log4c is marked for autoremoval from testing
log4c 1.2.4-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-08-20 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1015865: liblog4c3: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 https://bugs.debian.org/1015865 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
Bug#982459: mdadm examine corrupts host ext4
Hi Håkan, * Håkan T Johansson [220730 23:43]: > I have now tried with the mdadm 4.2~rc2-2 installed in both the chroot > environment (tried only that first), and also the host system. > Unfortunately, the host / fs is still affected when running > 'update-initramfs -u', when /dev is not mounted. [..] > is kind of readable, though, then I'm lost. I can't see a difference that should matter from userspace. I have stared a bit at the kernel code... there have been quite some changes and fixes in this area. Which kernel version were you running when testing this? Could you retry on something >= 5.9? I.e. some version with patch 08fc1ab6d748ab1a690fd483f41e2938984ce353. Thanks, Chris
blackbox_0.70.1-39_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 23:01:51 +0200 Source: blackbox Architecture: source Version: 0.70.1-39 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Håvard F. Aasen Closes: 1016273 Changes: blackbox (0.70.1-39) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * d/gbp.conf: Specify branch, debian/master * d/not-installed: Exclude *.la files from all architectures. * Add 120_include-ctime-header.patch. Closes: #1016273 * autopkgtest: - Remove test that runs in the background. - Add 'superficial' to the remaining two tests. * d/control: - Bump debhelper to 13. - Update Standards-Version to 4.6.1 * d/lintian-overrides: It seems that lintian can't find this typo, removing. Checksums-Sha1: 2c975fdcf9c27b1ec6ef4fc03fe03a5a490804d4 2006 blackbox_0.70.1-39.dsc 536d559a0dffdda177829ce92756d4bd9203c920 23264 blackbox_0.70.1-39.debian.tar.xz 4cd639c9d15fd600961f5b6ecbaa123aa69108f9 7054 blackbox_0.70.1-39_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 2cada8520155aff9d188c81f5fa654622ea61b7063ece7e54228061b23728544 2006 blackbox_0.70.1-39.dsc cb1848d0d1f24b6d123aaffb3d00954bd513386c411daa0fc604817b028a9518 23264 blackbox_0.70.1-39.debian.tar.xz e609a6313540ad9f6d4e1e7af9c3aa2ed8a49be1b792603375d4fbbc66b6606e 7054 blackbox_0.70.1-39_source.buildinfo Files: 2bfe6b6129cca63ff916159134cead31 2006 x11 optional blackbox_0.70.1-39.dsc 43ca6b2764bfa61abeaf36e47a317a38 23264 x11 optional blackbox_0.70.1-39.debian.tar.xz 478af36941d3a5e9e421a196faf83aed 7054 x11 optional blackbox_0.70.1-39_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEkjZVexcMh/iCHArDweDZLphvfH4FAmLlYtUACgkQweDZLphv fH7BThAA3qgauvM8+nadQfuMvB+50HjuK/SlMes1y4ZWkM0BJcVB/wRxo0O10c0L B61x9Gx90vXt4/W5Ee7JR997f617hC+DJwnGPX7GV9l0DmQHfwKm3toJ5Foe7V8n PWtFdLYt4bJiEVVtQ7eTrX8Z3precXYThaWdSOH1kQI4iV4IYjQQ9i8l0VTBuN3z 4wc9LDWliH0yxdem2nD+g5HuwaEGoncot3xZ5rNlGxhqllK/wNS1vSL/WK/Kds1s S0zAdgiuzs/iLpv6uRqPCf4K50IRvxk1+PWo9rvXFlxiKXjDfDQC2c3EvAeoXicA 1gAokrhf3i3aYvjxm1AzpS70tR1S7tfzgL4+dQfyZ2p0tfljqWeHqDHorfxg4VQy goFaypSN932AbfGTLkXoQLQxIwD9l1f9IJnP2a2/Cya1XyS7c8U3ph96XOPnQFv+ 3os4u1Bk8idWX6sTVo7W/7gU3osGUW+1JAhXWqVBmM/f/ePHVrhFCdmU+OigSTXE U00W1R7MyXsOAYK8wsKVDdPhU2l/ZyLSnDczI8NSouLpgPbVNWI6C/7OJL/JG3xj Gsf+8MDSh/ruzfaiLL9hbQaWcRDkPL+36jnmTJ4pGkEsFgehjqpWJnTjwV2AY1UF PgWvjiHWGZhIX66/M+CCIrr28HAP/rVPlSrV7oNFgE40Me3JhU4= =Wh8Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of blackbox_0.70.1-39_source.changes
blackbox_0.70.1-39_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: blackbox_0.70.1-39.dsc blackbox_0.70.1-39.debian.tar.xz blackbox_0.70.1-39_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Bug#1016273: marked as done (blackbox: FTBFS: Toolbar.cc:260:17: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:18:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1016273: fixed in blackbox 0.70.1-39 has caused the Debian Bug report #1016273, regarding blackbox: FTBFS: Toolbar.cc:260:17: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1016273: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016273 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: blackbox Version: 0.70.1-38 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/usr/include > -DSHAPE -DXFT -DNLS -DLOCALEPATH=\"/usr/share/blackbox/nls\" > -DDEFAULTMENU=\"/etc/X11/blackbox/blackbox-menu\" > -DDEFAULTSTYLE=\"/usr/share/blackbox/styles/Gray\" -I../lib -g -O2 > -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -I/usr/include/uuid -I/usr/include/freetype2 > -I/usr/include/libpng16 -c -o Toolbar.o Toolbar.cc > Toolbar.cc: In member function ‘void Toolbar::reconfigure()’: > Toolbar.cc:260:17: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope > 260 | time_t ttmp = time(NULL); > | ^~~~ > Toolbar.cc:41:1: note: ‘time’ is defined in header ‘’; did you forget > to ‘#include ’? >40 | #include > +++ |+#include >41 | > Toolbar.cc:265:21: error: ‘localtime’ was not declared in this scope > 265 | struct tm *tt = localtime(); > | ^ > Toolbar.cc:265:21: note: ‘localtime’ is defined in header ‘’; did you > forget to ‘#include ’? > Toolbar.cc:268:17: error: ‘strftime’ was not declared in this scope > 268 | int len = strftime(t, 1024, options.strftime_format.c_str(), > tt); > | ^~~~ > Toolbar.cc:268:17: note: ‘strftime’ is defined in header ‘’; did you > forget to ‘#include ’? > Toolbar.cc: In member function ‘void Toolbar::redrawClockLabel()’: > Toolbar.cc:458:14: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope > 458 | if ((tmp = time(NULL)) == -1) > | ^~~~ > Toolbar.cc:458:14: note: ‘time’ is defined in header ‘’; did you > forget to ‘#include ’? > Toolbar.cc:460:8: error: ‘localtime’ was not declared in this scope > 460 | tt = localtime(); > |^ > Toolbar.cc:460:8: note: ‘localtime’ is defined in header ‘’; did you > forget to ‘#include ’? > Toolbar.cc:463:9: error: ‘strftime’ was not declared in this scope > 463 | if (! strftime(str, sizeof(str), options.strftime_format.c_str(), > tt)) > | ^~~~ > Toolbar.cc:463:9: note: ‘strftime’ is defined in header ‘’; did you > forget to ‘#include ’? > make[4]: *** [Makefile:504: Toolbar.