Re: Bug#593798: libsoqt3-20 is linked against Qt 4 (should be Qt 3)
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 05:18:09PM +0100, David Claughton wrote: FWIW, I could be wrong, but it looks like configure is invoking pkgconfig to determine the QT version and it's always finding QT4 regardless of what QTDIR is set to. Maybe --enable-pkgconfig wasn't the default in the previous release? In any case adding --disable-pkgconfig *seems* to do the trick, although I didn't have time to test it thoroughly. Good idea, thanks. However, when I tried it, the build eventually failed with the following error. It seems that Qt3 doesn't have QImage::hasAlphaChannel(), etc: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../../../src -I../../../data -I../../../../src -I/usr/include/Inventor/annex -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/share/qt3/include -DSOQT_DEBUG=1 -DSOQT_INTERNAL -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-multichar -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-builtin -finline-functions -Wreturn-type -Wchar-subscripts -Wparentheses -c ../../../../src/Inventor/Qt/SoQtImageReader.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/SoQtImageReader.o In file included from ../../../../src/Inventor/Qt/SoQtImageReader.cpp:31: /usr/share/qt3/include/qimage.h: In member function 'bool QImageTextKeyLang::operator(const QImageTextKeyLang) const': /usr/share/qt3/include/qimage.h:61: warning: suggest parentheses around '' within '||' ../../../../src/Inventor/Qt/SoQtImageReader.cpp: In member function 'SbBool SoQtImageReader::readImage(const SbString, SbImage*) const': ../../../../src/Inventor/Qt/SoQtImageReader.cpp:65: error: 'class QImage' has no member named 'hasAlphaChannel' ../../../../src/Inventor/Qt/SoQtImageReader.cpp:66: error: 'class QImage' has no member named 'convertToFormat' ../../../../src/Inventor/Qt/SoQtImageReader.cpp:66: error: 'class QImage' has no member named 'hasAlphaChannel' ../../../../src/Inventor/Qt/SoQtImageReader.cpp:67: error: 'Format_ARGB32' is not a member of 'QImage' ../../../../src/Inventor/Qt/SoQtImageReader.cpp:67: error: 'Format_RGB32' is not a member of 'QImage' I think I'll just remove the Qt3 packages after all. -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
freeze exception for php-fpdf
Hi all, please consider to allow the release uploaded 2010-08-12 migrate to testing. The motivations: * version 1.6 is stable (released by upstream author two years 2008-08-03) * next version 1.6 support UTF-8 in document properties * next version 1.6 fix some bugs (like PNG was inserted through a URL) thanks in advance Alessandro De Zorzi
Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks,
and apparently nobody cares.
I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been able to move
to testing, should I rebuild them for tpu or can I expect this to be
solved in a reasonable timeframe?
The problem is that the Versions script on mips doesn't contains the
symbols gcc fails to find at link time. There is a problem with the
regular expressions used to build this file, I'll try to write a patch
asap.
I don't know exactly why, but on mips, some of the data appear in the
D section (initialized data) instead on the R section (read only
data). Thus it is necessary to update the regex as in the following
patch:
--- db-5.0.26/debian/patches/debian-changes-5.0.26-1
+++ db-5.0.26/debian/patches/debian-changes-5.0.26-1
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
+Versions: $(C_OBJS)
+ rm -f $@
+ printf DB5_0 {\n global:\n $@
-+ nm $$(sed -n /^pic_object='\(.*\)'$$/ { s//\1/;s,.libs/,,;p;}
$(C_OBJS)) | grep [TR] | cut -d -f3 | sed -e 's/$$/;/' $@
++ nm $$(sed -n /^pic_object='\(.*\)'$$/ { s//\1/;s,.libs/,,;p;}
$(C_OBJS)) | grep [TRD] | cut -d -f3 | sed -e 's/$$/;/' $@
+ printf local: *; };\n $@
+
# Shared C library.
Note that it is a patch generated by gcc, not sure if it should be
modified here on included in a debian-changes-5.0.26-2 patch.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824100808.ga3...@volta.aurel32.net
Freeze exception for libdbi and libdbi-drivers
Hello to the whole release team, I have uploaded to SID recently both libdbi, and it's brother libdbi-drivers. I believe they both should enter Squeeze, because: - these are upstream bug-fix releases, and have been well tested in other distribution for quite some time. - the packages now include the test suites of libdbi that runs tests for sqlite, sqlite3, mysql and postgress, which helps to make sure that the packages are in good shape and run as expected. I feel sorry that I didn't have time to work more on these packages before the freeze, but I'm convince that there is a lot of added improvements that are pushing for a freeze exception here. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73a1c2.8060...@debian.org
Re: Freeze for LLVM packages
2010/8/23, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Wed, August 18, 2010 11:50, Arthur Loiret wrote: 2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: This package still needs a bit of work, but not on this side. Ah, I'd assumed everything was basically ready to go and just waiting to be uploaded. How much is a bit of work? One issue I did notice is that llvm-defaults is missing a build-dependency on m4 (having tried building it in a clean(ish) chroot). The source package was given in its current state, so not ready to be uploaded yet. The bit of work remaining is quite small (partly done locally already). I will probably give you the finished version later today. Any news on this? How far off are you from having a final version of llvm-defaults and llvm-2.6 ready? (I'm assuming/hoping that the latter would largely be a copy of the current llvm source package with the necessary symlinks added, rather than also including a new upstream version). Here is llvm-defaults: http://people.debian.org/~aloiret/squeeze/llvm/llvm-defaults_0.1.dsc It should be close to its final state, but note its libllvm-ocaml-dev package is not installable yet because I need to do an llvm-2.7 upload before. llvm-runtime, llvm and llvm-dev are fine. llvm-gcc-4.2 is now fixed. llvm-2.6 is on its way, and will be quite simple: no source changes from the llvm package, just a few packaging bits. Thanks, Arthur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=ojedus+rj0jpaq=qcdaeu=75q4bkei0mt=...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Tellico 2.3
Hi, Thanks for the reply, and sorry for the delay... On Mon, August 16, 2010 22:57, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 00:52:05 +0200, Regis Boudin wrote: Dear release team, Tellico 2.3, which was the version I was planning to have in Squeeze, was released a couple of days the freeze. So, if I upload this new upstream release, do I have a chance to get it in Squeeze, or should I make new upload of the previous version with only bugfixes ? You could upload to experimental in the mean time. I was planning to do that anyway, and it's done, now. What does the diff for the new version look like (excluding translations)? There is a lot of noise in the diff, with a fair number of asserts/debug added and typos in comment fixed, but I'll make split of the diff between new files, unit tests, and the rest. Thanks again. Regis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7040c651f6a70c0f1b39ad1823e560cc.squir...@imalip.net
