Re: git (was: Making packaging Python modules fun again)
On Jan 27, 2014, at 10:11 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >About git: This needs clarification, e.g. will we settle on gbp? >Shall our branch be "master" (gpbs default) or "debian" (more >intuitive when one works with upstream)? Will we use the >pristine-tar branch or pristine tar files? Etc. That all remains to be seen. I'd personally like to see some sample packages with both alternatives so that we can play with them, and try to garner consensus. -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140129160528.14f0f202@anarchist
git (was: Making packaging Python modules fun again)
On 2014-01-27 00:14, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: (a lot) I agree with everything. If somebody has time to update "my" packages to modern helpers, convert them from svn to git, or enable Python 3, please go on! About git: This needs clarification, e.g. will we settle on gbp? Shall our branch be "master" (gpbs default) or "debian" (more intuitive when one works with upstream)? Will we use the pristine-tar branch or pristine tar files? Etc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140127091158.ga12...@fama.tangosoft.com