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/07/28/blackbox_0.70.1-38_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220728;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=ftbfs-20220728=lu...@debian.org=1=1=1=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: blackbox Source-Version: 0.70.1-39 Done: Håvard F. Aasen We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of blackbox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1016...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Håvard F. Aasen (supplier of updated blackbox package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash:
Bug#1008920: marked as done (Versions table not rebuilt after latest Buster 10.2 point release)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:10:01 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1008920: Versions table not rebuilt after latest Buster 10.2 point release has caused the Debian Bug report #1008920, regarding Versions table not rebuilt after latest Buster 10.2 point release to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1008920: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008920 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal The last point release for buster updated various packages. The packages updated as part of the release are showing up under "news", but the respective versions are not updated in the "versions" table on the left. And likewise for "versioned links". Two examples: cups 2.2.10-6+deb10u5: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cups openssl 1.1.1n-0+deb10u1 https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openssl Cheers, Moritz --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Mon, 04 Apr 2022, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > The last point release for buster updated various packages. The packages > updated as part of the release are showing up under "news", but the respective > versions are not updated in the "versions" table on the left. > > And likewise for "versioned links". Two examples: > > cups 2.2.10-6+deb10u5: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cups > > openssl 1.1.1n-0+deb10u1 > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openssl At the time of your report, I witnessed the issue, but it seems like that it fixed itself in the mean time. I'm not sure what caused the issue. It seems unlikely that I can find the cause now without an example to investigate. Thus I'm closing the bug. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS--- End Message ---
Re: Revival of lintian.d.o (sort of)
Hello Lucas, On Sun, 03 Jul 2022, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Seeing that lintian got adopted, I got motivated into looking if I could > help on the lintian.d.o side, that is, provide up-to-date archive-wide > up to date to developers. Thanks for working on this! > Since the architecture of lintian.d.o seemed quite complicated, I > instead decided to follow what worked for other UDD-based data importers > (such as the one that scans for new upstream versions). So my plan is > the following: > - use a UDD postgresql table for data storage > - use UDD to decide which packages need to be analyzed > - coordinate the analysis from UDD, but do the analysis itself on a > third-party 'worker' machine (since the process is quite CPU intensive) > - provide visualisation directly on https://udd.debian.org (similar > to https://udd.debian.org/dmd/ or https://udd.debian.org/bugs/) > - work with data consumers on how to best export the data from UDD to > them > > I know it feels a bit like NIH, but I believe the simpler design will > help in the long term... At least it helps to have something running in the short term. But there are really parts that I'd like to move to something more standardized that we can use for multiple tasks in the context of Debian. Paul already hinted at it but debusine is clearly meant to help with: - scheduling tasks - running tasks on multiple workers https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/debusine/ At this point, debusine is not doing much yet but I hope that we have laid out some good initial architecture to be able to share the workload on multiple workers. Currently the only "Task" that it knows how to run is "sbuild" and we don't have any data storage yet (i.e. the generated artifacts are not stored anywhere, it's up to the caller to pass some --post-build-commands to make something with the result). Storing data is the next milestone that we will work on. Maybe it's a bit early to try to use it for your use case, but if you want to give it a try, you are more than welcome to. Feel free to open tickets and ask questions too. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
