cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
Hi, I'm trying to fix libsbml bugs and while doing so upgrade to the latest upstream version. Since the original tarball needs to be stripped I moved the packaging from SVN to Git[1] (so please do not try debcheckout which does not lead to the latest packaging status). Unfortunately my attempt is blocked by ... CMake Error at docs/CMakeLists.txt:212 (message): Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR. -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! ... even if I tried in debian/rules export JDK_PATH=$(readlink -f /usr/bin/javac | sed "s:/bin/javac::") export JAVA_INCLUDE_PATH=$(JDK_PATH)/include as well as specifying -DJDK_PATH:STRING=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -DJAVA_INCLUDE_PATH:STRING=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include to the cmake call. Any help would be welcome. Kind regards Andreas. [1] git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/libsbml.git -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: dpkg-buildpackage -A : common headers case
Hi, >So it must be done by hand: no facility has been implemented to say that >a given indep package must be treated as arch package at buid stage ? The indep builders might not even call the arch auto_build, so I presume it is not implemented because it might just not even be called? (not completely sure, I even forgot about the original question :D) cheers, G.
Bug#808231: RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mkcast" * Package name: mkcast Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : a...@keyboardfire.com * URL : https://github.com/KeyboardFire/mkcast * License : The MIT License Section : Python It builds those binary packages: mkcast - A tool for creating GIF screencasts of a window, with key presses To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mkcast Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mkcast/mkcast_1.0.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: mkcast (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #808227) -- Abhilash Mhaisne <55abhil...@openmailbox.org> Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:46:46 +0530 Regards, Abhilash Mhaisne
Bug#806815: RFS: lirc/0.9.4-devel-0.1 [NMU] -- Linux Infrared Remote Control
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Alec, (sorry again for the long wait, I was hoping somebody else was going to help in this, but nobody seems to be caring about this package) > * Non-maintainer upload. > * First shot on major upstream updates. > - Re-packaged from scratch based on new dh primitives. > - Thanks for help on debian-mentors! > * New upstream release 0.9.4 > - Release 0.9.1 .. 0.9.3 was never packaged. > - This is an experimental, pre-release package. > - Old 'lirc' service split into separate systemd services: > lircd.service, lircmd.service and irexec.service. > - New package structure: lirc, lirc-doc, liblirc0, liblirc-dev with > corresponding upgrade path dependencies. > - Fixes "Not updated to last version" (Closes: #777199). > - Fixes "Default device for mode2 is /dev/lirc" (Closes: #702140). > - Fixes "/var/run/lirc contents disappear..." (Closes: #676343). > - Fixes "lircrcd segfaults" (Closes: #780062). > - Fixes "'/etc/init.d/lirc restart' is broken" (Closes: #782091). > - Fixes "Prompting due to modified conffiles..." (Closes: #655969). > - Fixes "LIRC installs bad udev rule" (Closes: #804397). > * Old lircd output socket link /dev/lirc dropped. Use /var/run/lirc/lircd. > * Update compiler flags: -Wl,as-needed + hardening > [Stefan Lippers-Hollmann] > * Avoid negative architecture deps like [!hurd] (Closes: #634807) > [Stefan Lippers-Hollmann] > * Add patch 0007-tools-remove-configs-symlink.patch + explicit link > to walk around #801719. > * Changing Vcs-* headers to point to upstream packaging branch. I asked probably this before, but did you take account about the Ubuntu delta? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/0.9.0-0ubuntu5 (also look ubuntu1 ubuntu2 ubuntu3 ubuntu4 delta) >Currently, this package is maintained by >pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org which seems to be MIA. I have invoked >the MIA procedure by sending message to the >QA team. I have also requested to >be member of this group. > >The packaging situation has been discussed: >https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2015/10/msg00487.html > >The update is disruptive and needs manual intervention: >https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/11/msg00082.html 1) $ dpkg --compare-versions 0.9.4-devel-0.1 gt 0.9.4-1 $ echo $? 0 you should rename in something like 0.9.4~devel or maybe something better explaining such as 0.9.4~{alpha,beta,RC} and release an upstream snapshot (not strictly requested, but "devel" doesn't mention a particular history, just a generic one) 2) I did: dget -x http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lirc/lirc_0.9.0~pre1-1.2.dsc dget -u http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lirc/lirc_0.9.4-devel-0.1.dsc debdiff lirc_0.9.0~pre1-1.2.dsc lirc_0.9.4-devel-0.1.dsc > debdiff filterdiff debdiff -i "*debian*" > debdiff.filtered changelog: -- gregor herrmann Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:51:55 +0100 - lirc (0.9.0~pre1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload with maintainers permission. * Add dh-autoreconf to fix FTBFS on ppc64el. Closes: #746505 -- Andreas Barth Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:18:17 + - lirc (0.9.0~pre1-1) unstable; urgency=low two lines deleted here control: are you sure about the autotools-dev build dependency? usually autoreconf is a better replacement +# libjs-jquery(See lintian overrides) fine to leave jquery out, but lintian is correct, and overriding is wrong. I can sponsor with that lintian warning, but please do not override it +# libftdi1-dev, (Not available in jessie) well, do not care about backports right now, we are talking about unstable and stretch. +# See DBS #801588 +Build-Conflicts: libirman I can look at this if needed, maybe fix libirman and then use it? (BTW it is called BTS not DBS, and this kind of comments is better in the changelog instead of control file. soemthing like "build-conflict against libirman (cfr: #XXX)" 3) debian/trunk (others?) this seems to be useless, please keep the debian directory minimal, and strip the debian packaging from upstream tarballs 4) watch file seems broken Newest version on remote site is xmms-plugin-1.4, local version is 0.9.4-devel => Newer version available from maybe this: http://sf.net/lirc/lirc-(\d.+)\.tar\.gz works better? (forcing a digit as first number) The upgrade facility looks nice, but I didn't try to install the new version (yet). If you fix the above and reupload on mentors, I'll do some test builds and see how lintian/adeguate/piuparts performs and try something on a real virtual machine. (I have to say I like the packaging, you seem to have done a great work on this, even if the upgrade path requires manual intervention, but having a script is indeed something nice and appreciated). I hope to sponsor this package really soon (for experimental). (ccing Stefan, maybe he has some hints) cheers, G. (and sorry again for the long tim
Re: install udpxy.1.0.23
Hi, as a start you might want to give some build logs or install logs. I see you already ccd Alex, who did a first packaging work. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687543 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687620 unfortunately the package didn't get in unstable, so there isn't much we can do here. If you want to package it please start, own the RFP, do the packaging work (and here we can help with it) and open an RFS bug. If you want to install something not available in debian repositories debian-mentors is not the right place (here we discuss mainly request of sponsorships, and packaging issues). Maybe there are some debian-users lists that might be more helpful. cheers, Gianfranco Il Mercoledì 25 Novembre 2015 22:24, linuxuser ha scritto: hello Can you help me how to installed udpxy.1.0.23-0-prod.tar.gz I uses Debian 8.2 ,I'm trying but it is impossible
Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem
On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote: > >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place. > > I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source > > code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching. > > > > Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original > > source code which patch modify changes. > > > > And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to > > reduce patches if they are not really needed? > > I think it's appropriate to apply a patch (and submit it upstream) in > this case, as this is certainly a bug in the upstream makefile, and it > should be fixed. Ok. I can send patch to upstream project which fix compilation (on debian). But, what is wrong with my original (and current) version which use pmake and does not need patching original software? -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
Hi Kevin, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:44:40PM +1100, Kevin Murray wrote: > > I have pushed a possible fix to the branch 'daube/possible-cmake-fix'. I am > not > sure of the overall effects, the build is taking ages on my laptop, but it > seems > to have fixed the immediate error. Thanks a lot for this first and very helpful step. Following this strategy I was even able to work around another issue with Java bindings which was also solved by setting a variable accordingly. Finally after 1-2 hours of building I went into ... make[4]: Entering directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' [100%] Generate Java-API Documentation /usr/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/build.make:61: recipe for target '../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html' failed make[4]: *** [../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html] Error 127 make[4]: Leaving directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1123: recipe for target 'docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all' failed make[3]: *** [docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' ... When I trow the error message above in a web search it comes up with the log of bug #548729 which says: This is most likely a lack of /proc. Some ld.so features require /proc/self/exe. $ readelf -d /usr/bin/java | grep ORIGIN 0x000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64/jli] 0x6ffb (FLAGS_1)Flags: ORIGIN AFAIK, a mounted /proc is close to mandatory these days. The error message could be nicer, but this is a libc bug. If I try inside the pbuilder chroot: 1|root@wr-linux01:/ # mount mount: failed to read mtab: No such file or directory 2|root@wr-linux01:/ # readelf -d /usr/bin/java | grep ORIGIN 0x000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64:/usr/local/lib/amd64:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64] I can confirm that /proc is not mounted. Any idea how to approach this to finally build libsbml successfully (at least passing the step to Generate Java-API Documentation? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#808243: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.3-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid": * Package name: hoteldruid Version : 2.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis * URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com * License : AGPLv3 Section : web It builds those binary packages: hoteldruid - web-based property management system for hotels or B&Bs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.1.3-1.dsc More information about hoteldruid can be obtained from http://www.hoteldruid.com. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * debian/postinst: use Require syntax in apache2 configuration. * Removed debian/menu as requested by Technical Committee decision on #741573. * debian/postrm: use shell function to check if ucf and ucfr exist. * Removed echo -e from HotelDruid launcher script. (Closes: #772237) * Added a patch to fix some backup bugs in includes/funzioni_backup.php. * Changed debhelper compatibility version to level 9. * Added base.js to debianize patch to cut a line larger than 256 characters. * New upstream release (2.1.1-1). * debian/control: updated Standards-Version (no change needed). * removed MimeType from hoteldruid-launcher desktop entry. * debian/po: include new template translations + nl.po: Dutch translation, thanks to Frans Spiesschaert. (Closes: #767416) Regards, Marco M. F. De Santis
Bug#808141: sponsorship-requests: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package eclipse-titan.
control: tag -1 moreinfo On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:45:02PM +0100, Gergely Pilisi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipse-titan": Ok, first, a question: do you do your debian packaging in git? And, here is a review: * trailing whitespace on the changelog line. * maybe you're happy to discover tools like `wrap-and-sort`, to wrap the Build-Depends and Depends line (and sort other stuff, and removing trailing whitespaces in some other files) * please don't cp files that way in d/rules, I find that ugly. instead, use a debian/eclipse-titan.install file. See dh_install(1) for more info. On a related note, I prefer using $(CURDIR) instead of $$(pwd) + this will also make debian/eclipse-titan.dirs useless + if you need to rename files dh-exec can help you a bit, if you want * during the compilation there are several errors like ./TTCN3.hh:58:39: fatal error: RT1/TitanLoggerApiSimple.hh: No such file or directory is this to be expected & ok? * is there a way to have a more verbose build, showing all the command line? * you told me that you could get it to build with hardening-wrapper, well, to me it doesn't (see below) :) * can you enable parallel building? (see debhelper(7)) * debian/copyright is totally inadequate. + personally I won't be totally happy without a copyright following copyright-format 1.0 + anyway, please pick a random package from the archive and try having a look at what a copyright file normally looks like. About ditching hardening-wrapped in favour of just using what dpkg-buildflags do: whatever I use the .dsc you provided, just removed hardening-wrapper or enable the hardening build flags using DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS, the build fails with In file included from jnimw.cc:8:0: jnimw.h:14:17: fatal error: jni.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. ../Makefile.genrules:87: recipe for target 'jnimw.o' failed So there is not much of a comparison to do. Maybe you built the package with an hardening-wrapper without the fix for #801597 ? And btw, having a verbose build is kinda important to check for the build flags, hardening, etc. I might have other points to say, but let's go gradually, uh? :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Thibaut Varène wrote: > I suppose what I need is having people take over my packages and call > it a day, tbh. With my upload rights revoked there’s not much meaning > in being a DD. Not really. There are several active DDs who got their key removed due to the 1024 purge and still have packages sponsored. Sponsoring a DD is also easier, you know that most probably the sponsoree is already aware of good conventions, etc. Don't give up just for this inconvenience, ask for sponsorship and as soon as you manage to get your key back into the keyring you can come back full steam :) PS: @Tim: what about this RFS? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#808243: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.3-1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:46:56PM +0100, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid": I'll sponsor it, if you just change this to things: * debhelper version 9.0.0 never existed, neither 8.0.0 did. using (>= 9) is more than enough. * debian/copyright says 2001-2013, but I have to guess it exstends till 2015 too? * debian/changelog contains info about the unreleased version 2.1.1-1, please fold them toghether with 2.1.3-1 the rest looks good enough. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#808167: marked as done (RFS: adjtimex/1.29-7)
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:59:59 + with message-id <20151217175959.gk1...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#808167: RFS: adjtimex/1.29-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #808167, regarding RFS: adjtimex/1.29-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 808167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "adjtimex" * Package name: adjtimex * Version : 1.29-7 * Upstream Author : Steven S. Dick , James R. Van Zandt * URL : http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/admin/time * License : GPL-2 * Section : admin It builds those binary packages: adjtimex - kernel time variables configuration utility To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/adjtimex Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/adjtimex/adjtimex_1.29-7.dsc Changes since the last upload: * remove the wrong debian/dirs line in changelog of previous version 1.29-6 * debian/patches: - Replace patch 03 with the one by Bjarni I. Gislason, which also minimizes the time of lock over "/dev/rtc" (Closes: #724929). - Fix potential uninitialized memory accessing (thanks peppe , Closes: #688933). - Avoid a few gcc warnings * debian/copyright: Add copyright for newly added patch * debian/adjtimexconfig: - Move tmp file during executing from /etc to /tmp. - Code clean up. * debian/templates + debian/config + debian/po + debian/NEWS: - Remove the debconf whether to start adjtimex on startup, which now depends on the existence of /etc/default/adjtimex file. By default, there's no /etc/default/adjtimex, which is generated by running: adjtimexconfig. - adjtimexconfig is still a choice in defconf, but change to false by default because it takes 70 seconds to excute on install/upgrade. * debian/postinst: - Refrain from running adjtimexconfig on configure, which is triggered by each install/upgrade - Refrain from starting adjtimex service on configure (Closes: #785208). - Code clean up. * debian/postrm: - Code clean up. * debian/adjtimex.init + debian/adjtimex.service: Start adjtimex service on startup only if config file /etc/default/adjtimex is ready. * debian/adjtimexconfig.8: Update man page For the debconf change (remove adjtimex/run_daemon) and systemd service change (add a condition path), it's already discussed in systemd ML [0]. Thanks and look forward to the upload! Cheers, Roger Shimizu [0]: https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/2015-December/009932.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:56:17AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "adjtimex" mattia@chase ~/devel/RFS/adjtimex % dput adjtimex_1.29-7_source.changes Uploading adjtimex using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org; directory: /pub/UploadQueue/) [...] Uploading adjtimex_1.29-7.dsc Uploading adjtimex_1.29-7.debian.tar.xz Uploading adjtimex_1.29-7_source.changes mattia@chase ~/devel/RFS/adjtimex % Thanks for your contribution to Debian! :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
I remember something ghc related https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787227 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773768 Cheers G. Gio 17/12/15, Andreas Tille ha scritto: Oggetto: Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR. A: "Debian Mentors List" Cc: "Debian Med Packaging Team" , "Ivo Maintz" Data: Giovedì 17 dicembre 2015, 17:26 Hi Kevin, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:44:40PM +1100, Kevin Murray wrote: > > I have pushed a possible fix to the branch 'daube/possible-cmake-fix'. I am not > sure of the overall effects, the build is taking ages on my laptop, but it seems > to have fixed the immediate error. Thanks a lot for this first and very helpful step. Following this strategy I was even able to work around another issue with Java bindings which was also solved by setting a variable accordingly. Finally after 1-2 hours of building I went into ... make[4]: Entering directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' [100%] Generate Java-API Documentation /usr/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/build.make:61: recipe for target '../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html' failed make[4]: *** [../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html] Error 127 make[4]: Leaving directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1123: recipe for target 'docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all' failed make[3]: *** [docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' ... When I trow the error message above in a web search it comes up with the log of bug #548729 which says: This is most likely a lack of /proc. Some ld.so features require /proc/self/exe. $ readelf -d /usr/bin/java | grep ORIGIN 0x000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64/jli] 0x6ffb (FLAGS_1) Flags: ORIGIN AFAIK, a mounted /proc is close to mandatory these days. The error message could be nicer, but this is a libc bug. If I try inside the pbuilder chroot: 1|root@wr-linux01:/ # mount mount: failed to read mtab: No such file or directory 2|root@wr-linux01:/ # readelf -d /usr/bin/java | grep ORIGIN 0x000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64:/usr/local/lib/amd64:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64] I can confirm that /proc is not mounted. Any idea how to approach this to finally build libsbml successfully (at least passing the step to Generate Java-API Documentation? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
Hi Gianfranco, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:45:19PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I remember something ghc related > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787227 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773768 Seems to be the same consequence as I've drawn below. I checked in the pbuilder chroot diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 8916f38..3fdf167 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ endif /bin/sh debian/bin/python_fix.sh override_dh_auto_build: + if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else mount proc /proc -t proc ; fi cd build ; make cp NEWS.txt changelog and I was able to make the api_java_doc target successfully. Since I have not seen things like this in the ghc source I wonder if this should be really the suggested solution to the problem. Comments? Kind regards Andreas. > > Gio 17/12/15, Andreas Tille ha scritto: > > Oggetto: Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, > please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR. > A: "Debian Mentors List" > Cc: "Debian Med Packaging Team" > , "Ivo Maintz" > Data: Giovedì 17 dicembre 2015, 17:26 > > Hi Kevin, > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:44:40PM +1100, Kevin Murray > wrote: > > > > I have pushed a possible fix to the branch > 'daube/possible-cmake-fix'. I am not > > sure of the overall effects, the build is taking ages > on my laptop, but it seems > > to have fixed the immediate error. > > Thanks a lot for this first and very helpful step. > Following this > strategy I was even able to work around another issue with > Java bindings > which was also solved by setting a variable accordingly. > > Finally after 1-2 hours of building I went into > > ... > make[4]: Entering directory > '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' > [100%] Generate Java-API Documentation > /usr/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries: > libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > directory > docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/build.make:61: recipe for > target '../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html' failed > make[4]: *** [../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html] Error > 127 > make[4]: Leaving directory > '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1123: recipe for target > 'docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all' failed > make[3]: *** [docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all] Error > 2 > make[3]: Leaving directory > '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build' > ... > > > When I trow the error message above in a web search it comes > up with the > log of bug #548729 which says: > > > This is most likely a lack of > /proc. Some ld.so features require > /proc/self/exe. > > $ readelf -d /usr/bin/java | grep > ORIGIN > 0x000f > (RPATH) > Library rpath: > [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64/jli] > 0x6ffb > (FLAGS_1) Flags: > ORIGIN > > AFAIK, a mounted /proc is close to > mandatory these days. The error > message could be nicer, but this is a > libc bug. > > > If I try inside the pbuilder chroot: > > 1|root@wr-linux01:/ # > mount > > > > > > > > > > > > mount: failed to read mtab: No such file or directory > 2|root@wr-linux01:/ # > readelf -d /usr/bin/java | grep ORIGIN > 0x000f (RPATH) > Library rpath: > > [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64:/usr/local/lib/amd64:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64] > > > I can confirm that /proc is not mounted. Any idea how > to approach this > to finally build libsbml successfully (at least passing the > step to > Generate Java-API Documentation? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#808249: RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libirman" * Package name: libirman Version : 0.5.1 Upstream Author : Tom Wheeley * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libirman/ * License : GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libirman-dev - library for accessing the Irman InfraRed hardware libirman0 - Shared library to access the libirman hardware. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libirman Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libi/libirman/libirman_0.5.1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: libirman (0.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Update to latest upstream, closes: #801588. * Handle conditional build of lirc plugin when lirc >= 0.9.4. -- Alec Leamas Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:16:26 +0100 Regards, Alec Leamas
Bug#808251: RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas" * Package name: clblas Version : 2.8+ds1-3 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS * License : Apache version 2 Section : science It builds those binary packages: libclblas-bin - OpenCL BLAS library (executables) libclblas-dev - OpenCL BLAS library (development files) libclblas-doc - OpenCL BLAS library (documentation) libclblas2 - OpenCL BLAS library (shared library) libclblas2-dbg - OpenCL BLAS library (debugging symbols) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/clblas Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clblas/clblas_2.8+ds1-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * d/rules: clean residual pyc files from build. Fixes FTBFS in reproducibility builds. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant
Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:29:30PM +0100, Tim Weippert wrote: > Hi Mattia, Hi Tim (please avoid doing top posting...) > i had talked to Thibaut and I'am willing to took maintainership for this > packages, > currently i'am working on an new Upload to incorporate the review from > Gianfranco and the suggestions > he mention. cool! > If i'am ready i will announce it for review on the debian-mentors mailinglist. please try to ignore RFS bugs to -mentors@, just mail the bug report :) (guessed you actually meant that, but I wanted to be sure :)) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]
