in .NET/CLI and wanting a new language to programwith that is not under the power of large companies(i.e. C#). I plan to make program templates for using component such as gtk and other commonly used linux libraries. As self-hosting is achieved dylan.NET shall be only developed under Linux. Dylan From: brem...@debian.org To: borgdy...@hotmail.com; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: RFS: dylandotnet Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:35:33 -0300 On Sat, 14 May 2011 16:34:14 +0200, Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com wrote: I have updated the package(the debian dir only). The packagge is opens ource. Open source software can run on Windows!...remove the misconception that Windows software always must cost money. Hi Dylan; non-free is used in Debian in a technical sense to refer to software that does not mee the Debian Free Software Guidelines. In order to be included in Debian main, not only must your software be DFSG free, but it must be buildable using only DFSG free tools. Since your software only builds on Windows so far, it can't be built only with DFSG free tools. This is why I referred you to specific sections of Debian policy. In my opinion, you should also address the question of what-kind/how large of an audience your package would have. You have to remember that you are in the position of selling your package to a potential sponsor, and there are many packages and people clamouring for attention. David
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dylan, On 14.05.2011 23:20, Dylan Borg wrote: As my audience I would like people wanting to work in .NET/CLI and wanting a new language to programwith that is not under the power of large companies(i.e. C#). I plan to make program templates for using component such as gtk and other commonly used linux libraries. As self-hosting is achieved dylan.NET shall be only developed under Linux. please note Debian is not intended as a possible platform to promote and advocate your own project. You should have a notable user base before you are actually trying to introduce a package to Debian. Don't get me wrong, it is perfectly fine to have upstream authors interested to maintain their own projects in Debian - no one else would know them better than they do. What David wanted to advise you is, you should - perhaps - think whether your program really already has enough users, which would justify inclusion to Debian targeted to a large audience in contrast to some enthusiastic contributors. You seem not to have really much downloads [1]. Moreover, all we can do, is to suggest you what you could or should do. It is still fine if you keep trying to find a sponsor for your package once you passed through at least the things David mentioned - but the tenor of our comments seem to suggest you should perhaps wait a bit more until you really want to push Debian inclusion. Since your build dependencies are non free (as of our DFSG, as David explained you already) things are even more complicated (for you). [1] https://launchpad.net/dylandotnet/+download - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNzvrjAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtW7YP/jnW3ITTioQb/J1Mz0JQr9ie eo1bj8Y5xY7J8Pca/YoyMTfVlilH8LM+isdbKKh+sloYG7Ybo+Z5wyEXG5VRMFUh BsS+tBKA6WY0YsRzQx/aIzIFKET2fGRhx+WvACkJOGIy5KRedGPdPYNiirmPwolo MsCeY3jsDjany5mbYOWVVIh/YzGnyRCvZHOTYn4y7/QeQTaAYcBMlYmOYXOTXEhG PYuUxIEFMM/gG9FhGYhsPyz6QvH2K2a/Q4b55Vh9AKhCqYGkzyzpjttagR17YXOx 1H9Y4Ms/GIaTyrXMd5sASXJQUJ4OtJqfKTzF6uwmYb5yY6kihZLhMiI2n/+FCsNR hPxuZTtRjakyBPg8Lxams5hkloguqKzErtr91ugbrxk2yj+V5d8dNno37VyGi30N pfHib7/LaWgUmrQfWVIUxOaoR8EJjcg5Z9IWfP8NY/bpNWqOYfTmiTdYhZ3yeN4Y Zb7FrqU2//eZexN7ov3rllFePsXdqNDUKghfF7pMaFJBugOG1myniWZ+HtVdhOXl WvAYMcFBOrknVKDQZX0+zp2QYuSUc2R7DHaB9HHdMS6pf/yWxY2oTXAZ6kCYTqau Wz0aW3JkZuh2FY3WOvexOwwKuqCqLIPcEH7sapjRjhsjuGMa0TLg074Uu8scbKEc LNGhdeAgrw3AfpfFmvRz =WhRo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcefae3.2030...@toell.net
