Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2023 22:48:46 +0200
with message-id <b3bd7b14-18b4-4b47-ae23-e91611c24...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: giggle: build-depends on transitional package 
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037374,
regarding giggle: build-depends on transitional package libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1037374: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037374
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: giggle
Version: 0.7-5
Severity: important
Tags: trixie sid
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: split-gdk-pixbuf

This package Build-Depends on libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev.

In Debian 11, libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev was split into two packages:

- libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev contains the supported gdk-pixbuf-2.0 library

- libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-dev contains the deprecated, unmaintained
  Xlib integration layer, gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0

If this package only requires functionality from gdk-pixbuf-2.0.pc
and <gdk-pixbuf/*.h>, please update the build-dependency to
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev.

If it also requires the Xlib integration gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0.pc and
<gdk-pixbuf-xlib/*.h> (unlikely), then you can also build-depend on
libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-dev until the package can be updated to remove
that requirement.

libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev was present in both Debian 11 and Debian 12, so
it is not necessary to have a "| libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev" alternative
dependency, even for packages that are expected to be backported.

We should remove the libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev transitional package during
the Debian 13 'trixie' cycle, so this bug is likely to become RC later.

Thanks,
    smcv

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7-6

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to