Bug#167004: My counter-proposal

2002-11-17 Thread Christian Marillat 
Hi,

We simply add 40 points if a window manager is compliant with The
Window Manager Specification Project instead of 20. this will solve the
metacity problem.

Christian

--- policy.sgml.orig2002-11-17 15:56:45.0 +0100
+++ policy.sgml 2002-11-17 15:57:17.0 +0100
@@ -7025,7 +7025,7 @@
id=http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/wm-spec.html;
name=The Window Manager Specification Project,
   written by the url id=http://www.freedesktop.org;
-   name=Free Desktop Group, add 20 points.
+   name=Free Desktop Group, add 40 points.
 /p
   /item

Re: Bug#167004: My counter-proposal

2002-11-17 Thread Colin Walters 
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 10:04, Christian Marillat wrote:
 Hi,
 
 We simply add 40 points if a window manager is compliant with The
 Window Manager Specification Project instead of 20. this will solve the
 metacity problem.

Seconded.  

This proposal should be considered as superseding my original proposal.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bug#167004: My counter-proposal

2002-11-17 Thread Branden Robinson 
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:41PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
 On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 10:04, Christian Marillat wrote:
  Hi,
  
  We simply add 40 points if a window manager is compliant with The
  Window Manager Specification Project instead of 20. this will solve the
  metacity problem.
 
 Seconded.  

I second this as long as people swear to stop bitching at me about what
window manager ends up as the default.  :-P

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|I'm sorry if the following sounds
Debian GNU/Linux   |combative and excessively personal,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |but that's my general style.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Ian Jackson


pgpfdQVuOy9rO.pgp
Description: PGP signature