Bug#695146: hunspell: doesn't honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2012-12-04 Thread Colin Watson
Package: hunspell
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: crossbu...@debian.org
Usertags: cross

hunspell's debian/rules fails to honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck
(policy 4.9.1).  In particular, this gets in the way of cross-building
it unless you have emulation set up.

  * Honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck.

diff -u hunspell-1.3.2/debian/rules hunspell-1.3.2/debian/rules
--- hunspell-1.3.2/debian/rules
+++ hunspell-1.3.2/debian/rules
@@ -51,7 +51,9 @@
dh_testdir
 
$(MAKE)
+ifeq (,$(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
$(MAKE) check
+endif
pod2man debian/ispellaff2myspell \
 debian/ispellaff2myspell.1
 

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121204155750.gz21...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk



Bug#669423: writer2latex: FTBFS: Build-Conflicts libreoffice-java-common (= 1:3.5.0~), unstable has 1:3.5.2-4

2012-04-19 Thread Colin Watson
Package: writer2latex
Version: 1.0.2-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch precise

writer2latex fails to build in unstable as follows:

  Reading package lists...
  Building dependency tree...
  Reading state information...
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:
  
  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   sbuild-build-depends-writer2latex-dummy : Depends: libreoffice-java-common 
(= 1:3.1.0~) but it is not going to be installed
  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
  apt-get failed.

This is because it Build-Conflicts with the version of
libreoffice-java-common currently in unstable.  I think this patch
should fix it, although I haven't tried the resulting binaries.

  * Fix build with LibreOffice 3.5.

diff -u writer2latex-1.0.2/debian/rules writer2latex-1.0.2/debian/rules
--- writer2latex-1.0.2/debian/rules
+++ writer2latex-1.0.2/debian/rules
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 build-indep: build-indep-stamp
 build-indep-stamp: configure-stamp 
 
-   ant -DURE_CLASSES=/usr/lib/ure/share/java 
-DOFFICE_CLASSES=/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/classes jar
+   ant -DURE_CLASSES=/usr/lib/ure/share/java 
-DOFFICE_CLASSES=/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/classes jar
ant javadoc
ant oxt
touch $@
diff -u writer2latex-1.0.2/debian/control writer2latex-1.0.2/debian/control
--- writer2latex-1.0.2/debian/control
+++ writer2latex-1.0.2/debian/control
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
 Uploaders: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org, Chris Halls ha...@debian.org
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 6.0.7~), ant, libxerces2-java, libxalan2-java, 
gcj-jdk, libreoffice-java-common (= 1:3.1.0~), ure (= 1.4.1~), dpatch, 
tex-common, zip, unzip
-Build-Conflicts: libreoffice-java-common (= 1:3.5.0~), ant (= 1.8.0-1), ant 
(= 1.8.0-2), ant (= 1.8.0-3)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 6.0.7~), ant, libxerces2-java, libxalan2-java, 
gcj-jdk, libreoffice-java-common (= 1:3.5.0~), ure (= 1.4.1~), dpatch, 
tex-common, zip, unzip
+Build-Conflicts: ant (= 1.8.0-1), ant (= 1.8.0-2), ant (= 1.8.0-3)
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 Vcs-Git: https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-openoffice/writer2latex.git
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-openoffice/writer2latex.git;a=summary

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120419175357.gy6...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk



Bug#659867: libreoffice-common: use Pre-Depends rather than 'dpkg-maintscript-helper supports' guards

2012-02-14 Thread Colin Watson
/libreoffice/sofficerc  libreoffice-common -- $@
+   dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile \
+   /etc/openoffice/soffice.sh 
/etc/libreoffice/soffice.sh  libreoffice-common -- $@
rm -rf /`echo @OOBRANDDIR@ | sed -e 
s,usr/,var/,g`/share/prereg/bundled
rmdir /`echo @OOBRANDDIR@ | sed -e s,usr/,var/,g`/share/prereg/ 
|| true
rmdir /`echo @OOBRANDDIR@ | sed -e s,usr/,var/,g`/share/ || true
@@ -26,7 +23,6 @@ case $1 in
rmdir /`echo @OOBASISDIR@ | sed -e s,usr/,var/,g` || true
# and try to remove /@OOBRANDDIR@ itself
rmdir /`echo @OOBRANDDIR@ | sed -e s,usr/,var/,g` || true
-   fi
;;
 esac
 
diff --git a/libreoffice-common.preinst.in b/libreoffice-common.preinst.in
index 5a46257..b95651b 100755
--- a/libreoffice-common.preinst.in
+++ b/libreoffice-common.preinst.in
@@ -17,9 +17,7 @@ case $1 in install|upgrade)
fi
fi
 
