Bug#811164: marked as done (RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-11)
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:28:31 + (UTC) with message-id <1263208801.9607567.1452950911084.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#811164: RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #811164, regarding RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 811164: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811164 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-11 Hi everybody, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-11 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail As my sponsor Arno seems to be unavailable sice some weeks I'm asking here for someone who could upload my packages. Debdiff is found under [1], changes since last upload: policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-11) unstable; urgency=low * debian/postrm + Fix command-with-path-in-maintainer-script * debian/init.d + Updated LSB header * debian/rules + Add dh_lintian * Add debian/source.lintian-overrides + override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature as upstream does not provide cryptographic signature * Update to debhelper 9 * Updated 10_replace_net_dns_dn_expand.patch to use official replacement Net::DNS::DomainName::decode for Net::DNS::Packet::dn_expand * Add 13_fix_default_rhsbl_dnsbl_in_man5.patch which updates default dnsbls/rhsbls in man5 manpage * Add 14_ignore_rfc1918_a_records_config_option.patch which introduces new config config option $IGNORE_RFC1918_A. If enabled A records with RFC1918 addresses aren't treated as bogus addresses by policyd-weight and therefore bogus_mx_score is not added. Updated sample configuration and man5 manpage (Closes: #799314) * Add closing bug in previous changelog entry -- Werner Detter <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:17:14 +0100 It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-11.dsc Regards, Werner [1] Debdiff werner@smaint:~$ debdiff policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-10.dsc policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-11.dsc diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog2015-01-07 07:32:00.0 +0100 +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog2015-12-01 09:45:29.0 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,32 @@ +policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-11) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/postrm ++ Fix command-with-path-in-maintainer-script + * debian/init.d ++ Updated LSB header + * debian/rules ++ Add dh_lintian + * Add debian/source.lintian-overrides ++ override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature as upstream does + not provide cryptographic signature + * Update to debhelper 9 + * Updated 10_replace_net_dns_dn_expand.patch to use official replacement +Net::DNS::DomainName::decode for Net::DNS::Packet::dn_expand + * Add 13_fix_default_rhsbl_dnsbl_in_man5.patch which updates default +dnsbls/rhsbls in man5 manpage + * Add 14_ignore_rfc1918_a_records_config_option.patch which introduces +new config config option $IGNORE_RFC1918_A. If enabled A records with +RFC1918 addresses aren't treated as bogus addresses by policyd-weight +and therefore bogus_mx_score is not added. Updated sample configuration +and man5 manpage (Closes: #799314) + * Add closing bug in previous changelog entry + + -- Werner Detter <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:17:14 +0100 + policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-10) unstable; urgency=low - * Add 12_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch which removes rhsbl.ahbl.org list due -to service shutdown + * Add 12_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch which removes rhsbl.ahbl.org list due +to service shutdown (Closes: #774772) -- Werner Detter <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:30:14 +0100 diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/compat policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/compat --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/compat 2014-10-04 16:43:25.0 +0200 +++ policy
Bug#811164: RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-11
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-11 Hi everybody, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-11 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail As my sponsor Arno seems to be unavailable sice some weeks I'm asking here for someone who could upload my packages. Debdiff is found under [1], changes since last upload: policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-11) unstable; urgency=low * debian/postrm + Fix command-with-path-in-maintainer-script * debian/init.d + Updated LSB header * debian/rules + Add dh_lintian * Add debian/source.lintian-overrides + override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature as upstream does not provide cryptographic signature * Update to debhelper 9 * Updated 10_replace_net_dns_dn_expand.patch to use official replacement Net::DNS::DomainName::decode for Net::DNS::Packet::dn_expand * Add 13_fix_default_rhsbl_dnsbl_in_man5.patch which updates default dnsbls/rhsbls in man5 manpage * Add 14_ignore_rfc1918_a_records_config_option.patch which introduces new config config option $IGNORE_RFC1918_A. If enabled A records with RFC1918 addresses aren't treated as bogus addresses by policyd-weight and therefore bogus_mx_score is not added. Updated sample configuration and man5 manpage (Closes: #799314) * Add closing bug in previous changelog entry -- Werner Detter <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:17:14 +0100 It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-11.dsc Regards, Werner [1] Debdiff werner@smaint:~$ debdiff policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-10.dsc policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-11.dsc diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog2015-01-07 07:32:00.0 +0100 +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog2015-12-01 09:45:29.0 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,32 @@ +policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-11) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/postrm ++ Fix command-with-path-in-maintainer-script + * debian/init.d ++ Updated LSB header + * debian/rules ++ Add dh_lintian + * Add debian/source.lintian-overrides ++ override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature as upstream does + not provide cryptographic signature + * Update to debhelper 9 + * Updated 10_replace_net_dns_dn_expand.patch to use official replacement +Net::DNS::DomainName::decode for Net::DNS::Packet::dn_expand + * Add 13_fix_default_rhsbl_dnsbl_in_man5.patch which updates default +dnsbls/rhsbls in man5 manpage + * Add 14_ignore_rfc1918_a_records_config_option.patch which introduces +new config config option $IGNORE_RFC1918_A. If enabled A records with +RFC1918 addresses aren't treated as bogus addresses by policyd-weight +and therefore bogus_mx_score is not added. Updated sample configuration +and man5 manpage (Closes: #799314) + * Add closing bug in previous changelog entry + + -- Werner Detter <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:17:14 +0100 + policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-10) unstable; urgency=low - * Add 12_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch which removes rhsbl.ahbl.org list due -to service shutdown + * Add 12_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch which removes rhsbl.ahbl.org list due +to service shutdown (Closes: #774772) -- Werner Detter <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:30:14 +0100 diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/compat policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/compat --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/compat 2014-10-04 16:43:25.0 +0200 +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/compat 2015-11-30 20:34:32.0 +0100 @@ -1 +1 @@ -7 +9 diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/control policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/control --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/control 2014-10-04 16:43:25.0 +0200 +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/control 2015-11-30 20:34:32.0 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: mail Priority: optional Maintainer: Werner Detter <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7) +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9) Homepage: http://www.policyd-weight.org/ Standards-Version: 3.9.6 diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/init.d policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/init.d --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/init.d 2014-10-04 16:43:25.0 +0200 +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/init.d 2015-11-30 20:34:32.0 +0100 @@ -1,20 +1,15 @@ #
Bug#774753: marked as done (RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5+wheezy2)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:33:57 +0100 with message-id 20150117153357.gd3...@ramacher.at and subject line Re: Bug#774753: sponsorship-requests: RFS - pu policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5+wheezy2 has caused the Debian Bug report #774753, regarding RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5+wheezy2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 774753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774753 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear Maintainer, policyd-weight uses the abusive hosts blocking list which has been shutdown on january 1st, more information can be found on the website of the dnsbl: http://www.ahbl.org/content/last-notice-wildcarding-services-jan-1st The list now replies which a positive response which may lead to false positives. I hereby ask for someone to upload this package to stable? I've already recreated the package for unstable and uploaded it to mentors. Meanwhile I've backported the patch for stable. A debdiff can be found here [1] * Package name: policyd-weight Version : policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5+wheezy2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail I've uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net - it would be great if someone could upload this package. The URL of your package is: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-5+wheezy2.dsc Thanks, Werner Detter [1] debdiff diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog2014-03-15 13:24:45.0 +0100 +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/changelog2015-01-07 07:56:59.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-5+wheezy2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Add 10_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch which removes rhsbl.ahbl.org list due +to service shutdown + + -- Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:30:14 +0100 + + policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-5+wheezy1) wheezy; urgency=low * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/patches/10_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/patches/10_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/patches/10_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/patches/10_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch 2015-01-07 07:55:16.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +Description: removes RHSBL rhsbl.ahbl.org from policyd-weight source +Author: Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de +DEP: 3 +--- a/policyd-weight b/policyd-weight +@@ -389,8 +389,7 @@ + + ## RHSBL settings + my @rhsbl_score = ( +-'multi.surbl.org', 4,0,'SURBL', +-'rhsbl.ahbl.org', 4,0,'AHBL' ++'multi.surbl.org', 4,0,'SURBL' + ); + + my $BL_ERROR_SKIP = 2; # skip a RBL if this RBL had this many continuous diff -Nru policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/patches/series policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/patches/series --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/patches/series 2014-03-15 13:26:31.0 +0100 +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.2/debian/patches/series 2015-01-07 07:54:13.0 +0100 @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ 07_del_rfc-ignorant.org.patch 08_del_dnsbl.njabl.org.patch 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch +10_del_rhsbl.ahbl.org.patch -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Werner On 2015-01-17 16:09:35, Werner Detter wrote: confirmation from Adam received, see http://bugs.debian.org/774773 Uploaded! Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#753018: marked as done (RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845))
