Bug#801552: Processed: tagging 801552

2015-10-23 Thread Ben Finney 
On 23-Oct-2015, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:12:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > 
> > > tags 801552 + confirmed
> > Bug #801552 [libreoffice] unorc got lost on upgrade/downgrade -> LO fails 
> > to start with RuntimeException
> > Added tag(s) confirmed.
> > > thanks
> > Stopping processing here.
> 
> What makes you think this?

Your message to the BTS, Message-ID:
,
added a specific “found” field without further elaboration, so I
inferred that you had confirmed the bug in that version of the
package.

I have no other basis for adding that “confirmed” tag, feel free to
remove it if it doesn't apply. (In the absence of more information
from the submitter, adding a “moreinfo” tag would also be appropriate.)

-- 
 \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “I think so, |
  `\   Brain, but why does a forklift have to be so big if all it does |
_o__)   is lift forks?” —_Pinky and The Brain_ |
Ben Finney 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#801552: Processed: tagging 801552

2015-10-23 Thread Rene Engelhard 
Hi Ben,

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:12:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> 
> > tags 801552 + confirmed
> Bug #801552 [libreoffice] unorc got lost on upgrade/downgrade -> LO fails to 
> start with RuntimeException
> Added tag(s) confirmed.
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.

What makes you think this?

Maybe confirmed that it starts if unorc is missing, the question is _why_
it goes missing.

I did the following:

1) cowbuilder --login to a stable chroot
1a) apt-get install debsums apt-show-versions vim
2) apt-get install libreoffice
3) add backports, apt-get update
4) apt-get -t jessie-backports install libreoffice

5) remove backports, apt-get update
6) apt-get install `apt-show-versions | grep -v uptodate | cut -d" " -f2 | cut 
-d: -f1 | sed -e "s, ,/stable ,g"`


all unorcs are there and reported OK by debsums.

Wookey, how did you do the downgrade?

Regards,

Rene

Processed: Re: Bug#801552: Processed: tagging 801552

2015-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 801552 - confirmed
Bug #801552 [libreoffice] unorc got lost on upgrade/downgrade -> LO fails to 
start with RuntimeException
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
> tag 801552 + moreinfo
Bug #801552 [libreoffice] unorc got lost on upgrade/downgrade -> LO fails to 
start with RuntimeException
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
801552: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#801552: Processed: tagging 801552

2015-10-23 Thread Rene Engelhard 
tag 801552 - confirmed
tag 801552 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi,

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 06:58:10AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Your message to the BTS, Message-ID:
> ,
> added a specific “found” field without further elaboration, so I
> inferred that you had confirmed the bug in that version of the
> package.

Nah, it was meant as adding that version based on Wookeys

"I am running the jessie version. libreoffice was working fine, thenI
tried upgrading to the 1:5.0.2-1~bpo8+1 in jessie-backports, [...]
carefully downgrading everything back to the jessie versions"

so 1:5.0.2-1 (bpo is not handled/relevant in this BTS, so I took the
version it is based on) is "in the game". in whatever way.

> I have no other basis for adding that “confirmed” tag, feel free to
> remove it if it doesn't apply. (In the absence of more information

OK.

> from the submitter, adding a “moreinfo” tag would also be appropriate.)

Jup.

Regards,

Rene