Re: RFS: ocamlgsl
2005/5/21, Sylvain LE GALL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > > Well, i was preparing to go on holiday, when i received a RC > bugs on ocamlgsl yesterday ;-< > > The fix is ready in the SVN repository. It just need to be uploaded to > unstable and to deal with release-manager to get it included in Sarge. > The upload is done. I will contact RM promptly.
RFS: ocamlgsl
Hi all, Well, i was preparing to go on holiday, when i received a RC bugs on ocamlgsl yesterday ;-< The fix is ready in the SVN repository. It just need to be uploaded to unstable and to deal with release-manager to get it included in Sarge. The fix is minor : add a dependency on libgsl0-dev. Could one of you upload ocamlgsl and look forward his inclusion in Sarge ? Thank you in advance Regard Sylvain Le Gall ps: i will be on vacation until next friday... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
Hello, On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:17:51AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: > > On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple > > answer : "yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on > > those architecture ". > Hmm.. that sucks :-( Indeed, that sucks. > > > That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build. > Okay. I will upload then tonight when I get home to my gpg key :) > Thank you for the upload. Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall
Re: RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
Hello, On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:17:51AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: > > On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple > > answer : "yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on > > those architecture ". > Hmm.. that sucks :-( Indeed, that sucks. > > > That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build. > Okay. I will upload then tonight when I get home to my gpg key :) > Thank you for the upload. Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple > answer : "yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on > those architecture ". Hmm.. that sucks :-( > That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build. Okay. I will upload then tonight when I get home to my gpg key :) -m
Re: RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple > answer : "yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on > those architecture ". Hmm.. that sucks :-( > That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build. Okay. I will upload then tonight when I get home to my gpg key :) -m -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
Hello,
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:31:54PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> per ocamlgsl,
>
> There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
> only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
> interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
> archs). So applying the attached 2 line patch will make it build.
> I didn't check this into svn, since I figured I let you do that
> with whatever style you prefer.
>
> Also, it would probably be a good idea to forward this upstream as
> well.
>
> After you check this in, I'd be happy to upload it for you.
>
> --
> Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1024D/124B26F3 5B9F 587F BC5C D823 50CE 4DB0 ED93 CA29 124B 26F3
> diff -urN ocamlgsl-0.3.2.orig/mlgsl_ieee.c ocamlgsl-0.3.2/mlgsl_ieee.c
> --- ocamlgsl-0.3.2.orig/mlgsl_ieee.c 2004-02-05 09:32:42.0 -0500
> +++ ocamlgsl-0.3.2/mlgsl_ieee.c 2004-05-03 21:34:46.0 -0400
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
> value ml_gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(value x)
> {
>gsl_ieee_double_rep r;
> - gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(&(Double_val(x)), &r);
> + double d = Double_val(x);
> + gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(&d, &r);
>return rep_val(&r);
> }
>
;-)
Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple
answer : "yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on
those architecture ".
In fact, for a lot of functions, it uses array of float, and when using
this you need to copy the full array casting each member of it.
In other words, upstream tell me that building for those arch require
too much work ! ( he just release a new tarball, which contains a #ifdef
ARCH_ALIGN_DOUBLE #error... ).
That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build.
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
Re: RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
Hello,
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:31:54PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> per ocamlgsl,
>
> There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
> only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
> interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
> archs). So applying the attached 2 line patch will make it build.
> I didn't check this into svn, since I figured I let you do that
> with whatever style you prefer.
>
> Also, it would probably be a good idea to forward this upstream as
> well.
>
> After you check this in, I'd be happy to upload it for you.
>
> --
> Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1024D/124B26F3 5B9F 587F BC5C D823 50CE 4DB0 ED93 CA29 124B 26F3
> diff -urN ocamlgsl-0.3.2.orig/mlgsl_ieee.c ocamlgsl-0.3.2/mlgsl_ieee.c
> --- ocamlgsl-0.3.2.orig/mlgsl_ieee.c 2004-02-05 09:32:42.0 -0500
> +++ ocamlgsl-0.3.2/mlgsl_ieee.c 2004-05-03 21:34:46.0 -0400
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
> value ml_gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(value x)
> {
>gsl_ieee_double_rep r;
> - gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(&(Double_val(x)), &r);
> + double d = Double_val(x);
> + gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(&d, &r);
>return rep_val(&r);
> }
>
;-)
Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple
answer : "yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on
those architecture ".
In fact, for a lot of functions, it uses array of float, and when using
this you need to copy the full array casting each member of it.
In other words, upstream tell me that building for those arch require
too much work ! ( he just release a new tarball, which contains a #ifdef
ARCH_ALIGN_DOUBLE #error... ).
That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build.
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
per ocamlgsl,
There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
archs). So applying the attached 2 line patch will make it build.
I didn't check this into svn, since I figured I let you do that
with whatever style you prefer.
Also, it would probably be a good idea to forward this upstream as
well.
After you check this in, I'd be happy to upload it for you.
--
Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1024D/124B26F3 5B9F 587F BC5C D823 50CE 4DB0 ED93 CA29 124B 26F3
diff -urN ocamlgsl-0.3.2.orig/mlgsl_ieee.c ocamlgsl-0.3.2/mlgsl_ieee.c
--- ocamlgsl-0.3.2.orig/mlgsl_ieee.c 2004-02-05 09:32:42.0 -0500
+++ ocamlgsl-0.3.2/mlgsl_ieee.c 2004-05-03 21:34:46.0 -0400
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
value ml_gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(value x)
{
gsl_ieee_double_rep r;
- gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(&(Double_val(x)), &r);
+ double d = Double_val(x);
+ gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(&d, &r);
return rep_val(&r);
}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
Hello all, As usual, i come to ask for sponsored upload. The RFS for ocamlgraph fixes a RC bugs, and i really would like to see ocamlgraph enter sarge... If any one is willing to help a poor non DD ;-) Thanks in advance Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
per ocamlgsl,
There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
archs). So applying the attached 2 line patch will make it build.
I didn't check this into svn, since I figured I let you do that
with whatever style you prefer.
Also, it would probably be a good idea to forward this upstream as
well.
After you check this in, I'd be happy to upload it for you.
--
Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1024D/124B26F3 5B9F 587F BC5C D823 50CE 4DB0 ED93 CA29 124B 26F3
diff -urN ocamlgsl-0.3.2.orig/mlgsl_ieee.c ocamlgsl-0.3.2/mlgsl_ieee.c
--- ocamlgsl-0.3.2.orig/mlgsl_ieee.c 2004-02-05 09:32:42.0 -0500
+++ ocamlgsl-0.3.2/mlgsl_ieee.c 2004-05-03 21:34:46.0 -0400
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
value ml_gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(value x)
{
gsl_ieee_double_rep r;
- gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(&(Double_val(x)), &r);
+ double d = Double_val(x);
+ gsl_ieee_double_to_rep(&d, &r);
return rep_val(&r);
}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RFS : ocamlgsl 0.3.2-2 and ocamlgraph 0.70-3 ( fix a RC bugs )
Hello all, As usual, i come to ask for sponsored upload. The RFS for ocamlgraph fixes a RC bugs, and i really would like to see ocamlgraph enter sarge... If any one is willing to help a poor non DD ;-) Thanks in advance Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall