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2014 20:34:19 +0200 with message-id 53c2d12b.20...@debian.org and subject line Re: Urgent: could anyone please sponsor upload of policyd-weight due to RC-Bug _before_ package will be removed? has caused the Debian Bug report #753018, regarding RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 753018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753018 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845) dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc Sorry, right URL is, of course: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-8.dsc Cheers, Werner Detter ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, On 13.07.2014 20:13, Werner Detter wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-8.dsc I uploaded your package as is, as the diff is very small. Please follow-up on the bug next time, if you'd like to ping us. That being said, I wonder about the purpose of that hunk, but meh: @@ -12,7 +20,7 @@ * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) - -- Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Sun, 8 Dec 2013 15:23:19 +0100 + -- Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:05:19 +0100 policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-5) unstable; urgency=high Anyway, I think I told you like two years ago already that you can ping me directly if you need a policyd-weight upload, didn't I? -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#753016: marked as done (RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845))
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2014 20:34:19 +0200 with message-id 53c2d12b.20...@debian.org and subject line Re: Urgent: could anyone please sponsor upload of policyd-weight due to RC-Bug _before_ package will be removed? has caused the Debian Bug report #753018, regarding RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 753018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753018 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 Hi everybody, currently, policyd-weight is broken in unstable/testing due to recent libnet-dns-perl upgrade, technically speaking policyd-weight used Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand() which does not exist anymore. This upgrade fixes policyd-weight, policyd-weight now uses Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand_PP(). * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-8 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes: * Add 10_replace_net_dns_dn_expand.patch which replaces Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand() with dh_expand_PP() (Closes: #752845) * Fixed description in 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Cheers, Werner Detter ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, On 13.07.2014 20:13, Werner Detter wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-8.dsc I uploaded your package as is, as the diff is very small. Please follow-up on the bug next time, if you'd like to ping us. That being said, I wonder about the purpose of that hunk, but meh: @@ -12,7 +20,7 @@ * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) - -- Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Sun, 8 Dec 2013 15:23:19 +0100 + -- Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:05:19 +0100 policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-5) unstable; urgency=high Anyway, I think I told you like two years ago already that you can ping me directly if you need a policyd-weight upload, didn't I? -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#753016: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845)
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 Hi everybody, currently, policyd-weight is broken in unstable/testing due to recent libnet-dns-perl upgrade, technically speaking policyd-weight used Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand() which does not exist anymore. This upgrade fixes policyd-weight, policyd-weight now uses Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand_PP(). * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-8 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes: * Add 10_replace_net_dns_dn_expand.patch which replaces Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand() with dh_expand_PP() (Closes: #752845) * Fixed description in 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Cheers, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aee41e.9050...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#753018: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845)
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845) dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc Sorry, right URL is, of course: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-8.dsc Cheers, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aee7c7.2050...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#731466: marked as done (RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:15:06 -0800 with message-id caczd_tb4qm6t6lcc3h9v588faeo45hqf1koqj4m9_8dtnjx...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #728758, regarding RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 728758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, hi Jan, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: * Updating standards version to 3.9.5 * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl I've updated Standards already to 3.9.5 as PTS is telling me already to do so: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/policyd-weight.html It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you, Werner Detter ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package already uploaded to unstable. [1] [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2013/12/msg00927.html---End Message---
Bug#728758: marked as done (RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:15:06 -0800 with message-id caczd_tb4qm6t6lcc3h9v588faeo45hqf1koqj4m9_8dtnjx...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #728758, regarding RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 728758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you and happy working, Werner Detter ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package already uploaded to unstable. [1] [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2013/12/msg00927.html---End Message---
Re: Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote: -. /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem the the policyd-weight init script doesn't use of them - maybe that's the point? Right, but I had the lintian warning: init.d-script-call-internal-API before with . /lib/init/vars.sh in the init-script. I've googled around and found this bugreport: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710559 So, I took it out. ... where Niels says that the lintian tag was premature and he deactivated it in lintian git for the time being. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Rigmor Gustafsson: Empty Hearts signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Am 10.12.13 09:04, schrieb gregor herrmann: On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote: -. /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem the the policyd-weight init script doesn't use of them - maybe that's the point? Right, but I had the lintian warning: init.d-script-call-internal-API before with . /lib/init/vars.sh in the init-script. I've googled around and found this bugreport: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710559 So, I took it out. ... where Niels says that the lintian tag was premature and he deactivated it in lintian git for the time being. Yes .. but .. Josh states: /etc/init.d/skeleton is wrong; only sysvinit's own internal scripts should use vars.sh directly. Other scripts should source /lib/lsb/init-functions and use the log_* functions. Yes tag was premature and deactivated BUT will it be reenabled if /etc/init.d/skeleton is fixed? I can take it back in - no problem - but then i get the mentioned lintian-warning init.d-script-call-internal-API so what to do here now? Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a6e584.5010...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:57:24 +0100, Werner Detter wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710559 So, I took it out. deactivated it in lintian git for the time being. Yes .. but .. Josh states: /etc/init.d/skeleton is wrong; only sysvinit's own internal scripts should use vars.sh directly. Other scripts should source /lib/lsb/init-functions and use the log_* functions. Right, there is a problem somewhere but this needs to be fixed before, in my understanding. Yes tag was premature and deactivated BUT will it be reenabled if /etc/init.d/skeleton is fixed? Probably, as soon as there is a solution for the actual issue. I can take it back in - no problem - but then i get the mentioned lintian-warning init.d-script-call-internal-API so what to do here now? I left it in in a script of mine and just ignored the lintian warning, knowing that it will go away as soon as someone finds the time to upload lintian. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #34: (l)user error -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131210102937.ga5...@colleen.colgarra.priv.at
Re: Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
+++ Werner Detter [2013-12-10 10:57 +0100]: Am 10.12.13 09:04, schrieb gregor herrmann: On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote: -. /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem the the policyd-weight init script doesn't use of them - maybe that's the point? Right, but I had the lintian warning: init.d-script-call-internal-API before with . /lib/init/vars.sh in the init-script. I've googled around and found this bugreport: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710559 So, I took it out. ... where Niels says that the lintian tag was premature and he deactivated it in lintian git for the time being. Yes .. but .. Josh states: /etc/init.d/skeleton is wrong; only sysvinit's own internal scripts should use vars.sh directly. Other scripts should source /lib/lsb/init-functions and use the log_* functions. Yes tag was premature and deactivated BUT will it be reenabled if /etc/init.d/skeleton is fixed? I can take it back in - no problem - but then i get the mentioned lintian-warning init.d-script-call-internal-API so what to do here now? Given that the init script doesn't use any of the variables from vars.sh there is no reason to use an interface that is now deprecated to do nothing, so I agree that taking this line out is the right thing to do. The 'waiting for a fix' part is only relvaant if your script actually _is_ using those vars, IMHO. So I'll upload as-is. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131210143301.gj1...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
Re: Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi Wookey, So I'll upload as-is. Thank you. Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a727f4.2090...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Please, anybody? . Am 08.12.13 15:32, schrieb Werner Detter: Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, hi Jan, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-6) unstable; urgency=low * Updated standards version to 3.9.5 * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl * debian/init.d removed internal api call /lib/init/vars.sh from init scrip * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) I've updated Standards already to 3.9.5 as PTS is telling me already to do so: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/policyd-weight.html Furthermore - I've removed api call /lib/init/vars.sh from init script, here's the diff: --- ../../policyd-weight/debian/init.d2013-12-08 14:16:33.669298059 +0100 +++ init.d2013-12-08 15:27:14.695661873 +0100 @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ # Gracefully exit if the package has been removed. test -x $DAEMON || exit 0 -. /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions # Read config file if it is present. It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a61b24.3030...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
+++ Werner Detter [2013-12-09 20:33 +0100]: Please, anybody? . OK. I'll bite. Am 08.12.13 15:32, schrieb Werner Detter: Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 That builds OK, and the diff looks sensible. Furthermore - I've removed api call /lib/init/vars.sh from init script, here's the diff: --- ../../policyd-weight/debian/init.d 2013-12-08 14:16:33.669298059 +0100 +++ init.d 2013-12-08 15:27:14.695661873 +0100 @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ # Gracefully exit if the package has been removed. test -x $DAEMON || exit 0 -. /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem the the policyd-weight init script doesn't use of them - maybe that's the point? It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? I have no idea. The IPv6 changes do seem quite important. I don't actually know what the procedure for getting fixes into point releases is. Mail the release list? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131210001731.gg1...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
Re: Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi, -. /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem the the policyd-weight init script doesn't use of them - maybe that's the point? Right, but I had the lintian warning: init.d-script-call-internal-API before with . /lib/init/vars.sh in the init-script. I've googled around and found this bugreport: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710559 So, I took it out. It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? I have no idea. The IPv6 changes do seem quite important. I don't actually know what the procedure for getting fixes into point releases is. Mail the release list? I've done that before - first package needs to hit unstable/testing and then I have to open a PU. Thanks, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a6b12a.1020...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, hi Jan, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: policyd-weight (0.1.15.2-6) unstable; urgency=low * Updated standards version to 3.9.5 * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl * debian/init.d removed internal api call /lib/init/vars.sh from init scrip * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) I've updated Standards already to 3.9.5 as PTS is telling me already to do so: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/policyd-weight.html Furthermore - I've removed api call /lib/init/vars.sh from init script, here's the diff: --- ../../policyd-weight/debian/init.d 2013-12-08 14:16:33.669298059 +0100 +++ init.d 2013-12-08 15:27:14.695661873 +0100 @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ # Gracefully exit if the package has been removed. test -x $DAEMON || exit 0 -. /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions # Read config file if it is present. It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a482f6.2060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, hi Jan, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: * Updating standards version to 3.9.5 * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl I've updated Standards already to 3.9.5 as PTS is telling me already to do so: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/policyd-weight.html It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a0bd19.1070...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, hi Jan, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: * Updating standards version to 3.9.5 * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl I've updated Standards already to 3.9.5 as PTS is telling me already to do so: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/policyd-weight.html It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you, Werner Detter I would love to see this go. Why is nobody interested in sponsoring this upload? Cheers Raoul -- Raoul Bhatia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/31db8029-7e45-4be8-af80-bdf2d66cc...@email.android.com
Bug#728758: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you and happy working, Werner Detter Am 16.11.13 14:05, schrieb Werner Detter: Hi, could anyone upload this package for me ? Thanks, Werner Detter Am 05.11.13 09:26, schrieb Werner Detter: Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you and happy working, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5298917c.4060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#728758: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi, could anyone upload this package for me ? Thanks, Werner Detter Am 05.11.13 09:26, schrieb Werner Detter: Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you and happy working, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52876db3.6030...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#728758: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage). Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-6 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail Changes since the last upload: * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns resolver is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670) * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this changes also hit stable? Thank you and happy working, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5278abb3.6020...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Arno, did you try to contact your previous sponsors? Could you reach Hauke? Not yet, I will try to contact them and get back to this thread if none of the previous sponsor has time for an upload. This version includes a little bugfix and updates standard versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight You don't try to get this into Testing, do you? I haven't looked at your package yet, but this does not sound like something which is targeting Testing at this stage. That's fine, of course, just telling you. Thanks for the RFS bug workflow hint. The severity of this upload is normal so it probably won't hit testing. It's not an RC fix. Bye, Werner -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQMeTZAAoJECrSoAS/sh/h1jkH/1p9dLRltjbEyciwU13+qQEx SUWrod6h3fW0SZq+dzshUnMYUkzqujVefNomJQwmZTCKmTT5XCW0zKAlrwJSmNge hSet2OOk3eY0KI0JCxi0/6VLDSltyJSlQyuQrUlr1P3f3cxf3fxZhcimm73mqMaG NukbuY0aWF1bn8VpeV0ymMN3X/R8cN9D6qPS6OaA6PjC8/FlIsBE+tWh7h8SaBtS +95q/L0qvKAyrtSzLqE6QNIkoyfbtwYly71A6yN9U/4t7f0k9INpmpBBLBjWoQO7 XkdDmvkB7jUsEj/nnssORaW+KlfH+OJf7m5GHGfPWwhR6LB2Srs+/bZAVKLRAIk= =OLk+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5031e4d9.9000...@aloah-from-hell.de
RFS: policyd-weight
Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-2 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes a little bugfix and updates standard versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-3 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, On 19.08.2012 12:38, Werner Detter wrote: I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-2 was already uploaded to unstable. did you try to contact your previous sponsors? Could you reach Hauke? This version includes a little bugfix and updates standard versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight You don't try to get this into Testing, do you? I haven't looked at your package yet, but this does not sound like something which is targeting Testing at this stage. That's fine, of course, just telling you. If nobody steps in, I may take care of it this week. By the way, did you notice the RFS bug workflow [1]? [1] http://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
On 02/17/2012 03:13 AM, Werner Detter wrote: Did you ask zigo who sponsored your last upload? sure i did. But he just became a father so he had no time left for uploading the package. Also, I'm busy with other packages, and did that last upload because I thought it was important that someone takes over the package that was orphaned. I never claimed that I'd be the sponsor for the life of the package (which I have no time for ATM, unfortunately). It would really help if someone else could also be the sponsor of this package, and maybe I will be able to help for the next upload, when I get less busy. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3e35f4.5090...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
Hi, so, it seems to me as nobody cares about uploading this package (and it's really just the upload) Well, I've done my Job. I can't do more then asking for a sponsor that will upload the package Meanwhile I'm thinking about orphaning the package if it's always the same procedure of waiting, sending mails and in the end nobody cares :) best, Werner Am 15.02.12 12:56, schrieb Werner Detter: Is there ANY DD that would upload the package? That would be sooo nice if anyone DD could care ... I'm, in principal, waiting since three weeks for an upload. ... cheers and thanks, Werner Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3d23b3.8060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
Hi, Please do not top-post. Le 16/02/2012 à 16:41, Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de écrivit : Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. The sponsoring game in Debian is a game of patience[1]. Sending an email every two days telling you are waiting for an upload doesn't do much more than annoy the very few people that are keen on sponsoring packages. Just be patient, and your turn will come. If your package isn't uploaded in three or four weeks, then do send an other email to remind people. Better yet, file a bug against the sponsorship-requests pseudo-package, so that your request doesn't fall through the cracks. Documentation for this is available at http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS. Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont [1] For my first sponsored upload, I waited for ~2 months for a reply on the list, and when the package was finally upload, it waited in NEW for ~6 months (during the squeeze freeze). Yet I'm still here enjoying Debian and the sponsor now reviews the packages directly. Don't give up! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871upu209z@poincare.home.olasd.eu
