Please call me first.....00228.901.58.45
DEAR FRIEND. RE-BUSINESS PROPOSAL I wish this my proposal will not come to you as a surprise. I am Mr. SOJI ANI, a Regional Director with a NATIONAL TRUST SECURITY COMPANY with regional Office in Lome-Togo. We had a foreign client (name with held) who deposited a huge sum of money (US$28.5million) with our Company. Eventually, this client was among the victims of EGYPT AIR BOEING 767 FLIGHT NO.990 that crashed on the 31-10-1999 in U.S.A but, since then we have not had any body coming for the claims as the next of kin. A sitaution I have monitored closely with my position in the Company. Now, having monitored this deposit and managed it over the years before his death, and hence nobody has showed up as the next of kin for the past one year plus, I have removed the file to my private volt. I now solicit for your assistance to present you as the next of kin as every other arrangement has being concluded by me and I am only waiting for a foreigner to enable me move the fund to his account. This does not have any risk attached to it as all the internal documentations will be handled by me. I therefore request you to confirm your interest by a return message and I will furnish you with details. Your interest will be negotiable before we commence the operation.You can call me on my telephone for oral introduction and for more details clarifications. Please send your reply through this e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] or you can call me on my telephone number.00228.901.58.45 I look forward to hearing from you. God bless you and your family. Regards MR. SOJI ANI. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [epg@progeny.com: Bug#154142: dhcp-client conflicts]
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 05:09:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 10:21:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Etherconf never invokes anything other than ifup and ifdown. It's ifup that has the smarts. I know it already handles dhcp-client and pump; i think (but may be wrong) that Branden has seen it work with udhcpc. So what you're saying is that the standard interface should be that provided by ifup and ifdown. No, that's how *etherconf* elects to take advantage of DHCP clients. There's no onus on anything else to work that way. There's nothing particularly wrong with that - it's just that it needs to be know that that's how things work. But it isn't, necessarily. Perhaps some sort of interface description ought to be added to the virtual packages list in policy? I still don't think that is necessary. Do you formally object to the proposed update to the virtual packages list? -- G. Branden Robinson| To stay young requires unceasing Debian GNU/Linux | cultivation of the ability to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | unlearn old falsehoods. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein pgpsMONl9ulap.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Rewriting policy soonish if poss.
At (time_t)1027611024 Sebastian Rittau wrote: I would rather recommend using the existing Note tag with a Role=rationale attribute. This is a good idea. Extending DocBook with new tags is trivial, but is best done only when DocBook clearly fails to provide a needed construct. The stylesheets are generally quite flexible, and can be extended to handle the role. It may be tempting, if the rationales are intended to be footnotes, to add a role attribute to the footnote tag instead, but that would be a needless confusion of content with presentation. Let the stylesheet dictate how rationales are presented. Love to hear people's thoughts on the matter. I think converting the policy to DocBook is the right way to go. Seconded. We at Progeny use DocBook/XML extensively, and it has served us very well. One advantage of DocBook over DebianDoc that we haven't leveraged yet is indexing, which is something I've sorely missed when looking for information in Policy and the DDR. -- John R. Daily emailmailboxjohn/mailboxdomaingeekhavoc.com/domain/email -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]