Processing of dosfstools_3.0.26-4_amd64.changes
dosfstools_3.0.26-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dosfstools_3.0.26-4.dsc dosfstools_3.0.26-4.debian.tar.xz dosfstools_3.0.26-4_amd64.deb dosfstools-dbg_3.0.26-4_amd64.deb dosfstools-udeb_3.0.26-4_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdcum-00048f...@franck.debian.org
dosfstools_3.0.26-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 03:09:10 -0300 Source: dosfstools Binary: dosfstools dosfstools-dbg dosfstools-udeb Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.0.26-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@debian.org Description: dosfstools - utilities for making and checking MS-DOS FAT filesystems dosfstools-dbg - utilities for making and checking MS-DOS FAT filesystems (debug) dosfstools-udeb - utilities for making and checking MS-DOS FAT filesystems (udeb) (udeb) Changes: dosfstools (3.0.26-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.6. * Added a debian/watch file. * debian/rules: added the DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS variable to fix the issues pointed by blhc. Checksums-Sha1: 0db0f5e171d1da903f8d2b7758402bdc71f32984 2037 dosfstools_3.0.26-4.dsc ccf44e90820611c07de02859784386ce0ce6986d 9088 dosfstools_3.0.26-4.debian.tar.xz 75896397e85a03065a067195bf7f8fc9b05e246c 86532 dosfstools_3.0.26-4_amd64.deb a4e7905f1fe6c252e94007d94c42a33f729a5289 152014 dosfstools-dbg_3.0.26-4_amd64.deb c85236465086f757b3937051549996c0971e4bb8 40152 dosfstools-udeb_3.0.26-4_amd64.udeb Checksums-Sha256: 7d7211b42c66fca86dd1c0de723b676976fd5a8d01fb9df394a5a96fa2d04854 2037 dosfstools_3.0.26-4.dsc 16f2d5eaff7bf5f55c05660947faa4fa87404656daba92d97860e31d1d1d8c7b 9088 dosfstools_3.0.26-4.debian.tar.xz 3fa3e849f441dd0438aad23d4f95ad4a71b90f0f505281a1b4651be77b938462 86532 dosfstools_3.0.26-4_amd64.deb 4547bd64d846795960bc5ff5baec5f1c56cedde5b473c0bd4f7911c17e1cd3d1 152014 dosfstools-dbg_3.0.26-4_amd64.deb 1a1a972cd552954b4bf54c8cd8bfc97422c5e63ea27456a072f0c8ca8dbc15ef 40152 dosfstools-udeb_3.0.26-4_amd64.udeb Files: ce87f708d267ba2a8dc96a9f50f4432e 2037 otherosfs optional dosfstools_3.0.26-4.dsc 8a9e1b8728ddb23309dea33e7d98c723 9088 otherosfs optional dosfstools_3.0.26-4.debian.tar.xz 8d6c2a7381730d59985b4dfd5a155002 86532 otherosfs optional dosfstools_3.0.26-4_amd64.deb 8c34814d0465dbe8c0c952a5d5b51172 152014 debug extra dosfstools-dbg_3.0.26-4_amd64.deb f8beb5fdff5638deb4887c2355e9ec4c 40152 debian-installer optional dosfstools-udeb_3.0.26-4_amd64.udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUOhx2AAoJEN5juccE6+nvA9YP/i0GTRYhcuC/1YVfNtWMPGWz OrJmYnmFg3N6hP4Io3QmOhfAPINO+YxGOuPaUqcqOk+CGFhCyHWnCXXufEZuOHJt sq1BFWOWZp4Fw/Cd84tnG/qFLO9Zg0/JFA12RUm8RrOazyioWCdE0j0ghw4BUj1x zSHBKjxEjDeAu5W3l2qdrL8bQeTdbqgeA2RDEPto1GpERHxlHCfr/U4L78ZLGFon umiDnU1I7NBp6zrofmXs4Oy6wb9MsFAUlUxvZyJZe9Qvi0kn9bOPhCGlK6gUQfv9 n+22hmHhdTcP5Or1XAAruLVayQfTf20r5iG7RrQ8Pjq1Q8nqN/UBBasclXJ9VhK/ wf/fZ8y/ni30qW4AmnT3pIqmD+0F8tkEHWVAn+7jOEP+hafINSGNSkXp0Dj9fXRR K5/S+utAiAhQoqJBtG1mhdb3Kps7vfLf12VvdR+7Cn8L8ZoAAgRbPCFl7a5O4wL1 27b0vVOMhqTmInuXf+3qnkXvDR0pt8ddjGUKi4Mrme5ZaVWORXOMeMi8ZVOSJm+R 3Rl5ifjRz57gT1e+bW9R6rE82Mnyd1losgkLyRQpIxRUot86bVtP+0cp8SItE5XY xwDt5Q66gnSTtfck3jW8H6ZHKxUtXTQ6QD7Mi3hjmqefKcrCNhthSowC++YxmQMM QsySN7WEMXDjNIS2N7Yu =nJ5N -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdcir-0005nb...@franck.debian.org