Please unblock istanbul 0.2.2-8
Hi, istanbul/0.2.2-8 fixes two RC bugs and had already aged in sid without further reports, please unblock it. debdiff attached. istanbul (0.2.2-8) unstable; urgency=medium * Remove GStreamer alsa explicit audiosource, not available on kfreebsd-* (Closes: #591739) * Avoid overwriting directories when saving screencast (Closes: #592258) -- Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:39:08 +0200 -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S.| lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer istanbul_0.2.2-8.debdiff Description: Binary data pgpupYjqaoavn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Please unblock istanbul 0.2.2-8
On 08/24/2010 03:16 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: Hi, istanbul/0.2.2-8 fixes two RC bugs and had already aged in sid without further reports, please unblock it. debdiff attached. It has already migrated due to my unblock earlier today :-) Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73c68b.6040...@debian.org
Re: Moodle package update request
On 08/23/2010 11:11 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: I have uploaded package version moodle_1.9.9.dfsg-2 to unstable. I don't see the upload yet. Please tell us once the package has been accepted and aged a bit. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73cc6a.6000...@dogguy.org
update for NBD
Hi, I need to do another update for NBD. The main reason is to close #593783, which is RC; but I would like to include fixes for #592905 and #594140, too. The changes I intend to make can be reviewed at http://git.debian.org/?p=users/wouter/nbd.git;a=commitdiff;h=HEAD;hp=2.9.16-3 Would the release team vet that upload? -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#594193: release.debian.org: unblock: xen-tools/4.2~rc1-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock xen-tools 4.2~rc1-1: unblock xen-tools/4.2~rc1-1 Last upstream commit of 4.2rc1 was on the day Squeeze has been frozen[1] and there's an upstream feature freeze since then, too. (Didn't manage to upload it on the day of freeze due to the train into my VAC would not have waited for late passengers, so the release and upload to unstable was one week later[2], but no new commits besides the changelog entry since then.) [1] http://xen-tools.org/pipermail/xen-tools-discuss/2010-August/000803.html [2] http://xen-tools.org/pipermail/xen-tools-discuss/2010-August/000804.html If there are some more bug fixes necessary I plan to fix them upstream and incorporate them into the final 4.2 version (which then would need another unblock). Otherwise 4.2rc1 will be released as 4.2, too, just with cosmetic version number changes, etc. Compared to 4.2~beta1-1 from testing, 4.2~rc1-1 * fixes five bugs reported in Debian (513126, 516902, 560011, 588783, 50) and many found by upstream or direct users of upstream. * fixed all tests in its test-suite to cleanly run through (this caused some issues to be fixed, too) * adds btrfs support. * some smaller rewrites of generally buggy code which also resulted in smaller features like the addition of password generation. Upstream git diff --stat and git log between the 4.2~beta1-1 and 4.2~rc1-1 following: $ git diff --stat debian-4.2--beta1-1..debian-4.2--rc1-1 .gitignore | 40 ++- .hgtags |2 - .mailmap|6 + .release| 34 -- AUTHORS |6 +- Makefile| 27 +- TODO| 79 ++-- bin/xen-create-image| 777 --- bin/xen-create-nfs | 20 +- bin/xen-delete-image|9 +- bin/xen-list-images |6 +- bin/xen-resize-guest|5 +- bin/xen-update-image| 27 +- bin/xt-create-xen-config|7 +- bin/xt-customize-image | 20 +- bin/xt-guess-suite-and-mirror | 44 +- bin/xt-install-image| 88 +++-- debian/NEWS |9 + debian/changelog| 25 + debian/control |4 +- debian/rules|1 + etc/xen-tools.conf | 127 -- hooks/centos-4/20-setup-yum |5 - hooks/centos-4/40-setup-networking | 13 + hooks/centos-4/60-copy-host-files | 58 --- hooks/centos-4/90-make-fstab|7 + hooks/centos-5/20-setup-yum |6 - hooks/centos-5/40-setup-networking | 13 + hooks/centos-5/60-copy-host-files | 58 --- hooks/centos-5/90-make-fstab|7 + hooks/common.sh | 22 +- hooks/dapper/20-setup-apt | 31 +- hooks/dapper/40-setup-networking| 14 + hooks/dapper/50-setup-hostname | 85 +++-- hooks/dapper/60-copy-host-files | 22 - hooks/dapper/70-install-ssh | 43 ++- hooks/dapper/90-make-fstab |7 + hooks/debian/15-disable-hwclock | 19 +- hooks/debian/20-setup-apt | 32 +- hooks/debian/40-setup-networking| 14 + hooks/debian/50-setup-hostname | 83 ++-- hooks/debian/55-create-dev |4 +- hooks/debian/60-copy-host-files | 23 - hooks/debian/70-install-ssh | 42 ++- hooks/debian/80-install-kernel | 64 ++-- hooks/debian/90-make-fstab |7 + hooks/debian/95-configure-locales |4 +- hooks/edgy/20-setup-apt | 33 +- hooks/edgy/40-setup-networking | 14 + hooks/edgy/50-setup-hostname| 77 ++-- hooks/edgy/60-copy-host-files | 22 - hooks/edgy/70-install-ssh | 43 ++- hooks/edgy/80-install-kernel| 32 +- hooks/edgy/90-make-fstab|7 + hooks/fedora-core-6/20-setup-yum|7 - hooks/fedora-core-6/40-setup-networking | 13 + hooks/fedora-core-6/60-copy-host-files | 58 --- hooks/fedora-core-6/90-make-fstab |7 + hooks/gentoo/40-setup-networking| 14 + hooks/gentoo/60-copy-host-files | 59 --- hooks/gentoo/90-make-fstab |7 + hooks/intrepid/20-setup-apt | 33 +- hooks/intrepid/30-disable-gettys| 10 +- hooks/intrepid/40-setup-networking | 14 + hooks/intrepid/50-setup-hostname| 77 ++-- hooks/intrepid/60-copy-host-files | 22 - hooks/intrepid/70-install-ssh |
Re: Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
On 08/18/2010 06:43 PM, Philipp Schafft wrote: So what to do? Option 0: let the upstream which is (nearly) bugfix-only release in Option 1: backport bugfixes and let such a package in in this case I need to know which parts exactly you dislike so we know what to backport. Option 2: remove the package. We do dislike this most (I'm sure every package maintainer would ;)) See above why we think this is bad to do. Option 2. I hope to see it in Squeeze+1, when it will be more tested, with more users. You explained how this package could be useful for other packages. But, I needed to know why it's worth including it in Squeeze. The development your were planning to do will be outside Squeeze anyway. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73d028.3060...@debian.org
Re: Approval to upload adtool 1.3.3-2
On 08/23/2010 11:01 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, Please consider the following diff for fixing bug #593744, severity important (not yet uploaded to sid). It looks ok. Please upload and tell us once the package has been uploaded. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73ddb4.80...@dogguy.org
Re: update for NBD
On 08/24/2010 03:46 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Hi, I need to do another update for NBD. The main reason is to close #593783, which is RC; but I would like to include fixes for #592905 and #594140, too. Looks fine. Please upload and tell us once the package has been accepted. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73debd.2060...@dogguy.org
Bug#594203: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.7.7-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package xorg-server. This upload has one packaging fix (for a bug reported on irc by waldi), and a bunch of cherry-picks from upstream. $ git diff --stat xorg-server-2_1.7.7-3..xorg-server-2_1.7.7-4 ChangeLog | 279 +++ Xext/xace.c | 170 +++- debian/changelog| 10 ++ debian/rules|2 + doc/Xserver.man.pre | 26 ++--- exa/exa_classic.c |3 +- fb/fbbits.h |2 +- hw/xfree86/common/xf86RandR.c |4 +- hw/xfree86/ddc/interpret_edid.c |2 +- hw/xfree86/parser/Input.c |7 +- os/access.c | 14 ++- render/render.c |8 + xkb/xkbUtils.c |4 +- 13 files changed, 405 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-) unblock xorg-server/2:1.7.7-4 Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Pre-approval of kcemu bugfix upload
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:40:13PM +0200, Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 08/15/2010 09:33 PM, Jan Dittberner wrote: Adrian Glaubitz (CCed) prepared an upload for kcemu (debdiff attached) to fix #592978, a FTBFS on kfreebsd and hurd-i386. Would you unblock the package if I'd sponsor the upload? I see that kcemu never compiled on those architectures. Before considering granting a freeze exception, I'd like to know if you did test your program on kbsd*|hurd? Do you know if there are any issues there? Thank you very much for your quick reply. Indeed, I have tested kcemu on both kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386. I have setup virtual machines in a kvm to my Debian packages there. You can take a quick look at the screenshots I took on Debian kfreebsd and hurd-i386: http://users.physik.fu-berlin.de/~glaubitz/kcemu-kfreebsd.png http://users.physik.fu-berlin.de/~glaubitz/kcemu-hurd.png I didn't experience any problems with the package on these two architectures, so I think it's a very good idea to push the fixed version of kcemu, 0.5.1-2 into Debian Squeeze/testing. Hello Release-Team, could you please tell me whether Adrian's arguments could convince you to allow an upload/future unblock of kcemu? Regards Jan Dittberner -- Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10 B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C F09B A73E 0055 558F B8DD http://www.dittberner.info/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#594200: unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package lwjgl Closed FTBFS RC bug #594022. $ grep-excuses lwjgl lwjgl (2.5+dfsg-1 to 2.5+dfsg-2) Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Too young, only 0 of 10 days old Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed) Updating lwjgl fixes old bugs: #594022 Not considered unblock lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/3 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824145137.15694.85009.report...@phenomenon.
Bug#594203: marked as done (unblock: xorg-server/2:1.7.7-4)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:14:08 +0200 with message-id 4c73e1c0.30...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#594203: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.7.7-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #594203, regarding unblock: xorg-server/2:1.7.7-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 594203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package xorg-server. This upload has one packaging fix (for a bug reported on irc by waldi), and a bunch of cherry-picks from upstream. $ git diff --stat xorg-server-2_1.7.7-3..xorg-server-2_1.7.7-4 ChangeLog | 279 +++ Xext/xace.c | 170 +++- debian/changelog| 10 ++ debian/rules|2 + doc/Xserver.man.pre | 26 ++--- exa/exa_classic.c |3 +- fb/fbbits.h |2 +- hw/xfree86/common/xf86RandR.c |4 +- hw/xfree86/ddc/interpret_edid.c |2 +- hw/xfree86/parser/Input.c |7 +- os/access.c | 14 ++- render/render.c |8 + xkb/xkbUtils.c |4 +- 13 files changed, 405 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-) unblock xorg-server/2:1.7.7-4 Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 08/24/2010 05:06 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: unblock xorg-server/2:1.7.7-4 Done. -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ ---End Message---
Re: Pre-approval of kcemu bugfix upload
On 08/24/2010 05:08 PM, Jan Dittberner wrote: Hello Release-Team, could you please tell me whether Adrian's arguments could convince you to allow an upload/future unblock of kcemu? Sorry for the delay. Please go ahead with the upload and tell us once the package has been accepted (and aged a bit). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73e3b5.9090...@dogguy.org
Re: aide 0.15 in unstable - please consider a freeze exception
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:05:46PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:21:18PM -0400, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 17:11:25 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: I have uploaded the diffs to http://q.bofh.de/~mh/stuff/diff (full diff) http://q.bofh.de/~mh/stuff/manual-diff (generated files and irrelevant changes removed) for your review. I'd really appreciate an appropriate exception. Thanks, the stripped down diff looks sane on a quick glance. Can you upload to unstable, make sure the package is as well tested as possible, and get back to us in a couple of weeks (or whenever you're confident that it's ready for squeeze)? Hannes uploaded, and I will ping you in about two weeks (should no bugs arise). ping. aide 0.15 has now been running ok on all my servers, and no bugs have been reported. I think it's safe to allow aide into squeeze. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824152545.gg21...@torres.zugschlus.de
Re: Seeking for advice regarding keepalived
Luk Claes schrieb am Saturday, den 14. August 2010: On 08/14/2010 09:04 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: Hi folks, Hi Alexander some time ago I uploaded keepalived 1.2.0 to debian because it was the first (development) version with ipv6 support for ipvs. I thought/hoped development would be faster so that we have a working/stable version with ipv6 for squeeze. Unfortunatly that wasn't the case. I don't think 1.2.0 should be released with squeeze, but I also don't want to release without keepalived since several people rely on it. So I see two options here: - Upload 1:1.1.17 to unstable/testing (that was the latest version in squeeze before 1.2.0) - Upload 1:1.1.19 to unstable/testing (that is a bugfix release which contains some wanted bugfixes.) The second option would be my preferred one. What do you think? At my work place we are using 1.1.19 as we really needed some bugfixes which were not in 1.1.15 nor 1.1.17. It works stable and we did not have any issues up to now. So personally I would go for 1.1.19, so unless there are objections please do upload that one. JFTR I uploaded 1:1.1.20 to unstable a few days ago. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824070847.ga18...@nelson.snow-crash.org
Re: New version of inkscape to be released the next days
