Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package) [highly configurable terminal emulator]

2010-10-12 Thread Tony Houghton
On 12/10/10 00:50, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
 
 I'll take this. The change seems minimal, so I'll sponsor it. Please
 be sure to request the release team for a freeze exception.

Thanks. I've sent a message to debian-release.

I don't fully understand the freeze exception process. I see you already
uploaded this to unstable, but last time George Danchev waited for a
response from debian-release before uploading. Which is the more normal
thing to do?

Also, I've now moved to 1.19.* upstream, which has new/changed features.
Should I ask for this to be sponsored for experimental or just wait
until the freeze is over?

-- 
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cb471fe.6020...@realh.co.uk



Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package) [highly configurable terminal emulator]

2010-10-12 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Tony,

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
 On 12/10/10 00:50, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
  
  I'll take this. The change seems minimal, so I'll sponsor it. Please
  be sure to request the release team for a freeze exception.
 
 Thanks. I've sent a message to debian-release.
 
 I don't fully understand the freeze exception process. I see you already
 uploaded this to unstable, but last time George Danchev waited for a
 response from debian-release before uploading. Which is the more normal
 thing to do?

It might have made more sense to ask the release team for permission,
especially if you were suspicious that they might reject the
change. However, since the change seemed minimal (and important), I
made a guess (which I hope wasn't inaccurate) that the release team
would not have too much of an issue in allowing it through.

Maybe, from next time, I should first ask the release team first. But
I don't think it should matter much.

 Also, I've now moved to 1.19.* upstream, which has new/changed features.
 Should I ask for this to be sponsored for experimental or just wait
 until the freeze is over?

If you want to provide your users the package early on, experimental
would be an option, though some don't like that approach (there is a
discussion on this list happening now on this topic). But, in any
event, under the current guidelines, I'd advise you to not get the new
version into unstable during the freeze.

Thanks for your contribution to Debian!

Kumar
-- 
Linux - Where do you want to fly today?
-- Unknown source


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101012150952.ga27...@146653177.ece.utexas.edu



RFS: roxterm (updated package) [highly configurable terminal emulator]

2010-10-11 Thread Tony Houghton
Dear mentors,

My first RFS for this version didn't result in an upload so I am still
looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.5-3 of my package roxterm.

It builds these binary packages:
roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 598971

The bug can affect which environment variables roxterm decides to set or
change in its child shells. The specific problem experienced in Ubuntu
Maverick (not setting TERM correctly) is unlikely to affect Debian,
because Debian's older vte library sets TERM whereas Maverick's doesn't.
However, the bug still has potential to cause weird things to happen
with environment variables and the fix is very simple, so I think it
should be included in squeeze.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.18.5-3.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Tony Houghton

-- 
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cb34b6d.8050...@realh.co.uk



Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package) [highly configurable terminal emulator]

2010-10-11 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Hi!

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:37:49PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
 The upload would fix these bugs: 598971
 
 The bug can affect which environment variables roxterm decides to set or
 change in its child shells. The specific problem experienced in Ubuntu
 Maverick (not setting TERM correctly) is unlikely to affect Debian,
 because Debian's older vte library sets TERM whereas Maverick's doesn't.
 However, the bug still has potential to cause weird things to happen
 with environment variables and the fix is very simple, so I think it
 should be included in squeeze.

I'll take this. The change seems minimal, so I'll sponsor it. Please
be sure to request the release team for a freeze exception.

Thanks for mailing the request again, and thank you for contributing
to Debian!

Kumar
-- 
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk ?
Microsoft spel chekar vor sail, worgs grate !!
(By leit...@inf.fu-berlin.de, Felix von Leitner)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature