Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:47:03PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: I am offering a third patch that implement the Build-Options control field proposal. I reject this proposal, until such time as the code has implemented it. hint: send patches to the bts for dpkg-dev So you are going to implement this even if the discussion is not already closed. Of course you can implement it anyway, but it's unfair to ignore what Branden Robinson asked: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which is also of interest to me. You might have privately replyed, but in this case i'd like the answare to be sent here for logging too. thanks, -- Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they local LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't depend on the language.
Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:25:13AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: I appreciate your efforts, but i'm sorry: i still have not seen a reply to last mail from Branden: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please could you provide references in the form of http://lists.debian.org/... so that we can track these down? Thanks, Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, website: http://www.polya.uklinux.net/ Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/ Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:38:39PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:25:13AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: I appreciate your efforts, but i'm sorry: i still have not seen a reply to last mail from Branden: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please could you provide references in the form of http://lists.debian.org/... so that we can track these down? Here it is: http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2003/debian-policy-200311/msg00092.html Note that http://lists.debian.org autmomatically add link to messages matching Message-ID. However, Branden question belong more to debian-dpkg than here. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here.
Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:38:39PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:25:13AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: I appreciate your efforts, but i'm sorry: i still have not seen a reply to last mail from Branden: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2003/debian-policy-200311/msg00092.html References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2003/debian-policy-200311/msg00085.html Please could you provide references in the form of http://lists.debian.org/... so that we can track these down? hth, cu andreas
Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:49:19PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: I appreciate your efforts, but i'm sorry: i still have not seen a reply to last mail from Branden: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please could you provide references in the form of http://lists.debian.org/... so that we can track these down? Here it is: http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2003/debian-policy-200311/msg00092.html Note that http://lists.debian.org autmomatically add link to messages matching Message-ID. How? I haven't figured out how to search by Message-ID. However, Branden question belong more to debian-dpkg than here. In response to Branden's question (does debian/control already have to exist when the package is unpacked), I would suggest the following: Before debian/rules build* is run, one has to check the build-dependencies. So at this point, at least the source section of debian/control must exist. And since this field (whatever form it eventually takes) would exist in the source section of debian/control, and would not be needed until after the build-dependencies are checked, there should be no problem. And then again, we can always use debian/interfaces or debian/rules.targets or something similar instead Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, website: http://www.polya.uklinux.net/ Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/ Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
Previously Adam Heath wrote: On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: (FWIW, I've seen doogie mention thinking of moving debian/ to dpkg/ at some point.) I don't recall this. However, I could see mv debian deb. I said that. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Новая серия flash мультиков - Масяня отдых ает! fgiKU
Зайдя по этой ссылке http://217.106.225.141/mult.html?rf=xoAHH2 Вы можете просмотреть flash мультики, которые предлагает наш портал. Мульты обновляются регулярно - заходите еще!!! P.S Если есть желание сотрудничать с нами, т.е прислать свои работы ( естественно за вознаграждение), пишите администрации сайта. FpcFbed