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Wolfram Quester wo...@sigxcpu.org wrote: There is as AFAIK only one package which build-depends on inkscape: openclipart. I I just verified that the new version of inkscape is able to build the package as well as the old one. dak and build-rdeps disagree: $ ssh merkel.d.o dak rm -s unstable -Rn inkscape ... Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: brdesktop-flavours: brdesktop-gnome [powerpc] ink-generator: ink-generator meta-gnome2: gnome-office open-font-design-toolkit: open-font-design-toolkit zoomer: zoomer # Broken Build-Depends: collatinus: inkscape dicelab: inkscape gnome-colors: inkscape jpoker: inkscape openclipart: inkscape (= 0.42.2+0.43pre1-1) oxygencursors: inkscape xul-ext-monkeysphere: inkscape $ build-rdeps inkscape Reverse Build-depends in main: -- openclipart oxygencursors collatinus jpoker gnome-colors dicelab xul-ext-monkeysphere Found a total of 7 reverse build-depend(s) for inkscape. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikhrsatmq6quvtjbnmi0x9ta4y0zckb6bmna...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Seeking for advice regarding keepalived
On 08/24/2010 09:08 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: JFTR I uploaded 1:1.1.20 to unstable a few days ago. I unblocked it. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73e76c.6010...@debian.org
Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:29:50PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Please go ahead with the upload of xapian 1.2 to unstable. Uploaded. Cheers, Olly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824154403.gu16...@survex.com
Bug#594056: future unblock: libdbd-sqlite3-perl/1.29-3
On 08/23/2010 01:51 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Would it be possible to unblock it and can we procede with the upload? The changelog says: + * No longer run release tests. +* Remove build-dep on libpod-simple-perl, libperl-minimumversion-perl, + libtest-cpan-meta-perl, libtest-minimumversion-perl, libtest-pod-perl. Could you please explain why? Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73eaf1.6030...@dogguy.org
Please unfreeze cron-apt due to fix of Bug#593859
Hi Release Team By mistake the configuration file contains a bandwidth limit (and a very low one) in the version of cron-apt used in squeeze. This is now fixed in the version of squeeze in unstable. Please allow it in as this is a quite important bug for the release. Thanks in advance, // Ola -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824154429.ga9...@inguza.net
Re: New version of inkscape to be released the next days
On 08/24/2010 07:46 AM, Wolfram Quester wrote:
Dear release team,
I am the maintainer of the inkscape vector graphics program and SVG
editor. The inkscape project finished the release of version 0.48.0.
The public announcement happened yesterday. During the last week, I
prepared a package which was uploaded to experimental by my sponsor
Guido Günther (CC). It's a pitty that the release happened a bit too
late for the freeze of squeeze, but I think it would be nice to have
version 0.48.0 in our next stable release.
It would have been nice if the diff was a bit smaller:
1088 files changed, 1525126 insertions(+), 1304027 deletions(-)
Leaving only the code and other non-{documentation,image,noise} changes:
773 files changed, 82137 insertions(+), 45419 deletions(-)
which is still high.
Given the diff's size and the number of reverse dependencies, I am rather
reluctant to grant a freeze-exception for it.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73f0ed.9070...@debian.org
Re: Please unfreeze cron-apt due to fix of Bug#593859
On 08/24/2010 05:44 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Release Team By mistake the configuration file contains a bandwidth limit (and a very low one) in the version of cron-apt used in squeeze. This is now fixed in the version of squeeze in unstable. Please allow it in as this is a quite important bug for the release. Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73f149.3020...@dogguy.org
Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: [patch] small patch to build against latest apt in experimental
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package aptitude release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'aptitude', 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'aptitude', 'release.debian.org' block 579795 by 594199 Bug #579795 [release.debian.org] transition: apt Was blocked by: 580085 Added blocking bug(s) of 579795: 594199 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 579795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579795 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128266724822030.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
Am 16.08.2010 20:27, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
On 08/16/2010 04:33 PM, Philipp Schafft wrote:
Here is a list of why I think the packages should be unblocked for
update:
muroard:
missing depends on oss-compat (#592911). If the package is not
installed muroard may become completly unusable.
Ok for this one.
Regarding this whole discussion, I have uploaded now muroard 0.1.0-2.
Please unblock it. We also fixed the remaining issue with a better method:
diff -Nru muroard-0.1.0/debian/changelog muroard-0.1.0/debian/changelog
--- muroard-0.1.0/debian/changelog 2010-07-05 22:41:24.0 +0200
+++ muroard-0.1.0/debian/changelog 2010-08-24 18:18:56.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+muroard (0.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Philipp Schafft ]
+ * Added patch 01-use-libao.diff which changes the used driver to libao
+Closes: #592911
+
+ -- Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:15:37 +0200
+
muroard (0.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru muroard-0.1.0/debian/control muroard-0.1.0/debian/control
--- muroard-0.1.0/debian/control2010-07-05 22:41:24.0 +0200
+++ muroard-0.1.0/debian/control2010-08-24 18:18:56.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org
Uploaders: Philipp Schafft l...@lion.leolix.org
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), libmuroar-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), libmuroar-dev, libao-dev
Standards-Version: 3.9.0
Section: sound
Homepage: http://roaraudio.keep-cool.org/
diff -Nru muroard-0.1.0/debian/patches/01-use-libao.diff
muroard-0.1.0/debian/patches/01-use-libao.diff
--- muroard-0.1.0/debian/patches/01-use-libao.diff 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ muroard-0.1.0/debian/patches/01-use-libao.diff 2010-08-24
18:18:56.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# This patch changes the used driver from default (OSS) to libao
+
+diff -Naur muroard-0.1.0.orig//features.h muroard-0.1.0/features.h
+--- muroard-0.1.0.orig//features.h 2010-07-02 05:02:13.0 +0200
muroard-0.1.0/features.h 2010-08-24 18:17:53.0 +0200
+@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
+ /*/
+
+ // Which driver should we build?
+-#define MUROAR_FEATURE_DRIVER DRIVER_OSS
++#define MUROAR_FEATURE_DRIVER DRIVER_LIBAO
+
+ // Default device for OSS:
+ // Comment this out for no default device.
