Re: RFS: libqsi - second attempt

2012-02-13 Thread chrysn
hello jasem,

i'm not a debian developer myself, so i can't help you with uploading,
nor should you rely solely on my opinion here, but i hope these comments
are helpful both to you and the developer reviewing your package for
upload:

* you already require debhelper 6, is there any reason you don't let it
  operate to its full potential by setting debian/compat to 6?
* by adding a (Closes: #656203), you could make the upload automatically
  close your itp bug
* the Support: paragraph in the COPYING file contains a line that is
  typically included in the copyright file (comes without warranty of
  fitness). i'd include that in debian/copyright too just to be on the
  safe side, but don't know if that's a matter of personal preference or
  if people more familiar with what needs to be in a copyright file have
  a stronger opinion on that.
* the NEWS file is empty. you can tell dh_installdocs, which afaict
  installs it automatically, to not install it by passing -X NEWS to it,
  but i can't tell exactly where that goes in a cdbs based build
  process.
* if, for any other reasons more important than this little item, you
  have to increase your debhelper level to 7, you can strip the
  debian/tmp off the debian/*.install files, making them more readable
  in my opinion.
* there's a number of things lintian still complains about. please run
  lintian on your .changes file and see what it says (use -i for
  additional information). some things are formal issues that are easy
  to fix (copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-lgpl,
  wrong-section-according-to-package-name,
  extended-description-line-too-long), i don't know exactly about
  package-name-doesnt-match-sonames (never happened to me before), and
  for binary-without-manpage, i'm afraid you'll have to write at least
  very short explanations of what the binaries do and how to use them
  (as there are no man pages in the source, but debian requires them).

regards
chrysn

-- 
There's always a bigger fish.
  -- Qui-Gon Jinn


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


RFS: libqsi - second attempt

2012-02-11 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package libqsi.

 * Package name: libqsi
   Version : 6.0.3-1
   Upstream Author : Quantum Scientific Imaging
 * URL : http://www.qsimaging.com
 * License : Propietary
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

libqsi-dev - Quantum Scientific Imaging (QSI) CCD Libraries.
 libqsi6- Quantum Scientific Imaging (QSI) CCD Libraries.

libqsi provides library to operate and control QSI CCD cameras and
filter wheels used in astronomical imaging. INDI QSI driver depends on
libqsi. Permission is granted to distribute the library in source and
binary forms without any modification in order to operate INDI QSI
driver. Please add this package to the non-free archive.

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libqsi

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/libq/libqsi/libqsi_6.0.3-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

Jasem Mutlaq


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAE0bU5=Fev=sxajnifu3otqgxi67m4uvjzpjsttpdgnncrm...@mail.gmail.com



Fwd: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-26 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jasem Mutlaq mutla...@ikarustech.com
Date: Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: RFS: libqsi
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

Ok, I modified the subsection and updated copyright information for
the following packages:
1. libqsi (non-free): http://mentors.debian.net/package/libqsi
2. indi-qsi (contrib): http://mentors.debian.net/package/indi-qsi
Is there anything else I need to do?

Can someone please review and upload this package? If there is
anything else I can do, please let me know.

Regards,
Jasem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAE0bU5mY=hq+Cm8w+CpRNYaU3i=67xspLPb_Cq=qrm9mnra...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-22 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:

 The driver that requires this library (INDI QSI driver) is released
 under the LGPL v2.1. However, the library itself (QSI) is proprietary
 and there is no open source alternative as this is a very special
 purpose library for controlling astronomical CCDs. Therefore, I think
 the INDI QSI driver can end up in contrib and libqsi end up in
 non-free ?

 Correct.

 Is there a procedure to ask the inclusion of these packages into those
 respective archives?

 http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections

Ok, I modified the subsection and updated copyright information for
the following packages:

1. libqsi (non-free): http://mentors.debian.net/package/libqsi
2. indi-qsi (contrib): http://mentors.debian.net/package/indi-qsi

Is there anything else I need to do?

Regards,
Jasem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAE0bU5kq=fmrv3533aenjysr3sc5w4xadcvbbkcoghwfint...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:

 The driver that requires this library (INDI QSI driver) is released
 under the LGPL v2.1. However, the library itself (QSI) is proprietary
 and there is no open source alternative as this is a very special
 purpose library for controlling astronomical CCDs. Therefore, I think
 the INDI QSI driver can end up in contrib and libqsi end up in
 non-free ?

Correct.

 Is there a procedure to ask the inclusion of these packages into those
 respective archives?

http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6g_d7chrdbj+rvepiluyhgepsuk6kqeapc1_b9tc2x...@mail.gmail.com



RFS: libqsi

2012-01-20 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package libqsi.

