Louis-Philippe Véronneau:
> On 20-05-11 17 h 02, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
>> On 20-05-11 16 h 48, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:03 AM Hans-Christoph Steiner
>>> wrote:
Ok, this has become a bit more urgent since someone has moved my package
fdroidserver into PAPT without asking me. Now I cannot push commits to
it. So either someone needs to grant me PAPT access or put my package
back where it was in salsa. I'm fine with fdroidserver being in PAPT,
I'm not fine with being locked out of my package.
>>>
>>> I am sorry this happened (though I've no idea who did it).
>>> Whilst I don't have the right permissions/access to add you to PAPT
>>> officially, I have given you maintainer access to fdroidserver so this
>>> won't be a blocker to you.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> That was I, and I documented the process in bug #946105 [1]. As stated
>> on the BTS, the package was already in the PAPT but wasn't respecting
>> the policy, thus making team work harder.
>>
>> Looking at the package, it seems I forgot to push a patch to d/control
>> to change the VCS. Sorry for overlooking that, I did a bunch in a row
>> and must have skipped fdroidserver by mistake.
>>
>> I'll do that in a few minutes.
>>
>> Sorry if the changes to the repository path I made caused you problems.
>>
>> [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946105
>>
>
> Hmm, re-reading the BTS entry, it seems I went a little fast and didn't
> take in account you put the PAPT in the "Uploaders" field instead of the
> "Maintainer" one. I shouldn't have touched the package.
>
> I guess that's why I didn't originally push a patch. Somehow
> fdroidserver ended up in the list I gave to the Salsa team when I asked
> them to migrate a bunch of repositories for us.
>
> Again, sorry for the screw up :(
All's well that ends well. I've got access now and I'm happy to have
the package in PAPT. I put this package as Uploaders: since I'm also
upstream on fdroidserver, and we generally try to sync the release
process with Debian, so new upstream releases should be handled accordingly.
.hc
