Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends
On August 14, 2023 12:28:30 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Control: tags -1 pending > >Hi, > >I've fixed the issue reported in this bug[1]. > >In addition I've took the chance to upload pdm to its latest upstream >version. When doing so I realised that build time tests are basically >ignored. This was mainly due to the removal of artefacts that are used >for testing. I admit I do not see any reason to remove those data >files - in Debian R team this kind of data files which is just used for >testing is accepted. Thus I took the freedom to re-introduce these >files and was running the tests in d/rules. Unfortunately there is >quite a number of tests failing > > 54 failed, 620 passed, 1 xfailed, 3 rerun in 228.94s (0:03:48) > > >(see Salsa CI[2]) > >I'd like to stress that to run those tests at all I needed a patch[3] >since BaseProvider can't be simply imported from findpython. > >Before I upload I'd like to ask for reviewing this patch and opinions >about the test suite errors. While these possibly occure in previous >versions (which I did not tested) we might consider ignoring just the >failing tests. I need to admit that I did not went through the list of >single failures - may be there is a chance of easy fixes for some of >them. I simply wanted to discuss the reintroduction of the artifacts >and my patch first. > With the exception of future_fstrings those are all binary without source. That's a problem. It's probably okay if you add the corresponding source somewhere in the package. I do think it's odd that pdm would need poetry-core in its test suit. Scott K
Bug#1049347: ITP: liboprf - Oblivious Pseudo-Random Generator and Threshold OPRF library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Joost van Baal-Ilić * Package name: liboprf Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Stefan Marsiske * URL : https://github.com/stef/liboprf * License : GPLv3, LGPLv3 Programming Lang: C Description : Oblivious Pseudo-Random Functions and Threshold OPRF library This library implements the basic OPRF (ristretto255, SHA-512) variant from the "Oblivious Pseudorandom Functions using Prime-Order Groups" Draft from the IRTF Crypto Forum Research Group (https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-voprf/). Additionally it implements a threshold OPRF based on "TOPPSS: Cost-minimal Password-Protected Secret Sharing based on Threshold OPRF" by Krawczyk et al (https://ia.cr/2017/363). . This library depends on libsodium. The (yet to be packaged) Klutshnik software (https://klutshnik.info/) will depend upon liboprf. I will be working on this package at (yet to be created) https://salsa.debian.org/debian/liboprf . Bye, Joost signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends
Control: tags -1 pending Hi, I've fixed the issue reported in this bug[1]. In addition I've took the chance to upload pdm to its latest upstream version. When doing so I realised that build time tests are basically ignored. This was mainly due to the removal of artefacts that are used for testing. I admit I do not see any reason to remove those data files - in Debian R team this kind of data files which is just used for testing is accepted. Thus I took the freedom to re-introduce these files and was running the tests in d/rules. Unfortunately there is quite a number of tests failing 54 failed, 620 passed, 1 xfailed, 3 rerun in 228.94s (0:03:48) (see Salsa CI[2]) I'd like to stress that to run those tests at all I needed a patch[3] since BaseProvider can't be simply imported from findpython. Before I upload I'd like to ask for reviewing this patch and opinions about the test suite errors. While these possibly occure in previous versions (which I did not tested) we might consider ignoring just the failing tests. I need to admit that I did not went through the list of single failures - may be there is a chance of easy fixes for some of them. I simply wanted to discuss the reintroduction of the artifacts and my patch first. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm/-/commit/2691b62c20944e0d9ca2326cb99e196d954b2735 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm/-/jobs/4555215 [3} https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm/-/blob/master/debian/patches/0002_fix_import.patch -- http://fam-tille.de
