Re: Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-10-31 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *,

while reading the forwarded messages in the BTS, I  am  supporting  Bill
to continue maintaining menu since the desktop is  hit  by  to  many
limitations.

I have an Add-On to menu called tdfvwm-menu which is  currently  not
updated since I have some problems here in France...

http://devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/tdfvwm-menu/

However, I will continue updating my package AFTER release of Lenny...

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant



Am 2008-08-15 21:07:08, schrieb Daniel Dickinson:
 
 
 Begin forwarded message:
 
 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:44:29 +0200
 From: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
 
 
 On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
  Josselin Mouette wrote:
   Therefore, I still feel that, despite it being a big mess, the
   current situation is the best:
 * the default menu contains only what is needed, and we are
   still hunting down entries that are useless to make them not show up
   by default;
 * users wanting the Debian menu and its gazillions of entries
   including window managers, terminal emulators and shell
   interpreters can enable it easily in the menu editor;
 * those really wanting only the Debian menu can replace
   gnome-applications.menu by debian-menu.menu.
   
   If you want this to change, you need to seriously think about
   evolutions to both XDG and Debian menu systems, to convince fd.o
   and the Debian menu maintainer to implement them
  
  Actually, no, if you want this to change, you have only to do nothing.
  
  People (many of them MOTUs from Ubuntu in my experience) are filing
  lots of requestes for random packages to have .desktop files added to
  them, so they appear in the gnome menu. The criteria seems to be a
  program that $RANDOM_USER would like to have on the menu and files a
  bug about || that $RANDOM_UPSTREAM ships a desktop file for, for
  whatever reason.
  
  So, after sufficient time, the gnome menu will contain a random
  assortment of the menu items that also appear in the debian menu. Not
  a well-chosen and consistent assortment, but the kind of random
  assortment that you get when you ignore policy and go off on your own
  way.
 
 I agree with you, but I am only the 'Debian menu maintainer' and I do
 not have time or interest to maintain the .desktop files in Debian.
 Instead people (not you) ask me transparently to stop maintaining menu
 and maintain the .desktop files instead, but no one is willing to do
 the work. (And of course .desktop is about 10% of the XDG spec).
 
 Cheers,
 -- 
 Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Imagine a large red swirl here. 
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -- 
 And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
 now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
 strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
 GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
 No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com
 
 
 
 
 END OF REPLIED MESSAGE 




-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917  ICQ #328449886
+49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)


signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:14:07 -0700
From: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I think that Russ is very pessimistic on the quality of the XDG
 desktop entry sepcification. It uses a simple syntax and 18 different
 keys, only 4 of them being required. Many of the Lintian errors noted
 earlier in this thread are related to the desktop menu specification,
 which is a separate document.

 http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/
 http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/

Russ formed his opinion by attempting to write code to the desktop entry
specification without additional reference to existing implementations
and watching it not work in the real world with real desktop entries.
That's the acid test of a standard and the XDG desktop entry
specification didn't fare well.

The menu specification has other problems, but I am indeed also
complaining about the XDG desktop entry specification and specifically
saying that the desktop files in Debian do not universally comply with
it, that it is unclear and underspecified, and that it needs clarity and
additional work to be usable for a Debian policy.

I do think that if we had such a standard and additional checks and the
intention to enforce it, most of the problems with the desktop files in
/usr/share/applications could be relatively quickly cleaned up.  (The
*.desktop files outside of /usr/share/applications are a whole different
problem and are mostly a disaster from a compliance with the
specification perspective, but that may not be an issue; most of the
ones outside of that tree are legitimately used for internal purposes
by different desktop systems and aren't necessarily intended to comply
with a spec.)

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:02:47 +0800
From: Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Second: XDG has less features than debian-menu currently does. For
 instance, unless I'm mistaken it's not possible to specify in an XDG
 .desktop file that a particular application is a curses or similar
 application that requires an xterm or some such, which is possible
 with menu. Due to this feature, it's also possible to have a package
 like pdmenu for non-graphical systems.

Terminal=true exists, if it doesn't work, then that is a bug in the
implementation.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:40:58 +0900
From: Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


Le Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 12:35:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
 
 
 I think that writing a policy is the first necessary step and is the
 main thing required to move this conversation beyond a constantly
 recurring debian-devel thread and towards something that we can
 implement.  Just saying we should use .desktop files is not
 sufficient; the standard isn't clear, Debian isn't following the
 standard currently, and there's no migration strategy.  Closing those
 gaps is hard and necessary work, and until someone has a chance to do
 that work, this will stay stuck at the recurring conversation stage.

Le Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 09:44:29PM +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
 
 I am only the 'Debian menu maintainer' and I do
 not have time or interest to maintain the .desktop files in Debian.
 Instead people (not you) ask me transparently to stop maintaining menu
 and maintain the .desktop files instead, but no one is willing to do
 the work. (And of course .desktop is about 10% of the XDG spec).


Hi all,

From my maintainer point of view, the current situation leads to
maintain in parallel two files with similar information and different
syntax, with the main difference being that in the .desktop - .menu
conversion the translations are discarded. The big advantage of the
.desktop format is also that it can be forwarded upstream, so that it
reduces the complexity of our packages and is useful to the whole
communauty. This is exactly the contrary of adding a burden on the
Debian maintainers and Bill.

I think that Russ is very pessimistic on the quality of the XDG
desktop entry sepcification. It uses a simple syntax and 18 different
keys, only 4 of them being required. Many of the Lintian errors noted
earlier in this thread are related to the desktop menu specification,
which is a separate document.

http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/

Now we are close to Lenny release, and there is enough to keep us very
busy until September, but after this, if Bill is interested, how about
writing a DEP (Debian Enhancement Proposal)?

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian-Med packaging team,
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 00:12:23 +0200
From: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Daniel Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 03:15:28AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 02:42 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
  For discussion:
  
  Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are the the top three desktops used in debian
  and cover most users of desktops in debian.
  
  They all use xdg .desktop-based menus as their main menu.
  
  xdg .desktop-based menus are not covered by policy.
 
 Honestly, policy really needs to be updated to use the XDG standards
 menu spec, and every WM at this point really should be using them for
 their menus.
 
 I think the debian-menu system should be seen as legacy, since it has
 been replaced with a standard used and supported by many upstreams and
 many other distros.
 
 However, there's a few places where debian-menu is a better solution
 though. (It can be used to build menus for many WMs which do not
 support XDG, but honestly, do we need all these WMs?)

First of all: Yes, we do. Personally, I prefer not to use one of those
'desktop environment' thingies, since they annoy me. One of the main
reasons why people use Linux is choice; we should give them that choice,
not take it away and give users a pre-chewed monocultural environment
(if you want that, go to Windows, MacOS, or Ubuntu).

Second: XDG has less features than debian-menu currently does. For
instance, unless I'm mistaken it's not possible to specify in an XDG
.desktop file that a particular application is a curses or similar
application that requires an xterm or some such, which is possible with
menu. Due to this feature, it's also possible to have a package like
pdmenu for non-graphical systems.

 Another solution would be to make debian-menu build .desktop entries
 for the menu in the main menu namespace and not the 'Debian'
 namespace; this seems like the easiest solution.

The separation of a Debian menu and a desktop menu has been seen by
some as a feature. I remember a post on Planet Debian by one of the
GNOME maintainers (although I don't recall who it was) who explicitly
said that he would not like to see non-GNOME applications in the GNOME
menu but outside the Debian section. It is not unreasonable to state
that it may be confusing for people to have a menu containing both GNOME
and non-GNOME applications on a shared system; after all, different UI
toolkits often have different UI guidelines and concepts; mixing those
is not necessarily a good idea.

-- 
Lo-lan-do Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
  -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 19:11:44 + (UTC)
From: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


On 2008-07-06, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset
  of the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications deeper
  in KDE menu and Qt/KDE - in Gnome one).
 
