Re: pycharm package in debian

[Paul Wise]

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 30/09/2017 à 14:22, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
>> Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part
>> of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it
>> is awesome.
>
> Maybe you should look at WNPP to see if someone filed a RFP or ITP, and
> if not, submit a RFP yourself?

Looks like someone attempted it but gave up, so if you would like to
do it that would be great.

https://bugs.debian.org/742394
https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

[Rebecca N. Palmer]

On 30/09/17 16:50, Diane Trout wrote:

I am curious if Rebecca is using pandas on a non-intel architecture
though (was wondering how she noticed pandas hadn't built)


No - I found this email thread and checked 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pandas

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

[Diane Trout]

On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 12:26 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> 
> 
> > I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line,
> > install
> > sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx?
> 
> Adding sphinx-common to B-D and keeping python3-sphinx in B-D-Indep
> is
> probably the easiest solution. Also you can try not relying on --with
> at all and manually call dh_sphinxdoc when the build is arch-indep.
> 

It took me two tries, but statsmodels 0.8.0-6 builds everywhere pandas
builds now.

I am curious if Rebecca is using pandas on a non-intel architecture
though (was wondering how she noticed pandas hadn't built)

Diane

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: pycharm package in debian

[Julien Puydt]

Hi,

Le 30/09/2017 à 14:22, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
> Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part
> of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it
> is awesome.

Maybe you should look at WNPP to see if someone filed a RFP or ITP, and
if not, submit a RFP yourself?

Snark on #debian-python

Re: pycharm package in debian

[Yaroslav Halchenko]

Fwiw I have made a pycharm-community-sloppy package available from NeuroDebian 
- just wrapped their distribution. Btw seems to work with open jdk just fine. 
Packaging for Debian proper would need some Java verse maintainer.

On September 30, 2017 8:22:56 AM EDT, kamaraju kusumanchi 
 wrote:
>Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part
>of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it
>is awesome.
>
>thanks

-- 
Sent from a phone which beats iPhone.

pycharm package in debian

[kamaraju kusumanchi]

Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part
of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it
is awesome.

thanks
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

Updated Veusz

[Jeremy Sanders]

Hi -

I'd be very grateful if somebody could review my updated Veusz package 
in the PAPT repository:

https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/veusz/trunk/

I've updated it to Veusz 2.0.1. This upgrades to Qt5. I'm also building 
for python 2 and 3. It now uses sphinx docs.


I've split apart the package into the main executable and docs (veusz, 
based on python3), the python packages (python-veusz and python3-veusz), 
the architecture-specific parts (python-veusz.helpers and 
python3-veusz.helpers) and the data shared by the modules (veusz-data) 
and debug packages (pythonX-veusz.helpers-dbg). This is a lot of 
subpackages. I could merge the pythonX-veusz and pythonX-veusz.helpers, 
if that would make it better at the expense of disk space.


Presumably these should somehow obsolete the old veusz-helpers package, 
but I'm not sure how to do that, given that that used python2 and veusz 
now uses python3 by default.


The source code is:
https://github.com/veusz/veusz/releases/download/veusz-2.0.1/veusz-2.0.1.tar.gz
signature:
https://github.com/veusz/veusz/releases/download/veusz-2.0.1/veusz-2.0.1.tar.gz.asc

Thanks very much in advance

Jeremy

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

[Dmitry Shachnev]

Hi Diane,

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 03:55:13PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> Oops.
>
> I thought that it wouldn't try using sphinx when not building doc
> packages. But apparently being listed in "dh --with" counts as being
> used.

Yes, because dh tries to open Sequece/sphinxdoc.pm which is provided by
sphinx-common.

> I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line, install
> sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx?

Adding sphinx-common to B-D and keeping python3-sphinx in B-D-Indep is
probably the easiest solution. Also you can try not relying on --with
at all and manually call dh_sphinxdoc when the build is arch-indep.

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

[Rebecca N. Palmer]

On 29/09/17 23:55, Diane Trout wrote:

I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line, install
sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx?


For local testing of this, use pbuilder --debbuildopts -B

Given earlier messages that we want this working ASAP, always installing 
python3-sphinx is the lowest-risk option.



As for nose, python{,3}-nose is listed a build-depends ? Why
is it failing on importing nose? it should either be there or it
shouldn't be running tests?


It's not failing on importing nose - it's failing because the patch 
tries to skip a test *without* importing nose.