* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:34:04 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote... > > > That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff. > > +1 > > In order to control the transition, I've filed in ITP (intent to > package) for Adam's python-magic as https://bugs.debian.org/877849 Did I misunderstand | Ideally the upstream file package would take it over. ? Perhaps a little bit early, because we didn't see Adams solution, but I would like to understand the goals. Am I right that the intentions are - Add a compatibility layer to python-magic[file] to support the feature set of python-magic[pypi] - Provide in some way on Pypi the same featureset for file-magic and python-magic ? If this would be the case, in my understanding there wouldn't be any need for an ITP or transition, but just the possibility for (Debian) packages needing python-magic[pypi) to use the then compatible python-magic[file]. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Behrle PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6 AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1C71 7681 D6D0 9BE4 8405 BBF6
pgpzPw_4kLPRE.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP