Bug#564933: aub: should this package be removed?
Source: aub Severity: serious Justification: orphaned, orphaned upstream, low popcon, alternatives exist User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal aub seems like a candidate for removal from Debian: * orphaned * the previous Debian maintainer was also the upstream * low popcon (6 votes) * alternatives exist (e.g. brag, lottanzb, nzb) If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please adopt it. If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nn with this bug's number: severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: aub -- RoQA; orphaned, no upstream, low popcon, alternatives thanks For more information, see http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt Regards, smcv signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#564930: aap: should this package be removed?
Source: aap Severity: wishlist Justification: low-popcon build tool with no rdepends User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal aap seems like a candidate for removal from Debian: * orphaned * low popcon (12 votes) * many alternatives exist (it's a make-like tool) * nothing in Debian depends on it If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please adopt it. If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nn with this bug's number: severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: aap -- RoQA; orphaned, low popcon, no rdepends, alternatives thanks For more information, see http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt Regards, smcv signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#561402: ude: should this package be removed?
Source: ude Version: 0.2.9b-5 Severity: normal Justification: low popcon, last upstream in 2004, orphaned since 2007 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal ude/uwm seem like a possible candidate for removal from Debian: * low popcon (17 votes each for ude and uwm) * no upstream releases since 2004 (although there seems to be some activity on Sourceforge this year) * orphaned since April 2007 * alternatives exist (it's yet another minimal window manager) If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please just close this bug, and do an upload to fix the issues in it. If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nn with this bug's number: severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: -- RoQA; orphaned, low popcon, alternatives thanks For more information, see http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt Regards, smcv signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#561400: postman: should this package be removed?
Package: postman Version: 2.1-7 Severity: serious Justification: RC-buggy, low popcon, orphaned since 2007 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal postman seems like a possible candidate for removal from Debian. Cc'ing KiBi since he touched it last :-) * RC-buggy (FTBFS) * low popcon (5 votes) * orphaned since 2007 * last upstream release appears to have been 2005 * alternatives exist (it's webmail) * potentially security-sensitive (it's webmail) If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please just close this bug, and do an upload to fix the issues in it. If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nn with this bug's number: severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: -- RoQA; RC-buggy, old, orphaned, low popcon thanks For more information, see http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt Regards, smcv signature.asc Description: Digital signature