 The users should have equal access to good programs.

  Are you commenting on OnlyShowIn?  This feature is not meant to list

No. the thing that makes moving Gnome/gtk application deeper in KDE
menu...


/Sune


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:43:32 +0200
From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


Le dimanche 06 juillet 2008 à 21:01 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit :
  There are only 47 desktop files with OnlyShowIn on my system out of
  218 desktop files installed, so it's not used too wildly I would say.

Well, there should be much more than that, see #478286 which is still
here despite the fix being trivial.

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :  We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'   We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-our own. Resistance is futile.


-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:01:15 +0200
From: Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


On Sun, Jul 06, 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote:
 On 2008-07-06, Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the
  matter of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper
  subset of the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications
  deeper in KDE menu and Qt/KDE - in Gnome one).
 
 I actually don't like this - just as I don't like the kde and
 gnome package sections.
 
 The users should have equal access to good programs.

 Are you commenting on OnlyShowIn?  This feature is not meant to list
 all GNOME-ish apps in GNOME and KDE-ish apps in KDE.  It's meant to
 prevent some silly things to display across desktops.  For instance
 gnome-about (About GNOME) shouldn't show in the KDE menus, nor should
 the configuration applets for window management, keyboard etc. which
 touch GNOME specific GConf settings, or nautilus-cd-burner...

 There are only 47 desktop files with OnlyShowIn on my system out of
 218 desktop files installed, so it's not used too wildly I would say.

 (Some of these are probably bogus.)

 Most people (no matter what desktop they are using) thinks that
  - amarok is better than the gnome equivalent (rythmbox?)

 there isn't one GNOME player; I don't know whether amarok is
 OnlyShowIn KDE, but Rhythmbox should show up in KDE menus, just like
 Banshee and I hope the other players as well (Quodlibet, etc.).

  - gimp is better than the kde equivalent (released versions of krita)
  - kontact and evolution - fits different to different people

 These don't have an OnlyShowIn here and should show up in KDE menus.

-- 
Loïc Minier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 17:51:13 + (UTC)
From: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


On 2008-07-06, Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the
 matter of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper
 subset of the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications
 deeper in KDE menu and Qt/KDE - in Gnome one).

I actually don't like this - just as I don't like the kde and gnome
package sections.

The users should have equal access to good programs.

Most people (no matter what desktop they are using) thinks that
 - amarok is better than the gnome equivalent (rythmbox?)
 - gimp is better than the kde equivalent (released versions of krita)
 - kontact and evolution - fits different to different people

At least, the KDE section seems to be a nice dumping ground for anything
that links against kdelibs - and in some cases just Qt.

/Sune


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:02:02 -0500
From: Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Dickinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-policy@lists.debian.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use
non-policy main menu


Wouter Verhelst dijo [Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:12:23AM +0200]:
 The separation of a Debian menu and a desktop menu has been seen by
 some as a feature. I remember a post on Planet Debian by one of the
 GNOME maintainers (although I don't recall who it was) who explicitly
 said that he would not like to see non-GNOME applications in the GNOME
 menu but outside the Debian section. It is not unreasonable to state
 that it may be confusing for people to have a menu containing both
 GNOME and non-GNOME applications on a shared system; after all,
 different UI toolkits often have different UI guidelines and
 concepts; mixing those is not necessarily a good idea.

Maybe the menu name should be changed - All of the applications that
appear both in the desktop-specific and in the Debian menu are
Debian-provided. I think the Debian section should be renamed, to
avoid confusion, to not desktop-integrated or such.

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:51:16 +0200
From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 484656 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


Le lundi 07 juillet 2008 à 02:48 -0400, Daniel Dickinson a écrit : 
 And depends on the package maintainer being cooperative.  Because
 there is no debian policy on this if a package maintainer disagrees
 they don't have to hide their menu entry.

Yes, that’s probably the most important issue with the current
situation; nothing prevents the Java maintainer from adding a useless
Java policy tool icon in the Preferences menu, even though it has
nothing to do with the preferences and no one except a small number of
professional Java developers will have anything to do with it.

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :  We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'   We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-our own. Resistance is futile.


-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:27:43 +0200
From: Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


Hello Josselin,

Am 2008-07-06 14:28:15, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
 the restrictions of the Debian menu system (no i18n support, 32x32 XPM
 icons, strict hierarchy), these goals are simply not compatible.

For Fvwm it is not right, since you can do

$[gt.Hello]

and in the ~/.fvwm/config I use

LocalePath /usr/share/locale;fvwm-menu:+

I was working last year on this stuff, but since my whole network was
destrcted by an very heavy over-voltage the development has stoped.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917  ICQ #328449886
+49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)


-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-08-15 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:44:29 +0200
From: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Josselin Mouette wrote:
  Therefore, I still feel that, despite it being a big mess, the
  current situation is the best:
* the default menu contains only what is needed, and we are
  still hunting down entries that are useless to make them not show up
  by default;
* users wanting the Debian menu and its gazillions of entries
  including window managers, terminal emulators and shell
  interpreters can enable it easily in the menu editor;
* those really wanting only the Debian menu can replace
  gnome-applications.menu by debian-menu.menu.
  
  If you want this to change, you need to seriously think about
  evolutions to both XDG and Debian menu systems, to convince fd.o
  and the Debian menu maintainer to implement them
 
 Actually, no, if you want this to change, you have only to do nothing.
 
 People (many of them MOTUs from Ubuntu in my experience) are filing
 lots of requestes for random packages to have .desktop files added to
 them, so they appear in the gnome menu. The criteria seems to be a
 program that $RANDOM_USER would like to have on the menu and files a
 bug about || that $RANDOM_UPSTREAM ships a desktop file for, for
 whatever reason.
 
 So, after sufficient time, the gnome menu will contain a random
 assortment of the menu items that also appear in the debian menu. Not
 a well-chosen and consistent assortment, but the kind of random
 assortment that you get when you ignore policy and go off on your own
 way.

I agree with you, but I am only the 'Debian menu maintainer' and I do
not have time or interest to maintain the .desktop files in Debian.
Instead people (not you) ask me transparently to stop maintaining menu
and maintain the .desktop files instead, but no one is willing to do
the work. (And of course .desktop is about 10% of the XDG spec).

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-07-06 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:28:15 +0200
From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


Le samedi 05 juillet 2008 à 02:42 -0400, Daniel Dickinson a écrit :
 Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are the the top three desktops used in debian and
 cover most users of desktops in debian.
 
 They all use xdg .desktop-based menus as their main menu.

The last time this discussion was raised up, the clear consensus was
that, at least for the GNOME menu, the primary goals of the xdg-based
menu system and those of the Debian menu are fundamentally different.
The GNOME menu is aimed towards usability, and the Debian menu is aimed
towards completeness. Given the capabilities of the GNOME panel (for
which adding submenus is neither easy nor efficient in terms of
usability), the limitations of the XDG system (for which it is not
possible to define “views” including or excluding some categories) and
the restrictions of the Debian menu system (no i18n support, 32x32 XPM
icons, strict hierarchy), these goals are simply not compatible.

Therefore, I still feel that, despite it being a big mess, the current
situation is the best:
  * the default menu contains only what is needed, and we are still
hunting down entries that are useless to make them not show up
by default;
  * users wanting the Debian menu and its gazillions of entries
including window managers, terminal emulators and shell
interpreters can enable it easily in the menu editor;
  * those really wanting only the Debian menu can replace
gnome-applications.menu by debian-menu.menu.

If you want this to change, you need to seriously think about evolutions
to both XDG and Debian menu systems, to convince fd.o and the Debian
menu maintainer to implement them, and to find a good way to present
them in a nice way in the main menu and in a menu editor. None of these
tasks are simple.

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :  We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'   We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-our own. Resistance is futile.


