Re: RFS: rudeconfig
Hi, On Mon, February 6, 2012 4:11 am, Richard Laager wrote: Are you actually using these components in an application? If you're packaging them just for fun, that's probably not the best use of your time or Debian's archive space, buildds, etc. Yes. My team uses rudecgi for parsing. We are using it for an internal web based admin panel. I was intending to package only rudecgi and later gave a thought of packaging all. But, for rudecgi we are using it and also hope that it gets into Debian. Sincerely, -- Medhamsh Hacktivist | http://medhamsh.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/10075.122.169.166.198.1328523698.squir...@mail.medhamsh.org
Re: RFS: rudeconfig
On 05.02.2012 16:31, Medhamsh wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rudeconfig. * Package name: rudeconfig Version : 5.0.5-1 Upstream Author : Matthew Flood * URL : http://rudeserver.com/config/index.html * License : GNU GPL Section : libs It builds those binary packages: librudeconfig-dev - C++ config file library for reading and writing .ini files - deve librudeconfig3 - C++ config file library for reading and writing .ini files - runt Why another .ini file library is needed, while about 1000 others are already available? Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2e9935.2070...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
Re: RFS: rudeconfig
Hello, On Sun, February 5, 2012 8:29 pm, Michael Tokarev wrote: Why another .ini file library is needed, while about 1000 others are already available? I have submitted an ITP for rudecgi parser lib for C++ and uploaded the package to mentors(#658347). After that found all the components of http://rudeserver.com to be interesting. So, wanted to package all of them and started with the .ini file lib. If it is unnecessary re-work I would stop working on it and close the bug. I would also request an opinion whether the core libs at http://rudeserver.com are worth packaging. I want to submit ITPs for all of them. Else I would stop doing the same. Sincerely, -- Medhamsh Hacktivist | http://medhamsh.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/49221.14.99.21.159.1328455795.squir...@mail.medhamsh.org
Re: RFS: rudeconfig
On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 20:59 +0530, Medhamsh wrote: I have submitted an ITP for rudecgi parser lib for C++ and uploaded the package to mentors(#658347). After that found all the components of http://rudeserver.com to be interesting. Are you actually using these components in an application? If you're packaging them just for fun, that's probably not the best use of your time or Debian's archive space, buildds, etc. -- Richard signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
