Bug#527508: marked as done (xtel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2010-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:04:53 +
with message-id e1np2rv-00062s...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#527508: fixed in xtel 3.3.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #527508,
regarding xtel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
527508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527508
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-6
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
# /usr/bin/make
# Imake commands
xmkmf
make: xmkmf: Command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

You should Build-Depend on xutils-dev instead of xutils.
-- 
Daniel Schepler



---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xtel
Source-Version: 3.3.0-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xtel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xtel_3.3.0-7.diff.gz
  to main/x/xtel/xtel_3.3.0-7.diff.gz
xtel_3.3.0-7.dsc
  to main/x/xtel/xtel_3.3.0-7.dsc
xtel_3.3.0-7_amd64.deb
  to main/x/xtel/xtel_3.3.0-7_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 527...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (supplier of updated xtel package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:03:18 +0100
Source: xtel
Binary: xtel
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.3.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org
Changed-By: Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org
Description: 
 xtel   - X emulator of the French Minitel
Closes: 474129 527508 572730
Changes: 
 xtel (3.3.0-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control:
 - New maintainer (Closes: #474129).
 - Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.4 (no changes needed).
 - Replace xbase-clients build-dep with xfonts-utils (for bdftopcf and
   mkfontdir).
 - Replace xutils with xutils-dev (for xmkmf) (Closes: #527508).
 - Drop xbase-clients and xfonts-utils Depends.
 - Fix spelling.
 - Move ppp from Depends to Recommends.
 - Add xterm to Recommends for teleinfo support
   * debian/rules: Remove install-stamp on clean.
   * xteld.man: Replace quotes with double quotes.
   * debian/prerm: Remove call to install-docs.
   * Enable teleinfo support and fix it for UTF-8 support (Closes: #572730).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 929dfd48183204839397901770a83e31de0db999 1166 xtel_3.3.0-7.dsc
 f0ab2950215af4fd5bf7bdd750f6d2b72d917f22 28069 xtel_3.3.0-7.diff.gz
 b993ff5802c18a153291dac87da9a5961285a4b9 220790 xtel_3.3.0-7_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 cca648d6febc8a86261234ffd8e7f2fc8b1c33e2e08d3935355fa2dfd826a4af 1166 
xtel_3.3.0-7.dsc
 9c82fbe118dc1353600761beeb1a215535743e94779b0aedac52f24f7d2411aa 28069 
xtel_3.3.0-7.diff.gz
 1530651317c18a7e2a793d2f0697a03ac4643b3c6b5e8bdcf007fb7471693a40 220790 
xtel_3.3.0-7_amd64.deb
Files: 
 df4d3659b77ba91c9d18b09a907b596f 1166 comm extra xtel_3.3.0-7.dsc
 06b26a03d74ec596a9bfda63738ad775 28069 comm extra xtel_3.3.0-7.diff.gz
 0601941d65eda87b8aedea74222e8895 220790 comm extra xtel_3.3.0-7_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAkuUSpsACgkQjSdX/Wzu6KZUQQD/aaEY2YpEN3OJ3Jtk5Ia5G5ty
mYKlS8oAQc7cDjVR6GwBAJrDfB16tGhdGEtbDnUNBhCQlyxa57Yet+ydEjuUrO9q
=yUzs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---


Bug#527508: marked as done (xtel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:14:48 +0100
with message-id 200905111814.n4biemxb010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line xtel has been removed from Debian, closing #527508
has caused the Debian Bug report #527508,
regarding xtel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
527508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527508
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-6
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
# /usr/bin/make
# Imake commands
xmkmf
make: xmkmf: Command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

You should Build-Depend on xutils-dev instead of xutils.
-- 
Daniel Schepler



---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 3.3.0-6+rm

The xtel package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/474129 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

---End Message---