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:41:39PM +0100, Werner Detter wrote: so, it seems to me as nobody cares about uploading this package (and it's really just the upload) Well, I've done my Job. I can't do more then asking for a sponsor that will upload the package Meanwhile I'm thinking about orphaning the package if it's always the same procedure of waiting, sending mails and in the end nobody cares :) Did you ask zigo who sponsored your last upload? It would help greatly if I could even find your gpg key on any server. Unless it's there *and* you sign your mails, there isn't even a way to know that you actually built the package. The changes look reasonable anyways. If you fixed the gpg stuff, I might be persuaded into uploading it. Hauke -- .''`. Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org www.jhr-online.de : :' : Debian Developer www.debian.org `. `'` Member of the Linux Foundationwww.linux.com `- Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe www.fsfe.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Werner Detter escribió: Hi, so, it seems to me as nobody cares about uploading this package (and it's really just the upload) Well, I've done my Job. I can't do more then asking for a sponsor that will upload the package Meanwhile I'm thinking about orphaning the package if it's always the same procedure of waiting, sending mails and in the end nobody cares :) best, Werner Hi! I am not DD/DM, but probably, IMO, you can change the debian/rules. See http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html 4.4.2 Default rules file. You can change the file to something like %: dh $@ and include some extra files, like policyd-weight.manpages,... Is only a comment. Cheers, kix Am 15.02.12 12:56, schrieb Werner Detter: Is there ANY DD that would upload the package? That would be sooo nice if anyone DD could care ... I'm, in principal, waiting since three weeks for an upload. ... cheers and thanks, Werner Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3d23b3.8060...@aloah-from-hell.de -- ||// //\\// Rodolfo kix Garcia ||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120216174511.gb24...@kentin.kix.es
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, so, it seems to me as nobody cares about uploading this package (and it's really just the upload) Well, I've done my Job. I can't do more then asking for a sponsor that will upload the package Meanwhile I'm thinking about orphaning the package if it's always the same procedure of waiting, sending mails and in the end nobody cares :) Did you ask zigo who sponsored your last upload? sure i did. But he just became a father so he had no time left for uploading the package. It would help greatly if I could even find your gpg key on any server. Unless it's there *and* you sign your mails, there isn't even a way to know that you actually built the package. I've just uploaded my pubkey[1] and signed this message. The changes look reasonable anyways. If you fixed the gpg stuff, I might be persuaded into uploading it. Thanks, Werner [1] http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x2AD2A004BFB21FE1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPPVVbAAoJECrSoAS/sh/hVCYH/2ggiJALMIb7JW16OAbap18T a1u32bvw9nsQbosxM/QGEu57rujhF0g9RbtXFumYvI+32PYdbH/NpIvHclVFT9O7 PL6pWCx7PcO/dgEV9PVE++3yz8mXDZbqg+cSDbWg0MopJDTX1IDnF5GqBVCT71Dp Hgjk77yDIDXwr1Rc/ilPAv2Zy17fR1jmlhNjK8ZCF/selS75gMh/lQZbsac8xwMd lqft76PO5MhptL2eSfSWz09IfV0+vBdygg4/eVY/PStZm8WyydZ13uGuj2byPRy6 HafWLjlqLygwbqJ4EP9J1pRiLM9mEQAWGVgkObEs1Z1GtIg48oHjVvVFAqPKF7s= =8x+9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3d555b.5090...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
Hi, The sponsoring game in Debian is a game of patience[1]. Sending an email every two days telling you are waiting for an upload doesn't do much more than annoy the very few people that are keen on sponsoring packages. It's not my first sponsored upload but the second one. The first one is already in stable, this is just a small update. The other side of the view is - I'm pretty new in officially packaging stuff for debian. So a new wannabe maintainer is motivated and wants to get things fixed. On the other hand - the package is uploaded since weeks, nobody replies on the RFS's - and so not only the DD get's annoyed but also me because just nothing happens. In fact it's not the 10th try as suggested by the subject. This was just for getting attention purposes. Just be patient, and your turn will come. If your package isn't uploaded in three or four weeks, then do send an other email to remind people. I've uploaded the package three weeks ago. Better yet, file a bug against the sponsorship-requests pseudo-package, so that your request doesn't fall through the cracks. Documentation for this is available at http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS. thanks for the hint. Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3d56f2.4060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
Hi, The sponsoring game in Debian is a game of patience[1]. As the process is pretty new and I'm not (yet) familiar with normal time slots for sponsored uploads this is something learned. Thomas helped me a lot for which I'm really grateful, working with him is fun and it went fast. I've probably expected the same (fast) process for the next upload without him as he's currently busy. Sorry for noise caused on the list and hopefully I'll find a second sponsor. The time will come :) Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3d608a.1020...@aloah-from-hell.de
RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
Is there ANY DD that would upload the package? That would be sooo nice if anyone DD could care ... I'm, in principal, waiting since three weeks for an upload. ... cheers and thanks, Werner Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f37b8d9.3060...@aloah-from-hell.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3b9d6e.1030...@aloah-from-hell.de
RFS: policyd-weight
Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f37b8d9.3060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Anyone ? :) Am 08.02.12 12:53, schrieb Werner Detter: Hi everybody I've received an email from Thomas. He proposed that it would make sense to have not only one sponsor for my package but maybe two So if one is busy the other one can do the sponsoring. Thomas had no time to upload my package which I've uploaded on Januar 24th. But he suggested to ask on the mentors list for a second sponsor :) So I'm asking the list if any DD could sponsor this upload for me? In principal the new package includes little fixes with the init-script, and closes a bug. Thanks for your help. Regards from Munich, Werner Detter Am 07.02.12 15:33, schrieb Werner Detter: Hi everybody, as Thomas is non responsive since about two weeks I'll try to find somebody that uploads the package for me. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc Thanks, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f34f9d3.9080...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi everybody I've received an email from Thomas. He proposed that it would make sense to have not only one sponsor for my package but maybe two So if one is busy the other one can do the sponsoring. Thomas had no time to upload my package which I've uploaded on Januar 24th. But he suggested to ask on the mentors list for a second sponsor :) So I'm asking the list if any DD could sponsor this upload for me? In principal the new package includes little fixes with the init-script, and closes a bug. Thanks for your help. Regards from Munich, Werner Detter Am 07.02.12 15:33, schrieb Werner Detter: Hi everybody, as Thomas is non responsive since about two weeks I'll try to find somebody that uploads the package for me. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc Thanks, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f326245.3080...@aloah-from-hell.de
RFS: policyd-weight
Hi everybody, as Thomas is non responsive since about two weeks I'll try to find somebody that uploads the package for me. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc Thanks, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f313629.8020...@aloah-from-hell.de
RFS: policyd-weight
Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f118e13.3070...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Werner, On 14.01.2012 15:15, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) Please contact Zigo directly, or CC: him at least for follow-up requests. It is common to get in touch with former sponsors prior to contact mentors again [*]. Once you did that, and you didn't get any reply, or he asked you to explicitly ask through mentors it is advised to do so. [*] Although some sponsors prefer one time uploads. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPEaWzAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtUVMP/i0YS9yKd/p7/ZEM+X7rG3Ub g+ZYuQ+LjkeoceevYH6Il1fQJiwF7A1fA+59MbLDfJhDD8r30BzkCUr2XkGRYSNz SKOZGT4R5LB5hgdzQjTWyCFS8wv0gXFiU2gtg54CInemzCcfes1tHHrIn8PnX9ky idMWkCDBmCgrVmpxizrl2sHnTYwV5Be8QcSpAgIsbBioSA6TtJrdfn5nCBExSYGo aoJwIjaNxX0IxZvYuvCnKem11YCzHvToI61JCBAhhO4iUUTr5yDKix6ptaspaJFm PMA0rNfKvWt2+Pt4yulWrFoGodgwcX30QM9Hv/dJk9+H/1ghosZviXGkenNA8jS+ lSaVRaZ9lGYjFzFxSb5v5/mE5AxjJxc97Vwie54oQ9YuFPZC2qdsgc9eDlbkzM9Y ofdRGzA1GPBgIuPWJllEJfI+zQvgEYEAWYIHai4gGy+CNq10MvaTbegPbKLh5JHG +x/oi27Mv8WN1IL9lGbDKtOSF1BObPlPZ/w0sB3e8GjqOi0Ub2TI9ieL3yXG6bIB kkc/2UA+/1OQCy8nBbPNxGlppGIz872OTT6aDOousdvs0f65FohlT2Cpjjp6VSaX QAAjly6tb+7fgiRgCLkf3fWlfBbQ9fJJc0N5PtkhzXTY4h7TpGK0RKX3k8vZY1q1 Pikcp611jfv1hoxd0+4N =37XB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f11a5b4.3000...@toell.net
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Arno, thanks for the hint. I will get back to Zigo directly. Sorry for the noise caused and have a nice weekend. Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f11b169.9080...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi Ansgar, sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded in the end anyway :) No problem - I've just fixed another bug (#641538) in my local packet. It is not possible to change the package after an upload without making a new release that increases the version number. That said this change can probably wait until there are other changes as Thomas said. Ah, i see. Is it worth to increase the version number and upload the package when there is one (non critical) bug fixed and the missing /etc/default/policy-weight shipped? thank you, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0ab401.2040...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi, can anyone re-upload the package ? :) regards, Werner Detter Am 07.01.12 11:45, schrieb wer...@aloah-from-hell.de: Dear Mentors, I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my /etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure if the version that has been uploaded to mentors does include the /etc/default/policyd-weight file already so I've downloaded the source and it's not in there. Could you please re-upload the package? I've just uploaded the latest version to mentors. Sorry for the circumstances. Thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f09a7db.6010...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
On 01/06/2012 09:32 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi Thomas, I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the package got rejected: --- Reject Reasons: policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'MTime' is not defined] --- What's wrong? Just my server clock having an issue (it *was* in advance of few hours). As you saw, I re-uploaded and it's ok now. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0a0677.9040...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
On 01/08/2012 10:27 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi, can anyone re-upload the package ? :) regards, Werner Detter http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=wer...@aloah-from-hell.de It's in, as you can see! I don't think re-uploading only for the /etc/default/policyd-weight is worth the trouble. Just keep this in mind (and in your Vcs / workstation) for the next time! Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0a0787.3010...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi, sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded in the end anyway :) wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: Could you please re-upload the package? I've just uploaded the latest version to mentors. Sorry for the circumstances. It is not possible to change the package after an upload without making a new release that increases the version number. That said this change can probably wait until there are other changes as Thomas said. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871ur9s666@deep-thought.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Dear Mentors, I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my /etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure if the version that has been uploaded to mentors does include the /etc/default/policyd-weight file already so I've downloaded the source and it's not in there. Could you please re-upload the package? I've just uploaded the latest version to mentors. Sorry for the circumstances. Thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f082233.5050...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
On 01/06/2012 01:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Your debian/init.d script shouldn't set the PATH at all. All the folders it is putting in PATH are already accessible in the default $PATH, so don't change it. FYI, pabs don't agree with me, and think declaring the $PATH is the way to go. So please ignore this. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06ae90.9060...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi Thomas, thanks for your helpfull comments. What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using it anymore? It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable. The file /etc/default/policyd-weight isn't created but the init script takes account of it. /etc/default/policyd-weight is the place to add daemon-options for policyd-weight. What should we do here? Generate the file? Or don't take account of it in the init script? Your package seems using /var/run/policyd-weight/, but where exactly is that folder created? Shouldn't an mkdir -p be added to your init.d script? What is the use of /var/run/policyd-weight by the way? The creation of this directory is done by policyd-weight, so no need to create it via the init-script. Policyd-weight uses this directory for saving the PID and furthermore creates some more directories in /var/run/policyd-weight (for caching etc.). It behaves like the current policyd-weight in unstable/testing/stable. Thank you and best regards, Werner Detter Apart from that, I think the package is nicely improved, and would deserve to be uploaded. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06deb8.9070...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Werner, On 06.01.2012 12:44, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: What should we do here? Generate the file? Or don't take account of it in the init script? there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian regarding /etc/default/daemon options. That's confusing and something we should work on, but that needs to be addressed at a higher level. For you, in particular, you can choose either alternative for now. That's to use a /etc/default/daemon file or not. If you opt to do so, I'd suggest you to ship an example file how users are supposed to pass configuration options to your daemon, e.g. something like ## This is a POSIX shell fragment sourced by /etc/init.d/policyd-weight ## variable: DAEMON_OPTS ## daemon options to policyd-weight ## default: unset #DAEMON_OPTS= - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPBue8AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtYVgP/2HeSrPGiAHzzPm7QCB7j36K 1J1z3pQ4QbBlBRCSGaZndPWIIvUoEn2kVgVH4bXhzs7IF6r+byndWtyN/NsZbhnf wR/V7lOQEJPjwdcJkPBVhGFTdrM2Y7LJEsyZjASRoqiU9CojTj/GuWsUz4amU3rK /INr3lHRY9KTiNGdev3rB4dDUFJ8L2VHI0AGs5+5/rK8S/cvqqsLwf4vMwYLaJFz lNf//s3FJpHhu+zArPCrkfX5lx7tCcV86uJ8m6wcMavdP+r7ZT2EGyXGC5vcV3Ua csvBrdHLfdVX4J7WYACRLjye+c4e8h293ktZphZNr3//LPcM/zsSYq9RPcCHeknw KqLKSzRx8CbuW1UBl6kJ4CNdWYP8KRXDmVsYFqIJrFT7qY1UhpZtuZ8B5pJ2yK3p P8XcNTx/BiAKVOSPYQv+jJb2QUGS0QhRB8Hvxc3khfu+bB6TZIeAmyV9jR01cXZx 55OjU3y9Y0mQq4uihybvXoR7LwokeXNdX5fs6fxRe3rZUJbWJvMmv/HOuJZcyQqp heDmEMhQ5eW2a9x/Zfc9bd0YPO5dxP8j9kQjYsYWpyr9VBVCrQFVHHBv5odoHwCH VnCgX1GadT0Dokaw6tYzdWo5T1S4Fu25Nz0QNJ/Lyt1GFq06ZTxR8tiWTRTuYjg6 46FfJsYm/B/5emEiObvM =C78D -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06e7bc.3020...@toell.net
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi Arno, there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian regarding /etc/default/daemon options. That's confusing and something we should work on, but that needs to be addressed at a higher level. Ok, i see. For you, in particular, you can choose either alternative for now. That's to use a /etc/default/daemon file or not. If you opt to do so, I'd suggest you to ship an example file how users are supposed to pass configuration options to your daemon, e.g. something like ## This is a POSIX shell fragment sourced by /etc/init.d/policyd-weight ## variable: DAEMON_OPTS ## daemon options to policyd-weight ## default: unset #DAEMON_OPTS= I think that's the way to go. But where in source package should i put the file in my source package? I would then copy the file by postinst to /etc/default/policyd-weight ? Thank you, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06e9c9.40...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Werner, On 06.01.2012 13:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: I think that's the way to go. But where in source package should i put the file in my source package? I would then copy the file by postinst to /etc/default/policyd-weight ? typically you would put it in debian/policyd-weight and install it through dh_install(1). - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPBupPAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtpp8P/jyBU7ou6PnJeVQmY4x/ysGQ itFIQDqH8hM9zybz2sMVPFTSYmu+ODIjITLNuGrPPKW1Ih9D4tIWvaMllH+PIYmA 3SyVNnGJX7pvJN6fS91Y6mvGObnXMftWoIDbZK/OxXpmpm3hlRKM4LfSXy4nIqzB u6O8Vs5TqmLJKgRrsExZYamc+R0OIaVRjHSdngF7vXE3VKTQSgLkHAeZSxOu0pwC SyeDJFcoX3Zee8FfSDZO7WzJ2JfZUTDeJlERO5URKP0E9JVvE4j0/iaEwcjO9J3X //f1GQ/6WTLhgrQ1EGA+WcVYMchV008ODkxuSiTPLgWsQalfn8IO+E320o+FsbiV 26nZ44n1UXIf94lBgY5Apx/dqBn0P0wCUwzvyMnoVrWTQT1eFJRcPM+4Qk3XIavn dlnsqHjIJIx8MNiWTHbSi9N4YUQwdL5JnyeiKwqhFhkhZl1wW1vf5DBBRwx0OYbb p3BUEav2uD+B0/u9Qm9lIWLymB47X0w1PDuQ/qgg4dxJ5iTdhHtIszXa7hC2Z0dR e2rY3hcCrab74foyMi07MDRj1Bha6wEeSKo2nFjLNp8zXZr34wpgT0fshp0N4JG9 3UDq2+3AYDfOcXFA0RkY/ys12a47tiB7PzUtZt/AogTzXgjft7YxG0BHyGKS8kLj mn1BFNfOtdFQnO4HYcWv =rl8X -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06ea4f.3090...@toell.net
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
On 01/06/2012 07:44 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi Thomas, thanks for your helpfull comments. What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using it anymore? It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable. The file /etc/default/policyd-weight isn't created but the init script takes account of it. /etc/default/policyd-weight is the place to add daemon-options for policyd-weight. What should we do here? Generate the file? Or don't take account of it in the init script? I'd add a file there, with lots of comments, and all the options that you can put in it. It doesn't mater if absolutely every options are commented out, the point is to document what can be done with useful comments. Maybe you can do that on your next upload? The creation of this directory is done by policyd-weight, so no need to create it via the init-script. Policyd-weight uses this directory for saving the PID and furthermore creates some more directories in /var/run/policyd-weight (for caching etc.). It behaves like the current policyd-weight in unstable/testing/stable. Cool ! Since all the points I've asked you about have been addressed, I have uploaded the package. Thanks for your contribution to Debian, and thanks for being patient enough with all my (sometimes silly) questions, and your package polishing. Taking over maintenance of orphan packages is one of the best way to contribute to Debian! Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06ef6e.4070...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi Thomas, I'd add a file there, with lots of comments, and all the options that you can put in it. It doesn't mater if absolutely every options are commented out, the point is to document what can be done with useful comments. Maybe you can do that on your next upload? done :) I've added debian/default with the following content and re-uploaded the package. ## This is a POSIX shell fragment sourced by /etc/init.d/policyd-weight ## variable: DAEMON_OPTS ## daemon options to policyd-weight, possible options: ## ## Options ##-D Don't detach master - run master in foreground ##-d Debug, don't daemonize, log to STDOUT ##-f /path/to/file Specify a configuration file ##-h This help ##-k Kill cache instance ##-s Show cache entries and exit. With -d show debug ## cache entries ##-v Show version and exit ## ## default: unset # DAEMON_OPTS= Since all the points I've asked you about have been addressed, I have uploaded the package. I'm really happy about that :) Thank you. Thanks for your contribution to Debian, and thanks for being patient enough with all my (sometimes silly) questions, and your package polishing. Thanks for your help and your patience as this is my first package that i contributed to Debian. Also Thanks to Arno and Ansgar for their comments and hints :) I've learned a lot during my first package creation for Debian. Cheers, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06f748.1030...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi Thomas, I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the package got rejected: --- Reject Reasons: policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'MTime' is not defined] --- What's wrong? Thanks, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06f801.7060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06.01.2012 14:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: What's wrong? That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent persons, maybe they can help you out. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPBvpIAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtUSwP/RIHEgq4sFld465vl59VgQUG flbhaQ94xEtcRo2+7py1R4XMWA72Goas6H3CsA3HZUgeeKfcgz3Z8jI72fJjkaUS eHQFI5rUi1TuXd5jkKBrvkDkTk77/47xCHQRGN0pMkL5HW/U/cIxpcokGzMLUy20 QnfIyViL36kj0EyTFmmlH0N/5yykd44FpL4TtmhiCDwuYG0yNZV31gj1T7p32A9F VZ56KDdWzEBaUl7lafYSBRpyjlB64XSBWExx2+NE9lmi637pUUO060sWibzMvJlK XxpnenAZgVz7iOySU8q4xMiI7VG6vbk4A+R8klgpLxpDUI/2Bs7CvFOKzbLyRsnp 9atyHkJ6WAuWWVHw45L23gfP7+56guKx0H4MCC3XMSuhfhnxlMWYSJu1pBDtM4FJ T/T80ZcrqGLzG8Czw/H5TdFl4fmaC6UaWLd/VsXaSwSJivU7/pyB0p+1wGJb+O9e jJito4pM1Y+/nIKoquVzsxWMiZ8LAPSQvaBytpqMUt7/NujaoCxeC/sRtrWPMv2R dXQXxkpq9cIauWp1zKoM8uIxtTAfj5DNO+fvGtZAm+Ka1KBYeriytyspy0xT6IdW 4/oRs6aO7Hlbt3W+VC7mlZTZMiyvdNPzqxeIefD2OzH4zA1Zj4iVQ7fHYSJX6iDC rH1ShBD3O/jKLTLnRghm =GhrX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06fa49.7000...@toell.net