-   if dpkg-maintscript-helper supports rm_conffile; then
-   dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile 
/etc/bash_completion.d/ooffice.sh 1:3.3.0~rc4-2 libreoffice-common -- $@
-   fi
+   dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/bash_completion.d/ooffice.sh 
1:3.3.0~rc4-2 libreoffice-common -- $@
 if [ -n $2 ]  dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then
if [ -d /share ]; then
rm -f /share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml
@@ -68,14 +66,12 @@ case $1 in install|upgrade)
fi
fi
 
-   if dpkg-maintscript-helper supports mv_conffile; then
-   dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile \
-   /etc/openoffice/psprint.conf 
/etc/libreoffice/psprint.conf  libreoffice-common -- $@
-   dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile \
-   /etc/openoffice/sofficerc 
/etc/libreoffice/sofficerc  libreoffice-common -- $@
-   dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile \
-   /etc/openoffice/soffice.sh 
/etc/libreoffice/soffice.sh  libreoffice-common -- $@
-   fi
+   dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile \
+   /etc/openoffice/psprint.conf /etc/libreoffice/psprint.conf 
 libreoffice-common -- $@
+   dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile \
+   /etc/openoffice/sofficerc /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc  
libreoffice-common -- $@
+   dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile \
+   /etc/openoffice/soffice.sh /etc/libreoffice/soffice.sh  
libreoffice-common -- $@
;;
 esac
 

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120214113842.gp3...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk



Re: Bug#151529: Please add override for openoffice.org packages

2002-09-21 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:18:58AM +0200, Chris Halls wrote:
 Colin Watson suggested:
  I talked to a couple of the BTS admins, and apparently if you ask for
  overrides so that bugs on the various OOo package names go to you
  until you've uploaded properly then that can be arranged. You'll need
  to give them a list of package names and a target e-mail address. If
  you want that, file a bug against bugs.debian.org.
 
 Sorry that I hadn't done this before now; when I asked on #debian-devel
 about this, no-one suggested this was possible.
 
 I'd be grateful if you would add an override for openoffice.org and the
 .debs it generates:
 
 Source: openoffice.org
 Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org

I've added this override until such time as the openoffice.org packages
are in the archive, using the list of openoffice.org packages currently
sitting in the queue on auric.

I notice that the uploaded packages list you as the maintainer rather
than the mailing list. Do you intend to leave it this way, or to change
the maintainer to the list and move yourself into Uploaders? It would be
preferable not to rely on overrides, as they would have to be updated
whenever packages are added or removed, etc.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bugs against openoffice.org

2002-05-09 Thread Colin Watson
Hi,

Just checking whether you folks know that a few bugs have been filed
against the openoffice.org package in the BTS - there haven't been any
replies to any of them yet.

If you're planning to leave these open until openoffice.org is in Debian
proper, it might be useful for somebody to subscribe to openoffice.org
in the Package Tracking System in order to get its bugs. (I'm assuming
this works for non-existent packages.)

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



openoffice bugs in BTS

2002-03-17 Thread Colin Watson
Hi,

There are a couple of bugs filed against the 'openoffice' package in the
bug tracking system, which of course aren't assigned to a maintainer. I
don't want to just close them straight off, as they might be of some use
to the people developing packages here. Could somebody have a look at
them and reassign/close them as appropriate?

Grave functionality bugs - outstanding

 * #136830: openoffice can'topen libstlport_gcc.so
   Package: openoffice; Severity: grave; Reported by: Britton Leo
   Kerin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 12 days old.
 _
 
Normal bugs - outstanding

 * #136248: openoffice does not start in case of problems in finding 
   some shared libraries
   Package: openoffice; Reported by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   (Marc Schöchlin); 16 days old.

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]