Re: Suggestions for running Mac OS 9.0.1 on debian-x86-64

2008-08-01 Thread Jérôme Warnier

Christian Jaeger wrote:

Jérôme Warnier wrote:

In this case, why bother using MOL?
Just install Mac OS 9 directly under your qemu VM.


We're waiting for your confirmation that you have first-hand experience 
of running Mac OS 9 directly under qemu, or can refer to reports of 
doing that successfully.


On http://www.claunia.com:16080/qemu/ , which is being linked by 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_virtual_machines , I can read
GuestOS: MacOS, Version: 9.0, Guest system: Heathrow PowerMac, Working: 
No.


On http://qemu-forum.ipi.fi/viewtopic.php?f=6t=4284 one can read a post 
from Feb 03, 2008 in a thread named Call for ideas!: More urgent 
items would be (...) Classic (Mac OS 9) support (...)


Did you really want to say: In this case, I wonder if it wouldn't be 
possible to run Mac OS 9 directly under qemu. Maybe you didn't realize 
that this might be supported and should research that topic? I would be 
interested in the outcome.  ?

Yes.

And my rationale behind was that adding virtualization levels would 
certainly not help achieving decent stability or performance.
But if reports say it does not work, then it's another story of course, 
... Sorry for misleading you with my lack of experience.



Christian.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Suggestions for running Mac OS 9.0.1 on debian-x86-64

2008-07-31 Thread Jérôme Warnier

Christian Jaeger wrote:

Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Just my .2c: Both applications also exist for Windows, and probably 
run nicely under WINE.


Yes, I've thought about this, too, but I'd have to get a copy of those 
apps only for the purpose of the conversion; also I was still using 
FileMaker 4. Also there might be further (even if less compelling) 
reasons to run the old Mac OS for me, too. So I'd prefer the emulation 
path.

In this case, why bother using MOL?
Just install Mac OS 9 directly under your qemu VM.


Christian.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: New miboot-enabled d-i daily builds set up

2006-05-15 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 18:16 +0200, Jerome Warnier a écrit :
 Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 10:49 +0200, Hans Ekbrand a écrit :
  On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:35:51AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
   Le mercredi 03 mai 2006 à 01:11 +0100, Colin Watson a écrit :
Hi,

I've set up miboot-enabled daily builds of d-i powerpc floppies, to go
with my normal daily builds:

  http://people.debian.org/~cjwatson/d-i/powerpc-miboot/

Thanks to Sven Luther for the miboot package used to build these. Let me
know if there are any problems; I haven't been able to test them myself.
   I checked it on a PowerMac G3 beige.
  
  Here's my results from a Performa 5400 (24 MB RAM):
  
  2006-05-15: Boot ends with Instruction dump:
  7ca6 ... ... ... [ a lot of numbers in two lines]
  
   Version 2006-05-14 didn't boot at all.
  2006-05-14: not tested (suspected the same problem as with 06-05-15)
  
   Version 2006-05-13 boots, and it already gets pretty far, but it cannot
   detect any disk
  2006-05-13: Boots OK (didn't put out the floppy automatically though,
  I had to use a paperclip to get it out). The root image also works
  good, until hw-detection.
 You're right, I got used to the paperclip stuff with the previous
 versions, so I didn't even bother to specify it, but it is surely not
 practical at all.
Some more news on this side: it seems that once the cd-drivers floppy is
loaded, it can (and actually does) eject the floppies after reading
them. Could it be that the eject utility is located on this floppy
image? In this cas, it would probably be a good idea to move it to the
root floppy (at least on OldWorld PPC, or only on PPC floppies).

  Doesn't find my ide disk.
 Same thing here, except that I'm not actually sure it is an IDE disk,
 and not an SCSI one (I think I have both in the machine, and none is
 detected).
It seems I have at least a SCSI one, but it does not work nicely (again,
once the cd-drivers floppy is loaded): it gets detected multiple times,
and at least the first one doesn't work like expected, it is impossible
to partition and format.

  ~  # ls /lib/modules/2.6.16-1-powerpc-miboot/kernel/drivers
  baseieee1394net scsi
  
  No ide here!
  
  I found the ide drivers on the cd-drivers.img. That should be
  documented somewhere, since a net-install will fail without
  hd-support.
 Thanks, I will try this.
 
  Also after loading the net-drivers.img the installer failed to detect
  my ethernet de2104x PCI. I tried to load tulip dc21x4x manually but
  it failed.
 It detects mine (this is the second NIC I talked about in my mail).
 
  This was still an interesting test, since I have not been able to boot
  2.6.16 on this machine, but that must be a problem with the initrd
  created by initramfs (or possibly something with the way quik boots)



Install on OldWorld

2005-10-27 Thread Jérôme Warnier
So where are we?
What about the miboot floppy images? Did we progress?

I have several OldWorld waiting to be freed here.