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi Arno, That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent persons, maybe they can help you out. OK, thank you :) Have a nice day, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06fae6.9070...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06.01.2012 14:45, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent persons, maybe they can help you out. Mark fixed a bug in dak which produced your faulty error message. The problem was the cryptic error, the rationale for being thrown however was not. Apparently there is something completely wrong on Thomas' system regarding the system time. dak rejected the upload because of bad timestamps in the binary package. [14:51] mhy that line is looking for files with really bad timestamps which causes a reject - it's just that it failed to explain why it was rejected due to the bug - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPBz90AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtYBgQAMfozHOq5lMgoTEHj/G8iht2 88C7JRFTe68iAjHH9soDxaLH/5JKmYr3yl3XeNb0LzFhs1SJVCUwLif8qs1NB2KS riCNlt3SAD1N7skAWzccw60fvcF8+2xWCsveHHhsIZMtnakySna2WC2NTFhCPbuA OOecju8bcctym4eIAbAXp9Hgj7Uhc6FSweUa2wjGIa9GM+xBCHbFZpk8LqyWbXCr hFmk/maONi6WwxCLDhVMkJxI1XiNhbbt+PD4nzslSAc3f/f7XpX0RT6Z5N1YSASP aXKhO5oQaDIkiQ1QpJWu4F3OgG7yxWWoJgKAZFzUK9mTAgWIXeqI3iO0inIB8kFa kA2fYcm54k076byGUu7L7DVEfXuJ+E1W+FCrhm3ypL7d4fON+aywU16dRdm1Hegb Fow/31R1zEIT9accU3z6bwpVt4C2G9WQnMKXGUncZ/K67IQ04M5hmDWbOmyo69lg l72AUvTn+jzI6aewFazglHPBQAknvbLENlM8Rawet2676iAkgjeEg1kYZ6fJnuP/ 1q6TWwl7RI10hv+SbZPSdViZmFQGfU8dLpvGR+Lndmnfchr3Q3RS+KZDWXQqH6b0 P7QLHJcOnsbOwcsB63sk68yDZw0zUDBYdO5Fa/BZLA6zPogkCtGYirRVB9p3JA6t Drdp5HiCyKsZDcbXSevh =pSSZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f073f75.7040...@toell.net
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi again,
I do have another question left.
I've just discovered that there are some files left in the debian directory
after package
creation, e.g.
debian/files
debian/policyd-weight.*
debian/policyd-weight.*.debhelper
debian/*.dephelper.log
debian/policyd-weight/
As source packages should not contain files like debian/files. I've enabled
Debugging via
DH_VERBOSE=1 and I do see that dh_clean is deleting those files pretty much at
the beginning
of package-creation.
-- cut --
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
rm -f debian/policyd-weight.substvars
rm -f debian/policyd-weight.*.debhelper
rm -rf debian/policyd-weight/
rm -f debian/*.debhelper.log
rm -f debian/files
find . \( \( -type f -a \
\( -name '#*#' -o -name '.*~' -o -name '*~' -o -name DEADJOE \
-o -name '*.orig' -o -name '*.rej' -o -name '*.bak' \
-o -name '.*.orig' -o -name .*.rej -o -name '.SUMS' \
-o -name TAGS -o \( -path '*/.deps/*' -a -name '*.P' \) \
\) -exec rm -f {} \; \) -o \
\( -type d -a -name autom4te.cache -prune -exec rm -rf {} \; \)
\)
rm -f *-stamp
-- cut --
So as those files are just deleted at the beginning of the package and
afterwards are recreated
through the build process. I'm not sure if
a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ?
b) I missed a dh_clean (or pedant) somewhere ?
c) I have to delete those manually?
Thank you,
Werner Detter
PS: here's my debian/rules snippet
clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_prep
dh_installdirs
install -D -m 644 policyd-weight
debian/policyd-weight/usr/sbin/policyd-weight
# Build architecture-independent files here.
binary-indep: build install
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_installchangelogs changes.txt
dh_installdocs
dh_installinit -- defaults 19 21
dh_installman man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5 man/man8/policyd-weight.8
dh_link
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
dh_perl
dh_installdeb
dh_gencontrol
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb
# Build architecture-dependent files here.
build-arch: build
build-indep: build
binary-arch: build install
binary: binary-indep binary-arch
.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f075868.5000...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Werner, On 06.01.2012 21:24, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ? b) I missed a dh_clean (or pedant) somewhere ? c) I have to delete those manually? I didn't actually try your source package, but it looks feasible. These files are created by a regular build process and entirely typical for a debhelper based workflow. Every temporary file in debian YOU don't create during build but debhelper is being cleaned by dh_clean. So, as long as you call dh_clean in your clean target, you do not need to worry about it. You will find them after every build attempt of your binary packages. As long as they do not appear in the resulting source package (which they won't, if you made everything right), all is good. Clean the build tree manually if you're worried about them (e.g. call fakeroot debian/rules clean). dpkg-buildpackage will do so automatically prior to build your package. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPB1ysAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtDHcP/i5y1dmISh3X47PvRJ0k1AdX WVkZHuyrfl21YZYHHHN/+1g8PqWeLgURySaEloNGv7umrHI8JG1PjdszEOY5sybj YYx/aF2DQUR4qPeqpnVgIfR3648v9x8Gf4M8/ROkn2Fm55XYZ8Oamcc+ImahyX0Z Vdigka68ea0uV2RnjnxWg2GCdqZq4+KZk1s3ko8wikm0lnlYIJqxnQUSE+ADdzfw vP/wSlYQltcqMO5iVsdSKdWr4jVkekmhqjGEbcb7ttUSLiTKVYRnO7zFUjj4GAbD MpbPyQAbQaQd97USvhKXVTpBTIQGlthSMe44oOy0vWrnP77z6mFOnOZ08kcwobyM Fy5UP2j2EpTwXwl4XqlyKUeY7pT+gkcolrBQyGaFhpqHszjWUmj7pXs/CnhI9+vB LzVh1j9gK1hCjBpTLKeoaPdzId7pDipSz5QOPdVuUPFyGRHU+4c0SQ5VXa+V+JW8 0Qu6P9VcQCtEL0jckxOodNG7DbOrs+26fpfNfVnOr9j6gFW9z1KFiuet0C65xj7G 8LbZ4QsyJpCf+xY4QnW7xuwuIuDZXbw2lZQSzKwiYhJuNbiEPg9VTeK6NEPIuW7b Woj1FKlwM6ghAyxvuFU1ZaGEsLquLf20T5JH7rmKc9Cc4X6R1o5o+G0wSp6v7I5i 5AcMwPyMcdUuBuvGhQQ5 =kZlu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f075cac.4070...@toell.net
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Hi Arno, a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ? b) I missed a dh_clean (or pedant) somewhere ? c) I have to delete those manually? I didn't actually try your source package, but it looks feasible. These files are created by a regular build process and entirely typical for a debhelper based workflow. Every temporary file in debian YOU don't create during build but debhelper is being cleaned by dh_clean. So, as long as you call dh_clean in your clean target, you do not need to worry about it. You will find them after every build attempt of your binary packages. As long as they do not appear in the resulting source package (which they won't, if you made everything right), all is good. I see, i was a little confused but your explanation made things clear to me. Thank you. Would linitian complain e.g. for example about those files? Clean the build tree manually if you're worried about them (e.g. call fakeroot debian/rules clean). dpkg-buildpackage will do so automatically prior to build your package. I just ran fakeroot debian/rules clean after the build process, all files are gone. Thanks for your patience help and for answering my (maybe silly) questions! Cheers, WErn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f075f25.8090...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Ansgar, And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean. With: # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make # clean: unpatch clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean build-stamp That is wrong. dh_testdir is not a prerequsite, but part of the recipe (the shell commands run for the target). I've already fixed that - the package is done, lintian clean and is waiting for a sponsored upload :) Please check the latest Version of the package: * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f056012.8070...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi all, just check the package, this thread here is already done :) So it makes no sense to comment stuff that's already fixed. thank you, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f057824.20...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Dear mentors, sorry that I've created two threads for my package. Please correspond on this thread to avoid confusion. All comments from mentors have been considered, the latest package is clean and awaits a sponsor :) thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0579e4.3040...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
On 12/30/2011 05:54 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: With: # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make # clean: unpatch clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean build-stamp I get: dpkg-buildpackage: source package policyd-weight dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.1.15.2-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 dpkg-source --before-build policyd-weight-0.1.15.2 debian/rules clean make: *** No rule to make target `dh_testdir', needed by `clean'. Stop. Regards, Werner Hi ! If you put dh_testdir on the same line as the clean:, then it will *not* be considered as a command, but as a dependency of the clean target. In other words, you should write: clean: dh_testdir and not: clean: dh_testdir I hope that helps, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0576cb.1060...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
On 12/30/2011 06:30 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: seems like this entry in debian/rules fixed it :) clean: rm -fr debian/files dh_clean *NO* !!! :) You really need the dh_testdir and dh_testroot calls. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f057727.2010...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
* Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org, 2012-01-05, 18:10: seems like this entry in debian/rules fixed it :) clean: rm -fr debian/files dh_clean *NO* !!! :) You really need the dh_testdir and dh_testroot calls. dh_testdir and dh_testroot act only as extra safety nets. Their use is certainly not mandatory. In case of the clean target, it could be argued that dh_testroot does more harm than good. Using dh_testroot in binary* targets is certainly a good idea. It usually takes significant amount of time to run these targets and they always do require (fake)root privileges, so it's better to fail early if the target was accidentally run as normal user. However, this is not the case for the clean target: it's usually not time-consuming, and there's a good chance that it runs correctly even without (fake)root privileges. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120105125845.ga...@jwilk.net
RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f05e6d5.5000...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)
On 01/06/2012 02:07 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter Your debian/init.d script shouldn't set the PATH at all. All the folders it is putting in PATH are already accessible in the default $PATH, so don't change it. What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using it anymore? Your package seems using /var/run/policyd-weight/, but where exactly is that folder created? Shouldn't an mkdir -p be added to your init.d script? What is the use of /var/run/policyd-weight by the way? Apart from that, I think the package is nicely improved, and would deserve to be uploaded. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f068340.5040...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f02e8aa.3040...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They should be removed by the clean target (dh_clean). Keeping dh_testdir in the clean target also should not hurt. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k45aqu6a@deep-thought.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean. With: # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make # clean: unpatch clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean build-stamp That is wrong. dh_testdir is not a prerequsite, but part of the recipe (the shell commands run for the target). You might want to read a bit about make; maybe [1] or any similar introduction. Regards, Ansgar [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Introduction.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwfyqty0@deep-thought.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Ansgar, thank you for your hints. Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They should be removed by the clean target (dh_clean). You're right. I just forgot to remove the file. Fixed. Keeping dh_testdir in the clean target also should not hurt. Thanks. Added to clean target. I've recreated and reuploaded the package. thank you and regards, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f018aea.2010...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: I've recreated and reuploaded the package. It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions it was deleted). There also is an empty directory debian/patched which is not needed (I think dpatch used it). You can also remove the old clean rule in d/rules which is currently commented out. If you apply the changes, I can upload the package later today. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877h1aqrsu@deep-thought.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Ansgar, thanks - again :) It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions it was deleted). deleted quilt dependency, deleted debian/README.source There also is an empty directory debian/patched which is not needed (I think dpatch used it) deleted. You can also remove the old clean rule in d/rules which is currently commented out. deleted. If you apply the changes, I can upload the package later today. That would be great :) I've reuploaded the package. Cheers, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01aa36.1070...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, Since I might be interested in using this software, I had a quick look to the packaging. I've noticed some issues that are remaining. Ansgar, feel free to correct me if you don't agree with my remarks! * Please run lintian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it will show you more issues (like spelling mistakes in the man pages, etc.). I wont details them here, since Lintian does it better than me! :) * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that. * The debian/init.d script doesn't use lsb-base for printing messages. Please switch to it (and depend on lsb-base) and replace the echoes. Also, the set -e should be (IMHO) set earlier in the script. As a bonus point, use the default in /lib/init/vars.sh with something like that: . /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions case $1 in start) [ $VERBOSE != no ] log_daemon_msg Starting $DESC $NAME * debian/postinst does some checkings against version 0.1.14-beta-3, yet, version 0.1.14.17-5 is in ole-stable, meaning that right now, you will always get the same result. It'd be great, IMO, to fix this, and remove the tests and all, since you already know the result of them. By the way, since the package is already in Debian, I think it would be fine to have it uploaded without the above fixes, and fix that on the next upload. I hope that helps, Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01daf8.2030...@goirand.fr
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Thomas, hi Ansgar, thanks for the hints. I will improve the package as suggested by you and let you know when I'm done :) Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01e08b.9020...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that. Question: what is the correct Format: entry in debian/copyright? I don't understand what i need to define there. Lintian throws me an error like: P: policyd-weight source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ N: N:Format URI of the machine-readable copyright file is not versioned. N: N:Please use N:http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=revisi N:on as the format URI instead. OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use? http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=? Thanks, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01ff31.5000...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, ntian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it will show you more issues (like spelling mistakes in the man pages, etc.). I wont details them here, since Lintian does it better than me! :) Thanks for the hint. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream author in the relevant manpages? Should i create patches for it? How's the workflow handling spelling errors by the upstream author? Thanks, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01ff98.7020...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, As per: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/ the latest revision seem to be 240. Thanks, that worked for me :) Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f02101b.4060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
On 01/03/2012 03:02 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that. Question: what is the correct Format: entry in debian/copyright? I don't understand what i need to define there. Lintian throws me an error like: P: policyd-weight source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ N: N:Format URI of the machine-readable copyright file is not versioned. N: N:Please use N:http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=revisi N:on as the format URI instead. OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use? http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=? Thanks, Werner As per: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/ the latest revision seem to be 240. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f020f4c.7090...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Thomas, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that. done * The debian/init.d script doesn't use lsb-base for printing messages. Please switch to it (and depend on lsb-base) and replace the echoes. Also, the set -e should be (IMHO) set earlier in the script. As a bonus point, use the default in /lib/init/vars.sh with something like that: . /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions case $1 in start) [ $VERBOSE != no ] log_daemon_msg Starting $DESC $NAME done * debian/postinst does some checkings against version 0.1.14-beta-3, yet, version 0.1.14.17-5 is in ole-stable, meaning that right now, you will always get the same result. It'd be great, IMO, to fix this, and remove the tests and all, since you already know the result of them. done * Please run lintian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it will show you more issues (like spelling mistakes in the man pages, etc.). I wont details them here, since Lintian does it better than me! :) I're rebuild and uploaded the latest package with those fixes. The only thing that needs now to be fixed are the spelling-errors by the upstream author in the manpages. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream author in the relevant manpages? Should i create patches for it? How's the workflow handling spelling errors by the upstream author? Cheers and thank you, Werner Detter I got those Messages left werner@smaint:~/git/wd-deb-policyd-weight$ lintian -Ii -E --pedantic policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_amd64.changes I: policyd-weight: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz childs children N: N:Lintian found a spelling error in the manpage. Lintian has a list of N:common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary N:like a spelling checker does. N: N:If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help N:of gettext (with the help of po4a, for example) or a similar tool, N:please fix the error in the translations as well as the English text to N:avoid making the translations fuzzy. With gettext, for example, this N:means you should also fix the spelling mistake in the corresponding N:msgids in the *.po files. N: N:Severity: minor, Certainty: possible N: N:Check: manpages, Type: binary N: I: policyd-weight: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz childs children I: policyd-weight: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz:307 N: N:This manual page seems to contain a hyphen where a minus sign was N:intended. By default, - chars are interpreted as hyphens (U+2010) by N:groff, not as minus signs (U+002D). Since options to programs use minus N:signs (U+002D), this means for example in UTF-8 locales that you cannot N:cut and paste options, nor search for them easily. The Debian groff N:package currently forces - to be interpreted as a minus sign due to N:the number of manual pages with this problem, but this is a N:Debian-specific modification and hopefully eventually can be removed. N: N:- must be escaped (\-) to be interpreted as minus. If you really N:intend a hyphen (normally you don't), write it as \(hy to emphasise N:that fact. See groff(7) and especially groff_char(7) for details, and N:also the thread starting with N:http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200303/msg01481.h N:tml N: N:If you use some tool that converts your documentation to groff format, N:this tag may indicate a bug in the tool. Some tools convert dashes of N:any kind to hyphens. The safe way of converting dashes is to convert N:them to \-. N: N:Because this error can occur very often, Lintian shows only the first 10 N:occurrences for each man page and give the number of suppressed N:occurrences. If you want to see all warnings, run Lintian with the N:-d/--debug option. N: N:Refer to /usr/share/doc/groff-base/README.Debian and the groff_char(7) N:manual page for details. N: N:Severity: wishlist, Certainty: possible N: N:Check: manpages, Type: binary N: I: policyd-weight: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz:308 I: policyd-weight: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz:309 I: policyd-weight: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz additionaly additionally I: policyd-weight: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man8/policyd-weight.8.gz childs children -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
On 01/03/2012 03:03 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Thanks for the hint. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream author in the relevant manpages? Should i create patches for it? How's the workflow handling spelling errors by the upstream author? Best is to create a patch, include it in your Debian package, and forward that patch to upstream so he can have his manpage fixed upstream as well (so you will later remove the debian-specific patch). Thomas P.S: I'm registered to the list, no need to Cc: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f021834.70...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2012, 04:10 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand: OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use? http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=? Thanks, Werner As per: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/ the latest revision seem to be 240. Thomas Mmmh, Wouldn't it be a great idea to mention this also in the documention at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ ? There it tells you to use http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ (which gives you a 404...) coldtobi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1325541631.4741.2.ca...@mordor.loewenhoehle.ip
