Taking over SQLObject package?

[Neil Muller]

The current python-sqlobject package is decidedly outdated (SQLObject
upstream is at 1.4, released this konth while debian is still at
0.12.4, released in 2010), and the last 2 uploads (in 2012 and 2013)
have been NMUs. As a reasonably heavy user of SQLObject,  find this
state a considerable annoyance.

Since I'm responsible for the last NMU, and have a decent relationship
with upstream, would anyone object to me taking over the debian
package?

--
Neil Muller


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/capzz3haqonvnwkj7ff6kbm6w7gp-sjuqgbpsa0-zrf5ss_v...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Obsolete Conflits/Replaces: python2.3-MODULE, python2.4-MODULE

[Deepak Tripathi]

Yes please.



On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:

 Quite a few packages carry Conflicts or Replaces with

 python2.4-MODULE or
 python2.3-MODULE or sometimes even
 pythonX.Y-MODULE for X.Y  2.3.

 Not only such packages are long gone, but it's very unlikely that the file
 conflict that was the reason to add these Conflict/Replaces actually still
 occur. Please consider dropping these obsolete relations from your packages.

 Would anyone mind if I made a mass-commit to drop them from the packages
 (co-)maintained by DPMT?

 --
 Jakub Wilk