Processing of libofa_0.9.3-7_amd64.changes
libofa_0.9.3-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libofa_0.9.3-7.dsc libofa_0.9.3-7.debian.tar.xz libofa0-dev_0.9.3-7_amd64.deb libofa0_0.9.3-7_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdcsy-00072n...@franck.debian.org
libofa_0.9.3-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 03:23:58 -0300 Source: libofa Binary: libofa0-dev libofa0 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.9.3-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@debian.org Description: libofa0- Library for acoustic fingerprinting libofa0-dev - Library for acoustic fingerprinting - development files Changes: libofa (0.9.3-7) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.6. * Bumped DH level to 9. * Fixed the debian/watch file. * debian/copyright: fixed the symlink to GPL-2, instead of GPL only. * debian/rules: added the DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS variable to fix the issues pointed by blhc. Checksums-Sha1: e528806cb67b9cc52ef0b3ce962a41242936dd11 1886 libofa_0.9.3-7.dsc b17b01e91bd7f80d8ae8bc879980fa19dfb6ae1d 17372 libofa_0.9.3-7.debian.tar.xz eb03af10f1188f0976a22413f23beeabd52d450b 59332 libofa0-dev_0.9.3-7_amd64.deb e7b0847e0f1b472826f8c38ebc5b016b6d1bdd3f 51596 libofa0_0.9.3-7_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: a197dce3e35ef61bf19d769281eb5aa383728faf815329ab198ad53fb865881b 1886 libofa_0.9.3-7.dsc 6f43f1860844dde7ac05986262905595cc48ba412920061c2070646f176f0af2 17372 libofa_0.9.3-7.debian.tar.xz 488a384f15d4c6b31d9a82e7b3d2cd78a529574d834a6ffcb4179a001e5bb683 59332 libofa0-dev_0.9.3-7_amd64.deb 0899bfcbb00826fab9667c366e35f7ce2edb2aa3a58e88a5f4e795a9d441d661 51596 libofa0_0.9.3-7_amd64.deb Files: fcdd87f9bbcbb214be3c9f88ae1ffd64 1886 libs optional libofa_0.9.3-7.dsc 69182744ed8162d4c99717a14737f231 17372 libs optional libofa_0.9.3-7.debian.tar.xz ab0422b093edcb66f2bc3212ea5b4b78 59332 libdevel optional libofa0-dev_0.9.3-7_amd64.deb 1d271a84e405d16d885a518b8bb1cbd4 51596 libs optional libofa0_0.9.3-7_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUOiItAAoJEN5juccE6+nvsscP/jqRfLq7rjDQg2Yf+mFywA/x eIf8w/CCvIoqWitmSGTMspypJ5BsgBIsHRFRfNwKZSxbdxtYbNmFFJD+3KK8P0NC lXvFe2DIhHu4PUDc5Kg2ATeFuCqAN60grjxhS6pTuTCmHFrXnzxOuVNMP9RvNCkU JQMLmKisfhZ25WmfADlEEbljWdzt6NvURIptKpb2JPz5K6p1Avkug32FNBtESbQg JOu0gdCgD70qXO31MC8QfEssZ2uA/taVNutlDYM21wQpSAeJDtOKalMln52RWwCo Cysszt8TP5ju+vNMrz/m7eplcKtAouMvwtYymyZDcTZWCNGKBzIzwKN//d++oSE1 bY97QO4YxA/cjDn0JlXFHsQlKjlix6/y7aI/14X5xEmVcj3prnQjmYwIrRpTcZCs GxeoMSVPGuvBcQCFLq3vmsjSKMlJePmP23nYBIkUhApEb5ijV8Br4Mi8eXrh5ox8 FTf1aC3lADg3f9+K5Vvn2VZn5pIjLlpHOMevMoLmQJ1tJ7lyRYQ/3Gjm/FltsLjP Dwn4VZF3IorLYyql0zh0MVlBeAuoOi2Oa9mfaaUF5iIV2JLJSNMzjfjy34RPfmoB tKe0cBGwPOivSeCn3lVuKRdjBlWekhDd159H9eBrCHMcosRNypkfx97WgiKPu+uv ttEazeur9T1umWkfXwlI =+WlK -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdcxz-0007fl...@franck.debian.org
Bug#764886: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: l7-protocols | 20090528-4 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, only useful together with l7-filter-userspace -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 764...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/764886 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdias-0002tu...@franck.debian.org
Bug#764886: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 20090528-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package l7-protocols has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/764886 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdiax-0002vp...@franck.debian.org
Bug#638031: marked as done (l7-protocols: better patterns (working ones))
Your message dated Sun, 12 Oct 2014 12:23:03 + with message-id e1xdiax-0002vp...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#764886: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #638031, regarding l7-protocols: better patterns (working ones) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 638031: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638031 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: l7-protocols Version: 20090528-3 Severity: wishlist I've been playing around with QoS these last few days, using l7-filter-userspace as classifier. Sadly some patterns don't seem to work: worldofwarcraft: The unidentified packets l7-filter -v dumps look nothing like the pattern. bittorrent: I realize the protocol varies a lot between clients but I couldn't get a single match during my tests. Regards, C. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash l7-protocols depends on no packages. Versions of packages l7-protocols recommends: ii l7-filter-userspace 0.11-4 Userspace layer 7 packet classifie l7-protocols suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 20090528-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package l7-protocols has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/764886 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#764962: [pidgin-openpgp] Should be replaced with pidgin-gpg
Package: pidgin-openpgp Severity: normal Hi! As pidgin-openpgp is not nice to use, I found a pidgin plugin that does gnupg encryption. It is enabled / disabled with a toggle button. The development seems not to move on, but the plugin does its job very well. I think, either the plugin should replace the pidgin-openpgp package, or it should be added to debian. You can find it here: https://github.com/segler-alex/Pidgin-GPG However there is a crash when using 4098 bit keys. I found a fix for that: https://github.com/segler-alex/Pidgin-GPG/issues/5 commenting out line 513 in pidgin-gpg.c cipher_str[len] = 0; What do you think? Thomas -- gpg-id: ccdbc2cf https://www.setho.org/people signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#764992: dosfstools: successive runs of fsck -yvV show same error