+diff -Naur muroard-0.1.0.orig//Makefile muroard-0.1.0/Makefile
+--- muroard-0.1.0.orig//Makefile 2010-03-03 00:14:09.0 +0100
muroard-0.1.0/Makefile 2010-08-24 18:17:53.0 +0200
+@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
+ LDFLAGS += -Wall -Wextra
+
+ NETLIBS = $(lib_wsock32) $(lib_ws2_32)
+-LIBS+= $(NETLIBS)
++LIBS+= $(NETLIBS) -lao
+
+ all: ${TARGETS}
+ clean:
diff -Nru muroard-0.1.0/debian/patches/series
muroard-0.1.0/debian/patches/series
--- muroard-0.1.0/debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ muroard-0.1.0/debian/patches/series 2010-08-24 18:18:56.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+01-use-libao.diff
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73f464.5080...@debian.org
Re: Please unfreeze cron-apt due to fix of Bug#593859
Thanks a bunch! // Ola On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 08/24/2010 05:44 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Release Team By mistake the configuration file contains a bandwidth limit (and a very low one) in the version of cron-apt used in squeeze. This is now fixed in the version of squeeze in unstable. Please allow it in as this is a quite important bug for the release. Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824162240.gb11...@inguza.net
Re: Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
On 08/24/2010 06:33 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Regarding this whole discussion, I have uploaded now muroard 0.1.0-2. Please unblock it. Done. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73f560.6070...@debian.org
Re: Bug#590873: openconnect 2.25 does not verify SSL server certificates
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:56:46PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:13 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: To the untrained eye, the diff between 6732c0e8ccb4d57d6a970973f994a9d2d3509def and 3b2738befa7fe934d0d55b77fe1fcf28aafbe424 in upstream git is what's required for this, but the patch would need a bit of work to apply cleanly. Note also that there are some memory leaks fixed in 2.25 which might be a good idea to fix too. Given all this, might the best idea be allow an exception for the new upstream? The full changelog is: Most of the changes sound potentially worthy of inclusion. What does the debdiff look like? Hi, I haven't had a look at this yet (just for context, I'm not the maintainer - happy for them to speak up :) I will try and look at this at the weekend though. Cheers, Domniic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824171100.gj4...@urchin.earth.li
Freeze exception: common-lisp-controller 7.4
Hi all,
I have uploaded common-lisp-controller 7.4. Please unblock it.
This version fix 3 bugs (593157, 593179 and another found by myself
but not reported).
The full diff is attached.
Please CC Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org. He's my sponsor.
Don't CC me.
Thanks,
Des
diff --git a/clc-lisp b/clc-lisp
index 61813bf..54b9bfd 100644
--- a/clc-lisp
+++ b/clc-lisp
@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ if [ $EUID == 0 ] ; then
fi
(cd /usr/share/common-lisp/clbuild
- ./clbuild slime $@)
+ ./clbuild lisp $@)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d3728d0..b0c3243 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+common-lisp-controller (7.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * clc-lisp should run 'clbuild lisp'. (Closes: #593157)
+ * unregister-common-lisp-{source,implementation} handle more characters
+ * debian/control:
++ change Standards-Version to 3.9.1
++ depends on cl-asdf (= 2:2.004-1)
+
+ -- Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:37:48 +0800
+
common-lisp-controller (7.3) unstable; urgency=low
* update manpage (Closes: #589185)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 42c0e5a..905ee3e 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), po-debconf
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team pkg-common-lisp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Peter Van Eynde pvane...@debian.org, Kevin M. Rosenberg k...@debian.org,
Luca Capello l...@pca.it, Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com
-Standards-Version: 3.9.0
+Standards-Version: 3.9.1
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-common-lisp/common-lisp-controller.git
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/common-lisp-controller.git;a=summary
Package: common-lisp-controller
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, bash (= 2.04-9), debianutils (= 1.7), debconf (= 1.0) | debconf-2.0, cl-asdf (= 1.625), realpath, perl, adduser
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, bash (= 2.04-9), debianutils (= 1.7), debconf (= 1.0) | debconf-2.0, cl-asdf (= 2:2.004-1), realpath, perl, adduser
Breaks: cmucl ( 3.1.0), clisp ( 1:2.48-1), cl-asdf ( 1.501), sbcl ( 1:1.0.29.0)
Replaces: cmucl ( 3.1.0)
Suggests: sbcl
diff --git a/unregister-common-lisp-implementation b/unregister-common-lisp-implementation
index 659efaf..b3843c9 100644
--- a/unregister-common-lisp-implementation
+++ b/unregister-common-lisp-implementation
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ umask 0022
implementation=$1
-echo $implementation | grep -q '[^a-zA-Z0-9-]' echo Found special characters in $1! exit 42
+echo $implementation | grep -q '[^a-zA-Z0-9._+-]' echo Found special characters in $1! exit 42
echo $implementation | grep -q '\.\.' echo Found .. in $1! exit 1
echo $implementation | grep -q '\/\/' echo Found // in $1! exit 2
diff --git a/unregister-common-lisp-source b/unregister-common-lisp-source
index 39ba17c..b555635 100644
--- a/unregister-common-lisp-source
+++ b/unregister-common-lisp-source
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ umask 0022
library=$1
-echo $library | grep -q '[^a-zA-Z0-9-]' echo Found special characters in $1! exit 42
+echo $library | grep -q '[^a-zA-Z0-9._+-]' echo Found special characters in $1! exit 42
echo $library | grep -q '\.\.' echo Found .. in $1! exit 1
Bug#561944: GNUstep transition
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:26:48PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: Already migrated, so we're launching the GNUstep attack. gnustep-base/1.20.1-3 is already installed on hppa, and gnustep-netclasses built sucessfully (more or less confirming the fix). Could you please give-back gnustep-gui and schedule binNMUs on hppa for all other packages as appropriate? I have lusernet.app ready, waiting for -gui and pantomime1.2 to become available on hppa. terminal.app and textedit.app were uploaded to DELAYED/2. Mehdi said he would take care of gnustep-dl2 when the time comes. The only blocker for the transition seems to be #593898 (provided no other RC bugs pop up in the meantime). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824173119.ga10...@yavor.doganov.org
Bug#593610: release.debian.org: freeze exception pre-approval: qorganizer
package release.debian.org retitle 593610 remove qorganizer from testing thanks Hi, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 19:15:38 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Qorganizer has priority 'optional' and losing data sounds like important bug for me. Can I upload new upstream patch release 3.1.5 (current is 3.1.4)? Please upload and get back to us when the package is accepted in the archive. While preparing new package (which took a lot more time that it should) and looking to the code again, I now think that this software should be kept out of Squeeze due to its low quality. Appropriate RC bug #594229 filed. Please remove qorganizer from testing. Sorry for wasting your time reviewing upstream changes. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#561944: GNUstep transition
On 08/24/2010 07:31 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:26:48PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: Already migrated, so we're launching the GNUstep attack. gnustep-base/1.20.1-3 is already installed on hppa, and gnustep-netclasses built sucessfully (more or less confirming the fix). Could you please give-back gnustep-gui and schedule binNMUs on hppa for all other packages as appropriate? I've already gave back gnustep-gui and it's built now. I'll schedule the binNMUs soon. I have lusernet.app ready, waiting for -gui and pantomime1.2 to become available on hppa. ok. terminal.app and textedit.app were uploaded to DELAYED/2. thanks luk :) Mehdi said he would take care of gnustep-dl2 when the time comes. Indeed. The only blocker for the transition seems to be #593898 (provided no other RC bugs pop up in the meantime). I guess you're already working on fixing that? Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c740890.6050...@dogguy.org
Bug#594200: unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-2
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:51 +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Please unblock package lwjgl Closed FTBFS RC bug #594022. Your package is now unbuildable on mips, as openjdk-6 FTBFS there and is in the process of being removed; that will need resolving before the package could migrate (e.g. by asking ftpmaster to remove the older mips binaries). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282673145.29557.200.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Bug#593610: marked as done (remove qorganizer from testing)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:07:46 +0200
with message-id 20100824180746.ge3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#593610: release.debian.org: freeze exception
pre-approval: qorganizer
has caused the Debian Bug report #593610,
regarding remove qorganizer from testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
593610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
Today I received a mail from qorganizer's upstream author:
-8-
[...]
I found a very critical compatibility issue in qOrganizer 3.1-4. It
doesn't work well with Qt 4.6. I have issued a bugfix release.
[...]
Whenever used with the latest version of Qt some items (event titles)
from the Schedule will randomly disappear. Without warning, causing the
user to loose data. [...]
-8-
Qorganizer has priority 'optional' and losing data sounds like important
bug for me. Can I upload new upstream patch release 3.1.5 (current is
3.1.4)?
Upstream diffstat (excluding whitespace changes and stripping binaries
from tarball that are rebuilt anyway) attached.
P.S. Thanks for your hard work in preparing Squeeze release!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
diff -urN -b /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/CHANGELOG.txt /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/CHANGELOG.txt
--- /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/CHANGELOG.txt 2008-09-07 13:33:54.0 +0300
+++ /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/CHANGELOG.txt 2010-08-19 13:05:28.0 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+v3.1 Update 5:
+-Fixed critical compatibility issue with Qt 4.6
+-Fixed compile error under Qt 4.6
+
v3.1 Update 4:
-Added Polish translation thanks to Dariusz Gadomski
-Fixed a bug that caused memory problems and crashes on 64 bit systems
Binary files /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/qOrganizer and /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/qOrganizer differ
diff -urN -b /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/src/qcalendar.cpp /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/src/qcalendar.cpp
--- /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/src/qcalendar.cpp 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/src/qcalendar.cpp 2010-02-13 02:26:51.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#include qcalendar.h
+
+QCalendar :: QCalendar()
+{
+
+}
+
+
+void QCalendar :: addColoredDate(int year,int month, int day)
+{
+QDate sdate(year,month,day);
+dateSet.insert(sdate);
+}
+
+
+void QCalendar :: removeColoredDate(int year,int month, int day)
+{
+QDate sdate(year,month,day);
+dateSet.remove(sdate);
+}
+
+
+void QCalendar :: paintCell(QPainter *painter, const QRect rect, const QDate date) const
+{
+if((dateSet.contains(date)) (date != selectedDate())) {
+painter-fillRect(rect, Qt::red);
+painter-save();
+painter-setPen(Qt::white);
+painter-drawText(rect, Qt::AlignCenter, QString::number(date.day()));
+painter-restore();
+}
+else
+QCalendarWidget :: paintCell(painter,rect,date);
+}
+
+
+QCalendar :: ~QCalendar()
+{
+
+}
diff -urN -b /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/src/qcalendar.h /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/src/qcalendar.h
--- /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/src/qcalendar.h 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/src/qcalendar.h 2010-02-13 02:26:51.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+#ifndef QCALENDAR_H
+#define QCALENDAR_H
+
+#include QCalendarWidget
+#include QPainter
+#include QDate
+#include QColor
+#include QSet
+
+
+inline uint qHash(const QDate d)
+{
+return d.year()+d.month()+d.day();
+}
+
+
+class QCalendar : public QCalendarWidget
+{
+public:
+QCalendar();
+~QCalendar();
+
+ void addColoredDate(int year,int month, int day);
+ void removeColoredDate(int year,int month,int day);
+
+
+ protected:
+ QSetQDate dateSet;
+
+ private:
+virtual void paintCell(QPainter *painter, const QRect rect, const QDate date) const;
+
+};
+
+#endif // QCALENDAR_H
diff -urN -b /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/src/qorganizer.cpp /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/src/qorganizer.cpp
--- /tmp/tardiffdir1/qOrganizer-v3.1-4/src/qorganizer.cpp 2008-09-07 11:02:49.0 +0300
+++ /tmp/tardiffdir2/qOrganizer-v3.1-5/src/qorganizer.cpp
Re: Freeze exception: common-lisp-controller 7.4
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 01:38 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: I have uploaded common-lisp-controller 7.4. Please unblock it. The package doesn't seem to have been uploaded to the archive yet; please let us know once it has. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282674072.29557.293.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Bug#594056: future unblock: libdbd-sqlite3-perl/1.29-3
Hi Mehdi! On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:53:21PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 08/23/2010 01:51 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Would it be possible to unblock it and can we procede with the upload? The changelog says: + * No longer run release tests. +* Remove build-dep on libpod-simple-perl, libperl-minimumversion-perl, + libtest-cpan-meta-perl, libtest-minimumversion-perl, libtest-pod-perl. Could you please explain why? Sure. This change was made by Ansgar Burchardt. The reason was to try to avoid situations as we had in #589051 [1] and #589052 [2]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/589051 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/589052 The idea was to try to avoid (indirect) build-depends on itself of packages. These release tests only are t/97_meta.t, t/98_pod.t and t/99_pmv.t The t/97_meta.t tests that the META.yml matches current specifications. Similarly t/98_pod.t is test if the POD documentation is valid and t/99_pmv.t to test if the minimum needed Perl version declared matches really the syntax. In any case I have Cc'ed Ansgar if he would like to do any further comments on this. Thanks for you time and bests Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#594152: marked as done (unblock: psychopy/1.61.03.dfsg-1)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:41:30 +0100 with message-id 1282675290.29557.414.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net and subject line Re: Bug#594152: unblock: psychopy/1.61.03.dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #594152, regarding unblock: psychopy/1.61.03.dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 594152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package psychopy 1.61.03 is a bugfix release on top of upstream 1.61.02. 1.61.02.dfsg-2 (present in squeeze atm) already contained major fixes from 1.61.03, and 1.61.03 upstrem release which officially includes them + finally removed upstream non-DFSG video with DFSG version of the video improved for better user experience + documentation improvements + 1 new minor feature in configuration UI This is the last version in 1.6x development cycle and 1.62.00.dfsg-1 is already in Experimental. unblock psychopy/1.61.03.dfsg-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (901, 'unstable'), (900, 'testing'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:45 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Please unblock package psychopy 1.61.03 is a bugfix release on top of upstream 1.61.02. Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#592697: marked as done (unblock: java-common/0.40)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:48:46 +0100 with message-id 1282675726.29557.466.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net and subject line Re: Bug#592697: unblock: java-common/0.40 has caused the Debian Bug report #592697, regarding unblock: java-common/0.40 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 592697: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592697 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package java-common I believe Torsten Werner already informed you on this change, but as an reminder: * Change default-jdk/jre(-headless) back to gcj on the mips architecture because openjdk FTBFS there. Thank you in advance, ~Niels unblock java-common/0.39 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 22:23 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: thanks for unblocking 0.39 but my upload did not work as expected because the arch any packages got downgraded on mips. I have introduced an epoch for the arch any packages now. The upload includes the switch to openjdk on powerpcsce as discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/08/msg01138.html. The source diff can be seen at http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/?op=compcompare[]=%2ftrunk%2fjava-com...@12897compare[]=%2ftrunk%2fjava-com...@12931. The diff looks fine; thanks. Please let us know once the new package has been uploaded. It has been, and has built everywhere; unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Re: Please consider migrating gearman-interface 0.13.2-2 to testing
