Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
On 08/08/19 00:20:19 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski said ... both packages uploaded and tagged (I fixed lintian warning in sclapp before uploading) Thank you for the upload Piotr. Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
[Y Giridhar Appaji Nag, 2008-08-15] I am looking for sponsors for my sclapp and pytagsfs packages. What about your previous sponsor (who-uploads reports the same person for both packages)? Is he busy? If yes, ping me in private, I will check and upload it (if everything is ok). -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor pgpTsuwnOa4fv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
Hi! Piotr Oz.arowski schrieb: [Y Giridhar Appaji Nag, 2008-08-15] I am looking for sponsors for my sclapp and pytagsfs packages. What about your previous sponsor (who-uploads reports the same person for both packages)? Is he busy? If yes, ping me in private, I will check and upload it (if everything is ok). Yes, I am busy. Sorry :( Best regards, Alex signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
both packages uploaded and tagged (I fixed lintian warning in sclapp before uploading) [Alexander Reichle-Schmehl, 2008-08-18] Yes, I am busy. Sorry :( no problem; some of my sponsorees are asking on various mailing lists for sponsoring packages I uploaded once without even trying to reach me first. I thought it's the same here (there was nothing about previous sponsor being busy in original mail) so that's why I asked. -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor pgpkDmoVOncn7.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
Hi, I am looking for sponsors for my sclapp and pytagsfs packages. The latter is a new upstream release for which no packaging changes were required and the former has a minor update (adds fuse-utils to the dependencies). Both the packages are lintian clean (except for a warning in sclapp that I choose to ignore). The packages are available from mentors.d.n http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pytagsfs dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pytagsfs/pytagsfs_0.7.1-2.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sclapp dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sclapp/sclapp_0.5.3-1.dsc Both sclapp and pytagsfs are available from the SVN repos of DPMT and PAPT respectively, in case you prefer to upload picking them from there. Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
Hi Vincent, On 08/08/04 21:14 +0200, Vincent Bernat said ... I have uploaded this new version. Thank you :) I don't know if I have already told it (if so, excuse the repetition) but since pytagsfs has unittests, you can run them unless there is nocheck in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. somerule: # for example install ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) # run tests # clean tests (some pyc for example) endif It is up to you to decide if you want to run unittests. It should not be too CPU intensive but unittests are generally quick. pytagsfs and sclapp tests require proctor [1], which has not been packaged for Debian yet. That is why I don't run the unit-tests as of now. [1] http://www.doughellmann.com/projects/Proctor/ Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du dimanche 03 août 2008, vers 13:02, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait : I did declare a stronger dependency, but 0.7 onwards pytagsfs also build-depends on sclapp and I don't know how I ignored this. I fixed this and also updated pytagsfs to 0.7.1 (a bugfix release). The package is ready for upload: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pytagsfs/ Hi Giridhar! I have uploaded this new version. I don't know if I have already told it (if so, excuse the repetition) but since pytagsfs has unittests, you can run them unless there is nocheck in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. somerule: # for example install ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) # run tests # clean tests (some pyc for example) endif It is up to you to decide if you want to run unittests. It should not be too CPU intensive but unittests are generally quick. -- printk(Penguin %d is stuck in the bottle.\n, i); 2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/arch/sparc/kernel/smp.c pgplSSxgGK41z.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du lundi 21 juillet 2008, vers 14:05, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait : python-sclapp (0.5.2-1) - framework for Python command-line applications * New upstream release + sclapp.txt is now licensed under GPLv2+ * Update Standards-Version to 3.8.0 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sclapp I have uploaded this one. pytagsfs (0.7.0-1) - maps media files to an arbitrary directory structure * New upstream release + Needs python-fuse = 0.2 * Remove patch 02_fuse_exceptions merged upstream * Update Standards-Version to 3.8.0 (no changes required) As noted Alexander, this one fails to build from source : Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 22, in module from tests.common import TEST_DIR, TEST_DATA_DIR File tests/common.py, line 17, in module from sclapp.util import importName ImportError: No module named sclapp.util make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 I suppose that you need to put a stronger dependency on sclapp. I am not subscribed to either debian-mentors or debian-python, so please Cc: me on responses. This is better to be subscribed, especially when you put yourself out of mail-followup-to header. -- BOFH excuse #211: Lightning strikes. pgpzJfnO0uz9c.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
HI Giridhar! Y Giridhar Appaji Nag schrieb: python-sclapp (0.5.2-1) - framework for Python command-line applications * New upstream release + sclapp.txt is now licensed under GPLv2+ * Update Standards-Version to 3.8.0 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sclapp That one is fine... pytagsfs (0.7.0-1) - maps media files to an arbitrary directory structure * New upstream release + Needs python-fuse = 0.2 * Remove patch 02_fuse_exceptions merged upstream * Update Standards-Version to 3.8.0 (no changes required) ... but that one fails to build from source (tested with an up to date sid using pbuilder): == dpatch cat-all patch-stampT mv -f patch-stampT patch-stamp dh_testdir python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 22, in module from tests.common import TEST_DIR, TEST_DATA_DIR File tests/common.py, line 17, in module from sclapp.util import importName ImportError: No module named sclapp.util make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package - Aborting with an error == Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)
Hi, I am looking for sponsors to upload new upstream versions of sclapp and pytagsfs. These updates build the following binary packages (with the said changes): python-sclapp (0.5.2-1) - framework for Python command-line applications * New upstream release + sclapp.txt is now licensed under GPLv2+ * Update Standards-Version to 3.8.0 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sclapp pytagsfs (0.7.0-1) - maps media files to an arbitrary directory structure * New upstream release + Needs python-fuse = 0.2 * Remove patch 02_fuse_exceptions merged upstream * Update Standards-Version to 3.8.0 (no changes required) The packages are lintian except a warning in sclapp which is a non-issue IMO (The newer NEWS file is installed as changelog and I also retained the older CHANGELOG file in /usr/share/doc/sclapp). http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pytagsfs Both these packages have been in use by the sclapp/pytagsfs community for a while and there haven't been any issues reported, so I consider it safe to do an upload with a freeze around the corner. I should've sent a call with RFS much earlier (I had the packages ready about a month ago) but I would'nt have been able to respond to feedback in a timely fashion then. I am not subscribed to either debian-mentors or debian-python, so please Cc: me on responses. Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