Package: dosfstools Version: 3.0.26-4 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? On a file system not normally mounted that had been checked less than an hour earlier with the same options with the fsck from dosfstools 3.0.26-3, I encountered the following: fsck -yvV /dev/sdc1 fsck from util-linux 2.25.1 [/sbin/fsck.vfat (1) -- /dev/sdc1] fsck.vfat -yv /dev/sdc1 fsck.fat 3.0.26 (2014-03-07) fsck.fat 3.0.26 (2014-03-07) Checking we can access the last sector of the filesystem Boot sector contents: System ID MSWIN4.1 Media byte 0xf8 (hard disk) 512 bytes per logical sector 4096 bytes per cluster 40 reserved sectors First FAT starts at byte 20480 (sector 40) 2 FATs, 32 bit entries 14324224 bytes per FAT (= 27977 sectors) Root directory start at cluster 1392 (arbitrary size) Data area starts at byte 28668928 (sector 55994) 3577496 data clusters (14653423616 bytes) 63 sectors/track, 128 heads 63 hidden sectors 28675962 sectors total / Bad short file name (). Auto-renaming it. Renamed to Reclaiming unconnected clusters. Checking free cluster summary. /dev/sdc1: 59384 files, 3478304/3577496 clusters victoria:/home/amarsh04# fsck -yvV /dev/sdc1 fsck from util-linux 2.25.1 [/sbin/fsck.vfat (1) -- /dev/sdc1] fsck.vfat -yv /dev/sdc1 fsck.fat 3.0.26 (2014-03-07) fsck.fat 3.0.26 (2014-03-07) Checking we can access the last sector of the filesystem Boot sector contents: System ID MSWIN4.1 Media byte 0xf8 (hard disk) 512 bytes per logical sector 4096 bytes per cluster 40 reserved sectors First FAT starts at byte 20480 (sector 40) 2 FATs, 32 bit entries 14324224 bytes per FAT (= 27977 sectors) Root directory start at cluster 1392 (arbitrary size) Data area starts at byte 28668928 (sector 55994) 3577496 data clusters (14653423616 bytes) 63 sectors/track, 128 heads 63 hidden sectors 28675962 sectors total / Bad short file name (). Auto-renaming it. Renamed to Reclaiming unconnected clusters. Checking free cluster summary. /dev/sdc1: 59384 files, 3478304/3577496 clusters I have seen similar behaviour on one other filesystem (normally mounted, so could be getting corrupted by an unclean shutdown), but not on another filesystem (not normally mounted). * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.17.0 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages dosfstools depends on: ii libc6 2.19-11 dosfstools recommends no packages. dosfstools suggests no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141012193139.5074.87736.reportbug@localhost
Bug#764998: abcmidi: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/abcmatch
Package: abcmidi Version: 20070318-3 Hi, When packaging the new version of abcmidi (20140924), a lintian warning is emitted because the abcmatch binary does not have a matching manpage. There was manpage in the previous Debian version of abcmidi, but according to CHANGES, there have been new parameters added since then. It should be possible to take the old one, and update it according to the latest information in abcmatch.txt. But the Release Freeze for Debian Jessie is approaching! Regards, Ross signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#745989: Bug#760986: RM: guile-1.8 -- ROM; replaced by guile-2.0
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org writes: These are the reverse dependencies to be fixed before removing this package: Right -- I was hoping to try to reach a decision this week with respect to jessie. Here's what I hope is a reasonably accurate summary of the situation. As a general comment, people on #guile (including one of the upstream Guile maintainers) have said that at this point, they would prefer that we remove packages from jessie that support Guile 2.0 upstream, but still depend on 1.8 in Debian (though we might or might not keep them in unstable). This was mentioned in particular, with respect to g-wrap, guile-cairo, and guile-gnome-platform. As an overall summary: - There are a few packages that we might want to remove from jessie for now (but they're likely to return later if/when they have an active maintainer -- guile-cairo, etc.