Re: python-requests: adding a documentation package python-requests-doc

2019-12-31 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, 7:42 pm Daniele Tricoli,  wrote:

> Hello Fabrice,
> thanks for pinging I did not notice the MR :(
> Please next time can you assign it to me? I should reveive some sort of
> notification I hope! :)
>

I recommend you enable notifications for all packages in you are interested
in, by setting the notification switch on salsa to "watch".
Otherwise, you could get into the habit of scrolling through your ddpo page
every so often anche check the VCS column (but there is a huge delay as
iirc salsa is queried once a week for MRs).


>


Re: python-requests: adding a documentation package python-requests-doc

2019-12-31 Thread Daniele Tricoli
Hello Fabrice,
thanks for pinging I did not notice the MR :(
Please next time can you assign it to me? I should reveive some sort of
notification I hope! :)

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 12:35:19AM +0100, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I wish there was a python-requests-doc package for browsing
> python-requests' documentation offline.  I'd like to add it if I can.
> 
> I saw that debian/watch currently targets the PyPI tarball, which lacks
> the documentation.

Yes, I usually preferred PyPI distribution, but I'm fine switching since it
will enhance users experience.

> As a first step, I'm submitting a merge request [1] so that debian/watch
> tracks the github releases instead, which do contain the documentation.
> 
> After that, once a new upstream release of requests is published and
> propagated into the salsa repository, the latter will start
> containing the missing docs/ subdirectory.  So we'll at least be able to
> start working on a new python-requests-doc binary package containing the
> documentation.
> 
> In the merge request, I've basically applied the github recipe as
> indicated in the uscan(1) manpage.
> 
> If you could have a look at this merge request, that would be excellent.
> 
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/requests/merge_requests/1
> 

Looked at it, I would prefer the more common:

-8<
version=4
opts=filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz/requests-$1\.tar\.gz/ \
  https://github.com/psf/requests/tags .*/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz
-8<

Please can you update your MR? Can you also update d/changelog, so I will not
to have to write manually that I thank you and the attribution of the work you
have done? :)

Thanks for your contribution!

Regards and happy new year,

-- 
  Daniele Tricoli 'eriol'
  https://mornie.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature