Bug#658093: Message with no Package: tag cannot be processed! (wu-ftpd init script not working)
Package: wu-ftpd Version: 2.6.2-32 sudo apt-cache policy wu-ftpd wu-ftpd: Installed: 2.6.2-32 Candidate: 2.6.2-32 Version table: *** 2.6.2-32 0 500 http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status /etc/init.d/wu-ftpd attempts to start deamon with start-stop-deamon funtion which is not defined in the script. As a result - the deamon does not launch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cabb8nzj67udrmtuka+o6sdciecyqku0rldhhx9krxxjug+7...@mail.gmail.com
apt-build wish
Is this the right place to get wish list features for apt-build worked on? Regards Jonathan Aquilina Want a signature like mine? CLICK HERE.
Bug#658098: [apt-build] Error when upgrade
Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.39 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- The error when upgrade today: # aptitude -f install Os pacotes a seguir, parcialmente instalados, serão configurados: apt-build Nenhum pacote será instalado, atualizado ou removido. 0 pacotes atualizados, 0 novos instalados, 0 a serem removidos e 0 não atualizados. É preciso obter 0 B de arquivos. Depois do desempacotamento, 0 B serão usados. Configurando apt-build (0.12.39) ... dpkg: erro processando apt-build (--configure): sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 30 configured to not write apport reports Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de: apt-build E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A instalação de um pacote falhou. Tentando recuperar: Configurando apt-build (0.12.39) ... dpkg: erro processando apt-build (--configure): sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 30 Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de: apt-build --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 Debian Release: wheezy/sid 500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 500 unstablesft.if.usp.br 500 testing http.us.debian.org 500 stable dl.google.com --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed =-+- debconf (= 0.5) | 1.5.41 OR debconf-2.0 | libc6 (= 2.2.5) | 2.13-25 perl | 5.14.2-7 apt (= 0.5) | 0.8.15.9 gcc | 4:4.6.2-4 g++ | 4:4.6.2-4 dpkg-dev (= 1.9) | 1.16.1.2 libappconfig-perl(= 1.5) | 1.66-1 libapt-pkg-perl (= 0.1.11) | 0.1.25+b1 devscripts| 2.11.3 apt-utils | 0.8.15.9 Recommends (Version) | Installed ==-+-=== fakeroot | 1.18.2-1 build-essential| 11.5 Package's Suggests field is empty. -- ASD Consultoria, Rio, RJ Arq. Sávio M Ramos Só usamos Linux desde 2000 www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120131092844.467508cc@papai
Re: apt-build wish
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:09:18 +0100 Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote: Is this the right place to get wish list features for apt-build worked on? No. File a wishlist bug against the package after checking what bugs are already outstanding: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=nosrc=apt-build $ reportbug apt-build Generally, if you are sufficiently interested in an orphaned package to want new features, you should work on those features yourself and submit a patch then adopt the package as maintainer. If you don't / can't, it's unlikely that someone else will because nobody else is doing work on the package - that's why it is orphaned. Orphaned packages either get removed or get their RC bugs fixed (by someone interested in the release, not the package) and not a lot else. If the fix is truly minor (e.g. applying a tested patch), it *might* get applied by someone fixing other stuff. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgp5iYxUZ7pnN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#636876: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: jlgui | 3.0-11 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, lots of alternatives -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 636...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/636876 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rsjha-0003pq...@franck.debian.org
Processed: owner 658098
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: owner 658098 ! Bug #658098 [apt-build] [apt-build] Error when upgrade Owner recorded as Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@googlemail.com. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658098 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132804470021040.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processing of apt-build_0.12.40_source.changes
GnuPG signature check failed on apt-build_0.12.40_source.changes gpg: Signature made Tue Jan 31 21:53:55 2012 UTC using RSA key ID B2E4F4F3 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found (Exit status 2) /apt-build_0.12.40_source.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature! Removing /apt-build_0.12.40_source.changes, but keeping its associated files for now. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rslhl-0004nz...@franck.debian.org
Processed: severity of 658098 is grave
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 658098 grave Bug #658098 [apt-build] [apt-build] Error when upgrade Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658098 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132805400226415.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