[1]). - There's at least one package that has an active maintainer, and is actively being ported upstream, but that probably won't be ready for jessie (lilypond). - There are a number of packages that are more or less unmaintained, or may otherwise be unsuitable for continued inclusion in Debian. - Guile 1.8 is no longer maintained upstream, and hasn't been since 2010. [1] Though apparently g-wrap, guile-cairo, and guile-gnome-platform may be easy to NMU for 2.0 -- if I get enough time *immediately*, I might try to help there. Anyone else interested should talk to Mark (cc'ed above). In the end, the question is whether or not, on balance, we're better off with or without guile-1.8 in jessie. anubis No response wrt 2.0: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745989 Last non-NMU: 2009-09 beast No response wrt 2.0: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745991 Last non-NMU: 2013-02 drgeo Some response from the maintainer in May, but nothing since: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707903 Last non-NMU appears to be 2012-05 I've also been told that drgeo no longer uses Guile upstream. freetalk No response wrt 2.0: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745997 Last non-NMU: 2012-06 g-wrap [1] Only response wrt 2.0 is a mention of an upload that's been in experimental for two years, but no response from the maintainer: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761210 Last non-experimental upload: 2012-05 guile-cairo [1] Looks like this may just be waiting on a testing transition, which may have been blocked by a (now fixed) problem with guile-2.0 on arm*. If so, it should just need a rebuild on arm*. Though #guile warned that this NMU may or may not play nice with the current guile-gnome-platform (below), depending on exactly how the NMU was handled, guile-gnome-platform [1] No response wrt 2.0: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761211 Last non-NMU: 2012-06 gwave This may be dependent on the guile-cairo update. lilypond Upgrade to 2.0 won't be ready upstream in time for jessie, so removing guile-1.8 would imply removing lilypond. texmacs Last information was that upstream doesn't support 2.0 yet https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731787 but texmacs may also not be currently suitable for Debian for other reasons? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711383 trackballs No response wrt 2.0: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746011 Last non-NMU: 2007-12 swig2.0 I'm probably just missing something obvious, but I'm not sure why this is still listed -- 2.0.12-1 appears to be in testing, and it is supposed to have migrated to guile-2.0. Looking in the control file I also don't see any obvious guile-1.8 deps... graphviz Hmm, dak ... -s testing -Rn guile-1.8 doesn't list it, but maybe -s testing isn't working right? In any case, I imagine it's the swig dep above. guile-1.8-non-dfsg/non-free Should be removed iff guile-1.8 is. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87y4skhecf@trouble.defaultvalue.org