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi again :) Best is to create a patch, include it in your Debian package, and forward that patch to upstream so he can have his manpage fixed upstream as well (so you will later remove the debian-specific patch). I've created a new Patch which fixes the spelling errors and mentioned that in debian/changelog. lintian --verbose -Ii -E --pedantic policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_amd64.changes is clean now :) The URL of your package is: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc Thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f023523.8050...@aloah-from-hell.de
RFS: policyd-weight
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f009ed6.4030...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Dear Ansgar, thanks for your helpfull reply. I have some more questions. From d/changelog: ++ * New upstream release ++- (Closes: #641227) The second line misses something behind the dash. Changed. There is a debian/.pc directory which should not be there. Removed. You should mention that the package has a new maintainer and close the bug indicating that the package is orphaned (#612734). Done. debian/changelog has trailing whitespace. Removed. debian/README.source is not necessary for packages using a standard format like 3.0 (quilt). You also do not need to build-depend on quilt. Deleted the file, mentioned it in debian/changelog. If I remove the build- depend on quilt lintian throws me: E: policyd-weight source: missing-build-dependency quilt A note at the beginning of patches indicating the reason and author for the change would be nice. Hm, how do i add comments with quilt to existing patches. Can i directly edit the patches or is there another way/tool for it? From debian/rules: +include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make +build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN) clean: unpatch I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise the package build fails. These are not needed when using the 3.0 (quilt) source format. From the package description in debian/control: Its intended - It is intended or policyd-weight is intended. Fixed. The Vcs-* fields in debian/control are probably no longer current. Please update or remove them. Removed. I've reuploaded the package. Thank you and best regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efc7058.6030...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, I've added comments to my quilt patches and reuploaded the source package. So there is stuff left: +include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make +build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN) clean: unpatch I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise the package build fails. With what error? I guess you did not remove the unpatch dependency for the clean target (it's still in the new package)? That's right. After i removed the unpatch dep for the clean target I get: debian/rules clean make: *** No rule to make target `dh_testdir', needed by `clean'. Stop. Ok, I've also removed dh_testdir and get: debian/rules clean make: *** No rule to make target `dh_testroot', needed by `clean'. Stop. and so on :( So something is wrong and i currently don't know what. Any help here is appreciated. Thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efc86cf.2020...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: +include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make +build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN) clean: unpatch I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise the package build fails. With what error? I guess you did not remove the unpatch dependency for the clean target (it's still in the new package)? That's right. After i removed the unpatch dep for the clean target I get: debian/rules clean make: *** No rule to make target `dh_testdir', needed by `clean'. Stop. Ok, I've also removed dh_testdir and get: debian/rules clean make: *** No rule to make target `dh_testroot', needed by `clean'. Stop. and so on :( So something is wrong and i currently don't know what. How did your rules file look like? Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwg3z9k6@marvin.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: +include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make +build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN) clean: unpatch I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise the package build fails. With what error? I guess you did not remove the unpatch dependency for the clean target (it's still in the new package)? debian/README.source is not necessary for packages using a standard format like 3.0 (quilt). You also do not need to build-depend on quilt. Deleted the file, mentioned it in debian/changelog. If I remove the build- depend on quilt lintian throws me: E: policyd-weight source: missing-build-dependency quilt That is probably triggered by the include you still have. A note at the beginning of patches indicating the reason and author for the change would be nice. Hm, how do i add comments with quilt to existing patches. Can i directly edit the patches or is there another way/tool for it? You can just edit them and write something to the beginning or use quilt header -e with the patch you want to comment on top. There is also a standard format for comments: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ I especially find references to bug reports useful when looking at patches at a later time. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wr9fzd2u@marvin.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, How did your rules file look like? Currently: #!/usr/bin/make -f # written by Jan Wagner w...@cyconet.org # # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. #export DH_VERBOSE=1 include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make clean: unpatch dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean build-stamp install: build dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_prep dh_installdirs install -D -m 644 policyd-weight debian/policyd-weight/usr/sbin/policyd-weight # Build architecture-independent files here. binary-indep: build install dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_installchangelogs changes.txt dh_installdocs dh_installinit -- defaults 19 21 dh_installman man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5 man/man8/policyd-weight.8 dh_link dh_compress dh_fixperms dh_perl dh_installdeb dh_gencontrol dh_md5sums dh_builddeb # Build architecture-dependent files here. build-arch: build build-indep: build binary-arch: build install binary: binary-indep binary-arch .PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efc8a5c.2030...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: +include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make +build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN) clean: unpatch I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise the package build fails. With what error? I guess you did not remove the unpatch dependency for the clean target (it's still in the new package)? That's right. After i removed the unpatch dep for the clean target I get: debian/rules clean make: *** No rule to make target `dh_testdir', needed by `clean'. Stop. Ok, I've also removed dh_testdir and get: debian/rules clean make: *** No rule to make target `dh_testroot', needed by `clean'. Stop. and so on :( So something is wrong and i currently don't know what. debian/README.source is not necessary for packages using a standard format like 3.0 (quilt). You also do not need to build-depend on quilt. Deleted the file, mentioned it in debian/changelog. If I remove the build- depend on quilt lintian throws me: E: policyd-weight source: missing-build-dependency quilt That is probably triggered by the include you still have. But it's telling me hey there is a missing-build-dependeny quilt. I only get this error if I comment out the following line in debian/control include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make A note at the beginning of patches indicating the reason and author for the change would be nice. Hm, how do i add comments with quilt to existing patches. Can i directly edit the patches or is there another way/tool for it? You can just edit them and write something to the beginning or use quilt header -e with the patch you want to comment on top. There is also a standard format for comments: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ I especially find references to bug reports useful when looking at patches at a later time. Thanks. I'll consider this after the mentioned things. Regards and thank you, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efc7bc2.4060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: How did your rules file look like? Currently: [...] include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make clean: unpatch dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean build-stamp And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vlvz1ia@marvin.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean. With: # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make # clean: unpatch clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean build-stamp I get: dpkg-buildpackage: source package policyd-weight dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.1.15.2-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 dpkg-source --before-build policyd-weight-0.1.15.2 debian/rules clean make: *** No rule to make target `dh_testdir', needed by `clean'. Stop. Regards, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efce183.60...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, the package is built by using clean: without any parameters but if gives me warnings like follows: dpkg-genchanges -sa ../policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 2) dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 3) dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 4) dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 5) dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 6) dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 7) dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 8) dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload Every time I rebuild my package there is one more duplicate files list entry. Any Hint what I'm doing wrong? regards and thanks, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efce6f7.1030...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 7) dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 8) dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload Every time I rebuild my package there is one more duplicate files list entry. Any Hint what I'm doing wrong? seems like this entry in debian/rules fixed it :) clean: rm -fr debian/files dh_clean Furthermore I've uploaded the rebuild package to mentors.debian.net, so here's the RFS: the package again. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efce9e9.8060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
clean: rm -fr debian/files dh_clean dh_clean does remove debian/files, you don't need that explicit rm -fr. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111229223424.ga1...@jwilk.net
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Jakub, dh_clean does remove debian/files, you don't need that explicit rm -fr. good to know, thanks. Fixed, recreated and uploaded again on mentors. thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efceb79.9040...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efd644f.4060...@aloah-from-hell.de
