Hello,
On Tue 31 Jul 2018 at 12:00AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Monday, July 30 2018, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon 30 Jul 2018 at 09:54PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>
>>> This is my understanding as well: git-dpm is not mandatory anymore, and
>>> gbp is the preferred tool. I've been packaging all of my Python modules
>>> using gbp for a while.
>>
>> Do I have to use the full suite of gbp tools (e.g. gbp-pq) or is it
>> enough that `gbp buildpackage` will work?
>
> You don't have to use the full suite if you don't like. The important
> thing is to have the repository in the correct format
> (debian/upstream/pristine-tar branches [or something else, as long as
> properly documented in d/gbp.conf], tags, etc.), so that other people
> can use gbp without problems.
Thank you.
Just to note that gbp will work with patches-applied too, but I won't do
that.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