RE: RFS: dylandotnet
Therefore I will try pushing the package again in July since that is my target for getting rid of all non-dfsg build tools. But from now I wanted to fix the debian directory so when the code is completely includable in Debian I could include it without much much fuss at that point. Dylan Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 23:57:55 +0200 From: deb...@toell.net To: borgdy...@hotmail.com CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: dylandotnet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dylan, On 14.05.2011 23:20, Dylan Borg wrote: As my audience I would like people wanting to work in .NET/CLI and wanting a new language to programwith that is not under the power of large companies(i.e. C#). I plan to make program templates for using component such as gtk and other commonly used linux libraries. As self-hosting is achieved dylan.NET shall be only developed under Linux. please note Debian is not intended as a possible platform to promote and advocate your own project. You should have a notable user base before you are actually trying to introduce a package to Debian. Don't get me wrong, it is perfectly fine to have upstream authors interested to maintain their own projects in Debian - no one else would know them better than they do. What David wanted to advise you is, you should - perhaps - think whether your program really already has enough users, which would justify inclusion to Debian targeted to a large audience in contrast to some enthusiastic contributors. You seem not to have really much downloads [1]. Moreover, all we can do, is to suggest you what you could or should do. It is still fine if you keep trying to find a sponsor for your package once you passed through at least the things David mentioned - but the tenor of our comments seem to suggest you should perhaps wait a bit more until you really want to push Debian inclusion. Since your build dependencies are non free (as of our DFSG, as David explained you already) things are even more complicated (for you). [1] https://launchpad.net/dylandotnet/+download - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNzvrjAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtW7YP/jnW3ITTioQb/J1Mz0JQr9ie eo1bj8Y5xY7J8Pca/YoyMTfVlilH8LM+isdbKKh+sloYG7Ybo+Z5wyEXG5VRMFUh BsS+tBKA6WY0YsRzQx/aIzIFKET2fGRhx+WvACkJOGIy5KRedGPdPYNiirmPwolo MsCeY3jsDjany5mbYOWVVIh/YzGnyRCvZHOTYn4y7/QeQTaAYcBMlYmOYXOTXEhG PYuUxIEFMM/gG9FhGYhsPyz6QvH2K2a/Q4b55Vh9AKhCqYGkzyzpjttagR17YXOx 1H9Y4Ms/GIaTyrXMd5sASXJQUJ4OtJqfKTzF6uwmYb5yY6kihZLhMiI2n/+FCsNR hPxuZTtRjakyBPg8Lxams5hkloguqKzErtr91ugbrxk2yj+V5d8dNno37VyGi30N pfHib7/LaWgUmrQfWVIUxOaoR8EJjcg5Z9IWfP8NY/bpNWqOYfTmiTdYhZ3yeN4Y Zb7FrqU2//eZexN7ov3rllFePsXdqNDUKghfF7pMaFJBugOG1myniWZ+HtVdhOXl WvAYMcFBOrknVKDQZX0+zp2QYuSUc2R7DHaB9HHdMS6pf/yWxY2oTXAZ6kCYTqau Wz0aW3JkZuh2FY3WOvexOwwKuqCqLIPcEH7sapjRjhsjuGMa0TLg074Uu8scbKEc LNGhdeAgrw3AfpfFmvRz =WhRo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcefae3.2030...@toell.net
RFS: dylandotnet
From: Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: dylandotnet Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dylandotnet. * Package name: dylandotnet Version : 11.2.6-2 Upstream Author : Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com * URL : http://launchpad.net/dylandotnet * License : GNU GPL v2 Section : devel It builds these binary packages: dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET compiler The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: to give a new Mono language to the communities of Debian and Ubuntu. I intend to maintain and package the software myself since I am its author. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dylandotnet/dylandotnet_11.2.6-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Dylan Borg