Processing of tcpspy_1.7d-6_amd64.changes
tcpspy_1.7d-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tcpspy_1.7d-6.dsc tcpspy_1.7d-6.debian.tar.xz tcpspy_1.7d-6_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdvqc-0006ei...@franck.debian.org
tcpspy_1.7d-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 23:26:58 -0300 Source: tcpspy Binary: tcpspy Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.7d-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@debian.org Description: tcpspy - Incoming and Outgoing TCP/IP connections logger Changes: tcpspy (1.7d-6) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Added a fake debian/watch file to explain about the upstream site. * Added a patch to adequate the Makefile. * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.6. * Bumped source format to 3.0. * Upgraded the debian/rules to new (reduced) format. Checksums-Sha1: bc12798ee55b0c94d4ffb56c57c4c556941663a0 1643 tcpspy_1.7d-6.dsc ded1571a190ba83dd0f728b89de414b7788a02b1 7552 tcpspy_1.7d-6.debian.tar.xz 6a2cd40a17e8e3e4f917d05711620baf973de4ee 23322 tcpspy_1.7d-6_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 0b4c130a44402b0bd045361c0e18eded6850fb6ae31e7aae86d02fd8b5749c74 1643 tcpspy_1.7d-6.dsc 428f5ee06995604af469b4978caefd532385b330fea011f66b870e7a46eae4f7 7552 tcpspy_1.7d-6.debian.tar.xz 1a4e89731a1e40aeaafe20f38edd2ac3011da208d7ccbb11b81fe95ef5fbaabc 23322 tcpspy_1.7d-6_amd64.deb Files: fe6bf20697719698d4cdff63a8fda875 1643 net optional tcpspy_1.7d-6.dsc 763ebf2aa4fd0beb299e3e160cb0acbd 7552 net optional tcpspy_1.7d-6.debian.tar.xz 573404d67e82d71c5562f3500a2e93f5 23322 net optional tcpspy_1.7d-6_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUOz9lAAoJEN5juccE6+nvpJgP+wXKrulj6r78haTDeOAn1BOK 78Cc/rIiFsbfwRFSbRNMOYuYiokVHyiMelzOBG8DonLJHllmjlJupCeC5XksQaoZ WQO8tdGbZ2KtHmTPqe9EsGyflg6ovWWfd5GrSePXCFsm4i07whl7Ivhwin0qpECo hwMKUfief6LG6WYcxobOf/Z9gyTOn2/Kuc0dVxu7AZs7RmJfLnS9PioT/Xgqfyc8 Amk5/hdRTEHVOmrgpzRHvgfMkYnCVHKGr46T2UMwvoCIlKgdmVfsIE0rTLBHOH66 aDNS1m/kr98ItEZISmmbEqX7aIKZTn8BdOYxEb88V8/SUhaoKLZSkxfdQhbSonXx u/NjqC2mBYb/hyyZUPeaJ1DOvab6c5jniigy9+vJqc1yevL2dHNptcM2FIb9wIi4 zrRh2c2fHZsbWk4I6aUadTZSXrerhBPL5sGQrsBV22fPPzBwn/vza0fxQ5Bu/k7s dPWX5IOli3i/VtciVUpoKVmFJnRu40YIhYbDrLb9BtyyxLxwppqN0xvSeg3slJcU R78l4P7qRCcBidZ2CFpRQS/p8hb8/NxYpZWPhed3RyUYDF7vGaMbCeYl77z0BX4U 9e9aEh52BWpleAkvB8rHHuMII9d9jLnXtkzZmWNR17bHkSKua1wm8gYfgK5Ul5CY dnf4jzQqdOBK6tUmLL8V =Dlgf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdwbp-0001mm...@franck.debian.org
amanda is marked for autoremoval from testing
amanda 1:3.3.6-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-10-22 It is affected by these RC bugs: 760846: amanda-server: amreport crashes with segfault in file /usr/lib/amanda/perl/Amanda/Report/human.pm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdxps-000670...@franck.debian.org
freeimage is marked for autoremoval from testing
freeimage 3.15.4-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-11-12 It is affected by these RC bugs: 763255: freeimage: Rebuild with libjpeg-dev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdxpz-00069q...@franck.debian.org
Processing of apt-p2p_0.1.7_amd64.changes
apt-p2p_0.1.7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apt-p2p_0.1.7.dsc apt-p2p_0.1.7.tar.gz apt-p2p_0.1.7_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdy7j-00032m...@franck.debian.org
apt-p2p_0.1.7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:35:23 + Source: apt-p2p Binary: apt-p2p Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org Description: apt-p2p- apt helper for peer-to-peer downloads of Debian packages Closes: 745306 Changes: apt-p2p (0.1.7) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Set maintainer to Debian QA Group. * Update package to newer standards. * Use dh-python instead of python-support. * Import OpProgress from apt.progress.base (closes: #745306). Checksums-Sha1: d3d9548c3bcdf5b5687909c7e61072e5ad01edec 2288 apt-p2p_0.1.7.dsc 97906ef27b87a9e7095e9533d8413ab5e083e41d 1359892 apt-p2p_0.1.7.tar.gz 914352f12e523408a86173bfb748e216d7fb3c49 90030 apt-p2p_0.1.7_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 60519234dd9bb2a7d8c2b89f216377c7e4f589a79246fcf51270317395b6835f 2288 apt-p2p_0.1.7.dsc 65e60620cc026350857829673d6f4dfec269d1c48f53284e7f94d4c3be73936b 1359892 apt-p2p_0.1.7.tar.gz 0593a955ff9d0e15561685263259bd886a05277091f9a4f7d8384a4d4024bb62 90030 apt-p2p_0.1.7_all.deb Files: 542109b9af15042a0b29bfc180ad35b1 2288 net optional apt-p2p_0.1.7.dsc 7a1846cb7582512dd090d29690094372 1359892 net optional apt-p2p_0.1.7.tar.gz fc1d71132df8a953ca0b9938fd7ef2a9 90030 net optional apt-p2p_0.1.7_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJUO2DKAAoJELjWss0C1vRzVV8f/0BL1sR+oRO0hceLVIxNbGTQ 7IQKY+KFWmAQEIwpjXNI/9gl7OAnUBQYkm+Rkh8CXKUjqLwoB2CmLFvOG0N0cPPe o1YoX0BywU15Cuq9seddS/1Y8xHwTaNam3DWjwoStBPirnT0hoXQBl3AWmnW+UUH 9CGtOHTHisuV64LSzjRWnepxQ9dBJ/4JsPh7oJtgEojzI5U5NcwOMWtoscTYhyXe ae2fyopB0oJWWVKWsMXTv8sIg99DzmwcsNCTF+iBx54t+q7R5RlDew2BEiryY06x Bkc1w4MZIIXc0oSR7mr4SSPv1QfCXIWC1TgD1TEilAyij+BvTjWgz14yuNH/kwC5 zOWRUSpxv6b1hLM4PQOfLn28gQQ3kZse34ArT7kpPbWNVZG5qxbAxW3ulzB/7eTD KInREp6jWFp7Aiyrr8a9A6KCDujLpESqso7BMH9uUgp6gOMOKA27dyPaf0o5jfgU xvFDrw+7ea8jv/Mcm/KPlA0pKOYl+ZCXzoKPWXIv/vQo3mjm4CDhQaDPHZyzx9j9 JmpQ75zfirp3M9oUvkkRkP6eACXwbKHgE8aZjjlfW8FFeXZZs53BwS7/M9eHkbpc MA8xUFzQqfhMRbs7midcjNv9sVwGzW9NkBO59mc2jts94owwW5swSRzHeVnTEavH /v/wOY1DvnDcUfBYXEzcDD53BbwBQ1HE8Z6nGlm4kAHaWbRGh9vX5oqT6AT7Hp+e GkpuC/0knFvXkhlpnBbs2wIRqKYYN7VjqUubz50+FtWUHD9IjT9CCwPevhyG9oCr YrsVMv/ohK8g2wdGNsVPpw3YL4fyG1E+I379Fd4icy0ntumdhhSOCGnKJyrDWmZ7 ms3NV6a/8XtpEWEWPxWmi0969C6u0CxkGpOyJ4pRJ49kVTbxDBBjTrRr0d7vwiEh 6i1ZRRugbCVEQj9Z0CTI/9PDD2TJv205REuv0PfoxR7Byixm59t0/usGLvB28AyQ Kt42NoF83GgvMlGQIQNJ0jpvLZihKPFsbP4/QFkWgE4yITVCm1QHcS+/5GmvrD9e SPYTETex1K7ImhMqVw7SvdzO0FY5Lpe0Mjqr9ti+L83NLzpsxAGzWbvIPz/3OKe1 S46+hDUe3+Cjf9gRNWOkKNjhBPhEq+WkdBJVTAz6pOtcyLw1FiAK1YqyTXU7+1rz 6RTMRhDkfA9CLNnE1UcuMdv6bhfW4JQcvJR1xEisybJYKPwEX+HDOl18xW3mbtDH jLtfMYA/lQv5CV3uv17+7kCQ47fcztZaAT11XXoVaGWfolf9LF+1zKkyAV0qLmN6 qyABbEOpVHz1NctDEduwcmh3wbKfLJ/A5lstEcioS75K1qTWqiYWo1cFt7OFbbA= =KNR8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdygd-0003oq...@franck.debian.org