:-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

2005-10-13 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le jeudi 13 octobre 2005 à 13:14 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
 On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
  Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
   On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:13PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
  Nope, they are available since a couple of weeks :)
 Sorry, but there is only cdrom, hd-media, and netboot in
 http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/.
 Is it netboot?

Oh, damn, the floppies are still disabled then, will fix for tomorrow 
then.
The main problem is that the drivers and other images are way too big 
for
floppies.
   
   Ah, joeyh disabled them and forgot to reenable them once the miboot 
   kernels
   entered the archive :/
  So, I tried those available right now, and the boot image does not work
  (the Mac ejects the floppy automatically after trying to read it).
 
 Which those available right now ?

Those in
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy
(now=yesterday evening).

 The etch/sarge/testing one will never work until we free miboot, so you need
 the daily builds, and they should work.
 
 Also, it is well possible that your floppies or drive is dusty or something.
Your miboot.floppy of the other day worked, and I reused the same
floppies and tried with others, but boot.img did not work (it was
ejected by the Mac).

 Friendly,
 
 Sven Luther



Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

2005-10-12 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
 On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
  On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:13PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
Nope, they are available since a couple of weeks :)
   Sorry, but there is only cdrom, hd-media, and netboot in
   http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/.
   Is it netboot?
  
  Oh, damn, the floppies are still disabled then, will fix for tomorrow then.
  The main problem is that the drivers and other images are way too big for
  floppies.
 
 Ah, joeyh disabled them and forgot to reenable them once the miboot kernels
 entered the archive :/
So, I tried those available right now, and the boot image does not work
(the Mac ejects the floppy automatically after trying to read it).

 Friendly,
 
 Sven Luther



Linux-tiny (Was: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.)

2005-10-10 Thread Jérôme Warnier
[..]

  I would say that if more of the linux-tiny patches were incorporated in
  the mainline kernel, then it would be a really nice addition.
 
 I'm not aware of linux-tiny.  Where can I learn more about it?
http://www.selenic.com/linux-tiny/

 Enjoy!
 
 Rick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

2005-10-10 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le mercredi 21 septembre 2005 à 19:54 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
 On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:00:44AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
  On Aug 18 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
   I was forced to disable the floppy builds for now, since they failed to
   build, and the 2.6.12 kernels are 200K too big anyway for miboot
   floppies, we need to find out how to make them smaller, and solve the
   non-freeness of miboot for the etch release.
  
  Humm, this is indeed a problem. :-( The non-freeness of miboot is a
  secondary problem in face of not having a way to install the operating
  system on the box. :-(
 
 i managed to do a powerpc-miboot flavour build, which does fit on a miboot
 floppy. I would like (urgently) for folk to test it out, it is just a kernel,
 i need to see if it boots, not much more for now, before i go ahead and upload
 2.6.12-7 which would include it, and subsequently build debian-installer
 images with it.
 
 The floppy is at :
 
   http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot.floppy

It boots happily on my PowerMacintosh G3.
Where am I supposed to find the matching root disk image file, though?

 Friendly,
 
 Sven Luther



Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

2005-10-10 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 12:37 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
 On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:32:33PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
  Le mercredi 21 septembre 2005 à 19:54 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
   On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:00:44AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
On Aug 18 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
 I was forced to disable the floppy builds for now, since they failed 
 to
 build, and the 2.6.12 kernels are 200K too big anyway for miboot
 floppies, we need to find out how to make them smaller, and solve the
 non-freeness of miboot for the etch release.

Humm, this is indeed a problem. :-( The non-freeness of miboot is a
secondary problem in face of not having a way to install the operating
system on the box. :-(
   
   i managed to do a powerpc-miboot flavour build, which does fit on a miboot
   floppy. I would like (urgently) for folk to test it out, it is just a 
   kernel,
   i need to see if it boots, not much more for now, before i go ahead and 
   upload
   2.6.12-7 which would include it, and subsequently build debian-installer
   images with it.
   
   The floppy is at :
   
 http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot.floppy
  
  It boots happily on my PowerMacintosh G3.
  Where am I supposed to find the matching root disk image file, though?
 
 That was just a test image, no matching root, but i enabled this on the
 daily builds now :
 
   http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy
 
 Or something such.
I guess it will only be available tomorrow, then?
No problem, just to be sure.

 Friendly,
 
 Sven Luther



Re: gcc install problems in sarge testing

2004-08-29 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le dim 29/08/2004 à 23:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
 Greetings:
 
 I recently installed sarge testing onto my powerbook G3.
 
 i have most things working, however there seems to be no compiler!
 I noticed that when i installed that there was no option for development 
 stuff 
 in tasksel... could this have been forshadowing of what was to come?
 
 i noticed that gcc-3.3-base was installed, but the actual compiler collection 
 was not..
 
 so after an apt-get install gcc-3.3 i am left with a bunch of dpkg errors... 
 (see below)
This is a known bug in Sarge on all arch, and should be fixed now.
See #268771 (there are lots of bugs which have been merged).

[..]
-- 
Jérôme Warnier
Consultant
BeezNest
http://beeznest.net