-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-07-06 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:08:40 -0400
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


Josselin Mouette wrote:
 Therefore, I still feel that, despite it being a big mess, the current
 situation is the best:
   * the default menu contains only what is needed, and we are
 still hunting down entries that are useless to make them not show up
 by default;
   * users wanting the Debian menu and its gazillions of entries
 including window managers, terminal emulators and shell
 interpreters can enable it easily in the menu editor;
   * those really wanting only the Debian menu can replace
 gnome-applications.menu by debian-menu.menu.
 
 If you want this to change, you need to seriously think about
 evolutions to both XDG and Debian menu systems, to convince fd.o and
 the Debian menu maintainer to implement them

Actually, no, if you want this to change, you have only to do nothing.

People (many of them MOTUs from Ubuntu in my experience) are filing
lots of requestes for random packages to have .desktop files added to
them, so they appear in the gnome menu. The criteria seems to be a
program that $RANDOM_USER would like to have on the menu and files a
bug about || that $RANDOM_UPSTREAM ships a desktop file for, for
whatever reason.

So, after sufficient time, the gnome menu will contain a random
assortment of the menu items that also appear in the debian menu. Not a
well-chosen and consistent assortment, but the kind of random assortment
that you get when you ignore policy and go off on your own way.

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-07-06 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:13:30 +0700
From: Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


Twas brillig at 13:08:40 06.07.2008 UTC-04 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did
gyre and gimble:

 JH So, after sufficient time, the gnome menu will contain a random
 JH assortment of the menu items that also appear in the debian menu.

fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the matter
of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset of
the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications deeper in KDE
menu and Qt/KDE - in Gnome one).

-- 


-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-07-05 Thread Daniel Dickinson


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 15:13:46 +0200
From: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu


* Daniel Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080705 09:05]:
 xdg .desktop-based menus are not covered by policy.

I think this is an important point to acknowledge by all people wanting
to see more .desktop files: There is no policy how to use the
fields in them. Currently most people just copy the files from their
upstreams. That cannot work to get a coherent system. When Debian
packages use .desktop files from other packages in Debian, there should
be a Debian policy what those files may contain and what not.

The system also misses massively documentation. Perhaps it got better
in between, but last time I looked it totally missed any documentation
except and lengthy document that seemed to be targeted on writers
of menu programs displaying. Nothing how to overwrite items as user,
not wher to put them to test them, not even the actual paths (only
some placeholders without explanation everywhere).

 The main menu (meaning the primary menu used for program selection; I
 don't include quick access menus which have a small selection of often
 used programs) should either be the debian-menu or all packages which
 are supposed to have menu entires should also be required to
 supply .desktop files.

 Having a dual-menu scheme in policy is ugly.

 Currently the debian-menu is a submenu of the main menu, called
 'Debian'.

This is indeed very ugly. But I think that is not so much a technical
problem, but more a problem of different opinions what a menu should
be like.

Because from what I gathered in the previous discussions about this,
an important reason gnome and kde maintainers refuse to use the Debian
menu is that then all the programs (even the text and ugly X programs)
would be in the menu equal to the other ones.
Switching to .desktop files would of course not fix that, as then all
the other programs would have .desktop files, too.

The Debian menu system could easily be extended to have some more tags
describing such properties (perhaps some ShowAlsoInKDENoviceMode tag
or whatever), but that would need an honest discussion about the aims.

 desktops that want to have .desktop entries for specific programs
 ought to be responsible for creating the code that merges the debian
 main menu with their main menu (e.g. in menu-xdg), rather than
 forcing every other application in debian to do their work for them.

I think the easiest solution would be to have some additional tag that
menu-xdg uses to filter out menu entries that also have a .desktop file.
(hopefully it already has, that only needs documentation, otherwise it
should be added), and then policy should say that each package should
use this tag to specifiy which entries in the Debian menu are
duplicated by a .desktop file.

Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
-- 
Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools are
available! Niklaus Wirth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells:  Daniel's Webloghttp://cshore.wordpress.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]