Re: Maintenance of pydap
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ghislain Vaillantwrote: > Hi Sandro, > > I engaged with the pydap community and I can confirm that the project > has moved on from the old 2.x API. Since pydap 3.x is now using a new > namespace (pydap instead of dap), then both package versions should be > co-installable. > > Since I need the pydap 3.x API for hdf-compass, I propose to introduce > a new source package for it (which I am happy to maintain) and keep the > old source package alive until all reverse dependencies relying on 2.x > eventually move on. > > Hoe does that sound? sounds good to me -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
Re: Maintenance of pydap
Hi Sandro, I engaged with the pydap community and I can confirm that the project has moved on from the old 2.x API. Since pydap 3.x is now using a new namespace (pydap instead of dap), then both package versions should be co-installable. Since I need the pydap 3.x API for hdf-compass, I propose to introduce a new source package for it (which I am happy to maintain) and keep the old source package alive until all reverse dependencies relying on 2.x eventually move on. Hoe does that sound? Ghis On 28/01/16 09:50, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: I believe upstream has moved on from the API of 2.x (dap namespace) to using 3.x (pydap namespace). My assumption is based on the facts that: 1) the upstream repository [1] provide tags for 3.x releases only, 2) active issues, such as Python 3 support, are milestoned for 3.2.x [2], [1] https://github.com/robertodealmeida/pydap [2] https://github.com/robertodealmeida/pydap/issues/7 Since dap 2.x is no longer actively maintained, then the question is whether to introduce a new source package for pydap 3.x or just upgrade the current source package to 3.x and take care of the rdep for python-mpltoolkits.basemap. Thoughts? Ghis On 28/01/16 09:26, Sandro Tosi wrote: for a start, you can try to get upstream to reply to this (old) question: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pydap/6A6q-Y6qwtE On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: Forwarding to d-python, as it seems like a more appropriate place to discuss this matter. Forwarded Message Subject: Maintenance of pydap Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:00:32 + From: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> To: mo...@debian.org CC: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Ciao Sandro, I recently got involved with the packaging of the HDF compass [1], a viewer for HDF5 written in Python and using pydap as an install dependency. The version of pydap currently packaged is too old to work with the compass, first because version 3.x apparently changed the module API from using `import dap` to `import pydap`. I saw the following bug report [2] requesting an update of the package, but it was not acted upon or acknowledged. I am thereby contacting you to know whether the package was still actively maintained on your end. If you have lost interest in maintaining this package, myself and the Debian Science Team would be interested in taking over, since both hdf-compass and pydap are science related. Otherwise, please allow me to request an update to this package so I can carry on with my packaging work on hdf-compass. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812434 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788508 Many thanks, Ghis
Fwd: Maintenance of pydap
Forwarding to d-python, as it seems like a more appropriate place to discuss this matter. Forwarded Message Subject: Maintenance of pydap Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:00:32 + From: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> To: mo...@debian.org CC: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Ciao Sandro, I recently got involved with the packaging of the HDF compass [1], a viewer for HDF5 written in Python and using pydap as an install dependency. The version of pydap currently packaged is too old to work with the compass, first because version 3.x apparently changed the module API from using `import dap` to `import pydap`. I saw the following bug report [2] requesting an update of the package, but it was not acted upon or acknowledged. I am thereby contacting you to know whether the package was still actively maintained on your end. If you have lost interest in maintaining this package, myself and the Debian Science Team would be interested in taking over, since both hdf-compass and pydap are science related. Otherwise, please allow me to request an update to this package so I can carry on with my packaging work on hdf-compass. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812434 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788508 Many thanks, Ghis
Re: Maintenance of pydap
for a start, you can try to get upstream to reply to this (old) question: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pydap/6A6q-Y6qwtE On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Forwarding to d-python, as it seems like a more appropriate place to > discuss this matter. > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Maintenance of pydap > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:00:32 + > From: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> > To: mo...@debian.org > CC: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Ciao Sandro, > > I recently got involved with the packaging of the HDF compass [1], a > viewer for HDF5 written in Python and using pydap as an install > dependency. > > The version of pydap currently packaged is too old to work with the > compass, first because version 3.x apparently changed the module API > from using `import dap` to `import pydap`. > > I saw the following bug report [2] requesting an update of the package, > but it was not acted upon or acknowledged. I am thereby contacting you > to know whether the package was still actively maintained on your end. > > If you have lost interest in maintaining this package, myself and the > Debian Science Team would be interested in taking over, since both > hdf-compass and pydap are science related. > > Otherwise, please allow me to request an update to this package so I > can carry on with my packaging work on hdf-compass. > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812434 > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788508 > > Many thanks, > Ghis -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
Re: Maintenance of pydap
I believe upstream has moved on from the API of 2.x (dap namespace) to using 3.x (pydap namespace). My assumption is based on the facts that: 1) the upstream repository [1] provide tags for 3.x releases only, 2) active issues, such as Python 3 support, are milestoned for 3.2.x [2], [1] https://github.com/robertodealmeida/pydap [2] https://github.com/robertodealmeida/pydap/issues/7 Since dap 2.x is no longer actively maintained, then the question is whether to introduce a new source package for pydap 3.x or just upgrade the current source package to 3.x and take care of the rdep for python-mpltoolkits.basemap. Thoughts? Ghis On 28/01/16 09:26, Sandro Tosi wrote: for a start, you can try to get upstream to reply to this (old) question: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pydap/6A6q-Y6qwtE On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: Forwarding to d-python, as it seems like a more appropriate place to discuss this matter. Forwarded Message Subject: Maintenance of pydap Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:00:32 + From: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> To: mo...@debian.org CC: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Ciao Sandro, I recently got involved with the packaging of the HDF compass [1], a viewer for HDF5 written in Python and using pydap as an install dependency. The version of pydap currently packaged is too old to work with the compass, first because version 3.x apparently changed the module API from using `import dap` to `import pydap`. I saw the following bug report [2] requesting an update of the package, but it was not acted upon or acknowledged. I am thereby contacting you to know whether the package was still actively maintained on your end. If you have lost interest in maintaining this package, myself and the Debian Science Team would be interested in taking over, since both hdf-compass and pydap are science related. Otherwise, please allow me to request an update to this package so I can carry on with my packaging work on hdf-compass. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812434 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788508 Many thanks, Ghis