Processed (with 1 errors): still able to reproduce?

2007-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 392635 unreproducable
Unknown tag/s: unreproducable.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid 
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed 
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny 
lenny-ignore.

Bug#392635: rosegarden: always repeats incoming notes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: 

 tags 392635 moreinfo
Bug#392635: rosegarden: always repeats incoming notes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410587: tagging as upstream

2007-04-18 Thread Mike O'Connor
severity 410587 wishlist
tag 410587 upstream
forwarded 410587 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

thanks

I have sent this request to the upstream developers that they include
the changelog in their next release.

thanks,

stew


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#410587: marked as done (rosegarden: Doesn't include upstream changelog)

2007-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:11:07 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [Rosegarden-devel] include changelog in tarball?]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:1.5.0-1
Severity: minor

Rosegarden's debian package doesn't include the upstream changelog.

--Ken

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages rosegarden depends on:
ii  fftw3  3.1.2-1   library for computing Fast Fourier
ii  kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6 core libraries and binaries for al
ii  khelpcenter4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6 help center for KDE
ii  libasound2 1.0.13-1  ALSA library
ii  libc6  2.3.6.ds1-11  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1 2.4.2-1   generic font configuration library
ii  libgcc11:4.1.1-21GCC support library
ii  libice61:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjack0.100.0-0   0.101.1-2 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari
ii  liblircclient0 0.8.0-9   LIRC client library
ii  liblo0 0.23-2.1  Lightweight OSC library
ii  liblrdf0   0.4.0-1   a library to manipulate RDF files 
ii  libqt3-mt  3:3.3.7-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library
ii  libstdc++6 4.1.1-21  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6   2:1.0.3-5 X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6   1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxft22.1.8.2-8 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  rosegarden-data1:1.5.0-1 music editor and MIDI/audio sequen

Versions of packages rosegarden recommends:
ii  jackd 0.101.1-2  JACK Audio Connection Kit (server 
ii  swh-plugins [ladspa-plugin]   0.4.14-1.1 Steve Harris's LADSPA plugins

-- no debconf information

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
This is confirmation from the upstream developers that no actual
upstream changelog exists, so, this is not a bug.

Thanks,
stew

- Forwarded message from Guillaume Laurent [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Guillaume Laurent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Rosegarden-devel] include changelog in tarball?
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:47:46 +0200


On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:

On Wednesday 18 April 2007 7:24 am, Mike O'Connor wrote:

I don't think we actually *have* an official changelog.

That was my answer as well. We more or less make one up for each  
release, which is published along with the announcement, but that's  
about it. The 'changelog' file isn't maintained.

--
Guillaume
http://telegraph-road.org



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

- End forwarded message -


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---