 * Package name: libqsi
   Version : 6.0.3-1
   Upstream Author : Quantum Scientific Imaging
 * URL : http://www.qsimaging.com
 * License : BSD
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

libqsi-dev - Quantum Scientific Imaging (QSI) CCD Libraries.
 libqsi6- Quantum Scientific Imaging (QSI) CCD Libraries.

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libqsi

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libq/libqsi/libqsi_6.0.3-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

Jasem Mutlaq


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAE0bU5=qij41qh4f9a2hxjasjuh-55myx8p5hnsw+h4uhk3...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi,

Jasem Mutlaq mutla...@ikarustech.com writes:
  * Package name: libqsi
Version : 6.0.3-1
Upstream Author : Quantum Scientific Imaging
  * URL : http://www.qsimaging.com
  * License : BSD
Section : libs

   dget -x 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libq/libqsi/libqsi_6.0.3-1.dsc

There is no license included in the upstream tarball, only a copyright
notice and a disclaimer.  Where did you get the information that it is
licensed under a BSD license?

You do not need to include 'debian/tmp' in d/*.install. dh_install looks
there by default.

The package description is a bit short.

There seems to be no source for the PDF file in the doc/ directory.

Regards,
Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vco65tw3@deep-thought.43-1.org



Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-20 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
 There is no license included in the upstream tarball, only a copyright
 notice and a disclaimer.  Where did you get the information that it is
 licensed under a BSD license?

I contacted the company to get explicit BSD-2 clause in the COPYING
file. Awaiting their reply.


 You do not need to include 'debian/tmp' in d/*.install. dh_install looks
 there by default.

Ok, will correct that.


 The package description is a bit short.


Ok, will expand the description.

 There seems to be no source for the PDF file in the doc/ directory.

Is this recommended or mandatory?

Your help is appreciated!

--
Best Regards,
Jasem Mutlaq


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cae0bu5noz6_rc-jg9b4nukhytsq9lqrdewjeigzl5qod46p...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi,

Jasem Mutlaq mutla...@ikarustech.com writes:
 There seems to be no source for the PDF file in the doc/ directory.

 Is this recommended or mandatory?

Source needs to be present for everything part of Debian.  That includes
documentation and files that are not shipped in the binary packages.

If you cannot provide the source, you need to repack to upstream
tarball and remove the sourceless files.

Regads,
Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877h0m5qpt@deep-thought.43-1.org



Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-20 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
 Source needs to be present for everything part of Debian.  That includes
 documentation and files that are not shipped in the binary packages.

 If you cannot provide the source, you need to repack to upstream
 tarball and remove the sourceless files.

Ok, I got a confirmation from QSI that the source code for libqsi is
proprietary. They grant you the right to distribute source and binary
forms of the library, but not to modify the source itself. Can this be
added to Debian 'non-free' ?

Regards,
Jasem


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cae0bu5nmq2wpotnf5v59cidzbo4+e8xuarhfi0738z-kmzj...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:

 Ok, I got a confirmation from QSI that the source code for libqsi is
 proprietary. They grant you the right to distribute source and binary
 forms of the library, but not to modify the source itself. Can this be
 added to Debian 'non-free' ?

The non-free part of the archive only requires that Debian and our
mirrors have permission to distribute.

Also see these parts of policy for some things related to non-free:

http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-non-free

Please ask upstream to switch to a well known and understood Free
Software license (such as MIT/BSD/GPL).

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6eb+0df65rsm1+atsy5cuvq+v1c5sgbgr5p08vhjcm...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-20 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:

 Ok, I got a confirmation from QSI that the source code for libqsi is
 proprietary. They grant you the right to distribute source and binary
 forms of the library, but not to modify the source itself. Can this be
 added to Debian 'non-free' ?

 The non-free part of the archive only requires that Debian and our
 mirrors have permission to distribute.

 Also see these parts of policy for some things related to non-free:

 http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile
 http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-non-free

 Please ask upstream to switch to a well known and understood Free
 Software license (such as MIT/BSD/GPL).

The driver that requires this library (INDI QSI driver) is released
under the LGPL v2.1. However, the library itself (QSI) is proprietary
and there is no open source alternative as this is a very special
purpose library for controlling astronomical CCDs. Therefore, I think
the INDI QSI driver can end up in contrib and libqsi end up in
non-free ?

Is there a procedure to ask the inclusion of these packages into those
respective archives?

--
Best Regards,
Jasem Mutlaq


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cae0bu5mdmhhr8gac0u96uxg0mjefnmea-hv6hshemrtl7fo...@mail.gmail.com