Bug#1016034: marked as done (PTS: lintian statuses very out of date)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:29:03 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1016034: PTS: lintian statuses very out of date has caused the Debian Bug report #1016034, regarding PTS: lintian statuses very out of date to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1016034: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016034 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal I'm looking at various packages on tracker.debian.org, and they say things like "lintian reports NN errors and NN warnings", but when opening the box, it says something along the lines of: "Created: 2021-10-13 Last update: 2021-11-05 04:23". It seems that the lintian status reports are no longer being updated. Best wishes, Julian --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, Julian Gilbey wrote: > I'm looking at various packages on tracker.debian.org, and they say > things like "lintian reports NN errors and NN warnings", but when > opening the box, it says something along the lines of: > "Created: 2021-10-13 Last update: 2021-11-05 04:23". > It seems that the lintian status reports are no longer being updated. Indeed, this has been known for a while. Fortunately Lucas Nussbaum has started to make lintian runs and making the results available via UDD so we switched to that and we again have more accurate data. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS--- End Message ---
Bug#1016075: marked as done (DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian?)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:18:50 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1016059: DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian? has caused the Debian Bug report #1016075, regarding DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1016075: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016075 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, lintian.debian.org has been out of date since end of 2021. The question of its future has been raised with DSA: https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2022/07/msg6.html UDD now has its own importer for lintian data. It also provides a drop-in replacement for https://lintian.debian.org/static/qa-list.txt as https://udd.debian.org/lintian-qa-list.txt, and a web interface to view detailed results per package at (e.g.) https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?dpkg , which DDPO and PTS could use as a link target. I suggest that DDPO and PTS move to using UDD as a data source for lintian. https://udd.debian.org/lintian-qa-list.txt is refreshed on a regular basis while the importer is running. So DDPO/PTS can sync for example hourly. Minor caveat: the semantic for qa-list.txt was a bit poor: 1) for packages both in unstable and experimental, lintian-qa-list.txt show stats for packages in unstable. 2) packages not in unstable are not listed. 3) it does not provide a column for tags of type 'information'. I suppose it is OK to keep it like that. For reference, the UDD code the generate the data is https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/rimporters/lintian.rb#L380 Lucas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Control: clone -1 -2 > Control: reassign -2 tracker.debian.org > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:39:45AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: qa.debian.org > > cloning a copy for tracker. I'll do ddpo rsn! Switched the data source on tracker.debian.org too. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#1016191: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.5.3-2.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package vzstats has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1016191 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#1016191: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: vzstats | 0.5.3-2.1 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; requires unavailable API, obsolete, privacy breach -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1016...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1016191 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#748964: marked as done (vzstats: Contains a ca-bundle)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 09:06:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1016191: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #748964, regarding vzstats: Contains a ca-bundle to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 748964: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748964 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: vzstats Version: 0.5.2-1 Hi, Your package contains a ca-bundle with the certificates from the mozilla root program. Could you please switch to those provided by the ca-certificates package? Kurt --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.5.3-2.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package vzstats has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1016191 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