Hi Mattia, i had talked to Thibaut and I'am willing to took maintainership for this packages, currently i'am working on an new Upload to incorporate the review from Gianfranco and the suggestions he mention. If i'am ready i will announce it for review on the debian-mentors mailinglist. regards, tim On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:28:30PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Thibaut Varène wrote: > > I suppose what I need is having people take over my packages and call > > it a day, tbh. With my upload rights revoked there’s not much meaning > > in being a DD. > > Not really. > There are several active DDs who got their key removed due to the 1024 > purge and still have packages sponsored. > Sponsoring a DD is also easier, you know that most probably the > sponsoree is already aware of good conventions, etc. > > Don't give up just for this inconvenience, ask for sponsorship and as > soon as you manage to get your key back into the keyring you can come > back full steam :) > > > > PS: @Tim: what about this RFS? > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- -- Tim Weippert http://weiti.org - we...@weiti.org GPG Fingerprint - E704 7303 6FF0 8393 ADB1 398E 67F2 94AE 5995 7DD8
Bug#808251: marked as done (RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3)
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:59:55 + (UTC) with message-id <1136203798.707865.1450385995053.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#808251: RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #808251, regarding RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 808251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808251 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas" * Package name: clblas Version : 2.8+ds1-3 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS * License : Apache version 2 Section : science It builds those binary packages: libclblas-bin - OpenCL BLAS library (executables) libclblas-dev - OpenCL BLAS library (development files) libclblas-doc - OpenCL BLAS library (documentation) libclblas2 - OpenCL BLAS library (shared library) libclblas2-dbg - OpenCL BLAS library (debugging symbols) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/clblas Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clblas/clblas_2.8+ds1-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * d/rules: clean residual pyc files from build. Fixes FTBFS in reproducibility builds. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, package uploaded a few seconds ago :) cheers, G. Il Giovedì 17 Dicembre 2015 20:09, Ghislain Vaillant ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas" * Package name: clblas Version : 2.8+ds1-3 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS * License : Apache version 2 Section : science It builds those binary packages: libclblas-bin - OpenCL BLAS library (executables) libclblas-dev - OpenCL BLAS library (development files) libclblas-doc - OpenCL BLAS library (documentation) libclblas2 - OpenCL BLAS library (shared library) libclblas2-dbg - OpenCL BLAS library (debugging symbols) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/clblas Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clblas/clblas_2.8+ds1-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * d/rules: clean residual pyc files from build. Fixes FTBFS in reproducibility builds. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant--- End Message ---
Bug#808259: RFS: abi-monitor/1.6-1 ITP
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am planning to bring the abi-tracker tool [1][2] to Debian, because I think it can be very useful for maintainers of shared libraries. As a first step I therefore packaged abi-monitor, which I am seeking a sponsor for. Currently I am DM maintaining a few packages: [3]. * Package name: abi-monitor Version : 1.6-1 Upstream Author : Andrey Ponomarenko * URL : https://github.com/lvc/abi-monitor * License : GPL-2 Section : devel It builds those binary packages: abi-monitor - monitor new versions of a software library, try to build them and To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/abi-monitor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abi-monitor/abi-monitor_1.6-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: This is an initial upload Regards, Peter Spiess-Knafl [1]: https://github.com/lvc/abi-tracker [2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/12/msg00062.html [3]: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@spiessknafl.at
Bug#808243: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.3-1
Il 17/12/2015 18:44, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto: I'll sponsor it, if you just change this to things: * debhelper version 9.0.0 never existed, neither 8.0.0 did. using (>= 9) is more than enough. * debian/copyright says 2001-2013, but I have to guess it exstends till 2015 too? * debian/changelog contains info about the unreleased version 2.1.1-1, please fold them toghether with 2.1.3-1 the rest looks good enough. Hello, I've uploaded a new package with the corrections you requested. Regards, Marco
Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
* Andreas Tille , 2015-12-17, 19:11: override_dh_auto_build: + if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else mount proc /proc -t proc ; fi Well, you need root privileges to mount /proc, so doing it in debian/rules almost certainly won't work. If /proc is not mounted in your build environment, then you need to fix the environment. There's nothing that can be done about it in debian/rules. -- Jakub Wilk
Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
Hi Jakub, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:34:53PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Andreas Tille , 2015-12-17, 19:11: > >override_dh_auto_build: > >+ if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else > >mount proc /proc -t proc ; fi > > Well, you need root privileges to mount /proc, so doing it in debian/rules > almost certainly won't work. > > If /proc is not mounted in your build environment, then you need to fix the > environment. There's nothing that can be done about it in debian/rules. Right, the build-hook makes you root but probably the build itself is a non-privileged user. But *how* exactly can I ensure on my machine (and autobuilders!) that /proc is mounted??? BTW, on a different build machine (running testing in contrast to the machine some hours ago running stable) I get: ... 0 packages upgraded, 558 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 146 MB/367 MB of archives. After unpacking 1183 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libnet-ssleay-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package. libxml-libxml-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package. libxml-parser-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package. libhtml-parser-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... ... This somehow sounds like #787530 but I have no idea how to fix this. Seems I have opened a can of worms with this package. :-( Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#808259: RFS: abi-monitor/1.6-1 ITP
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:57:51PM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > As a first step I therefore packaged abi-monitor, which I am seeking a > sponsor for. Hi, Please help to update the license to GPL-2 or LGPL-2, as describe in copyright header and its LICENSE actully contains GPL-2 and LGPL-2. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen) Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
I think a non mounted proc is a bug, so probably you should fix the autobuilders and your build environment? The other issue is because of perl transition started yesterday. I think things will be better in the next few days https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl.html In the meanwhile you can build from a testing environment I think. Bests G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, 17 Dec, 2015 at 23:52, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Jakub, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:34:53PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Andreas Tille , 2015-12-17, 19:11: > >override_dh_auto_build: > >+ if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else > >mount proc /proc -t proc ; fi > > Well, you need root privileges to mount /proc, so doing it in debian/rules > almost certainly won't work. > > If /proc is not mounted in your build environment, then you need to fix the > environment. There's nothing that can be done about it in debian/rules. Right, the build-hook makes you root but probably the build itself is a non-privileged user. But *how* exactly can I ensure on my machine (and autobuilders!) that /proc is mounted??? BTW, on a different build machine (running testing in contrast to the machine some hours ago running stable) I get: ... 0 packages upgraded, 558 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 146 MB/367 MB of archives. After unpacking 1183 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libnet-ssleay-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package. libxml-libxml-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package. libxml-parser-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package. libhtml-parser-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... ... This somehow sounds like #787530 but I have no idea how to fix this. Seems I have opened a can of worms with this package. :-( Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#808259: RFS: abi-monitor/1.6-1 ITP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi! Thank you for reviewing my package. I have overlooked it, but its very important. I modified it and re-uploaded the package to mentors. Do you consider sponsoring it? As you might have seen in the ITP/RFS, I plan to bring the whole abi-tracker of Andrey to Debian. Greetings Peter On 12/18/2015 04:52 AM, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:57:51PM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl > wrote: >> As a first step I therefore packaged abi-monitor, which I am >> seeking a sponsor for. > > Hi, > > Please help to update the license to GPL-2 or LGPL-2, as describe > in copyright header and its LICENSE actully contains GPL-2 and > LGPL-2. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWc7nsAAoJED/ImGelQYVWOQAP/3Ldyz59bvBLedM9wcMObura mKqphYLL9B1WYAvzBli+8OEL7puzGVhikKi/QGG9cYAj56kJ3cCLXMhU6w+MpStf FN7NBLALtgsC0ozqh9izCLC8ee+CVB7e64321gf6V82lBuKCMDzM9c8Zq/2COYDj mA18KYvsHvZZ3jZeLIz7IBPdCqLtrnXn4h3Ebdwyj02PH1d5YS9UcfKbU7W3Bdcj EH4qhGVwpXgl5xwjmBMdfFNGGuvXT18YWUZJfLYfGDDWqD0rqy33uBhaT1duERY1 6x+34fX12iXTV1uR+bN6J+xK+KZoDXTOd515vEjlAVkBrBeQYDVtPiOVj9J09M+I bvNtrPAYGWDVKjEhC4qhlMclo7diaIoFc1bVMBfqGL2HE9IkhoSquDznEIASn6bk 0Zqr5L8o/NC21Z4rHrRKRUn+koXw2588Om1SfCEG2UUGQKqdAM8VXIjpFtt+AXQS it88JUV/R4WddoTAgiHXkjJoe9FTwec2aOVFRxpeRUfipbE2vrTqbbgV6MIGTcbZ ExKtxULvJgqgEiZkZZ+cRvctcgRRq1GetLLoLDnwbRJgyT8d07rNnQFBVHaUXTgi 0cj96wyzNZmMWlDiXv5RDWNSpgfpl+v9OYVrb8IqWbkb+i4dI8+D4Cmg/Z7U8U60 7tQUHlqFaeEHH0WpY82w =eM9O -END PGP SIGNATURE-