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:36 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Hi Adam, thanks very much for taking a look! On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: So far as I can see, this: [ -f python/libgearman.c.orig ] || [ -f python/libgearman.c ] mv -f python/libgearman.c python/libgearman.c.orig || true will attempt the mv if python/libgearman.c.orig exists but python/libgearman.c does not; was that intentional? Definitely not. The intention is to only do the move if libgearman.c.orig does not exist, and libgearman.c does. That's what I assumed. Having said that, although the test is clearly not as clear as it could be (as demonstrated by it not doing what you intended) the failure case I mentioned doesn't actually have any negative effects afaics. I suppose this actually does the same thing: mv -n python/libgearman.c python/libgearman.c.orig || true Aside from the fact that (for backports or partial upgrades) lenny's mv doesn't support -n, yeah :) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282676230.29557.523.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Bug#593981: future unblock: openarena/0.8.5-4 openarena-data/0.8.5-3
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 21:11 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: (Cc'd to the bug being fixed, because updated patches are attached.) I have patches ready to fix important bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592965, which is a failure to interoperate with older servers (our 0.8.5 client with a 0.8.1 server), caused by the way in which I patched openarena to be DFSG-compliant. Changes are necessary in both openarena and openarena-data; I suggest looking at the openarena diff first. Please go ahead, and let us know once the packages have been accepted. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282676929.29557.597.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: Bug#591673: movabletype-plugin-core: zemanta content recommendations on by default?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:16:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: Ok, please upload. Changes committed to git, but I will wait and see whether #591975 can be easily resolved before uploading. I don't think that resolution is going to come soon, so I've uploaded 4.3.4-2 for now. Please unblock. Thanks, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824185806.gq4...@urchin.earth.li
Processed: RM: lwjgl [mips]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 594200 -1 Bug#594200: unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-2 Bug 594200 cloned as bug 594240. reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #594240 [release.debian.org] unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-2 Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'. retitle -1 RM: lwjgl [mips] - Build-Depends on openjdk-6-jdk Bug #594240 [ftp.debian.org] unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-2 Changed Bug title to 'RM: lwjgl [mips] - Build-Depends on openjdk-6-jdk' from 'unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-2' block 594200 by -1 Bug #594200 [release.debian.org] unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-2 Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 594200: 594240 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 594200: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594200 594240: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594240 -1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12826771292267.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Freeze exception for gdc-4.3
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 17:54 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 22 August 2010 16:20, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
[...]
The diffstat between the testing and unstable packages is
824 files changed, 133190 insertions(+), 141498 deletions(-)
which is practically unreviewable. Ignoring whitespace
changes in the
diff reduces it to
767 files changed, 82109 insertions(+), 90417 deletions(-)
which is still very high.
The source tarball also houses the GDC D2 project too. And the diff
will have shown all the major updates to that frontend and it's
accompanying libraries, which includes the dmd2, phobos2 and druntime
directory. To my count, this accounts for 560 of those files. None of
which are used in the building of D1.
That certainly reduces the diff substantially; thanks. It leaves us
with [1]
209 files changed, 13659 insertions(+), 22012 deletions(-)
which is still a significant quantity of changes.
Regards,
Adam
[1] debdiff -w gdc-4.3_1.0{46-4.3.5-2,60-4.3.5-1}.dsc | filterdiff -x
*/phobos2/* -x */dmd2/* -x */druntime/*
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1282678357.29557.745.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: Bug#591673: movabletype-plugin-core: zemanta content recommendations on by default?
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:58:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:16:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: Ok, please upload. Changes committed to git, but I will wait and see whether #591975 can be easily resolved before uploading. I don't think that resolution is going to come soon, so I've uploaded 4.3.4-2 for now. Please unblock. Unblocked. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824191919.gu17...@halon.org.uk
Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I think is worth including in Squeeze. Said bugs are: - An infinite loop in Markdown lexer - A segfault on Tools-Reload Configuration when no documents are open - A memory leak on the search function The bugfix release came with few other changes but a quick review makes me confident that they would not be a problem. I hope you agree with me on this. The diffstat looks fairly reasonable, but I get 403s trying to view [2]. Sorry, fixed. Adam [2] http://charon.damianv.com.ar/debian/geany_0.19_0.19.1.patch.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824194932.go1...@damianv.com.ar
Upcoming lenny point release
Hi, The next Lenny point release (5.0.6) is scheduled for Saturday, September 4th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of August 28th - 29th. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282680291.29557.975.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
RE: Upcoming lenny point release
thanks nice to know etc :) Subject: Upcoming lenny point release From: a...@adam-barratt.org.uk To: debian-release@lists.debian.org CC: debian-b...@lists.debian.org; pr...@debian.org; debian-secur...@lists.debian.org; debian-l...@lists.debian.org; debian...@lists.debian.org Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:04:51 +0100 Hi, The next Lenny point release (5.0.6) is scheduled for Saturday, September 4th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of August 28th - 29th. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282680291.29557.975.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: Tellico 2.3
On 2010-08-24, Regis Boudin re...@boudin.name wrote: Hi, Thanks for the reply, and sorry for the delay... On Mon, August 16, 2010 22:57, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 00:52:05 +0200, Regis Boudin wrote: Dear release team, Tellico 2.3, which was the version I was planning to have in Squeeze, was released a couple of days the freeze. So, if I upload this new upstream release, do I have a chance to get it in Squeeze, or should I make new upload of the previous version with only bugfixes ? You could upload to experimental in the mean time. I was planning to do that anyway, and it's done, now. What does the diff for the new version look like (excluding translations)? There is a lot of noise in the diff, with a fair number of asserts/debug added and typos in comment fixed, but I'll make split of the diff between new files, unit tests, and the rest. FWIW, I've tested the version from experimental and it fixes annoying bugs still present in testing/sid, e.g. it allows to sort by dates again (which fails with 2.2.3 if you use a German locale). Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrni78b15.2lk@inutil.org
Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:49 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I think is worth including in Squeeze. Said bugs are: - An infinite loop in Markdown lexer - A segfault on Tools-Reload Configuration when no documents are open - A memory leak on the search function The bugfix release came with few other changes but a quick review makes me confident that they would not be a problem. I hope you agree with me on this. The diffstat looks fairly reasonable, but I get 403s trying to view [2]. Sorry, fixed. Thanks. The diff looks ok, although the re-autotooling with an older version of auto* makes it very noisy; is that an upstream change, or an artefact of the Debian package build? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282682329.29557.1182.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Mono 2.6 Transition Plan for Debian/Squeeze
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:28:15 +0200 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: 2) Which transitions are left for squeeze? What's their current state? ... - mono: mail to debian-release@ to be sent [assignee: meebey] Initially (around November/December) we (the Debian Mono Group) planned to ship Mono 2.4.* with Squeeze as that was the LTS (long term support) release of upstream. The following months we still prepared 2.6 packages for debian/experimental as a low priority for post-squeeze joy. Starting with Mono 2.6.7 upstream extended LTS to include 2.6.7. The LTS is very important for a Debian/Stable releases as upstream maintains the branch for critical issues such as security issues. At the same time Mono 2.6 has reached better architecture support compared to 2.4, especially for armel. On Mono 2.4.4 (which is in testing and unstable), 41 runtime tests fail out of 323 tests. On Mono 2.6.7 (which is in exp), 7 runtime tests fail out of 373 tests. Other architectures don't show significant changes. The packages 2.6.7 in Debian/Experimental have been receiving extensive testing for about 3 months and has not shown regressions. Around 20k users are known to consume these packages (through an external repository that is provided by Jo Shields a member of the Debian Mono Group). Also Ubuntu/maverick includes our packages from debian/experimental without showing any open issues for their release. So what needs to be done for squeeze-ing the best out of Mono? Mono 2.6 consists out of the following source packages that need to be uploaded to unstable (after this plan was approved by the release team) and also freeze exceptions granted once they are in unstable: gluezilla 2.6-1 libgdiplus 2.6.7-1 mod-mono2.6.3-2 mono2.6.7-2 mono-basic 2.6.2-1 mono-debugger 2.6.3-1 mono-tools 2.6.2-2 monodevelop 2.4+dfsg-1 monodevelop-debugger-gdb2.4-1 monodevelop-debugger-mdb2.4-1 monodevelop-python 2.4-1 monodevelop-vala2.4-1 xsp 2.6.5-1 Will this break reverse dependencies? No, there are no ABI changes over 2.4.4, only new API definitions and with that raised shlibs/clilibs. Nothing needs to be rebuild. I have been using a lot of Mono applications from unstable for the past 3 months and everything works as it should with the Mono packages out of experimental. PS: even though monodevelop's version is 2.4, that one matches the mono 2.6 runtime. -- Regards, Mirco Bauer Lead of the Debian Mono Group PGP-Key ID: 0xEEF946C8 FOSS Developermee...@meebey.net http://www.meebey.net/ PEAR Developermee...@php.net http://pear.php.net/ Debian Developer mee...@debian.org http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824222354.05266...@redbull
Bug#594056: future unblock: libdbd-sqlite3-perl/1.29-3
On 24 August 2010 20:49, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: Ok. Go ahead with the upload and tell us once the package has been accepted. I looked at this: the 'Depends' field has dropped 'perl (= 5.10.1-12), perlapi-5.10.1' since the package switched to --with perl_dbi. Could someone (Ansgar) confirm/deny whether this is okay? I've set it back to unreleased in the meantime. -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=t2euq_g7x35u4hrhyjk=00sr3q2qxwc7vv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:38:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:49 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I think is worth including in Squeeze. Said bugs are: - An infinite loop in Markdown lexer - A segfault on Tools-Reload Configuration when no documents are open - A memory leak on the search function The bugfix release came with few other changes but a quick review makes me confident that they would not be a problem. I hope you agree with me on this. The diffstat looks fairly reasonable, but I get 403s trying to view [2]. Sorry, fixed. Thanks. The diff looks ok, although the re-autotooling with an older version of auto* makes it very noisy; is that an upstream change, or an artefact of the Debian package build? Unfortunately from upstream. Damián Viano(Des) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824210736.gp1...@damianv.com.ar
Freeze exception quassel 0.6.1-2
Hi, please consider a freeze exception for quassel 0.6.1-2. In this version man pages have been updated and minor qa issues have been fixed. No source code change - besides removing an outdated python script. THX http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/q/quassel/current/changelog#versionversion0.6.1-2 http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quassel.html -- Thomas Müller (Thomas Mueller) E-Mail: thomas.muel...@tmit.eu Packages: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=thomas.muel...@tmit.eu Powered by Debian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Moodle package update request
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 08/23/2010 11:11 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: I have uploaded package version moodle_1.9.9.dfsg-2 to unstable. I don't see the upload yet. Please tell us once the package has been accepted and aged a bit. My mistake - sorry. It has been uploaded now as 1.9.9.dfsg2-1. cheers, Tomek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=-etm5r-3w3vel3vqpyzntw_lf+=pkvvv3z...@mail.gmail.com
Freeze exception for citadel
Please allow citadel, webcit, libcitadel to migrate to squeeze. The packages in sid are upstream bug fixes over the ones currently in squeeze. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber mes...@jabber.org VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100825014640.ga10...@hyperion.credativ.de
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: user-mode-linux_2.6.26-1um-2+24lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: user-mode-linux_2.6.26-1um-2+24lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24lenny1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oo5do-0001z1...@franck.debian.org
Re: RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Bhavani Shankar R bh...@ubuntu.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100824-1 of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info. ... (ps: I m CC'ing my previous version sponsor as freeze exception was granted the previous version) Hi, Freeze exception was granted for that version only. You should not upload new version (unless it fix bugs = important severity) /new package when freeze is in on going. (Paul is subscribed, so dropped CC to him). -- Kartik Mistry Debian GNU/Linux Developer IRC: kart_ | Identica: @kartikm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik5yck7laxratq+ml+drbjt1xpweptmofu+e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:07 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:38:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:49 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I think is worth including in Squeeze. [...] The diffstat looks fairly reasonable, but I get 403s trying to view [2]. Sorry, fixed. Thanks. The diff looks ok, although the re-autotooling with an older version of auto* makes it very noisy; is that an upstream change, or an artefact of the Debian package build? Unfortunately from upstream. Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282713027.6428.63.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: Freeze exception: common-lisp-controller 7.4
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 19:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 01:38 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: I have uploaded common-lisp-controller 7.4. Please unblock it. The package doesn't seem to have been uploaded to the archive yet; please let us know once it has. Now it has; unblocked. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282713200.6428.82.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
