Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-02-06 Thread Diederik de Haas 
On Saturday 06 February 2016 14:35:56 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name?
> >Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for
> >libindi0b and libindi-dev on hurd-i386.
> 
> That would do it.  You might want to file a architecture specific RM bug to
> clear it up.

I don't even have a remote clue how to go about that and against which 
package, so I'll leave that up to others who do understand that.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-02-06 Thread Diederik de Haas 
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:23:27 +0100 Maximiliano Curia  
wrote:
> Version: 0.9.8-4
> 
> On 08/01/16 19:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: libindi
> > Version: 0.9.7-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > libindi has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream
> > has released a new major version libusb 1.0 with a different API which
> > aims to fix design deficiencies with USB 2.0 and 3.0 in mind.
> This was changed some time ago, the 0.9.8.1-4  version was uploaded in
> 2014-07-18, is there any remaining part of libindi 0.9.7 hidden somewhere?

Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name?
Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for libindi0b and 
libindi-dev on hurd-i386.

HTH,
  Diederik

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman 


On February 6, 2016 2:31:02 PM EST, Diederik de Haas  
wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:23:27 +0100 Maximiliano Curia
> 
>wrote:
>> Version: 0.9.8-4
>> 
>> On 08/01/16 19:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > Package: libindi
>> > Version: 0.9.7-1
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> >
>> > libindi has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream
>> > has released a new major version libusb 1.0 with a different API
>which
>> > aims to fix design deficiencies with USB 2.0 and 3.0 in mind.
>> This was changed some time ago, the 0.9.8.1-4  version was uploaded
>in
>> 2014-07-18, is there any remaining part of libindi 0.9.7 hidden
>somewhere?
>
>Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name?
>Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for
>libindi0b and 
>libindi-dev on hurd-i386.

That would do it.  You might want to file a architecture specific RM bug to 
clear it up.

Scott K

Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-02-06 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
On Saturday 06 February 2016 21:03:05 Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Saturday 06 February 2016 14:35:56 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > >Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name?
> > >Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for
> > >libindi0b and libindi-dev on hurd-i386.
> > 
> > That would do it.  You might want to file a architecture specific RM bug
> > to
> > clear it up.
> 
> I don't even have a remote clue how to go about that and against which
> package, so I'll leave that up to others who do understand that.

Take a look at  and then use 
reportbug against ftp.debian.org, as version 0.9.7-1 is in unstable as 
rmadison outputs:

$ rmadison libindi
libindi| 0.9.1-2   | oldstable   | source
libindi| 0.9.7-1   | unstable| source
libindi| 0.9.8.1-5.1   | stable  | source
libindi| 0.9.8.1-5.1   | stable-kfreebsd | source
libindi| 1.0.0-4   | unstable| source
libindi| 1.1.0-1   | testing | source
libindi| 1.1.0-1   | unstable| source

Feel free to send me a copy of the bug so I can track it (reportbug will ask 
you if you want to send copies).

Happy hacking!

-- 
I am two fools, I know, for loving, and for saying so.
  John Donne

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-01-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno 
Package: libindi
Version: 0.9.7-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

libindi has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream
has released a new major version libusb 1.0 with a different API which
aims to fix design deficiencies with USB 2.0 and 3.0 in mind.

The old libusb 0.1 package is not supported upstream anymore and should
be considered deprecated.

If libindi supports the new libusb 1.0 library, please consider
switching the build-depends from libusb-dev to libusb-1.0-0-dev. If not
please inform upstream that porting the software to the new API is
recommended.

Thanks,
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net