Re: PAPT and git

2017-02-23 Thread Brian May
Barry Warsaw  writes:

> Yes!  Stefano has a bunch of scripts that he used to convert DPMT svn to git,
> so there's a great starting place.  Probably the main thing to change there
> would be to forego conversion to git-dpm and work on conversion to
> gbp-pq.

I would suggest waiting until after the freeze. This is a bigger and
much more invasive change then simply converting git-dpm to gbp-pq.

> Or, let's be expedient and use the existing scripts to go to git-dpm for now,
> taking up gbp-pq transition along with DPMT after Stretch.

I haven't looked at the scripts so I don't know what state they are in,
however I think it would be far simpler to go straight to
gbp-pq. Converting to git-dpm is, I think, a complicated task compared
with going straight to gbp-pq.
-- 
Brian May 



Re: PAPT and git

2017-02-23 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 23, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:

>Looking at http://python-apps.alioth.debian.org/policy.html, it
>appears that PAPT still uses svn.

True.

>I wanted to start working on the 'alot' PAPT package using git. On
>irc, olasd let me know that the current stance is that no PAPT
>packages should be in git until all PAPT packages are transitioned.
>
>So ... can I help to transition the PAPT packages to git?

Yes!  Stefano has a bunch of scripts that he used to convert DPMT svn to git,
so there's a great starting place.  Probably the main thing to change there
would be to forego conversion to git-dpm and work on conversion to gbp-pq.

Or, let's be expedient and use the existing scripts to go to git-dpm for now,
taking up gbp-pq transition along with DPMT after Stretch.

(While you're at it, gosh I'd love the zope packages to be moved to git + DPMT
:).

If it doesn't happen by then, Debconf 2017 would be a good time to work on
this stuff.

Cheers,
-Barry


pgplGLkYUxuFZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


PAPT and git

2017-02-23 Thread Jordan Justen
(I sent a similar email to the PAPT list yesterday, but olasd
recommended on irc that I also send it to debian-python.)

Looking at http://python-apps.alioth.debian.org/policy.html, it
appears that PAPT still uses svn.

I wanted to start working on the 'alot' PAPT package using git. On
irc, olasd let me know that the current stance is that no PAPT
packages should be in git until all PAPT packages are transitioned.

So ... can I help to transition the PAPT packages to git?

Thanks,

-Jordan


signature.asc
Description: signature